Am trying to update my wine i get the following ..
[] download]# yum update wine*
Loading "priorities" plugin
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* epel: ftp.nluug.nl
* rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net
* base: ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de
* updates: ftp.halifax.rwt
> [] download]# yum update wine*
> Loading "priorities" plugin
Good.
> * epel: ftp.nluug.nl
> * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net
Trouble's ahead...
> 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Uhoh! Looks like you did not configure the priorities.
> ---> Package wine-cms.i386 0:
I have a problem with two entries in my /etc/fstab. When I boot the
machine, the disks are not mounted. When I give mount -a, all disks are
present without an error. Of course I don't want to manually do that
after each reboot. What can be the problem?
CentOS 5.2
cat /etc/fstab
/dev/vg/centos
Hi all,
I know some may find this OT, so please ignore this if you think it's
OT. I don't know any Linux-friendly Windows mailing lists / forums
that will even bother with Linux related questions.
I want to carry some data (client info, documents, photos, email,
accounting stuff, etc) with me on
Can you help me further in this issue, should i disable rpm forge ..
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Christoph Neuhaus wrote:
>> [] download]# yum update wine*
>> Loading "priorities" plugin
>
> Good.
>
>
>> * epel: ftp.nluug.nl
>> * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net
>
> Trouble's ahead...
>
> Can you help me further in this issue, should i disable rpm forge ..
1. Please don't top post.
2. You have to decide for yourself which repo you want to use for the wine
packages. Just don't mix them!
Chris
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> So, does anyone know how to access (read & write) to EXT3 from Windows?
Why bother? TrueCrypt is cross-platform and will work for your
needs.
John
--
"I'
Greetings,
I just downloaded the mmonit from mmonit.com site on my CentOS box
untarred-unizipped it.
As per the documentation, I dutifully typed
./bin/mmonit
and it is refusing to run. I am running this as root and SELinux is disabled.
running it with strace spews the following (in entireity):
From: Rajagopal Swaminathan
> As per the documentation, I dutifully typed ./bin/mmonit
> and it is refusing to run. I am running this as root and SELinux is disabled.
> ...
> (Permission denied)
> ...
> What am I missing here?
Did you check the file and directory permissions?
JD
_
i did with your suggestions, it works
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Christoph Neuhaus wrote:
>> Can you help me further in this issue, should i disable rpm forge ..
>
> 1. Please don't top post.
> 2. You have to decide for yourself which repo you want to use for the wine
> packages. Just don'
SOLVED!
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
Sorry for answering my own mail
Turns out that the location where the file is happens to be another
partition mounted with user option. And that enables noexec.
remounted the partition with exec option and thing
Theo Band wrote:
> I have a problem with two entries in my /etc/fstab. When I boot the
> machine, the disks are not mounted. When I give mount -a, all disks are
> present without an error. Of course I don't want to manually do that
> after each reboot. What can be the problem?
>
Turned out that
ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> My thoughts exactly
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> Of Noob Centos Admin
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:00 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting ready
> Can you swap the disk drives with a node that works OK?
i will try that when i get back to the data center and can swap the nodes.
> Have you compared BIOS setups? Something tells me this is like
> interrupts related. Could even be poorly seated hardware: memory, power
> or data cables, video,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
>
>> * vlans
>> * mstp or some well established form of per vlan spanning tree
>> * acl's
>> * port mirroring or what cisco calls span sessions
>> * snmp
>> * ssh enabled remote management
>> * support w/ updates and bugfixes
>>
>>
>> I need
Anne et al.,
I have been out for a while. Has any resolution to this occurred. I am
still interested in it working correctly
even though I seem to have a "kludge" sort of working, i.e. I can scan &
print, no fax but I can live with that.
roger wells
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 16 March 2009
Rob Townley schrieb:
>
> Every time i read these posts they are filled with contradictions in
> that one person loves HP and hates CiscoLinksys while another hates
> HP. Let's get a more scientific approach. Switch performance still
> depends on the NICS in the client machines.
Uhm. No. Not an
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 22:22 -0400, C Linus Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 00:39 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>
> > This seems it may be a bad memory issue. When star is running it is
> > causing a lot of io to be cached putting pressure on regions of memory
> > that might otherwise go unuse
On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Rob Townley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>>
>>> * vlans
>>> * mstp or some well established form of per vlan spanning tree
>>> * acl's
>>> * port mirroring or what cisco calls span sessions
>>> * snmp
>>> * ssh enabled remote m
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 15:22:19 Roger Wells wrote:
> Anne et al.,
> I have been out for a while. Has any resolution to this occurred. I am
> still interested in it working correctly
> even though I seem to have a "kludge" sort of working, i.e. I can scan &
> print, no fax but I can live with th
> Tier 2 might have Dell Powerconnects and HP Procurves and Cisco 2000
> series products. These are good stable well performing products and
> are gobbled up in heaps by small and medium businesses. These are the
> usual choice for small enterprises and come in managed and unmanaged,
> lay
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Switch performance is extremely difficult to measure IMO. You need
> enough clients to make sure you're not accidentally measuring
> client-performance.
There's also a lot more to switches than pure performance, line
rate switches have been around for at least a decade(swi
I have a small squirrelmail server using Postfix & Dovecot, and I
would like to add a web-based "status" screen to remotely check its
health. Is there a preferred packaged for doing this?
I mostly want to monitor disk space usage, and CPU utilization.
__
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Rob Townley schrieb:
>>
>> Every time i read these posts they are filled with contradictions in
>> that one person loves HP and hates CiscoLinksys while another hates
>> HP. Let's get a more scientific approach. Switch performance still
>
On Tue, March 24, 2009 12:02 pm, Xn Nooby wrote:
> I have a small squirrelmail server using Postfix & Dovecot, and I
> would like to add a web-based "status" screen to remotely check its
> health. Is there a preferred packaged for doing this?
>
> I mostly want to monitor disk space usage, and CPU u
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:59 AM, nate wrote:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>> Switch performance is extremely difficult to measure IMO. You need
>> enough clients to make sure you're not accidentally measuring
>> client-performance.
>
> There's also a lot more to switches than pure performance, line
Rob Townley schrieb:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Rainer Duffner
> wrote:
>
>> Rob Townley schrieb:
>>
>>> Every time i read these posts they are filled with contradictions in
>>> that one person loves HP and hates CiscoLinksys while another hates
>>> HP. Let's get a more scientif
on 3-24-2009 2:27 AM madunix spake the following:
> Can you help me further in this issue, should i disable rpm forge ..
>
You should at least properly configure priorities. ust having the plugin
running is not enough.
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
--
MailScanner is li
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Rob Townley schrieb:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Rainer Duffner
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Rob Townley schrieb:
>>>
Every time i read these posts they are filled with contradictions in
that one person loves HP and hates CiscoLink
Rob Townley wrote:
> i would not be surprised if most SOHO networks may not even have layer
> 2 manageablity.
> How do you know it isn't something to be concerned about unless you
> have data from various manufacturers and various NICs?
I don't deal with SOHO networks(outside of my own which only
Look there really are 3 tiers for network equipment. The first two
tiers all give wire speed performance and have managed layer 2 and 3
options. The last tier is for consumer home use.
Tier 1 might have high-end Cisco, Juniper or Nortel (and others) that
have modular enclosures redundant power s
dnk wrote:
> I had a reseller in here yesterday, and apparently the linksys (higher
> end) lines are being merged into the cisco lines. So the linksys gear
> will just be branded Cisco. I am not sure if this is all linksys gear,
> or just what they cal the higher end stuff. But I am trying to conf
Morten Torstensen wrote:
> Can gcc/make be distributed? Could people dedicate their CPU time ala
> SETI or fold...@home to test builds and compiles? I am not sure where
> the bottleneck is, and I know throwing money and manpower does not
> always help when it comes to software development :)
Th
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The $ the project receives goes for hardware and network connectivity.
That is not true.
Money donated to the project goes to sit in a pot. Resources that we use
to do things on and with are on machines that we ( developers, centos
team and contributors ) pay for, manage a
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Money donated to the project goes to sit in a pot. Resources that we use
> to do things on and with are on machines that we ( developers, centos
> team and contributors ) pay for, manage and run ourselves. CentOS does
> not subsidise or pay for any of it.
Just to clarify
On Tue, March 24, 2009 1:13 pm, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Money donated to the project goes to sit in a pot. Resources that we use
>> to do things on and with are on machines that we ( developers, centos
>> team and contributors ) pay for, manage and run ourselves. CentOS doe
on 3-24-2009 9:53 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
> Morten Torstensen wrote:
>> Can gcc/make be distributed? Could people dedicate their CPU time ala
>> SETI or fold...@home to test builds and compiles? I am not sure where
>> the bottleneck is, and I know throwing money and manpower does n
One thing to remember is that you usualy get what you paid for...
I found out the hard way when my boss pushed me to buy brand XYZ PowerC...
switches because they were a half the price of other brands/models.
It said "web-managed"... and it really meant web (only) managed (not even SSL
encrypted
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:18:58AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> And then maybe you can take a breath?
>
> You all are very appreciated. Don't let 10 or 20 (l)users make you
> think that the other million or so aren't happy!! ;-)
I certainly hope this isn't in response to those of us who have pipe
on 3-24-2009 7:30 AM Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) spake the following:
>> Can you swap the disk drives with a node that works OK?
>
> i will try that when i get back to the data center and can swap the nodes.
>
>
>> Have you compared BIOS setups? Something tells me this is like
>> interrupts related
Scott Silva wrote:
>> Also, were not getting ready for 5.4. were going to be getting ready for
>> 4.8 first, then a CentOS6 Beta and then a 5.4.
>
> And then maybe you can take a breath?
Thats a good point. One thing that I hope to work towards and I feel we
are getting setup to do is get a con
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 3-24-2009 9:53 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
>>
>> Also, were not getting ready for 5.4. were going to be getting ready for
>> 4.8 first, then a CentOS6 Beta and then a 5.4.
>
> And then maybe you can take a breath?
Yeah, no kidding. This is a lot of work, no mat
Quoting Xn Nooby :
> I have a small squirrelmail server using Postfix & Dovecot, and I
> would like to add a web-based "status" screen to remotely check its
> health. Is there a preferred packaged for doing this?
>
> I mostly want to monitor disk space usage, and CPU utilization.
> ___
Marko A. Jennings wrote:
>
> You might want to try munin: http://munin.projects.linpro.no/
> It is available through the rpmforge repo and is easy to set up.
It's also on EPEL, and that's a repository that tends to create fewer
issues.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#howtouse
--
Florin
Ross Walker wrote:
> Look there really are 3 tiers for network equipment. The first two
> tiers all give wire speed performance and have managed layer 2 and 3
> options. The last tier is for consumer home use.
>
> Tier 1 might have high-end Cisco, Juniper or Nortel (and others) that
> have mo
I'll get it from EPEL, since it is Fedora-sponsored.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Marko A. Jennings wrote:
>>
>> You might want to try munin: http://munin.projects.linpro.no/
>> It is available through the rpmforge repo and is easy to set up.
>
> It's also on EPEL, and
I have a small Squirrelmail server, using Postfix & Dovecot. I am
trying to limit the amount of mail a user can get. The
"mailbox_size_limit" value does not seem to be being honored. I am
using the Maildir directory format.
>From googling, it appears that "mailbox_size_limit" applies to a
single f
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
> I just downloaded the mmonit from mmonit.com site on my CentOS box
> untarred-unizipped it.
> As per the documentation, I dutifully typed
> ./bin/mmonit
> and it is refusing to run. I am running this as root and SELinux is disabled.
Xn Nooby wrote:
> How should I limit the Mailbox size of the users?
>
> I'm not very familiar with Linux "quotas", but I think that is my only
> other choice.
That is a good option, if you happen to be using Courier for your
IMAP/POP3 this option exists as well:
http://www.courier-mta.org/imap/R
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:09 AM, madunix wrote:
> Am trying to update my wine i get the following ..
> [] download]# yum update wine*
> Loading "priorities" plugin
> Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> * epel: ftp.nluug.nl
> * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net
>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The $ the project receives goes for hardware and network connectivity.
>
> That is not true.
>
> Money donated to the project goes to sit in a pot. Resources that we use
> to do things on and with are on machines that
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:09 AM, madunix wrote:
>> Am trying to update my wine i get the following ..
>> [] download]# yum update wine*
>> Loading "priorities" plugin
>> Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
>> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>> * epel: ftp.nluug.nl
>>
Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>> i am often not very
>> impressed by network performance and need standardized benchmarks to
>> figure out if there may be an issue at the NIC driver, switch or on up
>> to a virus shield. It was either a ~2004 Dell Power magazine or
>> ~2004 Network World article that
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009, nate wrote:
>Xn Nooby wrote:
>
>> How should I limit the Mailbox size of the users?
>>
>> I'm not very familiar with Linux "quotas", but I think that is my only
>> other choice.
>
>That is a good option, if you happen to be using Courier for your
>IMAP/POP3 this option exists
On Mar 24, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Karanbir Singh
wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The $ the project receives goes for hardware and network
>> connectivity.
>
> That is not true.
>
> Money donated to the project goes to sit in a pot. Resources that we
> use
> to do things on and with are on machin
Rob Townley writes:
> i would like to see real performance data via something like netperf
> with client machines booted from a standardized LiveCD, then
> peformance under their Linux Distribution and performance under
> Windows.
Performance data is not the most important metric, at least for
Luke S Crawford wrote:
>
>> i would like to see real performance data via something like netperf
>> with client machines booted from a standardized LiveCD, then
>> peformance under their Linux Distribution and performance under
>> Windows.
>
>
> Performance data is not the most important metric,
On Mar 24, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Luke S Crawford wrote:
>>
>>> i would like to see real performance data via something like netperf
>>> with client machines booted from a standardized LiveCD, then
>>> peformance under their Linux Distribution and performance under
>>> Windows.
>
Hi,
Im using CentOS 4.4 , and wanted to dock an application into my System
tray(without using any external tool like Alldock, etc,.).
Thanks,
Senthilraj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
60 matches
Mail list logo
