>-Original Message-
>From: Ray Leventhal [mailto:cen...@swhi.net]
>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:32 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>Sorry for the late post on this thread, but there's free client called
>'Jalbum'
Dag Wieers napsal(a):
>
> The difference is that you can only install one distribution, but you can
> install tons of incompatible repositories.
>
> And the believe that one repo will rule them all (which is what Fedora and
> EPEL wants you to believe) is just debunked by yourself above :-)
>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Ray Leventhal [mailto:cen...@swhi.net]
>>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:32 PM
>>To: CentOS mailing list
>>Cc: sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>>
>>Sorry for the late pos
Thank you so much.
Yao
--- En date de : Lun 29.6.09, Filipe Brandenburger a
écrit :
De: Filipe Brandenburger
Objet: Re: [CentOS] Partitionning for future.
À: "CentOS mailing list"
Date: Lundi 29 Juin 2009, 20h39
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:50, Yaovi Atohoun wrote:
> I didn't put / and /boot
> The aim was to create platform, not
> strictly focused on enterprise. We wanted create something mixed.
> Something with enterprise, testing, backport levels and efforts. The
> project has been started but never really haven't happened.
I'll go on the record as being willing to volunteer to he
Hello All,
Could someone check if the last squirrelmail rpm is available on Centos4 ?
I check in a Centos4 server, but i find this:
[r...@linuxmail2 opt]# rpm -qi squirrelmail
Name: squirrelmail Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.4.8
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of luc...@lastdot.org
>Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:24 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>jalbum is a hog with large collections.. performance mu
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU a écrit :
> (And I won't mention the quality of Ubuntu's packages.)
> As for TUV, they decided they can only support ~2.5k packages,
> regardless of the fact that they're the #1 Linux company.
How many employees does Canonical have? AFAIK, it all started with a
group of 30
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:42 +0200, Kris Buytaert wrote:
> > Use a serial console, attach that to some "monitoring" host.
> > (you can useUSB-to-Serial, they are cheap and work), and log
> > on that one. You'll get the last messages from there.
> >
> I indeed had hoped to see some output on on the
security napsal(a):
> Hello All,
>
>
> Could someone check if the last squirrelmail rpm is available on Centos4 ?
> I check in a Centos4 server, but i find this:
>
>
> I check on http://centos.arcticnetwork.ca/4.7/updates/i386/RPMS/
> but there is no trace of the last squirrelmail package.
>
>
Niki Kovacs napsal(a):
> How many employees does Canonical have? AFAIK, it all started with a
> group of 30 odd Debian developers.
>
> Compare this with the russian ALT Linux distribution: 150 paid full time
> developers only to maintain the distro.
>
> As for Red Hat, according to recent news,
On 30 Jun 2009, at 9:46 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
>
>
>> The aim was to create platform, not
>> strictly focused on enterprise. We wanted create something mixed.
>> Something with enterprise, testing, backport levels and efforts. The
>> project has been started but never really haven't happened.
>
From: Paul Bijnens
> Is there any reason (besides upstream does it) to compile
> php5 with --without-sqlite in CentOS5 ?
I think I read that PDO has become the "default" for PHP... no?
# rpm -ql php-pdo
/etc/php.d/pdo.ini
/etc/php.d/pdo_sqlite.ini
/usr/lib/php/modules/pdo.so
/usr/lib/php/module
David Hrbác a écrit :
>
> Niki,
> that's starting the flame. Compare to PLD linux... more than 1
> RPMs...
Well, no flame intended. So let me just add this. I'm a happy RPMForge
repo user. No other third-party repos. I've learned how to circumvent
the odd quirks in the repo (like: how do
Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
>
> not to be rude but back to the core of the original question:
>
> is is safe to assume that future releases of Centos will remain a
> "built from publicly available open source SRPMS provided by a prominent
> North American Enterprise Linux vendor. CentOS conforms fu
So we had that nice long thread about the commercial support page a week
ago. There were a few recommendations on changes to the page. What next?
It is not clear to me if any recommendations were accepted or are being
debated internally or if this fizzled out somehow. Is there any process
Niki Kovacs napsal(a):
> Well, no flame intended. So let me just add this. I'm a happy RPMForge
> repo user. No other third-party repos. I've learned how to circumvent
> the odd quirks in the repo (like: how do I use VLC and Audacity at the
> same time). And if a package is not in RPMForge (whic
Geoff Galitz napsal(a):
> I'll go on the record as being willing to volunteer to help with a
> distribution/version neutral repo. Such a thing would benefit my business.
> Is anyone currently leading this project?
The "project" is to be found here http://rpmrepo.org/ I guess there's no
leadership
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:51:54PM -0700, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> > led to the great compiler we have today. The same
> > would hold for any large project (the kernel, firefox, etc.)
>
> And... are you happy with the quality of the huge $h1t which
> is Firefox? Because I am not.
Firefox
David Hrbác a écrit :
> security napsal(a):
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>> Could someone check if the last squirrelmail rpm is available on Centos4 ?
>> I check in a Centos4 server, but i find this:
>>
>>
>> I check on http://centos.arcticnetwork.ca/4.7/updates/i386/RPMS/
>> but there is no trace of t
Hi all,
> I have been using RPMforge much longer than EPEL and only have a few
> packages from EPEL on my 5.3 (32 bit) desktop. When I added the EPEL
> Repository to Priorities, the number of packages excluded went from
> approximately 400 to 1705. My belief is that had I not given EPEL a
> very l
Hallo,
today I had a surprising situation. Exim stopped. It's a German centos 5.3 64
Bit installation so the messages are partial in German.
Then I tried a restart:
[r...@centos ~]# service exim restart
exim beenden: [FEHLGESCHLAGEN]
exim sta
On 06/30/2009 10:47 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> So we had that nice long thread about the commercial support page a week
> ago. There were a few recommendations on changes to the page. What next?
> It is not clear to me if any recommendations were accepted or are being
> debated internally or if this
Oh my! Did you verify the size of the main.log file? 2TB of mail.log data
strikes me as too much. Are you rotating your logs? Is there a lot of
spam moving through your system?
Assuming you are running this on an ext3 filesystem you cannot increase the
maximum file size beyodn 2TB. If
On 06/30/2009 12:23 PM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> today I had a surprising situation. Exim stopped. It’s a German centos
> 5.3 64 Bit installation so the messages are partial in German.
there is an exim default limit or 2GB for the log file. you really
should be rotating them so they d
Hi, it is exactly as you're writing, thanks for help.
I've been trying to solve it with NFSv4 for a short while, but it
behaved the same way. So at last, i configured autofs, which is
mounting all the logical volume mountpoints itself.
Just for the others, here's the way i configured autofs:
[r
Some how I have changed something such that the command line:
gconftool-2 -t string --set /desktop/gnome/background/picture_filename
/usr/share/backgrounds/images/other.jpg
does not change my background any longer.
Has someone come across this before?
How can I change gnome back to ALL default
File size was actual some 2 GB:
-rw-r- 1 exim exim 2147483647 30. Jun 11:27 main-090630.log
Helmut
Von: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] Im
Auftrag von Geoff Galitz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 13:39
An: 'CentOS mailing list'
Betreff: Re: [CentOS]
From: Helmut Drodofsky
> today I had a surprising situation. Exim stopped.
> Reducing the size of /var/log/exim/main.log
> has solved the Problem.
> I presume it is a message of CentOS, not
> from exim. Is this correct?
Do you have a 'LogFileMaxSize' in your configuration file...?
BTW, no logrot
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>
>> I am still waiting for it. I am willing to give you commit
>> access to fix all the things that irritate you. I offered
>> the same to others.
>
> Actually, how do we know what builds and validates in RF and
> what doesn't?
>
> You should rath
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Linux Advocate wrote:
> beranger...@yahoo.com... , u have a problem with dag...and now it looks like
> u have a problem with linus torvalds himself u talk abt the need for
> cooperation,etc but you apparently dont get that 'you have to give
> respect to get respec
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dag Wieers napsal(a):
The difference is that you can only install one distribution, but you can
install tons of incompatible repositories.
And the believe that one repo will rule them all (which is what Fedora and
EPEL wants you to believe) is just de
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> I have been using RPMforge much longer than EPEL and only have a few
>> packages from EPEL on my 5.3 (32 bit) desktop. When I added the EPEL
>> Repository to Priorities, the number of packages excluded went from
>> approximately 400 to 1705. My belief is that h
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Hrbác( wrote:
Niki Kovacs napsal(a):
Well, no flame intended. So let me just add this. I'm a happy RPMForge
repo user. No other third-party repos. I've learned how to circumvent
the odd quirks in the repo (like: how do I use VLC and Audacity at the
same time). And if
Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Linux Advocate wrote:
>
>
>> beranger...@yahoo.com... , u have a problem with dag...and now it looks
>> like u have a problem with linus torvalds himself u talk abt the need
>> for cooperation,etc but you apparently dont get that 'you have to gi
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>> I have been using RPMforge much longer than EPEL and only have a few
>> packages from EPEL on my 5.3 (32 bit) desktop. When I added the EPEL
>> Repository to Priorities, the number of packages excluded went from
>> approximately 400 to 1705. My belief
Dag Wieers napsal(a):
>
> I am all for a solution, but unless it already works I would not call it a
> solution, but a short-term (and possibly long-term) risk.
>
I hasn't been working and I dare to say not because the community... So
I don't see any way how can contrib work after those years.
Ned Slider napsal(a):
> Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are
> already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro at present),
> why doesn't everyone do as Dag suggested, and adopt a handful of
> packages and help maintain them at rpmforge for the bene
Dag Wieers napsal(a):
>
> The biggest problem for me is that we do not have the infrastructure in
> RPMforge. I still need to build the x86 and x86_64 stuff, Fabian does
> the PPC packages.
Yes, "we" don't. As for me, there's no time and need to reinvent the
wheel. There are many etalons to look
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:06, Jerry Geis wrote:
> How can I change gnome back to ALL default settings?
DISCLAIMER: Not fully tested, might have other side effects. Do it at
your own risk. Also, it might not clean exactly what is causing your
problem (which could be a Gnome application that does n
> So we have centosplus and extras which are the repos with
> "access denied" for packages inclusion. Dag's rpmforge
> which is so huge with a lot of dependencies not suitable
> for "testing/bleeding edge/alternative" packages. So
> what's the suitable repo? That's why people are going to
> run
> How many employees does Canonical have? AFAIK, it all
> started with a group of 30 odd Debian developers.
Yes, but when they started, they mainly rebuilt the upstream
(Debian) packages, right?
> Compare this with the russian ALT Linux distribution:
> 150 paid full time developers only to main
> Firefox was better than Mozilla.
Nay. Only Firefox 0.9 was better than Mozilla.
Later on, bloatware won.
> It's definitely worth noting that, Epiphany &
> Firefox popped up so quickly because they built on
> Mozilla's rendering, etc.
Yes, it's easier to add bloatware on a solid open-sourced
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
> Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are
> already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro
> at present), ...
It may be clear to Ned, but is not the case.
I wish people not in the know would not purport to
char
> He wants me to do some things for him for free
> (unfortunately I am a freelancer and not a millionaire).
Not for *me*!!!
It's only a matter of perception. I normally don't like
when a SRPM doesn't build, and I believe that until it's
fixed, it should either be removed (alongside with the
c
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> But I *do* have a problem with RPM Fusion and Karanbir's repo, because
> they keep packages in "testing" even if nothing happens (they could stay
> there until 2014, right?).
oh _+please+_ troll elsewhere .. no-one forces you to use any
third
> What was the problem with audacious again ?
# yum install audacious
...
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package audacious.i386 0:1.3.2-5.el5.rf set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: audacious-plugins >= 1.3.0 for package: audacious
...
--> Missing Dependency: au
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>>
> Behalf
>
>> Of luc...@lastdot.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:24 AM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>>
>> jalbum
On 06/29/2009 08:06 PM, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
> The whole point of the question is to make sure that Centos will remain 100%
> binary compatible with PNAELV, at least in terms of package version. This
> does not mean that others will not have the ability to break this 100% binary
> compatibil
On 06/30/2009 12:10 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> There was a time where CentOS contrib repo has been announced. It was
> meant to be a package source for 'community-contributed' packages. So
> why not just merge stable RPMForge packages over there and start a
> 'semi-official' CentOS orientated repo
On 06/30/2009 11:03 AM, David Hrbác( wrote:
> The "project" is to be found here http://rpmrepo.org/ I guess there's no
> leadership right now.
rpmrepo.org suffered from a too-many-cooks and everyone wanting to
workout what the other guys were upto before deciding to do much - there
were a few ex
On 06/30/2009 09:22 AM, David Hrbác( wrote:
> that's starting the flame. Compare to PLD linux... more than 1
> RPMs... Not more that unpaid 40 people involved, actively committing
> only about 5 people...
I have much respect for the PLD guys, they have a fantastic system in
place, and I think
On 06/30/2009 03:46 PM, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> We even have centos.karan.org, with all the packages for 5 in...
> "testing", since 2007. Oh boy.
yes, perhaps the english language is alien to you - the word 'testing'
means something, there is a reason why those packages are there in
'test
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
> yes, perhaps the english language is alien to you - the
> word 'testing' means something, there is a reason why
> those packages are there in 'testing' - people who
> dont know what they are doing are recommended to
> NOT use them.
Karanbir, I've always 'appreciated' you being such a 'nice'
On 06/30/2009 05:05 PM, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> OTOH, it's such an accomplishment to have *all* the packages
> in "testing" since 2007 and none of them passing the QA
> requirements...
Where did you see the QA requirements for the packages in c.k.o ? Also,
why are you ignoring what has alr
Thanks
- Original Message
> From: Karanbir Singh
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:46:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
>
> On 06/29/2009 08:06 PM, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
> > The whole point of the question is to make sure that Centos
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any momentum to get OpenLDAP's back_perl feature
installed into the CentOS Yum repository. If this isn't the right mailing list
for such a request, could someone point me in the correct direction?
Thanks!
Tim Gustafson
Baskin School of Engineering
UC Santa Cruz
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Checked the site ou linked too, but I don't get it. Would my pics be hosted
> on my own server or on jalbum.net á la Picasa? I can't tell from the tour on
> the jalbum web site.
>
you run jalbum on the workstation that you use to process your photos
(could even be a mac or
Niki, could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and
would like to learn this.
- Original Message
> From: Niki Kovacs
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:11:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
>
> David Hrbác a écrit
david, could u tell me how to build frm SRPMS. i m not good in this area and
would like to improve.
- Original Message
> From: David Hrbác(
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:52:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
>
> Niki Kovacs napsal(a
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:18, Linux Advocate wrote:
> could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and would
> like to learn this.
This article in the Wiki should get you going...
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM
HTH,
Filipe
_
Hi list,
I can successfully build the driver modules; hdlc, dlci, syncppp, and lmc
from the 2.6.18-128.1.14 kernel source rpm, and have managed to
create a 'wan kmod' rpm. It all works fine for IPv4, but now I need
IPv6 for ppp connections, which doesn't work for me.
I think I'll need to back
>
> Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are
> already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro at present),
> why doesn't everyone do as Dag suggested, and adopt a handful of
> packages and help maintain them at rpmforge for the benefit of everyone.
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:24, Bob Beers wrote:
> I think I'll need to back port Krzysztof Halasa's 'ppp for generic hdlc'
> patches to the 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5 kernel sources.
>
> Has anyone worked on this? I have tried simply overwriting the
> drivers/net/wan directory with corresponding d
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years,
>> KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to
>> get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses
>> SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is a
At Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:18:58 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> Niki, could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and
> would like to learn this.
Simple form (should work with most packages):
# rpmbuild --rebuild package-version-release.srpm
'man rpmbuild' fo
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Curious about WordPress, although it's blogging SW. I installed it
> (and the dependencies) with yum, but it's not shown in the GNOME
> "Applications" menu. How do I launch WordPress?
> [la...@dell2400 ~]$ whereis wordpress
> wordpress: /etc/wordpress /usr/share/wordpress
>
At Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:11:38 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> >> I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years,
> >> KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to
> >> get away from FrontPag
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:24, Bob Beers wrote:
> > I think I'll need to back port Krzysztof Halasa's 'ppp for generic hdlc'
> > patches to the 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5 kernel sources.
> >
> > Has anyone worked on this? I have tri
> Where did you see the QA requirements for the packages
> in c.k.o ?
I didn't. But since you say that there is a reason for
them to be in "testing", I then assumed the reason was
"testing". But then, the activity usually called "testing"
is part of a process usually called Quality Assurance.
B
- Original Message
> From: Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:59:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
>
>
> > Where did you see the QA requirements for the packages
> > in c.k.o ?
>
> I didn't. But since you say th
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
GNOME
>> "Applications" menu. How do I launch WordPress?
>
> WordPress is NOT a local desktop application. It only makes sense
> installed on a web server. Unless you are running Apache (httpd), and
> MySQL server on your desktop machine, i
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> Checked the site ou linked too, but I don't get it. Would my pics be hosted
>> on my own server or on jalbum.net á la Picasa? I can't tell from the tour on
>> the jalbum web site.
>>
>
> you run jalbum on the workstation t
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a web photo gallery for my personal web server at home.
> Till
> now I've done the galleries manually from Adobe Photoshop Elements, but I
> feel that is a dead end, kinda', besides the fact that the galleries
> creat
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> So far I've come across a project called Gallery2, that seems to do
> what I want. Downside is that no rpm-packages are available with yum
> with this one.
FYI, gallery2 is available in EPEL for EL-5.
Ray
__
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> So far I've come across a project called Gallery2, that seems to do
>> what I want. Downside is that no rpm-packages are available with yum
>> with this one.
>>
>
> FYI, gallery2 is available in EPEL for EL-5.
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> how to change sequence back?
>
> Rather than chase that never ending loop, maybe now is the time
> to look into an fstab populated by UUID.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.cen
> I Can not speak for others, but the only time i have
> seen Karanbir be stern with anyone is when they do
> deserve it.
Well, I've read him saying in various ways and on
several occasions something that would equate "RTFM",
only it was put in such an offensive way that even
myself, as an ext
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are
>> already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro
>> at present), ...
>
> It may be clear to Ned, but is not the case.
>
Then we disagree. Other
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> R P Herrold wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>>> Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are
>>> already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro
>>> at present), ...
>>
>> It may be clear
> Anyway, as I said previously, I would rather see the CentOS
> Project concentrate on the core product and do a really good
> job on that (i.e, a move closer to the old 4 week release lag
> than the current 10 week release lag), and I would much rather
> see this than effort diluted by taking o
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 00:10 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> R P Herrold wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
> >
> >> Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are
> >> already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro
> >> at present), ...
> >
> > It
Sander Snel wrote:
> 10. use sudo instead of su -
How does that help?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>
>
>> If a SRPMS builds under CentOS 5.0 and it doesn't
>> under 5.3,then this package is broekn.
>>
>> Ok, you're making it yourself very hard now, but I
>> will accept scripts/tools that can verify this.
>> I don't think any other repository is
>> even doing th
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>
> RPMRepo is the best proof that collaboration is close to impossible.
Collaboration isn't exactly the point - in fact the differences are a good
thing. There are legitimate reasons (besides the obvious differences of
opinions) for incompatibly different version
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> How does that help?
Its considered proper convention to use "sudo" on individual commands
instead of changing the user to root. With sudo you can water down the
ability of a user, eg can't use the shutdown command.
I don't know if you c
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>
> As I said, and as everyone on this list knows:
> KB is not a person to talk with. Usually, KB would
> throw offensive assertion to people. No matter
> what KB would say, and no matter how important is
> KB to the CentOS project, a quick search through
> the cen
Thank you for answer.
"Label" just a way to work around. It is not real solution. I know "udev" can
make it work, but "udev" is too complext for me to understand.
--- 09/6/30 (二)，James A. Peltier 寫道：
> 寄件者: James A. Peltier
> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] How to change Disk sequence on DELL R900 CEN
Hi. Looking for suggestions/ideas.
I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a
tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group
of tasks by a basic web front end.
I have a series of scripts that do various conversions of data or
media, as well as a
>I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a
>tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group
>of tasks by a basic web front end.
Webmin?
>Then possibly react or setup
>alternate jobs if they passed or failed, etc. - some basic logic.
So the gui s
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a
>> tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group
>> of tasks by a basic web front end.
>>
There is this, Java based but can run scripts in any language:
http://www.sos-berl
Justin Bull wrote:
>
> I don't know if you can disable su -
Sure: usermod -L root. Before you do that, you need to have a user in
/etc/sudoers that has root equivalence. Ubuntu does this by default.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
At Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:43:14 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > How does that help?
>
> Its considered proper convention to use "sudo" on individual commands
> instead of changing the user to root. With sudo you can water down th
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Joseph L.
Casale wrote:
>>I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a
>>tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group
>>of tasks by a basic web front end.
>
> Webmin?
Webmin can do basic cron and process management
Robert Heller wrote:
> (eg 'sudo su -' which is kind if redundant).
A shortcut that I just recently learned: "sudo -s" gives you a root
shell, like "su". Not like "su -", because it's not a login shell, so
you don't get root's .bashrc and such, but you can then "su -" from
within the root shel
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Alan Sparks wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a
>>> tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group
>>> of tasks by a basic web front end.
>>>
> There is this, Java based b
Hi,
I was using yum, which was working very well. Then I decided to try
yumex, and installed yumex, which again worked fine. But, after that,
when I came back to use console yum, it started giving error messages.
So, I removed yumex and tried, in vain. Then I removed yum, and
installed it with rpm
Mauriat Miranda wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Joseph L.
> Casale wrote:
>>> I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a
>>> tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group
>>> of tasks by a basic web front end.
>> Webmin?
>
> Webmin can
great. thanx.
- Original Message
> From: Robert Heller
>could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and
> would like to learn this.
>
> Simple form (should work with most packages):
>
> # rpmbuild --rebuild package-version-release.srpm
>
> 'man rpmbuild' for m
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
