Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-27 Thread fmb fmb
Hi, the servers will be on the same subnet. httpd services...You stated that you wrote your own solution. I am curious if it is possible to be implemented using CentOS clustering tools... thnx, On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Neil Aggarwal wrote: > Do you want the servers on the same subnet o

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-27 Thread Neil Aggarwal
There might be a way to do it, but I have not explored that yet. You may call me to discuss it. My number is in my signature below. Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com Your e-commerce site can be geographically redundant and available even if failure occurs. Ask me

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-27 Thread Brian Mathis
CentOS has the redhat piranha packages available for install. Piranha is a repackaging of the linux virtual server software, along with a web-based front-end. You can find information about that in the CentOS docs and also by googling for "redhat piranha". On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, fmb

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-27 Thread fmb fmb
Thnx Brian. This is the first thing that I will do... On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > CentOS has the redhat piranha packages available for install. Piranha > is a repackaging of the linux virtual server software, along with a > web-based front-end. You can find informatio

[CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-06-27 Thread Mag Gam
WE have a centos 5.3 install, and our server is keep getting hacked. We see load averages of 500+ and see people from all over the world logging into our server (used last). Is there a good place to start to avoid these kinds of things? For example, here is what I already did. Open up sshd port

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-06-27 Thread John R Pierce
Mag Gam wrote: > WE have a centos 5.3 install, and our server is keep getting hacked. > We see load averages of 500+ and see people from all over the world > logging into our server (used last). > > what protocols are they logging on via? what accounts? have you changed all the passwords and

[CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Alan McKay
Aa, I'm pulling out my hair over here! I have an external USB drive which I had at work, connected just fine to my CentOS 5.3 box. I recall there was some jiggery-pokery involved, but do not recall just what. So now I'm on my wife's freshly installed CentOS 5.3 laptop trying to get it going

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > Aa, I'm pulling out my hair over here! > > I have an external USB drive which I had at work, connected just fine > to my CentOS 5.3  box.  I recall there was some jiggery-pokery > involved, but do not recall just what. > > So now I'm on my wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Alan McKay
> The fuse module is built by dkms.  Make sure you have the kernel devel > package that *matches* your running kernel.  What is the output of: > > uname -mr > > and > > rpm -qa kernel\* | sort [r...@localhost ~]# uname -mr 2.6.18-128.el5 i686 [r...@localhost ~]# rpm -qa kernel\* | sort kernel-2.6

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Alan McKay wrote: >> The fuse module is built by dkms.  Make sure you have the kernel devel >> package that *matches* your running kernel.  What is the output of: >> >> uname -mr >> >> and >> >> rpm -qa kernel\* | sort > > [r...@localhost ~]# uname -mr > 2.6.18-128.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Alan McKay
> Can you see that your kernel-devel (2.6.18-128.1.14) is newer than > your running kernel (2.6.18-128) ? No, that was not obvious to me > I strongly suggest that you run 'yum update' and get the latest kernel > and reboot. OK, will do. thanks -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertise

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, Alan McKay wrote: The fuse module is built by dkms.  Make sure you have the kernel devel package that *matches* your running kernel.  What is the output of: uname -mr and rpm -qa kernel\* | sort [r...@localhost ~]# uname -mr 2.6.18-128.el5 i686 [r...@localhost ~]# rpm

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Alan McKay
> But what is far the easiest solution is to head over to the elrepo > repository at: > Good luck and please report back ! Thanks again. Already started the yum update so if that does not take care of it then I will try that other stuff. Will let you know how it goes cheers, -Alan -- “Don't

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > No need for dkms, dkms-fuse, kernel-devel, kernel-headers or a > compiler. I recommend it nowadays over any dkms packages. > > Good luck and please report back ! I just noticed that my email client (alpine) was still configured to use the centos.org emai

[CentOS] SOLVED: CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

2009-06-27 Thread Alan McKay
Bingo! The yum update took care of it. Oddly enough, until I started my new job 2 months ago I'd always been in the habit of running 'yum -y update' first thing after installing Fedora or CentOS. But the product software we develop does not like that very much so I got out of the habit very quic