Hello
I'm running CentOS 5.3 with httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.x86_64 and
php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3.x86_64. When the logrotate scripts run and send the HUP
signal to httpd, the httpd process quits instead of reloading. The only thing I
can find in the logs is this:
[Sun Apr 19 04:02:04 2009] [notice]
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van
: RedShift [mailto:redsh...@pandora.be]
>Verzonden
: zondag
, april
19, 2009 09:42 AM
>Aan
: centos@centos.org
>Onderwerp
: [CentOS] httpd crashes after signal HUP
>
>Hello
>
>
>I'm running CentOS 5.3 with httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.x86_64 and
>php-5.1.6-2
Have you tried this:
http://www.electrictoolbox.com/seg-fault-or-similar-nasty-error/
Per
--- Original message follows ---
SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] httpd crashes after signal HUP
FROM: "RedShift"
TO: "CentOS mailing list"
DATE: 19-04-2009 9:49
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van
: RedShift [m
Per Qvindesland wrote:
> Have you tried this:
> http://www.electrictoolbox.com/seg-fault-or-similar-nasty-error/
>
> Per
Yes, I have tried it, but that's a workaround, not a real solution.
Glenn
>
> --- Original message follows ---
>
> *Subject: *Re: [CentOS] httpd crashes after signal H
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:10 AM, D Tucny wrote:
> 2009/4/19 Lanny Marcus
>> I just saw this thread in the OLM forum. Possibly of interest, since
>> they say it includes CentOS 5, if the update hasn't been released yet.
>> Always good to keep boxes updated, for security and stability
>> reasons.
RedShift wrote on Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:20:32 +0200:
> Yes, I have tried it, but that's a workaround, not a real solution.
Well, after reading just the first few lines I think the point is that a
PHP accelerator (APC) is involved.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive In
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> RedShift wrote on Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:20:32 +0200:
>
>> Yes, I have tried it, but that's a workaround, not a real solution.
>
> Well, after reading just the first few lines I think the point is that a
> PHP accelerator (APC) is involved.
>
> Kai
>
There is no PHP acceler
Robert Heller a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> Linux does not care about file *names*.
indeed Linux does not. but desktop managers do. That said, *.exe attacks
should only affect systems running Wine.
> [snip]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
RedShift wrote:
> Hello
>
>
> I'm running CentOS 5.3 with httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.x86_64 and
> php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3.x86_64. When the logrotate scripts run and send the HUP
> signal to httpd, the httpd process quits instead of reloading. The only thing
> I can find in the logs is this:
>
> [
At Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:07:05 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert Heller a écrit :
> > [snip]
> >
> > Linux does not care about file *names*.
>
> indeed Linux does not. but desktop managers do. That said, *.exe attacks
Are you sure? I would think that *Linux*-based desktop managers
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 15:54 -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
>
> > -
> > That's a known problem with the Kernel and VM Kernel. You need the fixed
> > kernel.
>
> Do you have an URL of the bug or something?
>
> I updated to the latest kernel.
>
> I was running 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, JohnS wrote:
> I don't reacall any one really saying if there was indeed a fix put into
> that PAE or any Specific Kernel for CentOS. Can the CentOS Kernel
> Builder Comment Please?
>
> Also See: +1
> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VMWare_Server?highlight=(1
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 09:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> > I don't reacall any one really saying if there was indeed a fix put into
> > that PAE or any Specific Kernel for CentOS. Can the CentOS Kernel
> > Builder Comment Please?
> >
> > Also See:
This machine is running CentOS 5.3, fully updated Linux
mavis.localdomain 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 #1
SMP Wed Apr 1 09:19:18 EDT 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux. Video is an
ATI Radeon 9000.
X froze overnight and attempts to restart it fail. I tried an old
kernel (2.6.18-92.1.22.el5)
before realizing
Robert Heller a écrit :
> At Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:07:05 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> Robert Heller a écrit :
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Linux does not care about file *names*.
>> indeed Linux does not. but desktop managers do. That said, *.exe attacks
>
> Are you sure? I would think that *
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 12:25 -0500, Robert wrote:
> This machine is running CentOS 5.3, fully updated Linux
> mavis.localdomain 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 #1
> SMP Wed Apr 1 09:19:18 EDT 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux. Video is an
> ATI Radeon 9000.
> X froze overnight and attempts to restart it fail.
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 12:25 -0500, Robert wrote:
> This machine is running CentOS 5.3, fully updated Linux
> mavis.localdomain 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 #1
> SMP Wed Apr 1 09:19:18 EDT 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux. Video is an
> ATI Radeon 9000.
> X froze overnight and attempts to restart it fail.
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:10 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> I'm now expert, but have done some programming in the past. I suspect
s/now/no/ # <*chagrin*>
>
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/li
RedShift wrote on Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:41:50 +0200:
> There is no PHP accelerator involved. It's all standard.
Maybe for you. There's probably an Apache module or a PHP extension
installed that is causing this.
Ah, I just saw your next message. So, you know the reason now.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl,
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 12:25 -0500, Robert wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
> Again, I'm not really knowledgeable about this stuff.
>
> HTH
>
First, thanks to both you and John Stanley and anyone else whose reply I
lost.
Finally, after beating up on myself, I found an
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 13:54 -0500, Robert wrote:
>
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 12:25 -0500, Robert wrote:
> >
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Again, I'm not really knowledgeable about this stuff.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> First, thanks to both you and John Stanley and anyone
At Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:06:43 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert Heller a écrit :
> > At Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:07:05 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Robert Heller a écrit :
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> >>> Linux does not care about file *names*.
> >> indeed Linux does not. but
I'm trying to rebuild nx-3.2.0-8.el5.centos.src.rpm from the extras repo.
It works on a machine running 5.1, but fails on another running 5.3. The
working machine is arch=x86_64, the other i386. The strange bit is the line
rpmbuild complains about: it's the last line in the spec file, at the e
Dear Toshaan,
Thank you for your teaching.
Hiraki
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Tosh wrote:
> Hidetsugu Hiraki wrote:
>> Dear Madam or Sir,
>>
>> I live in Japan. So I must comply with the nation's law.
>> When I install software for Linux, is there any easy way to know
>> whether the the ins
Dear Ms. or Mr. nate,
Thanks.
Hiraki
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:08 PM, nate wrote:
> Hidetsugu Hiraki wrote:
>> Dear Madam or Sir,
>>
>> I live in Japan. So I must comply with the nation's law.
>> When I install software for Linux, is there any easy way to know
>> whether the the installation an
25 matches
Mail list logo
