2009/7/11 o :
>
>> You mentioned that the data can be retrieved from somewhere else. Is
>> some part of this filename a unique key?
>
> The real key is up to 1023 chracters long and it's unique, but I have to trim
> to 256 charactes, by this way is not unique unless I add
Thanks, using directories as file names is a great idea, anyway I'm not sure if
that would solve my performance issue, as the bottleneck is the disk and not
mysql. I just implemented the directories names based on the hash of the file
and the performance is a bit slower than before. This is the
Ron Blizzard wrote:
Hello.
> Missing Dependency: libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
> transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
> Missing Dependency: libx264.so.55 is needed by package
> transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
Ask in the rpmforge list. This has nothing to do with CentOS repo
>
> Thanks, using directories as file names is a great idea, anyway I'm not sure
> if that would solve my performance issue, as the bottleneck is the disk and
> not mysql.
The situation you described initally, suffers from only one issue -
too many files in one single directory. You are not the
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I can't seem to log into my system via
> vsftpd. All other services using PAM are fine...Am I missing something simple?
> ftp> user
> (username) user
> 331 Please specify the password.
> Password:
> 530 Login incorrect.
>
>
> #
On 07/10/2009 09:00 PM, Eric B. wrote:
> I'm looking for a recent version of rsyslog. The yum repositories only show
> me a version that is 2.0.6. According to the www.rsyslog.com site, they are
> up to version 5 (dev), which means that I would think/assume that there
> would at least be v3 or v4
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 13:34 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I have been building and using myself much newer versions of rsyslog.
> Let me look at getting these into a slightly more public area.
I've been doing the same. Works great, minus maintaining the package
myself, but that's not a disaster
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 00:01 +, o wrote:
> > You mentioned that the data can be retrieved from somewhere else. Is
> > some part of this filename a unique key?
>
> The real key is up to 1023 chracters long and it's unique, but I have to trim
> to 256 charactes, by thi
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 11:48 -0400, JohnS wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 00:01 +, o wrote:
> > > You mentioned that the data can be retrieved from somewhere else. Is
> > > some part of this filename a unique key?
> >
> > The real key is up to 1023 chracters long and i
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Ron Blizzard wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
>> Missing Dependency: libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
>> transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
>> Missing Dependency: libx264.so.55 is needed by package
>> transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
>
I downloaded Firefox 3.5 from the M. Harris site and, for the most
part, have had good luck with it. But I have also had hard crashes
that take down CentOS, not just Firefox.
It happened to me twice on eBay (on the same page) -- and now I can
replicate it as many times as I want by going to...
ht
At Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:23:18 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I downloaded Firefox 3.5 from the M. Harris site and, for the most
> part, have had good luck with it. But I have also had hard crashes
> that take down CentOS, not just Firefox.
>
> It happened to me twice on eBay (on the same
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> I downloaded Firefox 3.5 from the M. Harris site and, for the most
> part, have had good luck with it. But I have also had hard crashes
> that take down CentOS, not just Firefox.
>
> It happened to me twice on eBay (on the same page) -- and now I can
> replicate it as many ti
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> I downloaded Firefox 3.5 from the M. Harris site and, for the most
> part, have had good luck with it. But I have also had hard crashes
> that take down CentOS, not just Firefox.
>
> It happened to me twice on eBay (on the same page) -- and now I can
> replicate it as many ti
Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> I'm writing for a couple reasons.
>>
>> I'm curious to see if this is only my problem, or if other have
>> experienced it or can replicate it.
>
> Confirmed - also i386 mharris packaging.
update - it didn't actually bring the OS down, it brought X11 down -
though it
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>
>>> I'm writing for a couple reasons.
>>>
>>> I'm curious to see if this is only my problem, or if other have
>>> experienced it or can replicate it.
>> Confirmed - also i386 mharris packaging.
>
> update - it didn't actually bring the OS down
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> I downloaded Firefox 3.5 from the M. Harris site and, for the most
> part, have had good luck with it. But I have also had hard crashes
> that take down CentOS, not just Firefox.
>
> It happened to me twice on eBay (on the same page) -- and now I can
> replicate it as many tim
I think if you use double authentication (both keys and a password) and put
your SSH server on a different port then you are doing the best you can. You
hope to prevent a 0-day but you cannot fully protect yourself...
James
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Rob Townley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10,
18 matches
Mail list logo
