If so
How to solve all dependies?
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För
Karanbir Singh
Skickat: den 13 juli 2009 01:19
Till: CentOS mailing list
Ämne: Re: [CentOS] lyris list manager
On 07/12/2009 01:56 PM, mattias wrote:
> anyon
On 07/13/2009 08:57 AM, mattias wrote:
> If so
> How to solve all dependies?
>
what are you struggling with ? it only needs postgres and tcl mostly
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
In article <667c2e1e0907122340vc63cf71t506fd0f1f8832...@mail.gmail.com>,
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> I got itchy fingers over the weekend and decided to fix what wasn't
> broken and upgraded one of the older servers from Centos 5.2 to Centos
> 5.3. Following the recommended process of updating glib
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Robert Heller
>Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:30 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) and/or
putty-tools
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Neil Aggarwal
>Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:02 AM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit)
and/orputty-tools
>
>What about FileZilla?
Do
Sorin Srbu schrieb:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Neil Aggarwal
>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:02 AM
>> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit)
> and/orputty-
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > find putty-tools. Is there an RPM for a client program for gFTP or
> > putty-tools? If so, in which repository? TIA!
> >
>
> aah well, have you tried konqurer with one tab opened in local fol
Hello all,
I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB
SATAs
This is the partition structure on both disks:
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot S
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Coert
Waagmeester wrote:
>
> I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB
> SATAs
>
> This is the partition structure on both disks:
>
> Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
> Units =
Just my two pence;
So just to confirm do you have 3 physical raid 1 arrays you want to
merge into 1? Or are these 3 partitions on a single physical raid
1array;
If its the later I find the easiest way (providing your hardware
supports this) is to set one drive as off line (so you are now in
runni
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 12:20 +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Coert
> Waagmeester wrote:
> >
> > I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB
> > SATAs
> >
> > This is the partition structure on both disks:
> >
> > Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 2
Hi,
> Perhaps the OIDs changed for the interfaces you are monitoring.
>
> Have you tried re-running cfgmaker to regenerate mrtg.cfg? It should
> pick up the correct OIDs again.
Yes I did, however the default MRTG configuration appears to contain
almost nothing. Consulting with others. it seems to
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Perhaps the OIDs changed for the interfaces you are monitoring.
>>
>> Have you tried re-running cfgmaker to regenerate mrtg.cfg? It should
>> pick up the correct OIDs again.
>
> Yes I did, however the default MRTG configuration appears to contain
> almost nothi
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:49 +, o wrote:
> >It is 1024 chars long. Witch want still help.
> I'm usng mysam and according to:
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/myisam-storage-engine.html
> "The maximum key length is 1000 bytes. This can also be changed by changi
JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:49 +, o wrote:
>
>>> It is 1024 chars long. Witch want still help.
>> I'm usng mysam and according to:
>> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/myisam-storage-engine.html
>> "The maximum key length is 1000 bytes. This can also
I know that I have asked this before of the list. However we just changed
ISP and ip's and I'm having this issue again. I have a linux firewall
using iptables with the following config
eth0 = WAN 1
eth1 = LAN 1
eth2 = WAN 2
I'm trying to forward all traffic that makes a request from eth2 to an
int
Hi All,
I have an nfs mount from my CentOS 5.3 client to a CentOS5.3 server.
This has been functioning correctly for some years.
Beginning last week I had problems saving OpenOffice documents onto the
nfs mounted volume.
OpenOffice just times out with a file io error.
So I tried just a simple s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>
>>
>> My suspicion is that it has to do with the language packs, since the
>> same src.rpm built w/o disabling language packs doesn't crash in
>> CentOS 5.3 on either arch.
I doubt that is the cas
Rob Kampen wrote:
> [rkam...@robsws p_494]$ sudo chmod +w 5887_cover.pdf
> Password:
> chmod: changing permissions of `5887_cover.pdf': Operation not permitted
> yet using gnome file browser I can change permissions on these nfs
> mounted files just fine - go figure.
>
> This did work in the past
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 15:47 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have an nfs mount from my CentOS 5.3 client to a CentOS5.3 server.
> This has been functioning correctly for some years.
> Beginning last week I had problems saving OpenOffice documents onto the
> nfs mounted volume.
> OpenOffice
nate wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
[rkam...@robsws p_494]$ sudo chmod +w 5887_cover.pdf
Password:
chmod: changing permissions of `5887_cover.pdf': Operation not permitted
yet using gnome file browser I can change permissions on these nfs
mounted files just fine - go figure.
This did work in the
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 16:32, Rob Kampen wrote:
> BTW
> chmod +w file.doc
> only changes permissions for owner and group - world is left untouched, not
> what I remembered, I guess some man reading coming my way.
>From "man chmod":
"If none of these are given, the effect is as if ‘a’ were given,
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 16:32, Rob Kampen wrote:
BTW
chmod +w file.doc
only changes permissions for owner and group - world is left untouched, not
what I remembered, I guess some man reading coming my way.
>From "man chmod":
"If none of these are given, the
on 6-28-2009 3:12 PM mcclnx mcc spake the following:
> we have DELL R900 with CENTOS 5.3 in it. This DELL R900 come with one
> integrate PERC6/I and two PERC6/E card. DELL 6/I control 5 internal disks.
> The original disk sequence are:
>
> /dev/sda1 /boot
> /dev/sda2 /
> /dev/sdb1 swap
> ..
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 16:32 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
> nate wrote:
> > Rob Kampen wrote:
> >
> >
> >> [rkam...@robsws p_494]$ sudo chmod +w 5887_cover.pdf
> >> Password:
> >> chmod: changing permissions of `5887_cover.pdf': Operation not permitted
> >> yet using gnome file browser I can change p
William Warren wrote:
for some reason cent 5 now wants cd 3 as well as 1. I make sure to
uncheck everything and instlal only the base system. Bad iso or new
default?
Sincerely,
William Warren
I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
text interface (as opp
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:07 -0700 Mark Tomandl wrote:
>
>
>I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
>text interface (as opposed to the default graphical interface) and
>de-selecting everything except Base and Editors (you might not need this
>option) in the "Cust
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Julian Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:07 -0700 Mark Tomandl wrote:
>>
>>
>>I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
>>text interface (as opposed to the default graphical interface) and
>>de-selecting everything except Base
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Julian Thomas wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:07 -0700 Mark Tomandl wrote:
>>
>>> I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
>>> text interface (as opposed to the default graphical interface) and
>>>
Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 16:32 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
nate wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
[rkam...@robsws p_494]$ sudo chmod +w 5887_cover.pdf
Password:
chmod: changing permissions of `5887_cover.pdf': Operation not permitted
yet using gnome file browser I can ch
Rob Kampen wrote:
> Is there any way to know what level (version) of nfs is in use?
> I know how to distinguish between v4 and the rest (the mount uses nfs4
> rather than just nfs) but how about the lower levels?
nfsstat should tell you
nate
___
Cent
Hi,
> Did the update overwrite your snmpd.conf file? The 'view' on the default one
> may not permit access to the things mrtg needs to see. Try changing it to .1
> to
> expose everything.
It might have done so. To be honest I have no idea since I've never
touched the SNMP configuration before
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 16:32 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> So now it seems what I have is an Openoffice problem. It writes odt
> files just fine via nfs but not doc files.
> Must be a micro$oft conspiracy.
> I'll take this off list as it does not appear to be a CentOS issue.
---
/usr/lib/openoffi
Installs from the first CD still work. You just need to make sure that
you chose "Customize software packages now" instead of the default
"Customize later" and deselect every package on the next screen. It
has worked for me on all CentOS v5 (including 5.3) and Fedora 9,10
and 11. Later you can us
34 matches
Mail list logo
