Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-02 Thread Tru Huynh
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:36:23PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: ... (trimmed) > >> > > I can see that RF has a slightly newer version of > > python-imaging-1.1.6-2.el5.rf.i386 ... (deleted R-C rant) ... > I don't find updating something like python acceptable.

[CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, The subject says it all. On my "server" machine in the local LAN (192.168.1.252 in a 192.168.1.0/24 network), I setup Bind. I installed the 'caching-nameserver' package, which provides a set of configuration files for Bind so it can be used as a caching nameserver out of the box. On the se

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hi Do you really need to use bind perhaps dnsmasq  would be a better option for you. Per E-mail: p...@norhex.com [1] http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland [2] --- Original message follows --- SUBJECT: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success FROM:  Niki Kovacs TO: "C

[CentOS] KVM on Dissimlar HW

2009-07-02 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, Can somebody share their experience regarding live migration of guests using KVM under Centos 5.3 (noted that 5.4 beta is out there) with cluster, GFS on DRBD and dissimilar hardware such as Xeon and duo core assuming sufficient memory is available on the target. TIA Thanks and Regard

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Brown
> > Now I'd like all the other machines on the network to use this local DNS > server instead of my ISP's DNS. First thing, I know Bind uses port 53, > so I take care to open that port on the server as well as on the other > machines in the network. Then, I try to use my local DNS server manual

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Redhat Directory Server

2009-07-02 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 11:29 -0400, Giovanni Torres wrote: > I have implemented LDAP on CentOS successfully using Redhat's Directory > Server and the great how-to on the CentOS wiki. > > Being new to LDAP, I have a question and maybe one of you guys can point > me in the right direction: I have

[CentOS] Upgrade 4.7 > 5.3 poorer 'performance'

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Brown
Hi During a test upgrade of a number of hosts in a pool i have found that exactly the same JVM based app runs more efficiently on the 4.7 systems than it does on the 5.3 on identical hardware. Specifically the apps seems to exhibit about 10% more 'load' on the CPU's for the same workload - bef

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
John R Pierce ha scritto: > > now, these commands are NOT persistent, and, AFAIK, RHEL has no > provision for `ip route` or rule commands, so I end up sticking this > stuff in /etc/rc.d/rc.local or something. > I was facing the same problem some time ago... what is the right place to put "ip

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread luc...@lastdot.org
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > John R Pierce ha scritto: > >> >> now, these commands are NOT persistent, and, AFAIK, RHEL has no >> provision for `ip route` or rule commands, so I end up sticking this >> stuff in /etc/rc.d/rc.local or something. >> > > I was facing the s

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread carlopmart
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > John R Pierce ha scritto: > >> now, these commands are NOT persistent, and, AFAIK, RHEL has no >> provision for `ip route` or rule commands, so I end up sticking this >> stuff in /etc/rc.d/rc.local or something. >> > > I was facing the same problem some time ago... wha

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
Doug Coats ha scritto: > I am ecstatically confused. > > After I entered the last two commands my routing is working the way that > I need it to. > > ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable > ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1 > > The problem is I don't know which actual commands worked

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
luc...@lastdot.org ha scritto: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Lorenzo > Quatrini wrote: >> John R Pierce ha scritto: >> >>> now, these commands are NOT persistent, and, AFAIK, RHEL has no >>> provision for `ip route` or rule commands, so I end up sticking this >>> stuff in /etc/rc.d/rc.local or

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-02 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Ron Loftin wrote: > As a really radical suggestion, perhaps you should consider moving this > "discussion" to the rpmforge mail list, since it seems that most of your > issues are focused on that repository. You might even find a larger > collection of viewpoints there. no, trolling works much be

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Niki Kovacs
Tom Brown a écrit : > > 53 udp and tcp ? No, that's not it. I disabled the (internal) firewall just for testing's sake, and still nothing. I can only use Bind on localhost (e. g. on the machine where I installed it), but not from any other machine on the network. _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Redhat Directory Server

2009-07-02 Thread John Doe
From: Coert Waagmeester > I have also just install centos directory server. > Successful install, but to be quite honest I hav no idea where to go > from here is there some howto somewhere that explains how to make > workstations authenticate to the DS and such? Maybe have a look at the docu

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread John Doe
From: Niki Kovacs > No, that's not it. I disabled the (internal) firewall just for testing's > sake, and still nothing. I can only use Bind on localhost (e. g. on the > machine where I installed it), but not from any other machine on the > network. what does the following command output on th

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Brown
> > No, that's not it. I disabled the (internal) firewall just for testing's > sake, and still nothing. I can only use Bind on localhost (e. g. on the > machine where I installed it), but not from any other machine on the > network. > what does you named.conf look like? i am guessing you ha

Re: [CentOS] lost CentOS repositories from yum

2009-07-02 Thread John Doe
From: Sagar Koirala > I was using yum, which was working very well. Then I decided to try > yumex, and installed yumex, which again worked fine. But, after that, > when I came back to use console yum, it started giving error messages. > So, I removed yumex and tried, in vain. Then I removed yum,

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Niki Kovacs
Tom Brown a écrit : > what does you named.conf look like? i am guessing you have it set to > only listen on localhost > > make sure you have a line similar to > > listen-on port 53 { 192.168.10.1; }; > > and bounce named I just got it to work. In fact, I deleted the stock caching-nameserver

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread luc...@lastdot.org
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Tom Brown a écrit : > >> what does you named.conf look like? i am guessing you have it set to >> only listen on localhost >> >> make sure you have a line similar to >> >> listen-on port 53 { 192.168.10.1; }; >> >> and bounce named > > I just got

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Brown
> I just got it to work. In fact, I deleted the stock caching-nameserver > package and followed this excellent tutorial: > > http://www.madboa.com/geek/soho-bind/ > > i dont see what was wrong with the stock one - seems you did not fully configure it _

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-02 Thread
Linux Advocate napsal(a): > david, could u tell me how to build frm SRPMS. i m not good in this area and > would like to improve. > As usual wiki is the good place to start from: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM I personally use the Mock: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock ht

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Redhat Directory Server

2009-07-02 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Giovanni Torres wrote: > I have implemented LDAP on CentOS successfully using Redhat's Directory > Server and the great how-to on the CentOS wiki. > > Being new to LDAP, I have a question and maybe one of you guys can point > me in the right direction: I have LDA

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Doug Coats wrote: > I am ecstatically confused. > > After I entered the last two commands my routing is working the way that I > need it to. > > ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable > ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1 > > The problem is I don't know which actual commands worked. I had ju

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Chris Boyd
On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > The subject says it all. On my "server" machine in the local LAN > (192.168.1.252 in a 192.168.1.0/24 network), I setup Bind. I installed > the 'caching-nameserver' package, which provides a set of > configuration > files for Bind so it can be us

[CentOS] Slowloris Apache DoS - solution

2009-07-02 Thread David Hrbáč
Hi, Those who are interested in anti Sloworis solution. I have built and packed mod_antiloris for C4/5. Packages are to be found at: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.c

Re: [CentOS] Slowloris Apache DoS - solution

2009-07-02 Thread Vidar Salberg Normann
Thank you, I was hoping for something like this Regards, Vidar 2009/7/2 David Hrbáč : > Hi, > Those who are interested in anti Sloworis solution. I have built and > packed mod_antiloris for C4/5. Packages are to be found at: > > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.

[CentOS] Anaconda-runtime and busybox-anaconda src rpms

2009-07-02 Thread Chadley Wilson
Hi All, does anyone here know where to get the source rpms for these two packages? anaconda-runtime-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos I have found the anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos on ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS but not the o

Re: [CentOS] Anaconda-runtime and busybox-anaconda src rpms

2009-07-02 Thread George Negoita
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Chadley Wilson wrote: > does anyone here know where to get the source rpms for these two packages? > anaconda-runtime-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.src.rpm > busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos busybox-1.2.0-4.el5.centos.src.rpm You can

Re: [CentOS] Anaconda-runtime and busybox-anaconda src rpms

2009-07-02 Thread Chadley Wilson
| |anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.src.rpm | |> busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos | |busybox-1.2.0-4.el5.centos.src.rpm | |You cand download them from here: http://ftp.ines.lug.ro/centos/5.3/os/SRPMS/ | |-- |George Negoita |System Administrator [CW] Sorry they are not there, I did find them @ rp

Re: [CentOS] Anaconda-runtime and busybox-anaconda src rpms

2009-07-02 Thread James Pearson
Chadley Wilson wrote: > |anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.src.rpm > | > |> busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos > | > |busybox-1.2.0-4.el5.centos.src.rpm > | > |You cand download them from here: http://ftp.ines.lug.ro/centos/5.3/os/SRPMS/ > | > |-- > |George Negoita > [CW] > Sorry George, > I was a

Re: [CentOS] Anaconda-runtime and busybox-anaconda src rpms

2009-07-02 Thread George Negoita
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Chadley Wilson wrote: > I was a bit quick on the assumption there, I was looking specifically for the > anaconda-runtime src. > But now I see that there isn't specifically a source for the > anaconda-runtime, the source for the rpm is anaconda, is that correct? Ye

[CentOS] Anaconda-runtime and busybox-anaconda src rpms

2009-07-02 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Chadley Wilson wrote: > I was a bit quick on the assumption there, I was looking specifically for the > anaconda-runtime src. > But now I see that there isn't specifically a source for the > anaconda-runtime, the source for the rpm is anaconda, is that correct? If you examin

Re: [CentOS] Anaconda-runtime and busybox-anaconda src rpms

2009-07-02 Thread Chadley Wilson
|anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.src.rpm | |> busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos | |busybox-1.2.0-4.el5.centos.src.rpm | |You cand download them from here: http://ftp.ines.lug.ro/centos/5.3/os/SRPMS/ | |-- |George Negoita [CW] Sorry George, I was a bit quick on the assumption there, I was looking

Re: [CentOS] Partitionning for future.

2009-07-02 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi Yaovi, In the future, please post your questions to the list and not directly to me, that way you might get answers from others as well. On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:52, Yaovi Atohoun wrote: > I have re-installed CENTOS but I have created a /tmp. Now I have /tmp and > tmps > > df -h > Filesystem

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Doug Coats
I was simply trying to follow the example in: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html That is my introduction and main resource for what I was doing. If there is other resorces that any could suggest beyond the man page I wold be interested to understanding this better. As a follo

Re: [CentOS] Partitionning for future.

2009-07-02 Thread Yaovi Atohoun
I accept your remark and thanks. I am planning to use the server mainly for MySQL and  need some space for Apache. This is why I have more than 100GB for /var. I may need more spcae for MySQL databaes in the future and this is why I want to to with LVM Thanks again Yaovi --- En date de : Jeu

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 53, Issue 1

2009-07-02 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

[CentOS] Upgrading drives in raid 1

2009-07-02 Thread Bob Hoffman
I think I have solved my issue and would like some input from anyone who has done this for pitfalls, errors, or if I am just wrong. Centos 5.x, software raid, 250gb drives. 2 drives in mirror, one spare. All same size. 2 devices in the mirror, one boot (about 100MB), one that fills the rest of di

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-07-02 Thread Gary Greene
On 7/1/09 8:29 PM, "Michael A. Peters" wrote: > Robert Heller wrote: >> At Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:08:08 -0600 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700 >>> Gary Greene wrote: >>> . With sudo, you get a record of what command was executed with superuser right

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading drives in raid 1

2009-07-02 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:52, Bob Hoffman wrote: > # mdadm --grow /dev/md1 --size=max If /dev/md1 is made out of /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2, it will not work, as those partitions will still be the same size as they were before... I think it would be easier to just create new partitions /dev/sda

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, > KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to > get away from FrontPage and Windows.  I know Answering my own thread, in case anyone else is interest

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading drives in raid 1

2009-07-02 Thread Bob Hoffman
>If /dev/md1 is made out of /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2, it will not work, >as those partitions will still be the same size as they were before... I have md0 as the boot, md1 as the rest. Inside md1 are all my lvm partitons. The grow command is supposed to expand the size of that md1 from its current

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading drives in raid 1

2009-07-02 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi Bob, On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 13:18, Bob Hoffman wrote: >>If /dev/md1 is made out of /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2, it will not work, >>as those partitions will still be the same size as they were before... > > The grow command is supposed to expand the size of that md1 from its current > 200+GB to fil

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading drives in raid 1

2009-07-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:18:43 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > >If /dev/md1 is made out of /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2, it will not work, > >as those partitions will still be the same size as they were before... > > > I have md0 as the boot, md1 as the rest. Inside md1 are all my lvm > partitons

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading drives in raid 1

2009-07-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:26:11 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 13:18, Bob Hoffman wrote: > >>If /dev/md1 is made out of /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2, it will not work, > >>as those partitions will still be the same size as they were before... > > > > The grow com

[CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
I've been having an odd problem lately. When I drag files from the computer to a flash drive, they appear to copy, but when I try to use the files I find that only the name was copied (file size of 0). When I copy the same files to the same flash drive, from the terminal, everything seems to work.

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote: > > >From http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090629 > > "Right next to the Gentoo stand was a group of young people, proudly > displaying their affiliation with CentOS. > Dag Wieers, the well-known maintainer of a once very popula

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:17:45 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote: > Thank you, to everyone who replied! Looks like for the moment, > KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. Note that the last time I checked, Kompozer doesn't run on newer versions of Fedora. Not that this matters when you're

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Gary Greene
On 7/2/09 12:10 PM, "Frank Cox" wrote: > On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:17:45 -0500 > Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> Thank you, to everyone who replied! Looks like for the moment, >> KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. > > Note that the last time I checked, Kompozer doesn't run on newer vers

Re: [CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-02 Thread Ryan Pugatch
Ron Blizzard wrote: > I've been having an odd problem lately. When I drag files from the > computer to a flash drive, they appear to copy, but when I try to use > the files I find that only the name was copied (file size of 0). When > I copy the same files to the same flash drive, from the terminal

Re: [CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-02 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 14:45, Ron Blizzard wrote: > I've been having an odd problem lately. When I drag files from the > computer to a flash drive, they appear to copy, but when I try to use > the files I find that only the name was copied (file size of 0). Do they show this way after you unp

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Niki Kovacs
Lanny Marcus a écrit : > Looks like for the moment, > KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. It lacks a lot > of stuff I'm used to in M$ FrontPage It took my 15-year-old nephew about two rainy afternoons to learn XHTML and CSS. All those WYSIWYG tools will allow you to make websit

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Gary Greene wrote: > On 7/2/09 12:10 PM, "Frank Cox" wrote: >> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:17:45 -0500 >> Lanny Marcus wrote: >> >>> Thank you, to everyone who replied! Looks like for the moment, >>> KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. >> >> Note that t

[CentOS] module-info vs pci.ids

2009-07-02 Thread nate
Hello - It's been so long since I've tried hacking the kickstart media to include an updated driver but I guess that time has come again for me at least, getting an updated "igb" driver into the CentOS 5.2 installation for a HP DL165G5p(I'm not ready yet for CentOS 5.3). Anyways, I had a pret

Re: [CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Pugatch wrote: > Ron Blizzard wrote: >> I've been having an odd problem lately. When I drag files from the >> computer to a flash drive, they appear to copy, but when I try to use >> the files I find that only the name was copied (file size of 0). When >> I copy

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi Lanny, On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 16:05, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Gary: The KompoZer web site says the .8 alpha4 version is much more > stable on Linux than the current version, Actually they say the 0.8 branch (not specifically alpha4 version) is more stable than the 0.7 branch. > but I don't see a

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 7/2/09, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Lanny Marcus a écrit : >> Looks like for the moment, >> KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. It lacks a lot >> of stuff I'm used to in M$ FrontPage > > It took my 15-year-old nephew about two rainy afternoons to learn XHTML > and CSS. All those WYS

Re: [CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 14:45, Ron Blizzard wrote: >> I've been having an odd problem lately. When I drag files from the >> computer to a flash drive, they appear to copy, but when I try to use >> the files I find that only the na

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Thu, July 2, 2009 4:19 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote: > I will begin learning... O'Reilly's "Head First HTML with CSS & XHTML" would not be a bad place to start: http://www.bestwebbuys.com/books/compare/isbn/059610197x Marko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 7/2/09, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 16:05, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Gary: The KompoZer web site says the .8 alpha4 version is much more >> stable on Linux than the current version, > > Actually they say the 0.8 branch (not specifically alpha4 version) is > more stable tha

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linux WYSIWYG HTML Editors

2009-07-02 Thread Gary Greene
On 7/2/09 1:19 PM, "Filipe Brandenburger" wrote: > Hi Lanny, > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 16:05, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Gary: The KompoZer web site says the .8 alpha4 version is much more >> stable on Linux than the current version, > > Actually they say the 0.8 branch (not specifically alpha4 ver

Re: [CentOS] How to change Disk sequence on DELL R900 CENTOS 5.3?

2009-07-02 Thread Jay Leafey
If you are not hung up on the device name changing, i.e. the device must ALWAYS be /dev/sda1 or /dev/hda1, you can use LABEL=? or UUID=? in /etc/fstab, or use LVM to create logical volumes that do not depend on the actual device name. By default, a fresh install will label the filesystem for /b

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-02 Thread Ned Slider
Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote: >> >From http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090629 >> >> "Right next to the Gentoo stand was a group of young people, proudly >> displaying their affiliation with CentOS. >> Dag Wieers, the well-known maintaine

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Christopher Chan
> As a follow up issue. The only thing that is not working properly is > that I can not pull up my website that is hosted on this server from > our private network. > > Do I need iproutes for my other two nics? I have never needed them > before. > > That is because you never redirected r

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Doug Coats
Christopher - you have been a great help! My internal network ip is 192.168.4.1 and I need it to access the aa.bb.166.2 interface or eth3. What would the rule look like that I need to add? On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Chan < christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > > > As a

Re: [CentOS] Flash Drive problem?

2009-07-02 Thread Robert Nichols
Ron Blizzard wrote: 1 > Jul 1 03:54:26 localhost hald[2450]: forcibly attempting to lazy > unmount /dev/sda1 as enclosing drive was disc That indicates that you unplugged the drive without first unmounting it, which is very likely to cause exactly the problem you are seeing. -- Bob Nichols

[CentOS] Centos 5.3 - one-time password

2009-07-02 Thread f...@ll
Hi, I have another server (debian) installed one-time password, the packages name opie-server and opie-client, now I must installing one-time pasword on the Centos 5.3 but I can't find which packages is a one-time password server? How in centos this package name? f...@ll _