Dear All,
I am having a HP xw4400 with following ethernet controller
as reported by lspci
Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5755 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02)
This machine was running CentOS 5.2 without any problem. After
updating the machine with yum update o
2009/4/21 Mangesh S. Umbarje
> Dear All,
>
> I am having a HP xw4400 with following ethernet controller
> as reported by lspci
>
> Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5755 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev
> 02)
>
> This machine was running CentOS 5.2 without any problem. Af
I have checked the physical connectivity which is perfectly
fine. This machine is very critical which we need to keep running as much
as possible. So I had gone to older kernel 2.6.18-92.1.17.el5. But along
with this kernel, I had added one more Dlink ethernet card which shows to
be
2009/4/21 Mangesh S. Umbarje
>
> I have checked the physical connectivity which is perfectly fine.
> This machine is very critical which we need to keep running as much as
> possible. So I had gone to older kernel 2.6.18-92.1.17.el5. But along with
> this kernel, I had added one more Dli
When the date was Tuesday 21 April 2009, Mangesh S. Umbarje wrote:
>I have checked the physical connectivity which is perfectly
> fine. This machine is very critical which we need to keep running as much
> as possible. So I had gone to older kernel 2.6.18-92.1.17.el5. But along
> with
From: James A. Peltier
> Anyone else having trouble when installing python-tools?
> sudo yum -y install python-tools
> Password:
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> adobe-linux
> | 951 B 00:00
> extras
> | 951 B 00:00
> base
> |
I am getting the following error when doing "yum -y install openldap-clients".
The machine is still on 5.2 and not 5.3. I dont wish to disturb the machine
that much at this time. Is there no easy way to install openldap-clients?
Jerry
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Insta
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am getting the following error when doing "yum -y install openldap-clients".
>
> The machine is still on 5.2 and not 5.3. I dont wish to disturb the machine
> that much at this time. Is there no easy way to install openldap-clients?
It looks
Hi list,
since release 5.3 all kernels ignore
options netloop nloopbacks=
within /etc/modprobe.conf
If is smaller than four there are always four
vifs created.
If is bigger than four the appropriate number
of vifs are created.
Is this expected/new/feature/bug?
Henry
__
Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2009, 17:29 +0200 schrieb henry ritzlmayr:
> Hi list,
>
> since release 5.3 all kernels ignore
>
> options netloop nloopbacks=
>
> within /etc/modprobe.conf
>
> If is smaller than four there are always four
> vifs created.
> If is bigger than four the appropriate nu
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possi
Quoting Sean Carolan :
> I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
> CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
> device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
>
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I wa
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:44:47AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using the
> mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpget requests but
> I'm not having much luc
Sean Carolan wrote:
> I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
> CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
> device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
>
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I was h
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Sean Carolan wrote:
>> I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
>> CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
>> device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
>>
>> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server i
> We have a six- or seven- year old cisco 3750 which is running an IOS
> which doesn't have the newer MIB; for this switch, we must explicitly
> query the MIB-II Bridge for each VLAN. I would hope that newer
> relesaes of IOS wouldn't have this limitation.
This is exactly what I was missing. Tha
> My notes: http://wiki.xdroop.com/space/snmp/Switching+Tables
>
Hi Dave, so using the example from your site above I tested a mac
address against one of our switches:
[scaro...@host:~]$ snmpwalk -v1 -c pub...@200 10.100.3.6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.17.4.3 | grep `hexmac2decoid 00:B0:D0:E1:BF:52`
SNMPv2-SMI:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if someone knows how to "automatically" login as root
> with gdm and gnome.
>
> I have been doing some searching, and havent been able to find a method.
> I dont want to login
> automatically all the time - its just p
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:22:07PM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.4.3.1.2.0.176.208.225.191.82 = INTEGER: 389
>
> Does this mean that the machine is plugged into port 389? I didn't
> think there were 389 ports on the switch.
It'd be a very large switch.
No, it just means it'
Hi List
I am hoping that someone here could perhaps give me a straight answer
on a question that someone asked me today
I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second
50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the largest would then be
the size of the smallest disk, not 80 or
>I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second
>50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the largest would then
>be the size of the smallest disk, not 80 or 100 or 120 for that matter
>or am I wrong here?
Well, wrt to R5, yes. If the array is spanned across different disks,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Per Qvindesland wrote:
>
> I am hoping that someone here could perhaps give me a straight answer on a
> question that someone asked me today
> I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second 50gb
> third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the large
Per Qvindesland wrote:
> Hi List
>
> I am hoping that someone here could perhaps give me a straight answer
> on a question that someone asked me today
>
> I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second
> 50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the largest would then be
>
Hi All
Thanks a lot for all your answers.
So I was right but also a bit wrong :)
Agan thanks a lot.
Regards
Per Qvindesland
--- Original message follows ---
SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] OT Question about raid 5
FROM: Jerry Franz
TO: "CentOS mailing list"
DATE: 21-04-2009 21:28
Per Qvindesland wrote
2009/4/22 Jerry Franz
>
> Per Qvindesland wrote:
> > Hi List
> >
> > I am hoping that someone here could perhaps give me a straight answer
> > on a question that someone asked me today
> >
> > I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second
> > 50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth
Anyone running this POS on CentOS and can spare some info? Support
is useless, and it's just not working:)I am not getting a qbdir.dat
file created, and the error log is, well, empty!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using the
> mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpget requests but
> I'm not having much luck. How would you tackle this problem?
>
Take a look at Netd
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
> >Of JohnS
> >Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:39 PM
> >To: CentOS mailing list
> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 08:12 -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> JohnS a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 09:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, JohnS wrote:
> >>
> >>> I don't reacall any one really saying if there was indeed a fix put into
> >>> that PAE or any Specific
on 4-21-2009 7:24 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
> I am getting the following error when doing "yum -y install openldap-clients".
>
> The machine is still on 5.2 and not 5.3. I dont wish to disturb the machine
> that much at this time. Is there no easy way to install openldap-clients?
>
>
>
On Apr 21, 2009, at 16:17, "Joseph L. Casale"
wrote:
> Anyone running this POS on CentOS and can spare some info? Support
> is useless, and it's just not working:)I am not getting a qbdir.dat
> file created, and the error log is, well, empty!
>
> jlc
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
