Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding

2009-03-22 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/21 John R Pierce : > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> HEAD / HEAD/1.1 >> Host: www.centos.org >> HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request > > its ... > > HEAD / HTML/1.1 > > ... not HEAD/1.1 I typed it wrong. Here's the example John Pierce gave me: HEAD / HTTP/1.1 Host: www.centos.org __

[CentOS] Backporting and Apache 2.0.52 is 4 1/2 years old

2009-03-22 Thread Rob Townley
http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_20.html states that Apache 2.0.52 is 4 years old and the latest version is 2.0.68. i am no longer a httpd expert, but at least one of the security fixes involves XSS attacks via malformed ftp commands. I also realize that redhat / centos may patch

Re: [CentOS] Backporting and Apache 2.0.52 is 4 1/2 years old

2009-03-22 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 22.03.2009 um 20:40 schrieb Rob Townley: > http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_20.html > > states that Apache 2.0.52 is 4 years old and the latest version is > 2.0.68. > i am no longer a httpd expert, but at least one of the security fixes > involves XSS attacks via malformed ft

Re: [CentOS] Backporting and Apache 2.0.52 is 4 1/2 years old

2009-03-22 Thread Les Mikesell
Rainer Duffner wrote: > Am 22.03.2009 um 20:40 schrieb Rob Townley: > >> http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_20.html >> >> states that Apache 2.0.52 is 4 years old and the latest version is >> 2.0.68. >> i am no longer a httpd expert, but at least one of the security fixes >> involv

Re: [CentOS] Backporting and Apache 2.0.52 is 4 1/2 years old

2009-03-22 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 3/22/09, Rob Townley wrote: > http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_20.html > states that Apache 2.0.52 is 4 years old and the latest version is 2.0.68. > i am no longer a httpd expert, but at least one of the security fixes > involves XSS attacks via malformed ftp commands. I also

[CentOS] SATA tape drive on 4.7

2009-03-22 Thread C Linus Hicks
I have gotten a hard system lockup several times using star on my system with a Quantum DLT-V4 SATA tape drive. I am including what got recorded in /var/log/messages from the most recent event showing stack trace. Output from uname -a: Linux lh10 2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jan 14 15:55:36 EST

Re: [CentOS] Backporting and Apache 2.0.52 is 4 1/2 years old

2009-03-22 Thread Rob Townley
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Rainer Duffner wrote: >> Am 22.03.2009 um 20:40 schrieb Rob Townley: >> >>> http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_20.html >>> >>> states that Apache 2.0.52 is 4 years old and the latest version is >>> 2.0.68. >>> i am no longer a ht

Re: [CentOS] SATA tape drive on 4.7

2009-03-22 Thread Ross Walker
On Mar 22, 2009, at 11:04 PM, C Linus Hicks wrote: > I have gotten a hard system lockup several times using star on my > system > with a Quantum DLT-V4 SATA tape drive. I am including what got > recorded > in /var/log/messages from the most recent event showing stack trace. > > Output from un

Re: [CentOS] How to add ClamAV to Postfix?

2009-03-22 Thread RobertH
the crash-hat ftp server for clamav has been older version & behind the times for a long time now. better to roll you own clamav or get it from sourceforge via dag and dries etc - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/m