I'm running a dovecot/IMAP server under CentOS-5.3 on my desktop,
reading the mail with KMail on my laptop.
I have what seems a venerable and well-documented problem/bug;
when I click on "Check Mail" I get an error message
"Error while getting folder information" ...
Actually, this doesn't appear
I saved pictures on an SD card with my Nokia phone (1 GB). Now, I'm
trying to use the card on my Acer Aspire 3680 (laptop) running 5.3 and
gnome.
Popping the card in (until it clicks) evokes nothing from the system log
or dmesg, and I don't see anything relevant in /dev. (What is the device
fo
Michael Klinosky wrote:
> So, one problem seems to be that I'm unfamiliar with modprobe; what's
> wrong? Do I need to install something?
In my experience at least many card readers that are integrated
into laptops have compatibility issues with linux. It may be
possible to get them working but of
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 07:03:02AM -0700, nate wrote:
> Michael Klinosky wrote:
>
> > So, one problem seems to be that I'm unfamiliar with modprobe; what's
> > wrong? Do I need to install something?
>
> In my experience at least many card readers that are integrated
> into laptops have compatibil
nate wrote:
> You can try to find the drivers yourself and compile them from
> source but I think for you is probably more trouble than it's
> worth given my impression of your linux experience.
Ok - the curious / adventurous part of me wants to know if that's all
I'd have to do. Not that I'm con
I have found this http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10913
I am running that motherboard with 2.6.18-128.1.10 x86_64
and I have the USB issues. I dont really want to use a later kernel
for a couple reasons one being the ATI Catalyst drivers dont work on
later kernels (I tried on another m
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:55 PM, wrote:
> James Matthews wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am wondering where I can get a repo that has xcache. (Or if anyone has
>> any tips on a PHP optimizer)
>
> How about
> http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/
> Looks to have XCache 1.2.2
>
>
> --
> Andrew
> _
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
> nate wrote:
>> Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Occasionally I get emails which have a subject header of "Rejected posting
>>> to Blah", from a listserv I am on. Without going into a 10 page diatribe
>>> of why, I'd like to reject t
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
> Is it possible to have more then one version of KDE installed and switch
> between them? I'd like to try out the new KDE but don't want to lose what
> I
> have now. Thnx
Maybe try it, using VMWare or Virtual Box, so you do not destroy
>
>
>> > [Normal log stuff from dictionary attack deleted...]
>>
>> This is common, and, presuming you have good passwords or only
>> accept authorized_keys, not a real problem other than large log
>> files.
>>
>> Look at fail2ban for a method that will automatically add
>> iptables blocks when thi
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:17:30 +0300 (AST)
fabian wrote:
> The problem was solved after using a non standard port for ssh.
You haven't solved the problem, because you haven't solved this problem:
> but wonder how it was gettin through my firewall
You should be finding this out. Traffic of unknow
Michael Klinosky wrote:
> nate wrote:
>> You can try to find the drivers yourself and compile them from
>> source but I think for you is probably more trouble than it's
>> worth given my impression of your linux experience.
>
> Ok - the curious / adventurous part of me wants to know if that's all
>
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> I saved pictures on an SD card with my Nokia phone (1 GB). Now, I'm
> trying to use the card on my Acer Aspire 3680 (laptop) running 5.3 and
> gnome.
>
> Popping the card in (until it clicks) evokes nothing from the system log
> or dmesg, a
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You might want to try the kernel drivers Alan Bartlett built about
> half an hour ago and released from the ELRepo site ( http://elrepo.org
> ). The details are in this CentOS forum thread:
>
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=14578&foru
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Michael Klinosky wrote:
>
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > You might want to try the kernel drivers Alan Bartlett built about
> > half an hour ago and released from the ELRepo site ( http://elrepo.org
> > ). The details are in this CentOS forum thread:
> >
> > http://www.c
So I have been reading the ssh attack thread and finally want to ask about
something.
I doubt there is a program like this, but I would love to have a program
that listens at common ports that I do not use at all...and only allow that
program to listen to it, especially the usual ssh port (using a
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:35:00 -0400
Bob Hoffman wrote:
> So...does something like this exist?
fail2ban
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin
>In other words, anyone hitting those ports that are not being used at all
>except by our sniff protector, would allow instant banning.
>
>So...does something like this exist?
I don't know of a program that specifically listens to defined ports and
acts on that, but fail2ban would accomplish the e
However if you are referring to packet sniffers there is no solid way of
blocking them.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >In other words, anyone hitting those ports that are not being used at all
> >except by our sniff protector, would allow instant banning.
> >
> >So..
>However if you are referring to packet sniffers there is no solid way of
>blocking them.
How exactly would I sniff the packets from say my work computer between
someone's home computer and work server?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Joseph L.
Casale wrote:
>>However if you are referring to packet sniffers there is no solid way of
>>blocking them.
>
> How exactly would I sniff the packets from say my work computer between
> someone's home computer and work server?
> ___
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> So I have been reading the ssh attack thread and finally want to ask about
> something.
>
> I doubt there is a program like this, but I would love to have a program
> that listens at common ports that I do not use at all...and only allow that
>
>
> That program would then, upon receiving a 'sniff' or 'user' would then add
> that ip to the deny hosts lists..for either a long or short time.
>
> Using this would seem like a win as you can easily grab someone before they
> can get somewhere one hopes.
> Also, by opening up a few other
> I doubt there is a program like this, but I would love to have a program
> that listens at common ports that I do not use at all...and only allow that
> program to listen to it, especially the usual ssh port (using a different
> one for real ssh)...
>
> That program would then, upon receiving a '
>Very carefully...
Lol, you missed the point. It's impossible. I was bluntly suggesting the
reply was not applicable nor on topic to the op's post. Port scanning
and packet sniffing have nothing to do with each other...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
26 matches
Mail list logo
