Re: [CentOS] Yum Repo that has xcache

Kai Schaetzl napsal(a): > James Matthews wrote on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:42:51 +0300: > >> I am wondering where I can get a repo that has xcache. (Or if anyone has any >> tips on a PHP optimizer) > > rpmforge has always the fitting eaccelerator for CentOS PHP. Works great. > > Kai > Hi, I do main

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Spiro Harvey >Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 1:49 AM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful > >> [...] and i would *seriously* a

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

> > "Commercial support is currently unavailable, although this is being > investigated by the community. The difficulty is that CentOS is a > volunteer run effort." > > Don't overreact Spiro. I really like your blurb, but the difficulty > sentence > has a negative ring. Please rephrase that sin

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Geoff Galitz >Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:16 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful > >FWIW, I think we should lighte

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Bent Terp wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: >  talk to someone with a marketing background.  seriously.  all you > need to do is admit that there's no support, but word it carefully so > that it doesn't seem like a big deal

Re: [CentOS] Need to rebuild installation CD

Chadley Wilson wrote on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:11:54 +0200: > The fact That I have sent email to a mailing group address authorizes > the group to read it. So I don't understand why we always have to > go down this road. Simple: this disclaimer is useless and intrusive at the same time, dead weight

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Sorin Srbu wrote: > "Commercial support is currently unavailable, although this is being > investigated by the community. The difficulty is that CentOS is a > volunteer run effort." > > Don't overreact Spiro. I really like your blurb, but the difficulty > sentence has a negati

[CentOS] startx problem

Dear All, I have recently upgraded mu centos 5 final to centos 5.3 using yum update i have the following setup which was running on centos 5 old server is centos os 5 now centos 3 with all the utilitlies Mailscanner 4.6 clam av 0.92 + spam assassin 3.1 mailwatch 1.04 after running yum server u

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Robert P. J. Day >Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:05 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful > >p.s. let me make it clear w

[CentOS] Error while installing packages

While installing some deps on a fresh system, I am getting the following errors: Running Transaction Installing : cyrus-sasl-devel[ 1/10] Installing : alsa-lib[ 2/10] /sbin/ldconfig: Cannot mmap file /usr/lib/libvm

Re: [CentOS] Need to rebuild installation CD

|-Original Message- |From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf |Of Kai Schaetzl |Sent: 22 June 2009 11:32 AM |To: centos@centos.org |Subject: Re: [CentOS] Need to rebuild installation CD | |Chadley Wilson wrote on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:11:54 +0200: | |> The

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem backup?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rafał Radecki wrote: > Could You please explain what exactly that line means: > > # dump 0f - / | (cd /seconddisk; restore -rf -) As root, do a level 0 (or full) backup of the root / filesystem. Rather than write the backup output to a regular file,

[CentOS] Wifi connection finally solved

After a year or so of trying to get wifi-cards of various brands and chipsets to work, today it finally happened! I got my 3com 3CRPAG175 to jump to it and connect to the department WPA2 AP! I wouldn't have done it without your help. Thanks all! One question though, should it really tak

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> p.s. let me make it clear why i'm being so obnoxious at the moment >> about this. a local company currently supports their software suite on >> linux on suse only. they're getting more call for RH support. i'd >> like to suggest they consider centos because i might get som

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > >> p.s. let me make it clear why i'm being so obnoxious at the > >> moment about this. a local company currently supports their > >> software suite on linux on suse only. they're getting more call > >> for RH support. i'd like t

Re: [CentOS] Error while installing packages

>Anyone know why this is happening and how to deal with this? Well it seems I can reproduce this in many situations if I install using a kickstart file that has a %post command that installs open-vm-tools from packages.vmware.com repo. Is it not considered safe practice to execute 'yum install '

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem backup?

At Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:26:22 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > Could You please explain what exactly that line means: > > # dump 0f - / | (cd /seconddisk; restore -rf -) This does a full dump of the file system mounted as '/' and sends it down a pipe to a shell process that first cha

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

Bent Terp wrote: > From my personal experience, we've received better support from CentOS > than from RedHat! > What you don't get is a phone-droid that's being paid minimum wages to > listen to phone abuse. I'm with you on that one. My first stab at Linux was in '99 when I bought an of

Re: [CentOS] Need to rebuild installation CD

On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:51:54 +0200 Chadley Wilson wrote: > |Simple: this disclaimer is useless and intrusive at the same time, dead > |weight. > | > |Kai > | > [CW] Thanks for the tip. As I said, I have no control over its existence. :( Perhaps you could use a different (disclaimer-free) email ad

Re: [CentOS] Need to rebuild installation CD

on 6-21-2009 10:20 PM Chadley Wilson spake the following: >> The initrd's are created as part of the post section of the kernel RPM. If >> you can get your driver into the kernel rpm it should get into the initrd. > [CW] Hi Scott, thanks for the response, so you are saying that if I get the > kern

Re: [CentOS] Program to ban sniffers

on 6-21-2009 2:31 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: > Barry Brimer wrote on Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:51:44 -0500 (CDT): > >> Many years ago I used portsentry for this. You can find an article about >> portsentry at > > and can be downloaded here: > http

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

on 6-21-2009 5:28 AM Robert P. J. Day spake the following: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> On 21/06/09 12:09, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> This Section or Page is coming soon. >>> >>> that is *not* going to give this client any warm fuzzies. from a >>> promotion perspective,

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Scott Silva wrote: > If they want commercial support, what is wrong with RedHat? That is > what they do. CentOS is a "community supported" enterprise distro. > Most organizations that want support usually look for an established > business entity. > > Besides, paid contracts

[CentOS] Make sshd log IP addresses, not hostnames

Can I adjust the ssh daemon to log IP addresses instead of hostnames? I assume this situation is feasible... * 10.10.10.10 attempts to ssh to the server * reverse dns resolves to "somehost.domain.com" * ssh daemon logs "somehost.domain.com" in messages * foward dns on "somehost.domain.com" resolv

Re: [CentOS] Minor dovecot/KMail problem

On 6/20/09 5:43 AM, "Timothy Murphy" wrote: > I'm running a dovecot/IMAP server under CentOS-5.3 on my desktop, > reading the mail with KMail on my laptop. > > I have what seems a venerable and well-documented problem/bug; > when I click on "Check Mail" I get an error message > "Error while getti

Re: [CentOS] Make sshd log IP addresses, not hostnames

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Scott Moseman wrote: > Can I adjust the ssh daemon to log IP addresses instead of hostnames? In sshd_config set UseDNS to no: UseDNS no Brett ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] Minor dovecot/KMail problem

On 6/22/09 12:31 PM, "Gary Greene" wrote: > On 6/20/09 5:43 AM, "Timothy Murphy" wrote: >> I'm running a dovecot/IMAP server under CentOS-5.3 on my desktop, >> reading the mail with KMail on my laptop. >> >> I have what seems a venerable and well-documented problem/bug; >> when I click on "Check

Re: [CentOS] Make sshd log IP addresses, not hostnames

Hi, On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 15:21, Scott Moseman wrote: > Can I adjust the ssh daemon to log IP addresses instead of hostnames? You can disable all DNS lookups by adding this line to /etc/ssh/sshd_config: UseDNS no This will probably accomplish what you want. > I assume this situation is feasi

Re: [CentOS] Make sshd log IP addresses, not hostnames

Indeed, that does log only the IP address. I could have sworn that I already played with that config option, but apparently I did not. Thanks, Scott On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > UseDNS no > ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Scott Silva wrote: > >> If they want commercial support, what is wrong with RedHat? That is >> what they do. CentOS is a "community supported" enterprise distro. >> Most organizations that want support usually look for an established >> business entit

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

At Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:14:20 -0400 (EDT) CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Scott Silva wrote: > > > If they want commercial support, what is wrong with RedHat? That is > > what they do. CentOS is a "community supported" enterprise distro. > > Most organizations that want supp

Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

I think the response from Geoff below is excellent. Its honest, to the point, and understandable. On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote: > I (amicably) object to the "currently unavailable" phrase.  As has been > mentioned support is available.  I would suggest the following change: