Hi
I need some logic to work out a value for me - this value is _always_
the 3rd last field in a string seperated by '.' but the string could be
5 or 6 fields long, e.g
foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala
foor.bar.gigi.VALUE.baz.lala
I need to find VALUE - if this were python or something i could do it
b
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need some logic to work out a value for me - this value is _always_
> the 3rd last field in a string seperated by '.' but the string could be
> 5 or 6 fields long, e.g
>
> foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala
>
> foor.bar.gigi.VALUE.baz.lala
>
> I need
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
michael.ket...@rm-solutions.de wrote:
> Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
>
> ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
> Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
> [simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
>
> Viele Grüße,
> Michael Kettel
You can resubcribe then, when you
Is there anyway you can tell which field it will be in (i.e. to use as
a search clause, so "search for the field with X properties"?)
Ultimately to get the data in the X'th field you are going to need
either awk or sed (they can both easily do this, awk probably easier
than sed)
You need to work
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich bin ab dem 15.06.2009 wieder zurück im Büro.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Simon Schillings
[simon.schilli...@rm-solutions.de]
Viele Grüße,
Michael Kettel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need some logic to work out a value for me - this value is _always_
> the 3rd last field in a string seperated by '.' but the string could be
> 5 or 6 fields long, e.g
>
> foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala
>
> foor.bar.gigi.VALUE.baz.lala
>
> I need
Hi.
echo foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala | awk -F. '{ print $(NF-2); }'
--
Alex S.
On 08.06.2009 13:29, Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need some logic to work out a value for me - this value is _always_
> the 3rd last field in a string seperated by '.' but the string could be
> 5 or 6 fields long, e.g
> I am pretty sure there is a way in awk to figure out how many fields
> you have, then take the total # of fields -3 each time to get the
> third last one. Just heading out the door and off hand can't remember
> how it would be done.
>
>
i can do it in cheetah templating with
set myloc = $g
muhammad panji wrote:
...
> awk -F\. {'print $3'}
> awk -F\. {'print $5'}
> awk -F\. {'print $6'}
awk -F\. {'print $(NF-2)'}
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Mobile: +45 22 12 53 25
Email: m...@crc.d
>echo foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala | awk -F. '{ print $(NF-2); }'
>
>
excellent - just what i needed
thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ben Mohilef wrote:
> The 8168B (02) NIC works well except that it does not go into promiscuous
> mode despite advertising itself in that mode after being so directed with
> ifconfig. Unfortunately, the little box is destined to be an IDS monitor, so
> that
> function is essential. The board is an
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:56:09AM +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
>
> >echo foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala | awk -F. '{ print $(NF-2); }'
>
> excellent - just what i needed
awk is probably the most readable way. In traditional shell stuff like
this used to be done in awk or sed
awk -F. '{print $(NF-2)}
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:29 +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need some logic to work out a value for me - this value is _always_
> the 3rd last field in a string seperated by '.' but the string could be
> 5 or 6 fields long, e.g
>
> foo.bar.VALUE.baz.lala
>
> foor.bar.gigi.VALUE.baz.lala
>
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 08:01 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> 2. Inside that, use the set command to change the field separator to "."
>
Correction: IFS (the Interfield Separator) is just another variable.
Just regular assignment will set it.
--
Bill
___
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 6-3-2009 2:27 AM Peter Hopfgartner spake the following:
>
>> Epilogue:
>>
>> I've tried to disable TSO (ethtool -K eth0 tso off), as was suggested on
>> the poweredge list. This did not help.
>>
>> I've configured the machine to start with the 5.2 kernel in
>> /boot/gru
Kevin,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Kevin Krieser wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> In my case, I was hoping it would avoid the bad sector since the bad
> sectors were in free space. So the hope was that it would skip it.
> Bad disks are a difficult case, and not a re
On Jun 8, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 6-3-2009 2:27 AM Peter Hopfgartner spake the following:
>>
>>> Epilogue:
>>>
>>> I've tried to disable TSO (ethtool -K eth0 tso off), as was
>>> suggested on
>>> the poweredge list. This did not help.
>>>
>>> I've c
> luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
>> I'm no Oracle user/expert, but isn't Oracle DB 11g free (as in beer)?
>> So my take is he's not paying anything.
>>
pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
> AFAIK, its only free for your initial development work. As soon as you
> deploy a production app, you have to get suppo
Hi,
If I now installed centos 5.3 and for 6 month I buying support from RHEL
I can change 5.3 to rhel 5.3? It's possible?
f...@ll
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 07:34, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> title CentOS (2.6.18-128.1.10.el5xen)
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /xen.gz-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01
> ide0=noprobe ide1=noprobe
> initrd /initrd-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5.img
[...]
> Can anyone see anyt
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 21:50, Stephen Harris wrote:
> But on reboot I still see ipv6 entries against the eth devices, ipv6 module
> is still loaded, and sit0 tunnel is present.
> What needs to be done to disable ipv6?
I had this exact same issue on one of my machines, and I found out
that the
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 09:21, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> * only one user (user 'install' / pass 'install')
userlist_enable = YES
userlist_deny = NO
userlist_file = /etc/vsftpd.user_list
And then:
# echo install >/etc/vsftpd.user_list
That way only "install" will be able to log in to the FTP server.
It is an D945GCLF2 with a 330.
> use the r8169 driver
That driver has issues with the counters, resolved with the ElRepo and
Realtek drivers. Ifconfig shows no dropped packets with the latter two
drivers.
> website, it has been working fine, and I regularly check my tcpdump,
> dmesg even state
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Albert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I now installed centos 5.3 and for 6 month I buying support from RHEL
>I can change 5.3 to rhel 5.3? It's possible?
No. The versions for Centos are always higher then RHEL. Therefore unless
the updates RHEL versions happen to be greater then the
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> Oh, sorry, fixed it with
>
> rpm -iv --force libwpd-0.8.7-3.el5.i386.rpm
> rpm -iv --nodeps libwpd-devel-0.8.7-3.el5.i386.rpm
That's pretty ugly. :-)
Is this perchance a multi-arch system? On x86_64:
[r...@wx1 ~]# rpm -q libwpd-devel
package libwpd-devel is not i
Filipe Brandenburger a écrit :
>
> userlist_enable = YES
> userlist_deny = NO
> userlist_file = /etc/vsftpd.user_list
>
> And then:
>
> # echo install >/etc/vsftpd.user_list
>
> That way only "install" will be able to log in to the FTP server.
Thanks very much !
Niki
Tom Diehl wrote:
...
> No. The versions for Centos are always higher then RHEL. Therefore unless
> the updates RHEL versions happen to be greater then the existing centos
> versions you will never get the updates.
I'd think that it would be technically possible to migrate a CentOS
system to RHEL
Hello,
I'm trying to get the LD_LIBRARY_PATH set from .bash_profile (Centos 5.3
fully updated).
This is a part of my .bash_profile:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/home/szyman/omnet/omnetpp-2.3p1/lib
export R_HISTSIZE=20
Everything works fine under standard ssh login, but unde
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 14:38, Andrzej Szymanski wrote:
> Everything works fine under standard ssh login, but under NX client the
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable is missing (the R_HISTSIZE is exported properly).
>
> Any hints?
This is probably not related to NX, but to the terminal emulator you
are
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 14:38, Andrzej Szymanski wrote:
>> Everything works fine under standard ssh login, but under NX client the
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable is missing (the R_HISTSIZE is exported properly).
>>
>> Any hints?
>
> This is probably not related t
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:04 +0200, Andrzej Szymanski wrote:
> Thanks for a fast resolution.
>
> However, moving this to .bashrc is a workaround. If I log in graphically
> to the console the LD_LIBRARY_PATH from .bash_profile is set correctly.
> It is unset only on NX session (and the other sett
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Andrzej Szymanski wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 14:38, Andrzej Szymanski wrote:
>>> Everything works fine under standard ssh login, but under NX client the
>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable is missing (the R_HISTSIZE is exported
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 15:04, Andrzej Szymanski wrote:
> However, moving this to .bashrc is a workaround. If I log in graphically
> to the console the LD_LIBRARY_PATH from .bash_profile is set correctly.
> It is unset only on NX session (and the other settings from
> .bash_profile are set prop
Phil Schaffner pisze:
> Tom Diehl wrote:
> ...
>> No. The versions for Centos are always higher then RHEL. Therefore unless
>> the updates RHEL versions happen to be greater then the existing centos
>> versions you will never get the updates.
>
> I'd think that it would be technically possible to
on 6-6-2009 5:04 PM Ron Blizzard spake the following:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:06 PM,
> RedShift wrote:
>
>>> I had the same question in the back of my mind. There are some great
>>> evolutions going on right now, but they take a lot of time to mature. I've
>>> also been wondering about deskt
Albert wrote:
...
> Thx for the answered, but the centos have commercial support like RHEL?
CentOS itself is a volunteer non-commercial effort. If you want a
paid-support OS RHEL is highly recommended, and CentOS would not exist
without them.
There are also companies that offer commercial supp
i need lzma compression for CloneZilla, but have not found it in any
CentOS repository. The Finnish website was down and when up, it does
not do much english.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Louis Lagendijk
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 12:21 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cannot get LD_LIBRARY_PATH to work
> under NX (freenx)
>
> On Mon, 2009-06-08
I'm surprised that since it installs in a non-standard location that it doesn't
create a /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ conf file. In that case it's a simple drop-in file
that only requires ldconfig to be run after the package installation
--
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
IT Operations
Minerva Networks, Inc.
Cell
Rob Townley wrote:
> i need lzma compression for CloneZilla, but have not found it in any
> CentOS repository. The Finnish website was down and when up, it does
> not do much english.
RPMforge has it. Please read
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories and note the
warnings and
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 16:42, Gary Greene wrote:
> I'm surprised that since it installs in a non-standard location that it
> doesn't create a /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ conf file. In that case it's a simple
> drop-in file that only requires ldconfig to be run after the package
> installation
I
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 16:42, Gary Greene wrote:
>> I'm surprised that since it installs in a non-standard location that it
>> doesn't create a /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ conf file. In that case it's a simple
>> drop-in file that only requires ldconfig to be run aft
Greetings,
I am looking for resources on how to build my own Centos install CD
for a preselected package set that I want to install. I think Red Hat
may have had this functionality at some point but it has been a while
since I have needed to do this.
I found this on how to build my own kernel -
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 09:50:11PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> I thought I'd done that standard stuff
> /etc/modprobe.conf:
> alias net-pf-10 off
> alias ipv6 off
> /etc/sysconfig/network:
> NETWORKING_IPV6=no
>
> But on reboot I still see ipv6 entries against the eth devi
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 06:48:28AM +0800, Hann-huei Chiou wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 09:50:11PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > I thought I'd done that standard stuff
> > /etc/modprobe.conf:
> > alias net-pf-10 off
> > alias ipv6 off
> > /etc/sysconfig/network:
> > NETWORKING
Need some opinions on making a multihomed box more resilient to
failure. This server runs asterisk and performs nat and firewalling
for an office. Its wan nic is plugged directly into a cable modem
and I am stuck with it being configured as a dhcp client. The lan
nic services a small office, and ha
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Now it seems there is still one last hurdle, when the connection is yanked
> to simulate a complete outage, asterisk still goes down. I can only assume
> this happens now as a result of no default gateway?
check the logs? run strace on the process? run tcpdump on
the int
Hi all,
Which would you recommend for a 4GB+ machine?
A 32-bit install with PAE-enabled kernel or just use 64-bit?
Regards,
Matt
--
Stand before it and there is no beginning.
Follow it and there is no end.
Stay with the ancient Tao,
Move with the present.
__
At Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:42:50 +0800 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Which would you recommend for a 4GB+ machine?
>
> A 32-bit install with PAE-enabled kernel or just use 64-bit?
It depends...
If you are not doing anything that needs a 64-bit address space, then
32-bit w/PAE will wo
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 22:28, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:42:50 +0800 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>> Which would you recommend for a 4GB+ machine?
>> A 32-bit install with PAE-enabled kernel or just use 64-bit?
>
> If you are not doing anything that needs a 64-bit address s
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Filipe
Brandenburger wrote:
> Even though PAE might work reasonably well if you have 4GB or 6GB or
> 8GB and with your current applications, 64-bit will keep working well
> when you need to upgrade your machine to 16GB or 32GB and run
> additional applications or ne
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Filipe
> Brandenburger wrote:
>
>> Even though PAE might work reasonably well if you have 4GB or 6GB or
>> 8GB and with your current applications, 64-bit will keep working well
>> when you need to upgrade your machi
61 matches
Mail list logo
