Hi
Thanks for replying.
I have been looking at this one, I have only 2 problems with it:
1. Generate Nis maps I believe that this should be the command nismap create
-i 1 -g " " -y auto.master but i am unsure if this is correct for my
exercise since I need to generate for multiple ou, could som
Shadies and Mentlemen;
I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the
day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our
nightly backups as "sleep" is a sort of low power usage mode.
(At this point I would be curious to know the different levels of
sleep, what
> >> Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully
> >> current CentOS x86_64.
> >> Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have
> >>
> >> [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash
> >> flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386
> >> [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire
> >> firefox-3.0.
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:13 AM, James Bensley wrote:
I would assume it would be possible but I don't know how, does anyone
have any idea?
http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth
James Bensley wrote:
> Shadies and Mentlemen;
>
> I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the
> day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our
> nightly backups as "sleep" is a sort of low power usage mode.
>
> (At this point I would be curious to know th
Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe?
I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4?
Has this already been fixed?
What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4?
Thought maybe today we would start seeing 5.3 showing up... Looking
forward to it.
Jerry
___
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe?
Define 'safe'
> I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4?
No. You've read reports about applications that had relied on a
feature/bug of ext3 eating data when using ext4.
> Has this already been
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe?
> I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4?
> Has this already been fixed?
Like Jim said, not ext4's fault.
> What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4?
Ext4 (actually ext4dev) in 5.3 will be a preview an
At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> James Bensley wrote:
> > Shadies and Mentlemen;
> >
> > I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the
> > day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our
> > nightly backups as "sleep" is
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>
>> James Bensley wrote:
>>
>>> Shadies and Mentlemen;
>>>
>>> I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the
>>> day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for o
From: James Bensley Sent: March 19, 2009 04:13
>
> I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the
> day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our
> nightly backups as "sleep" is a sort of low power usage mode.
I can not comment on how to do what your aski
Hi all,
I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context:
system_u:object_r:var_t
Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a
different context. So I tried to set e.g.:
semanage fcontext -a -t samba_share_t /srv/samba
/sbin/restorecon -v /srv/samba
but
At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:07:33 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> James Bensley wrote:
> >>
> >>> Shadies and Mentlemen;
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to be green and put our backup serve
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: James Bensley Sent: March 19, 2009 04:13
>
>> I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the
>> day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our
>> nightly backups as "sleep" is a sort of low power usage mode.
>>
>
> I
Theo Band wrote:
> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
>> From: James Bensley Sent: March 19, 2009 04:13
>>
>>
>>> I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the
>>> day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our
>>> nightly backups as "sleep" is a sort o
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context:
>
> system_u:object_r:var_t
>
> Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a
> different context. So I tried to set e.g.:
>
> semanage fcontext -a -t samba_share_t /srv
Ned Slider wrote:
> Marcus Moeller wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context:
>>
>> system_u:object_r:var_t
>>
>> Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a
>> different context. So I tried to set e.g.:
>>
>> semanage fcontex
Dear Ned.
>
> You may also need to manually change the context first:
>
> chcon -v --type=samba_share_t /srv/samba
chcon did the trick.
Thanks a lot
Marcus
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Dear Ned.
>
>> You may also need to manually change the context first:
>>
>> chcon -v --type=samba_share_t /srv/samba
>
> chcon did the trick.
>
> Thanks a lot
> Marcus
semanage will make the changes persistent through a complete filesystem
relabel (chcon will persist t
A. Kirillov wrote:
Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully
current CentOS x86_64.
Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have
[rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash
flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386
[rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire
firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i3
Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad .
i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300
evrey thing seems to be running very slow.
any help would be welcome
thanx
Sumit
___
CentOS m
On Thursday 19 March 2009, sumit agarwal wrote:
> Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad .
> i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300
> evrey thing seems to be running very slow.
> any help would be welcome
How did you deci
HI Peter,
thx for the reply.
I will update that soon on getting my network or wifi working.but can still
not reason why this should be so slow.
2009/3/19 Peter Kjellstrom
> On Thursday 19 March 2009, sumit agarwal wrote:
> > Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
on 3-19-2009 9:12 AM sumit agarwal spake the following:
> Hi,
> �� � �i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad .
> �� � �i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300
> �� � �evrey thing seems to be running very slow.
> �� � �any help would be welcome
>
>
On 3/16/09, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
> webmaster should happen to read this...
They (Layered Tech or Level3) fixed the problem the other day. I have
been checkin
hi thinkpad has a SATA drive?
Is the bios set to AHCI mode and not emulating PATA?
how can i fix this?
2009/3/19 Scott Silva
> on 3-19-2009 9:12 AM sumit agarwal spake the following:
> > Hi,
> > �� � �i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad .
> > �� � �i have enough ram ie 2 g
on 3-19-2009 11:22 AM sumit agarwal spake the following:
> hi
> thinkpad has a SATA drive?
> Is the bios set to AHCI mode and not emulating PATA?
> how can i fix this?
>
Are there options in the bios as to how the hard drive is accessed?
Which thinkpad do you have?
--
MailScanner is like de
i have R61 7742 -CTO i can set my bios to achi or compatible mode currently
its on compatibllity modei dont think achi mode is detected.
2009/3/19 Scott Silva
> on 3-19-2009 11:22 AM sumit agarwal spake the following:
> > hi
> > thinkpad has a SATA drive?
> > Is the bios set to AHCI mode and
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>
> working fine
2009/3/19 sumit agarwal
> i have R61 7742 -CTO i can set my bios to achi or compatible mode currently
> its on compatibllity modei dont think achi mode is detected.
>
>
>
>
> 2009/3/19 Scott Silva
>
>> on 3-19-2009 11:22 AM sumit agarwal spake the following:
>>
>> > hi
>> > thinkpad has a SATA
on 3-19-2009 12:03 PM sumit agarwal spake the following:
> i have R61 7742 -CTO i can set my bios to achi or compatible mode
> currently its on compatibllity mode
> i dont think achi mode is detected.
>
If you switch to ACHI, does the windows partition still work?
If yes, why not download the 5.2
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07:15PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Russ: Same problem with the centos.org web site again from my end. I
> did go to IRC, as you suggested, and sent a message to #centos-web
> several minutes ago. Didn't see anyone else there. I hope someone will
> reopen the Trouble Tic
2009/3/19 Tru Huynh :
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07:15PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Russ: Same problem with the centos.org web site again from my end. I
>> did go to IRC, as you suggested, and sent a message to #centos-web
>> several minutes ago. Didn't see anyone else there. I hope someone wi
I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes
(with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a
system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into
the system behind the FW.
Now if i connect to the IP (sine the public one is shared),
dnk wrote:
> I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes
> (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a
> system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into
> the system behind the FW.
>
> Now if i connect to the IP (sine the p
On 19-Mar-09, at 4:01 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> dnk wrote:
>> I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes
>> (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a
>> system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into
>> the system behind the
Are these on the same ip, but different ports? I suggest setting up two
different hostnames.
Russ
--Original Message--
From: dnk
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS Mailing list
ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list
Sent: Mar 19, 2009 6:53 PM
Subject: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, an
I posed a question about this a while back, and Kai found the problem
and sent this workaround:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Kai Vehmanen
> Date: Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM
> Subject: broken lame/mp3 output (was: Re: Problem with ecasound on CentOS
> 5.2, x86_64)
> To: MHR
On 19-Mar-09, at 4:07 PM, r...@vshift.com wrote:
> Are these on the same ip, but different ports? I suggest setting up
> two different hostnames.
>
> Russ
> --Original Message--
> From: dnk
> Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
> To: CentOS Mailing list
> ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list
I'm (finally) getting around to putting a backup LDAP authentication
server on my network. The backup uses syncrepl to grab the database,
and to my eyes both LDAP servers answer read queries identically.
I'm testing the client side of this configuration on virtual CentOS 5
i386 machine. /etc/ld
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> I'm (finally) getting around to putting a backup LDAP authentication
> server on my network. The backup uses syncrepl to grab the database,
> and to my eyes both LDAP servers answer read queries identically.
>
> I'm testing the client side of
42 matches
Mail list logo
