Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?

Am 17.04.2009 um 05:16 schrieb Mark Pryor: > > > After trying for 2 hours, I ran into 3 brickwall-issues. Like you > found, there are two base perl modules which require newer versions > than that which comes with 5.3. These modules are >File::Temp and Encode (core) > > cpan2rpm can pa

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Kai Schaetzl >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:33 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Guy Boisvert >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:04 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >As for Winblows, it always wipes the b

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Kai Schaetzl >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:16 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >> Generally speaking, which one is the e

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Kai Schaetzl >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:31 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >> install windows xp then install easyBC

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of David G. Miller >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:33 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >Windows (just like DOS) assigns drive

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Lanny Marcus >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 8:06 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >There is a >web page on the CentOS Wik

Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of MHR >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:18 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers > >I've never seen this problem at all - running AMD 64x2 7750,

[CentOS] CUPS oddity

Hi, I've been setting up a few printer servers with CUPS. Our public libraries here all run 100% Linux (CentOS 5), so what I do is simply install the printer on one of the machines (with a static IP) and then configure CUPS so it can act as a printer server for Linux clients. It took me some t

Re: [CentOS] CUPS oddity

2009/4/17 Niki Kovacs : > Hi, Hi, > > I've been setting up a few printer servers with CUPS. Our public > libraries here all run 100% Linux (CentOS 5), so what I do is simply > install the printer on one of the machines (with a static IP) and then > configure CUPS so it can act as a printer server f

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:37:53 +0200: > How do you mean broken? Sorin, why do you think I replied to you? The person using the broken configuration is "David G. Miller". Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:16:33 +0200: > Apparantely Windows can bork up after a while if the system files aren't on > C:. No, that is a myth. You just cannot put the system drive on an extended partition, it has to be a primary partition. If that is the first non-Linux partition

Re: [CentOS] CUPS oddity

localhost translates into 127.0.0.1 so the daemon listens only to this locally available address. Adding the LAN address makes the daemon available for connections from LAN. Sent from my iPhone On 17.04.2009, at 12:43, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I've been setting up a few printer servers

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:37:53 +0200: > > >> How do you mean broken? >> > > Sorin, why do you think I replied to you? The person using the broken > configuration is "David G. Miller". > odd, David Miller's message appears threaded just fine on my Th

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:37:53 +0200: > >> How do you mean broken? > > Sorin, why do you think I replied to you? The person using the broken > configuration is "David G. Miller". I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out the pr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 dkms-ndiswrapper

Agile Aspect wrote: > Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop > (latitude-e4500) for an employee. > > I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf - > enclosed are the > errors messages. > > The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS.

Re: [CentOS] CUPS oddity

Laurent Wandrebeck a écrit : >> >> Can anybody explain this strange behaviour to me? > localhost is a non routable address: 127.0.0.1. > So it won't answer on the public ip address if you don't add it yourself. Thanks! Got it! Niki ___ CentOS mailing l

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, muhammad panji wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. >> >> I basically need the following: >> - firewall >> - nat >> - VPN >> - bandwidth limiting / mon

Re: [CentOS] [OT] rsa host key change

Bill Campbell wrote: ... > That would make me very suspicious that the box had been cracked, > and that a foreign sshd had been substituted for the real one. > > rpm -V is your friend. Also rkhunter and chkrootkit. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:18:40 +0200 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Thanx guys, I see what I'm looking for doesn't really exist. SME > does what I need, but still runs on CentOS 4.7, and it doesn't offer > groupware email out of the box. What you are looking for doesn't exist in the a fully packaged form. B

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Devin Reade wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:19:54 -0600: > The symptoms you describe could be a side effect of being previously hit by > and > . Thanks for the belated info, anyway. But this doesn't seem to

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:46:14 -0400: > I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out > the problem, but maybe next time leave some text clue as to whom you are > referring. why? The threading makes it quite clear who I replied to. Or is your client bro

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

John R Pierce wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:34:49 -0700: > odder, I don't see a "In-Reply-To:" header, so I dunno HOW it appears > threaded just fine. It's been put in the thread according to the time sequence because the header you mention is missing. So, it just *appears* to be threaded, but

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:18:40 +0200 > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > >> Thanx guys, I see what I'm looking for doesn't really exist. SME >> does what I need, but still runs on CentOS 4.7, and it doesn't offer >> groupware email out of the box. > > What you are look

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > Install the FireFox extension "noscript" and be very careful about what > domains you authorize scripting from. > Is there such a thing for Seamonkey, or is this not required? (Or is this a "check with Mozilla" question?) Thanks. mh

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:46:14 -0400: > >> I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out >> the problem, but maybe next time leave some text clue as to whom you are >> referring. > > why? The threading makes it quite clear who I rep

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Toby Bluhm wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:46:14 -0400: >> >>> I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out >>> the problem, but maybe next time leave some text clue as to whom you are >>> referring. >> why? The threading makes it

Re: [CentOS] Weird performance problem

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 09:12 -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a CentOS 4. server and I sometimes face a weird problem. > It is a weird performance problem, and here is how I discovered it. > > This server runs OpenVZ virtual machines, and one of them is an asterisk > server f

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:14 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > My belief is that this is not possible, but there are many extremely > > knowledgeable people participating on this list and I would like to > > know if it is in fact possible. I am running CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) fu

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Apparantely Windows can bork up after a while if the system files aren't on > C:. I was thinking the Windows installer will see the linux partitions and > try to name them C: and D: etc, thus Windows will be installed on E: or F:, > which might not go down well with some prog

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Isn't reinstalling GAG the same thing as reinstalling grub. What's the > incentive so to speak? Is GAG so much better, or just easier to work with > than grub? > Easier. GAG has its own boot media (diskette or cd). It has a graphical interface and is very easy. Guy Bo

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Toby Bluhm wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:37:53 +0200: >> >>> How do you mean broken? >> Sorin, why do you think I replied to you? The person using the broken >> configuration is "David G. Miller". > > I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 14:08 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to deploy a solution with dual-booting systems where CentOS 5.3 is > already installed and WinXP will be installed to a separate disk. > > I found > http://apcmag.com/how_to_dual_boot_linux_and_windows_xp_linux_install

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

From: MHR > > Install the FireFox extension "noscript" and be very careful about what > > domains you authorize scripting from. > Is there such a thing for Seamonkey, or is this not required? (Or is > this a "check with Mozilla" question?) http://lmgtfy.com/?q=seamonkey+noscript+plugin&l=1 ;P

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> the forum, which is a highly restricted area. Today when it happened, > what exactly is *it*? Spiro: When I saw the pop ups, their file waiting for me to click, to OK it for download, etc. > >> Install-2006-60.exe wh

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: > My experience is that when browsing on any OS and you come across an > error message stating that your computer is infected and you need to > install such and such software, the web site I was visiting has an XSS >

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:23 AM, JohnS wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:14 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > If it makes you feel any safer I will go there and down load it on my > CentOS Desktop! BUT! If your running WINE Then that is another storie I > would NOT. No WINE here. I run Firefox

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:28:45 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > > Apparantely Windows can bork up after a while if the system files aren't on > > C:. I was thinking the Windows installer will see the linux partitions and > > try to name them C: and D: etc, thus Window

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > > My experience is that when browsing on any OS and you come across an > > error message stating that your computer is infected and you need to > > inst

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: >> >> > My experience is that when browsing on any OS and you come across an >> > error message stating that your comp

Re: [CentOS] Acrobat Reader 9 on Centos 4.7

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > > I have a copy of AdobeReader_enu-8.1.2-1.i486.rpm here, but I don't know if it > will work on Centos 4.  Never tried it. I found 8.1.3-1 of that in my yum cache and installed it, seems to be working OK. ___

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

on 4-17-2009 9:33 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Maltby > wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters >>> wrote: >>> My experience is that when browsing on any

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Robert Heller wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:21:01 -0400: > If MS-Windows can't install itself on the first drive (as seen by the > BIOS eg /dev/hda(1) or /dev/sda(1)), it won't install. I think it can install the system to the other drive, but it will want to write the bootloader on the first dri

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:47:26 -0400: > What makes you think mine is broken? because you didn't know who I replied to. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ Cen

[CentOS] problem with 5.3 upgrade or just bad timing?

I've been experiencing delays access data off my file server since I upgraded to 5.3... either I hosed something, have bad hardware or very unlikely, found a bug. When reading or writing data, the stream to the hdd's stops every 5-10 min and %iowait goes through the roof. I checked the logs and t

[CentOS] Threading and CentOS mailing list digest

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > John R Pierce wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:34:49 -0700: >> > odder, I don't see a "In-Reply-To:" header, so I dunno HOW it appears >> > threaded just fine. >> > > It's been put in the thread according to the time sequence because the > header you mention is missing. S

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:20:16 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert Heller wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:21:01 -0400: > > > If MS-Windows can't install itself on the first drive (as seen by the > > BIOS eg /dev/hda(1) or /dev/sda(1)), it won't install. > > I think it can install the syste

Re: [CentOS] Threading and CentOS mailing list digest

David G. Miller wrote: > What is happening is I get the CentOS mailing list in digest form. That > is, I get one e-mail each day with all of the previous day's posts. If > I notice a topic that I feel I can contribute to, I cut and paste an > appropriate e-mail from the digest and "reply" to t

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 14:43 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:20:16 +0200 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > > > Robert Heller wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:21:01 -0400: > > > > > If MS-Windows can't install itself on the first drive (as seen by the > > > BIOS eg /dev/hda(1)

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > on 4-17-2009 9:33 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Maltby >> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some > kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts > don't run, and some don't function at all. Not that it is a bad thing, it will > just

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Rob Townley wrote: > Remember the NeXT step days (for me, mid 90's) when a single > executable binary file contained both intel and PowerPC/Motorola code. >  When clicked, it would execute the intel code on the intel platform > and the PowerPC/Motorola code on the

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:07:31 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > > on 4-17-2009 9:33 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following: > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Maltby > >> wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:07:31 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva wrote: >> > on 4-17-2009 9:33 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following: >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Malt

[CentOS] failure to install python-tools

Anyone else having trouble when installing python-tools? sudo yum -y install python-tools Password: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile adobe-linux | 951 B 00:00 extras | 951 B 00:00 base | 1.1 kB 00:00 updates | 951 B 00:00 a

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS (fwd)

Doesn't look like my reply hit the list for some reason. -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:57 AM, John Doe wrote: > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=seamonkey+noscript+plugin&l=1  ;P > I am properly chastised - mea culpa Ccrow >>> Crow >>> Cow >>> Cw >>> C (gulp) mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS (fwd)

On Apr 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, "James A. Peltier" wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Ross Walker wrote: > >> I think it's worth while to keep xfs updated for a while until ext4 >> has made enough of an in-road to say xfs should be depreciated in >> favor of ext4. >> >> -Ross > > Considering that it s

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS (fwd)

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Ross Walker wrote: > Time to format isn't really an issue as it is done once before being > put into production. The biggest concern is processing performance and > time to fsck as well as data integrity and recoverability. Listen, when you're talking a multi TB or PB file sy

Re: [CentOS] Threading and CentOS mailing list digest

David G. Miller wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > What is happening is I get the CentOS mailing list in digest form. That > is, I get one e-mail each day with all of the previous day's posts. If > I notice a topic that I feel I can contribute to, I cut and paste an > appropriate e-mail from t

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some > kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts > don't run, and some don't function at all. Not that it is a bad thing, it will > just

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > >> Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some >> kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts >> don't run, and some don't function at all. Not that it is a

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > My problem with NoScript is that there is virtually no site that I visit > that does not require scripting to function properly.  The net result is > an almost knee-jerk reaction to click on "Allow all this page", which of > course negates

[CentOS] The law difference between country

Dear Madam or Sir, I live in Japan. So I must comply with the nation's law. When I install software for Linux, is there any easy way to know whether the the installation and use of the software is legal or not? Please teach me. Hiraki ___ CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] The law difference between country

Hidetsugu Hiraki wrote: > Dear Madam or Sir, > > I live in Japan. So I must comply with the nation's law. > When I install software for Linux, is there any easy way to know > whether the the installation and use of the software is legal or not? Worst case you can always use TurboLinux, been around

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > >> Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some >> kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts >> don't run, and some don't function at all. Not that it is a

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Robert Nichols > wrote: > >> My problem with NoScript is that there is virtually no site that I visit >> that does not require scripting to function properly. I think there is a mis-understanding of how noscript works. By default it blocks