Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

No way in 8.2 It's a socket option, managed well in 8.3 and later releases. If you don't hav large amount of very small syncronius writes, you don't need it. - Original Message - From: "Coert Waagmeester" To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [CentO

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p?

Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 at 1:19pm, Veiko Kukk wrote > >>> I'm not sure for this particular model server, but normally this is a >>> *BIOS* setting for the SATA controller. >> There are no settings in BIOS for AHCI mode, it's only possible to >> choose between raid and sata

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p?

Tony Mountifield wrote: > That's probably why. To use AHCI you need to set it to RAID mode. > Having done that, you can still use the drives independently if you > prefer kernel RAID; you just have to go into the BIOS RAID setup and > set the drives to JBOD mode (or something like that), by telling

Re: [CentOS] DRBD on a xen host: crash on high I/O

On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:31 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > When the two hosts are in sync, if I activate more than a few (six or > > seven) xen guests, the master server crashes spectacularly and reboots. > > > > I've seen a kernel dump over the serial console, but the machine > > restarts i

[CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks

hi, Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination is only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or /usr/sbin/sendmail route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected. Using postfix/c4. Had a look around, and header_c

[CentOS] Off-topic: strange problem with file size

Hi I'm having a curious problem with some files. The account has 77GB of data[1], but there some files with more than 100GB[2], in fact, two of then have more than 200GB[3]. The OS is Opensuse 10.2 x86_64. Has anyone seem something like this? How can I inspect more closely what is going on?

Re: [CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks

Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi, > > Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination is > only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or /usr/sbin/sendmail > route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. Emails to other > destinations should remain unaffected. > > Using postf

Re: [CentOS] Off-topic: strange problem with file size

On 07/29/2009 02:46 PM, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: > Hi > > I'm having a curious problem with some files. The account has 77GB of > data[1], but there some files with more than 100GB[2], in fact, two of > then have more than 200GB[3]. > > The OS is Opensuse 10.2 x86_64. > > Has anyone seem something

Re: [CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks

On 07/29/2009 01:58 PM, RedShift wrote: >> Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected. ^^ > The easiest way is probably to edit master.cf and make smtpd only listen on > localhost:25. well, no. The machine gets a few thousand other emails from all over the place. Would not want to st

Re: [CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks

RedShift wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination > > is only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or > > /usr/sbin/sendmail route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. > > Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected. >

[CentOS] limits.conf

Hello, I understand the function and reason of limits.conf, and I have some limited experience configuring values for (essentially single-user) Oracle systems. How do I understand correctly what my limits should be for multiuser system system, are there best practice guidance? Are there some typ

Re: [CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks

> hi, > > Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination is > only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or /usr/sbin/sendmail > route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. Emails to other > destinations should remain unaffected. > I guess you should need to configur

Re: [CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks

Hi 2009/7/29 Karanbir Singh > > On 07/29/2009 01:58 PM, RedShift wrote: > >> Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected. > ^^ > > > The easiest way is probably to edit master.cf and make smtpd only listen on > > localhost:25. > > well, no. The machine gets a few thousand other emails

Re: [CentOS] DRBD on a xen host: crash on high I/O

On Jul 29, 2009, at 7:52 AM, "Andrea Dell'Amico" wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:31 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > >>> When the two hosts are in sync, if I activate more than a few (six >>> or >>> seven) xen guests, the master server crashes spectacularly and >>> reboots. >>> >>> I've

Re: [CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks

Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/29/2009 01:58 PM, RedShift wrote: >>> Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected. > ^^ > >> The easiest way is probably to edit master.cf and make smtpd only listen on >> localhost:25. > > well, no. The machine gets a few thousand other emails from all ov

Re: [CentOS] DRBD on a xen host: crash on high I/O

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:55 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > I read on another forum how a user using iSCSI for domUs was > experiencing network hangs due to the fact that dom0 didn't have > enough scheduler credits to handle the network throughput. That might > be related. > > http://lists.cent

Re: [CentOS] limits.conf

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Eugene Vilensky wrote: > Hello, > > I understand the function and reason of limits.conf, and I have some > limited experience configuring values for (essentially single-user) > Oracle systems. > > How do I understand correctly what my limits should be for multiuser

[CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

Dear CentOS lovers, Is someone interested in the linux-2.6-smarter-relatime.patch for centosplus kernel? This patch solves disk I/O performance dramatically on servers, And recent distributions (fedora9 and later, etc.) and official kernel applies it. RHEL6 may include it, but RHEL5 is not. How a

Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

On 07/29/2009 03:54 PM, Yuji Tsuchimoto wrote: > Is someone interested in the linux-2.6-smarter-relatime.patch for centosplus > kernel? Akemi is managing the plus kernel tree at the moment, but I am relatively sure that if you were to propose the patch, she would consider it. -- Karanbir Sing

[CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

Hi, I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines? If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to all other systems. This is quite cumbersome. Any suggestions? - CS.

Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

Dear Karanbir and all, That sounds nice. I'll try to make a patch for the current plus kernel. Thanks, Yuji > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:10 AM > To: CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

2009/7/29 Carlos Santana : > I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we > just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines? > If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to > all other systems. This is quite cumbersome. Any suggestions?

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

Hi, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:13, Carlos Santana wrote: > I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we > just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines? Tipically yes (assuming all systems were freshly installed from scratch and do not have any conflicts), bu

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

Carlos Santana wrote: > Hi, > > I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we > just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines? > If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to > all other systems. This is quite cumbersome. Any suggestions

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

http://fedoranews.org/mediawiki/index.php/How_to_setup_and_maintain_Open LDAP_server_for_your_network this site has a very good howto on how to get started with ldap and how to migrate existing users in from NIS/passwd+shadow scping the files around works but unless you use pass-phraseless keys i

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

I intend to install lustre file system on the systems. It does not support LDAP and need to have etc passwd/groups database. All file system clients need to have same passwd and groups so that UID and GID are the same when they contact file system server. So I am not sure, how will I manage this.

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

Hi, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:45, Carlos Santana wrote: > I intend to install lustre file system on the systems.  It does not > support LDAP and need to have etc passwd/groups database. Where does that information come from? Even though Lustre might not support LDAP directly, it should work wit

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

Carlos Santana wrote: > I intend to install lustre file system on the systems. It does not > support LDAP and need to have etc passwd/groups database. All file > system clients need to have same passwd and groups so that UID and > GID are the same when they contact file system server. So I am not

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

Pushing passwd, group and shadow files can just be scripted to scp them from one master machine to all the client nodes. an ssh key can be used with the private key only existing on the master node so only it can push out changes (protect it with your life as this has the potential to be a nasty ho

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 10:13 -0500, Carlos Santana wrote: > Hi, > > I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we > just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines? Don't forget about /etc/shadow. > If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy

[CentOS] BIND vulnerability

Slashdot carried this story yesterday on a BIND vulnerability: The upstream report: Red Hat's Bugzilla: >From wha

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On 07/29/2009 05:15 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > From what I'm reading, if one has an Internet-facing master for a zone, one > is vulnerable, even if dynamic DNS isn't being used. yes, which is one of many reasons why a zone masters is usually setup to not be publicly available. -- Karanbir Sing

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

Lustre 1.6+ versions do not support LDAP. Thank you all for sighting different methods. I am exploring them for now. More comments welcome. - CS. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:07 AM, wrote: > Pushing passwd, group and shadow files can just be scripted to scp them > from one master machine to all

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

Kenneth Porter wrote: > Slashdot carried this story yesterday on a BIND vulnerability: > > > According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure: iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport

Re: [CentOS] etc passwd and groups file

At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:13:46 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we > just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines? > If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to > all other sys

[CentOS] Software RAID-1 partition constantly syncing

I have a partition set up as software RAID-1 on a CentOS 5.3 machine. Today, the system was rebooted, when it came back up I noticed that it had started to resync. It completes the sync, then immediately starts again. From the log: Jul 29 09:46:02 cbserver kernel: md: syncing RAID array md2 Jul

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

RedShift napsal(a): > According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure: > > iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DROP -m u32 --u32 '30>>27&0xF=5' > > Haven't tested it, would like to know the results... > Well, good point, but Centos does not ship libipt_u32.so. Even m

[CentOS] mod_perl2 and DBD::SQLite

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Fred Moyer wrote: > Looks like d...@httpd is aware of the issue and will be > releasing a fix. Haven't tried 5.3 centos but this sounds > like they shipped a version of apache that caused this. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@httpd.apache.org/msg44177.html > Hello, it s

[CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see support built into the included libphp module.. Thx, CC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chuck wrote: > > Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see > support built into the included libphp module.. > You need to install the php-mysql module :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chuck wrote: > > Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see > support built into the included libphp module.. It's not compiled in statically. It's built as a module. You need to install php-mysql. yum list php\* will show you loads o

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:59 PM, David Hrbáč wrote: > RedShift napsal(a): >> According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure: >> >> iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DROP -m u32 --u32 '30>>27&0xF=5' >> >> Haven't tested it, would like to know the results... >> > > Well

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

Chuck wrote: > > Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see > support built into the included libphp module.. > > Thx, > CC > > > > Use yum search php and watch the output very closely, tha

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On 07/29/2009 06:29 PM, luc...@lastdot.org wrote: >> Those looking for patched bind for Centos 4.x may use packages I have >> built with CVE-2009-0696 patch. >> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repoview/letter_b.group.html >> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repoview/let

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:24:44 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see > support built into the included libphp module.. You need to include some additional packages: (CentOS 4Plus): php-mysql-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 You shou

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

So PHP now supports modules and you can add/remove features on the fly? Or does installing the php-mysql module replace the libphp.so module in the apache tree? -Chuck On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chuck wrote: > > > > Do you need to roll

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Chuck wrote: > > So PHP now supports modules and you can add/remove features on the fly? Or > does installing the php-mysql module replace the libphp.so module in the > apache tree? PHP supports modules, though not on the fly. You still have to restart/reload http

[CentOS] Grub fallback problem

Hi ! I am running CentOS 5 using grub 0.97 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:36 PM +0100 Karanbir Singh wrote: > there are packages linked to people.redhat.com that point at the ones in > QA at Red Hat at the moment, I would recommend you use those RHEL errata are up: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Via RHSA-2009:1179 https://rhn.redhat.com/

Re: [CentOS] DRBD on a xen host: crash on high I/O

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:16 +0200, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:55 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > I'm pretty sure the crash is DRBD related: until the secondary drbd > server is detached, all is working well. There are 23 guests running, > right now, some of them paravirtualize

Re: [CentOS] Grub fallback problem

Let's try this again :) I am running CentOS 5 (core pkgs) / x86_64 using grub 0.97 and I am trying to configure a fallback between two partitions on my local disk, each installed with a CentOS image. The idea is to be able to install a new test OS image and fall back in case of a problem to t

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:41:59 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > So PHP now supports modules and you can add/remove features on the fly? Or > does installing the php-mysql module replace the libphp.so module in the > apache tree? Installing php-mysql *adds* a module (shared library in t

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On Jul 29, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > yes, which is one of many reasons why a zone masters is usually > setup to > not be publicly available. The localhost 127.0.0.1 zone can also be used as an attack vector according to the folks on the DNS Ops list, so it's looking like

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:10:56PM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote: > > On Jul 29, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > yes, which is one of many reasons why a zone masters is usually > > setup to > > not be publicly available. > > > The localhost 127.0.0.1 zone can also be used as an attac

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/29/2009 06:29 PM, luc...@lastdot.org wrote: >>> Those looking for patched bind for Centos 4.x may use packages I have >>> built with CVE-2009-0696 patch. >>> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repoview/letter_b.group.html >>>

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On Jul 29, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Do you have a link to a mailing lists post describing this? Would > like > to pass it along... This is the head of the thread: https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2009-July/004315.html Some of the relevant discussion: On

Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl >Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 5:32 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china > >Sorin Srbu wrote on Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:40:28 +0200: > >> What if y

Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >Behalf Of luc...@lastdot.org >Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 11:27 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china > >Vietnam and Indonezia are also suspects in my list. >The b

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

luc...@lastdot.org napsal(a): > Well done, David but there's a little problem with those rpms: > Preparing...### [100%] > package bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than > bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed >

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On 07/29/2009 08:27 PM, luc...@lastdot.org wrote: > where exactly am I to see something useful on people.redhat.com? I can > only see an image. The CentOS update have now been released, you should be able to yum update on C5 already. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq

Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >>Behalf Of luc...@lastdot.org >>Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 11:27 PM >>To: CentOS mailing list >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china >> >

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

luc...@lastdot.org napsal(a): > > Ok, thanks, but > where exactly am I to see something useful on people.redhat.com? I can > only see an image. Maybe he is pointing to http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/. But I do not see the point. This is RHEL 4.8 version with patch. Anyone running Centos 4.8?

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On 07/29/2009 09:19 PM, David Hrbáč wrote: > Maybe he is pointing to http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/. But I do > not see the point. This is RHEL 4.8 version with patch. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2009-July/004794.html I've updated 2 machines, and had no problems here. But

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

David Hrbáč wrote: > > Maybe he is pointing to http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/. But I do > not see the point. This is RHEL 4.8 version with patch. Anyone running > Centos 4.8? I'm still with 4.7 so bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 with patch > is the way for me, far better then having unpatched bi

[CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

Hi All, Is KVM support in CentOS 5.3 complete? That is, can a CentOS 5.3 system host KVM VMs or does CentOS 5.3 only support being virtualized via KVM? I ask because I installed KVM on a CentOS 5.3 host, but I can't find a kvm module anywhere in /lib/modules/* (let alone the running kernel). Re

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hi All, > > Is KVM support in CentOS 5.3 complete?  That is, can a CentOS 5.3 system > host KVM VMs or does CentOS 5.3 only support being virtualized via KVM? > > I ask because I installed KVM on a CentOS 5.3 host, but I can't find a >

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hi All, > > Is KVM support in CentOS 5.3 complete?  That is, can a CentOS 5.3 system > host KVM VMs or does CentOS 5.3 only support being virtualized via KVM? > > I ask because I installed KVM on a CentOS 5.3 host, but I can't find a >

[CentOS] python 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6

there is a python update ...snippel $ yum update ... Updating: python i386 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6 updates 5.9 M Installing for dependencies: kernel-PAE i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:06 -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote: > I don't think kvm is available upstream until 5.4. I figured that out about 5 minutes after sending the email. Just great. Anyone know when 5.4 is hitting? Thanks for the reply! Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:06 -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> I don't think kvm is available upstream until 5.4. kvm is available now. Here is the CentOS wiki article for kvm-howto. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM Akemi _

[CentOS] out of memory

I am getting this message quite often lately. Centos 5.3, AMD dual core 5050e system x64 1 GIG ram, 4 GIG swap I dont have that much running that the kernel should be cutting out my processes. Any thoughts? Jerry emTotal: 766264 kB MemFree:583984 kB Buffers:

Re: [CentOS] out of memory

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am getting this message quite often lately. > > Centos 5.3, AMD dual core 5050e system x64 > > 1 GIG ram, 4 GIG swap > Well that is a lot of swap for a server.. if something really starts using that much swap its going to most likely end up in

Re: [CentOS] python 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6

Markus Falb wrote: > there is a python update > > ...snippel > $ yum update > ... > Updating: > python i386 > 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6 updates 5.9 M > Installing for dependencies: > kernel-PAE i686 > 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 upda

Re: [CentOS] python 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6

Markus Falb wrote: > i found out the libxml2-python rpm is triggering the kernel dependency. > when i uninstall libxml2-python the dep goes away. > > ...snippel > [r...@bombas ~]# yum deplist libxml2-python > ... > dependency: /usr/lib/python2.4 >provider: python.i386 2.4.3-24.el5 >provi

Re: [CentOS] DRBD on a xen host: crash on high I/O

On Jul 29, 2009, at 2:30 PM, "Andrea Dell'Amico" wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:16 +0200, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:55 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > >> I'm pretty sure the crash is DRBD related: until the secondary drbd >> server is detached, all is working well. Th

Re: [CentOS] python 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote: > > I'm getting dependency issues on the python update itself: > > > I'm getting a missing dependency of /usr/lib64/python2.4 on the python > update. :( This happened on one of two identical (mirror image) servers of

Re: [CentOS] python 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote: > >> I'm getting dependency issues on the python update itself: >> >> >> I'm getting a missing dependency of /usr/lib64/python2.4 on the python >> update. :( >> > > This happened on one of two i

Re: [CentOS] USB, AutoMount & VNC

Hi Guy, I'm curious if you found a solution to the headless automount problem on centos? I'm running into a similar problem, though I am not using VNC. My machine is simply headless, with only network and power supplied, and I'm trying to trigger a bash script to run when a new device is

Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Yuji Tsuchimoto wrote: > Dear Karanbir and all, > > That sounds nice. > I'll try to make a patch for the current plus kernel. > > Thanks, Yuji Yujiさん, Yes, if you could provide a patch that can be cleanly applied to the CentOS kernel, that would be great. よろしく。

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

In-Reply-To=<4a70b20c.5020...@karan.org> Reply-To: (Apologies if this isn't in the thread properly; I'm trying to fake it from the website headers :-)) Karanbir Singh wrote: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2009-July/004794.html > > I've updated 2 machines, and had no problems h

Re: [CentOS] aautomatic updates

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:25 -0500, Robert wrote: [...] > Don't you just hate it when you know something and can't remember it!?! Yes, and it happens more often as time passes. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/m

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:26 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > kvm is available now. Here is the CentOS wiki article for kvm-howto. > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM I noticed that, too. The version in the testing repo is the one I'd be interested in. But, I have a couple of questions: 1. How sta

[CentOS] LSI MegaRAID system status

Dear list, I have inherited a CentOS-5 box with a LSI Sata Raid controller. It is configured as a RAID5 w/hot-standby. My concern is that I have no present means of determining the RAID status w/o downing the system and going into the bios to get status. If a disk has failed and brought the sta

Re: [CentOS] LSI MegaRAID system status

http://www.monitoringexchange.org/cgi-bin/page.cgi?g=2416.html;d=1 google has more. On Wednesday, July 29, 2009, Raymond Lillard wrote: > > Dear list, > > I have inherited a CentOS-5 box with a LSI Sata Raid controller. > It is configured as a RAID5 w/hot-standby.  My concern is that > I have no

Re: [CentOS] LSI MegaRAID system status

>I would much prefer a simple command line tool that I can >wrap a script around and run it under cron. I did this when I didn't have a Nagios environment or an snmp setup (LSI provides an SNMP monitoring package for it). Simply use the MegaCLI to query for status of all LD's and grep for failure

[CentOS] rattle rattle

Can I rattle this cage open? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Open Letter to Lance Davis

I seem to be having network and email issues tonight; please excuse any duplication -- Russ herrold -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 HTML dump on Thu Jul 30 00:30:33 EDT 2009 http://www.centos.org/ Open Letter to Lance Davis July 30, 2009 04:39 UTC This is an

Re: [CentOS] LSI MegaRAID system status -- SOLVED

Thanks to both of you who replied. Mr. Vilensky's approach seemed easiest and his google powers exceed mine. The link he provided was the key. http://www.monitoringexchange.org/cgi-bin/page.cgi?g=2416.html;d=1 The only issue for me was that the megarc URL has been changed. I found the package a

Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability

On 07/29/2009 10:15 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: ... > The CentOS update have now been released, you should be able to yum > update on C5 already. > Thanks! On my C5 server: # rpm -qa bind bind-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 On my RHEL 5 server: # rpm -qa bind bind-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1 # yum clean all # yum