Re: [CentOS] CentOS Pulse - The Bi-weekly CentOS Newsletter #0901

Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >>> I am pleased to announce the first edition of the bi-weekly CentOS >>> newsletter which we dubbed "CentOS Pulse". >> >> Dag: I read the first issue. Great idea! Please post he

Re: [CentOS] yum update error this morning

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Ralph Angenendt >Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:22 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] yum update error this morning > >> I did a yum clean all as well, but it didn't help. U

Re: [CentOS] yum update error this morning

On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 09:40 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> I did a yum clean all as well, but it didn't help. Uninstalling the file > >> package, as mentioned in my previous mail, resolved the issue for me. > YMMV > >> of course. > > > >The issue with the "file" package was a completely different o

Re: [CentOS] Dovecot under brute force attack - nice attacker

Henry Ritzlmayr wrote on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:21:04 +0200: > the logs you are referring to are only produced if you enable > > auth_verbose = yes > > right? That's possible, I didn't check. In that case and if I recall right I added that directive because I was missing the IP numbers in some l

Re: [CentOS] yum best policy && magic.mime problem (httpd update)

Rob Kampen wrote: > Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >> Hi! I have 2 questions : >> 1. I heard about an best and all policy with yum for 64bit arch .. how >> can i change the policy to best as is annoying to have doubled packages >> when i need only the 64bit ones ... >> >> 2. i try to update the apache and

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Rex Dieter wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > > > If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you > > get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 > > version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally > > did not replace stock com

Re: [CentOS] Dovecot under brute force attack - nice attacker

Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 10:31 +0200 schrieb Kai Schaetzl: > Henry Ritzlmayr wrote on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:21:04 +0200: > > > the logs you are referring to are only produced if you enable > > > > auth_verbose = yes > > > > right? > > That's possible, I didn't check. In that case and if I

[CentOS] get hardware info through lspci

I've recently read: Linux Find Out If PCI Hardware Supported or Not In The Current Running Kernel So, if I: grep 27d8 /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/modules.pcimap and see this: snd-hda-intel0x8086 0x27d8 0

[CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SWAP SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 18037 thba 31 15 304m 242m 62m 44m R 245.3

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you >>> get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 >>> version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally >>>

[CentOS] script question

I have this line: ALSA=`aplay --version` in a script. when I execute the script I get the message line 187: --version: command not found when I do "aplay --version" on the command line it works just fine. What is happening here, --version is a valid command line option? Thanks, j

Re: [CentOS] script question

Jerry Geis wrote: > I have this line: > ALSA=`aplay --version` > > in a script. when I execute the script I get the message > line 187: --version: command not found > $ echo $(aplay --version) aplay: version 1.0.18 by Jaroslav Kysela t

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Theo Band wrote: > I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. > > When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. > If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. Press 1 in top to see the per CPU info > > top: >   PID USER      PR  NI

Re: [CentOS] script question

> I have this line: > ALSA=`aplay --version` > > in a script. when I execute the script I get the message > line 187: --version: command not found What's in line 187? Do you really want to use backticks ` or should it be more like ALSA='aplay --version' (apostrophes)? If you want

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Sean Carolan wrote: > I have a server that is undergoing some patching soon and would like > to make note of any files that have changed after the patching is > complete.  Can you recommend a tool that uses md5sum snapshots to do a > quick before and after test, sh

Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: > Anyone have any idea as to why setroubleshootd would be dominating the > system: > >  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND >  2371 root      25   0 1884m 1.8g 4100 R 100.2 44.7 680:06.40 > setroubleshootd st

Re: [CentOS] script question

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I have this line: >             ALSA=`aplay --version` > > in a script. when I execute the script I get the message >  line 187: --version: command not found > > when I do "aplay --version" on the command line it works just fine. > > What is happe

Re: [CentOS] script question

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:11:37AM -0400, Jacques B. wrote: > head -n 188 your_script | tail -n 3 > That will output lines 186-188 so that you have some context (in case sed -n 186,188p your_script :-) -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Theo Band wrote: > I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. > > When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. > If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. Theo, by any chance are you using cumulative mode on top? -- Hakan (m1fcj)

Re: [CentOS] script question

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:11:37AM -0400, Jacques B. wrote: > >> head -n 188 your_script | tail -n 3 > >> That will output lines 186-188 so that you have some context (in case > > sed -n 186,188p your_script > > :-) > > -- > > rgds > Stephen

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

Didi wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Theo Band wrote: > >> I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. >> >> When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. >> If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. >> > > Press 1 in top to see the per CPU info >

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Theo Band wrote: > >> I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. >> >> When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. >> If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. >> > Theo, by any chance are you usin

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 52, Issue 3

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Les Mikesell wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you >>> get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 >>> version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally >>>

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Les Mikesell wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you >>> get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 >>> version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally >>>

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Rex Dieter wrote: > If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally did not replace stock components with newer

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Les Mikesell wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you > get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 > version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally > did not replace stoc

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> Rex Dieter wrote: >> If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you >> get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 >> version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel ge

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Les Mikesell wrote: > Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> Rex Dieter wrote: >>> If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you >>> get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 >>> version. Is this intentional and

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally did not

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Les Mikesell wrote: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally did not replace stock componen

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

Rob Kampen wrote: > >>> by default base+updates should get priority over anything else >>> including epel, don't you agree? >>> >> >> Not necessarily. I don't see any inherent reason that I would want >> openjdk-b09 over b12 and I'd expect the reverse since b12 fixes known >> bugs. But I w

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

on 6-4-2009 5:37 AM Theo Band spake the following: > I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. > > When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. > If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. > This one is easy. 4 cpu's, 100% total each, a maximum of 400%. Since

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:51:53PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Sean Carolan wrote: > > I have a server that is undergoing some patching soon and would like > > to make note of any files that have changed after the patching is > > complete. Can you recommend a tool that uses md5sum snapshots to do

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

Scott Silva wrote: > on 6-4-2009 5:37 AM Theo Band spake the following: >> I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. >> >> When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. >> If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. >> > This one is easy. 4 cpu's, 100% total each,

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

Hi, On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 08:37, Theo Band wrote: > When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. > If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. > There are all single threaded programs, so it's not that more cores are > being used. Are you sure? You can type

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

on 6-4-2009 2:14 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: > Scott Silva wrote: >> on 6-4-2009 5:37 AM Theo Band spake the following: >>> I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. >>> >>> When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. >>> If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: > >>> I have a server that is undergoing some patching soon and would like >>> to make note of any files that have changed after the patching is >>> complete. Can you recommend a tool that uses md5sum snapshots to do a >>> quick before and after test, showing anything t

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Sean Carolan wrote: > I have a server that is undergoing some patching soon and would like > to make note of any files that have changed after the patching is > complete.  Can you recommend a tool that uses md5sum snapshots to do a > quick before and after test, sho

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

Scott Silva wrote: > on 6-4-2009 2:14 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: >> Scott Silva wrote: >>> on 6-4-2009 5:37 AM Theo Band spake the following: I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. If I use gkrellm

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Sean Carolan wrote: >> I have a server that is undergoing some patching soon and would like >> to make note of any files that have changed after the patching is >> complete. Can you recommend a tool that uses md5sum snapshots to do a >

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

On 06/04/2009 11:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > md5deep/aide/etc will break if you have prelink turned on.. iirc, aide is prelink aware. And tracks changes to depending lib chains. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ Ce

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

On 06/03/2009 10:51 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > I always like brute force - and the ability to undo things... If you > have space somewhere to rsync (-aH) a backup copy of the filesystems > before the changes, repeating the rsync with -aHvn --delete, (don't > forget that -n) will show what is differ

Re: [CentOS] Good md5sum snapshot tool?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 06/04/2009 11:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> md5deep/aide/etc will break if you have prelink turned on.. > > iirc, aide is prelink aware. And tracks changes to depending lib chains. > The patches for this just went in. The versi

Re: [CentOS] CPU usage over estimated?

Les Mikesell wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: >> on 6-4-2009 2:14 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: >>> Scott Silva wrote: on 6-4-2009 5:37 AM Theo Band spake the following: > I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. > > When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of

Re: [CentOS] How to remove the wrong wireless firmware module

> > David McGuffey wrote: > > How do I back out of these directions? > > > > "yum install iwl4965-firmware > > > > rmmod iwl4965; modprobe iwl4965 > > > > rmmod iwl4965 > yum erase iwl4965-firmware > > > > Your wireless device should be working now. Enable NetworkManager to > use it. > > St

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 53, Issue 4

> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:52 AM, David McGuffey > wrote: > > This is my first post here on the CentOS forums.? I've been running > Fedora > > since FC4, and have been working with RHEL 4 at work.? But this is > my first > > foray into CentOS. > > > > I followed the multimedia guidance on the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 53, Issue 4

David McGuffey wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:52 AM, David McGuffey >> wrote: >> >>> This is my first post here on the CentOS forums.? I've been running >>> >> Fedora >> >>> since FC4, and have been working with RHEL 4 at work.? But this is >>> >> my first >> >>>

[CentOS] hosting provider with CentOS shell?

I need a hosting provider just like Dreamhost.net's shared hosting service, but with a CentOS shell instead of Debian. Any pointers? Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] hosting provider with CentOS shell?

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Matt Harrington wrote: > I need a hosting provider just like Dreamhost.net's shared hosting > service, but with a CentOS shell instead of Debian.  Any pointers? > > Matt > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > htt

Re: [CentOS] hosting provider with CentOS shell?

--- On Fri, 6/5/09, Matt Harrington wrote: > I need a hosting provider just like Dreamhost.net's shared hosting > service, but with a CentOS shell instead of Debian.  Any pointers? http://www.asmallorange.com/ R-C __ Con

Re: [CentOS] hosting provider with CentOS shell?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Ed Donahue wrote: > > You mean bash instead of korn or c-shell? I meant that some hosting providers give you a shell account -- access to a shell -- in addition to Apache, PHP, MySQL, etc. I'm looking for a provider that runs on CentOS. http://dreamhost.net has