Hi All,
I have a win2k3 server that its backing up to a CentOS 5.3 server. On
the Win2k3 machine I plan to have rsync back up nightly to the CentOS
server through ssh. The command I am using is as follows:
rsync -vrPtz -e ssh myu...@myserver:/remote/backup/folder/ /local/backup/folder/
This all
OK, this is solved now so thought I would post back to the list in
case future users search the archives for the same problem and for
anyone who is interested ;)
Thanks Tony, you answer was partially it. I hadn't correctly enabled
WOL on the NIC card:
> I don't know about your Dell, but on my HP
Am 28.04.2009 03:37, schrieb David M Lemcoe Jr.:
> If you are using PERC, it is simply not compatible with Linux, and
> should never be. It is a terrible piece of hardware. I would recommend
> using dmraid.
Hmm, this used to be an issue in the PERC3 days when PERC3DC was a
LSI/AMI controller and
James Bensley wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:14:54 +0100:
> This all works great for the inital test except its prompts me for a
> password for "myuser" (as you would except) but how can I embed the
> password for ssh into the command line? Or can I not?
You can't. You use a certificate. There are
Gregory P. Ennis wrote on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:20:21 -0500:
> The RAID controller appears to be on the mother board to me.
It's then Intel fake RAID.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
hi Kai,
> You can't.
Thats what I thought, I have been looking into using certificates and
passphrases and that will have to be it!
Thank for your help!
James ;)
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--> C++>$ U+> L++> B-> P+> E?> W+++>$ N K W++ O M++>$ V-
PS+++ PE++
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of James Bensley
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 6:54 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rsync/SSH automation problem?
>
> hi Kai,
>
> > You can't.
>
> Thats what I thoug
On 28/04/2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 4/28/09, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net
> wrote:
> > CentOS 5.3
> >
> > New updates available used to be flagged in the (Gnome) desktop
> > notification
> > area, but I don't get them any longer. What could be the problem?
> >
> > yum-updatesd is set up
Hi all,
We are running CentOS 5.2 64bit as our file server.
Currently, we used GFS (with CLVM underneath it) as our filesystem
(for our multiple 2TB SAN volume exports) since we plan to add more
file servers (serving the same contents) later on.
The issue we are facing at the moment is we found o
Thanks for your input, unfortunately the servers will be communicating
via the inter-web-net-spagetthi.
Its OK I have sorted this with ssh passphrases, the only reason I
posted to the list instead of using them in the first place is that I
was sceptical of the reliability of using them from a wind
Anthony Kamau wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:40:10 +1000:
> Interesting - why not do a pull from the CentOS box?
He's doing that.
> I mount Windows Server 2003 as follows:
Mounting is completely different from using rsync on two hosts - e.g. you
loose the delta algorithm advantage of rsync the w
Beartooth wrote:
>> Why do you want CentOS on an EeePC ?
>
> I have a strong if perhaps irrational preference for the .rpm
> family
Me, too, and it's rational in my case. I've experienced the whole range
of both sets of tools, from the ground up. RPMs are simpler to build
than DEBs, a
Hi,
independently from the results you have seen it might be always reasonable to
tune a gfs filesystem as follows:
http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-6533
specially
mount with noatime and
gfs_tool settune glock_purge 50
Regards Marc.
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 13:01:17 Hairul Ikmal Mohamad Fu
nate wrote:
> Beartooth wrote:
>> I have an ASUS EeePC 701 (with 2GB of RAM and an 8 GB card), on
>> which I've installed CentOS on the hard-drive-plus-card. But it can't
>> even use my eth0.
>>
>>Some one on a local LUG, where I had mentioned that other OSs did fine
>> with all the same e
David M Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Beartooth wrote:
>> I have an ASUS EeePC 701 (with 2GB of RAM and an 8 GB card), on
>> which I've installed CentOS on the hard-drive-plus-card. But it can't
>> even use my eth0.
>>
>>Some one on a local LUG, wh
In article ,
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Anthony Kamau wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:40:10 +1000:
>
> > >From here, I run the rsync command without the need for the -e option.
>
> ">" is a quote marker, don't write your own text after a quote marker!
He probably didn't do it himself. Some mail transpo
Warren Young wrote:
> Beartooth wrote:
>
>>> Why do you want CentOS on an EeePC ?
>>>
>> I have a strong if perhaps irrational preference for the .rpm
>> family
>>
>
> Me, too, and it's rational in my case. I've experienced the whole range
> of both sets of tools, from the g
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> nate wrote:
>
>> Beartooth wrote:
>>
>>> I have an ASUS EeePC 701 (with 2GB of RAM and an 8 GB card), on
>>> which I've installed CentOS on the hard-drive-plus-card. But it can't
>>> even use my eth0.
>>>
>>>Some one on a local LUG, where I had mentioned t
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 19:01 +0800, Hairul Ikmal Mohamad Fuzi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are running CentOS 5.2 64bit as our file server.
> Currently, we used GFS (with CLVM underneath it) as our filesystem
> (for our multiple 2TB SAN volume exports) since we plan to add more
> file servers (serving
From: John Doe
> 4. OT: fs corruption ont he USB keys...
>I copy the iso file on the key (no error message), then compare it to the
> original and some random differences appear.
I have corruption problems with both the i386 (3.7GB) and x86_64 (4.2GB) DVD
iso files.
But I tried the CDROM
> Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my
> /dev/md0 That it reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb
> available. What would cause this?
>
>
>
> # df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda2 71G 1.6G 66G 3% /
> /dev/sda1 99
>> Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my
>> /dev/md0 That it reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb
>> available. What would cause this?
>>
>>
>>
>> # df -h
>> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda2 71G 1.6G 66G 3% /
>> /dev/sda1
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:02:16PM +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> When we used SFTP to transfer file it will keep file property like
> "create date", "rwx".
>
> For FTP, is option can do that?
>
Certain FTP clients may simulate this with tricks (at least on
downloads), but the FTP protocol itself do
mcclnx mcc wrote:
> When we used SFTP to transfer file it will keep file property like "create
> date", "rwx".
>
> For FTP, is option can do that?
>
tar, ftp, untar. but, seriously, don't use FTP, its a wretched krufty
old protocol, with plaintext password authentication, and two different
met
Would you be willing to make the RPM available?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Joe Pruett wrote:
as i was waiting for the c5-testing repo to catch up with redhat, i went
ahead and built my own. i had to take the php-extras rpm and merge the
php changes between 5.1.6 and 5.2.6 into it. and
John R Pierce wrote:
> mcclnx mcc wrote:
>> When we used SFTP to transfer file it will keep file property like "create
>> date", "rwx".
>>
>> For FTP, is option can do that?
>>
>
> tar, ftp, untar. but, seriously, don't use FTP, its a wretched krufty
> old protocol, with plaintext password aut
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:57:26 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> David M Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
[]
> The key - Don't use Open Office, use AbiWord and Gnumeric instead.
> OpenOffice is total bloat.
Is that still true if you install only OO-writer and its
dependencies?
Actua
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:00:24 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
[]
> Oh, how do you unsoldier the drive? My understanding is this unit has
> the drive hard wired
You don't. Nobody touched it.
What I know of hardware would go in a gnat's eye. But when the
tech unsc
On Apr 29, 2009, at 8:35, William L. Maltby wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind is that ls must sort the file list. If the
> system load is high and memory is short, you may be getting into a
> swap
> situation. I suggest trying the test when the system is lightly loaded
> to see if the results di
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009, James Bensley wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I have a win2k3 server that its backing up to a CentOS 5.3 server. On
>the Win2k3 machine I plan to have rsync back up nightly to the CentOS
>server through ssh. The command I am using is as follows:
>
>rsync -vrPtz -e ssh myu...@myserver:/remo
Warren Young wrote:
> I think much of the hype about how great the Debian packaging system is
> came from the days before they adopted yum, so Debian fans could point
> to apt-get and say "Isn't it great to be able to install packages from
> the net directly from the command line?" Sure, once upo
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, nate wrote:
> It's more about the repositories themselves, the QA behind them,
> the integration of packages. A single unified source for patches,
> security fixes etc.
>
>> From Debian 5.0 (lenny):
> Total package names: 29647 (1186k)
> Normal packages: 22400
> Pure virtual
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:35, William L. Maltby
wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind is that ls must sort the file list.
Not only sorting, but usually "ls" ends up trying to find out if the
file is a directory, which uses a "stat" syscall for each of the
files.
This is always expensive on re
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:13, Tony Mountifield
wrote:
> In article ,
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Anthony Kamau wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:40:10 +1000:
>> > >From here, I run the rsync command without the need for the -e option.
>>
>> ">" is a quote marker, don't write your own text after a quote
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>
> In general, having directories with a huge number of files tends to be
> a bad idea, you will most likely have performance bottlenecks with
> specific filesystems or tools. If possible, try to change the
> application to create two or three levels of directories usi
R P Herrold wrote:
> oh please -- move advocacy to a new thread raher than
> hijacking. Quantity does not imply quality, and AWOL
> maintainers who move on is a problem in all of FOSS
Quality is implied by the hefty QA process debian goes
through, and the long release cycles. I thought I had
com
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Filipe Brandenburger
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 12:51 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rsync/SSH automation problem?
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:13, Tony
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate wrote:
> R P Herrold wrote:
>
> > oh please -- move advocacy to a new thread raher than
> > hijacking. Quantity does not imply quality, and AWOL
> > maintainers who move on is a problem in all of FOSS
>
> Quality is implied by the hefty QA process debian goe
I have a directory shared out via Samba for Quickbooks and seem
to have some issues with permissions. The directory being shared
is a subdirectory in an ext3 partition being mounted with the acl
option.
It has been setup as follows:
chown root:DOMAIN\AD_Group /mnt/Intuit_Data/
chmod 2770
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 15:45 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate wrote:
> R P Herrold wrote:
>
> > oh please -- move advocacy to a new thread raher than
> > hijacking. Quantity does not imply quality, and AWOL
> > maintainers
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>I have a directory shared out via Samba for Quickbooks and seem
>to have some issues with permissions. The directory being shared
>is a subdirectory in an ext3 partition being mounted with the acl
>option.
>
>It has been setup as follows:
> chown r
>You probably want to look at the ``force user'' and/or ``force group''
Well, I would need ``force group'', but I tried that with an AD group and
it didn't work? I will dig into this again and see what went wrong.
>(or look for a Real Accounting(tm) package in place
>of QB :-).
Don't even get m
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 05:26:22PM -0400, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 15:45 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate wrote:
> > R P Herrold wrote:
> >
> > > oh please -- move advocacy to a new thread raher than
> > > hijackin
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 14:30 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I have a directory shared out via Samba for Quickbooks and seem
> >to have some issues with permissions. The directory being shared
> >is a subdirectory in an ext3 partition being mounted wit
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 17:39 -0400, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 05:26:22PM -0400, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 15:45 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate wrote:
> > > R P Herrold wrote:
> > >
> > > > oh pleas
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:26 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> Not crazy about smooching huh? Ever bother to really research the facts?
> RedHat and MS are parteners! In the Virtualization area and more.
>
I used openSUSE for quite a while -- even after the agreement (11.0 is still
on what is now my backup d
>I don't think that would even solve the problem because gamin reports to
>QB and then QB makes the changes as per the FAM docs which is the older
>of gamin.
>http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/doc.html
>
>There is no explicit docs on gamin on the gnome site. They refer to FAM
>as the per the document
on 4-24-2009 3:51 PM Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle spake the following:
> Hi All,
>
> I am new to CentOS and I signed up for a Mosso Cloud Server that runs
> Cent OS 5.2
>
> I can ssh in.
>
> I ran: yum install vnc vnc-server
> then: vncserver (and set desktop viewing password)
>
> But I cannot co
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 14:30 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I have a directory shared out via Samba for Quickbooks and seem
> >to have some issues with permissions. The directory being shared
> >is a subdirectory in an ext3 partition being mounted with
Hi
I have small query, all our server are centos based 5 and 5.2 . We are
looking ofr a tool to that measure packet loss. we have servers in two IDC's
bothin the US and we are trying to download a 2gb file from the internet.
Some server are able to download the file at a higher b/w rate in one I
Maybe you guys should start your own thread about "how to reply to
emails" and "how changing the subject isn't really appropriate"?
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--> C++>$ U+> L++> B-> P+> E?> W+++>$ N K W++ O M++>$ V-
PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP t 5 X+ R- tv+ b+> DI D+++
Agnello George wrote:
> Hi
> I have small query, all our server are centos based 5 and 5.2 . We are
> looking ofr a tool to that measure packet loss. we have servers in two
> IDC's bothin the US and we are trying to download a 2gb file from
> the internet. Some server are able to download the
John R Pierce wrote:
> Agnello George wrote:
>> Hi
>> I have small query, all our server are centos based 5 and 5.2 . We are
>> looking ofr a tool to that measure packet loss. we have servers in two
>> IDC's bothin the US and we are trying to download a 2gb file from
>> the internet. Some ser
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 23:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> JohnS wrote on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:09:56 -0400:
>
> > If you don't mind when you come to an answer would you please let me
> > know. I am interested to know.
>
> I could not find a real solution. I had to go to another way of creating
> t
55 matches
Mail list logo
