I have 2Gbs DDR 2 Ram and swap part of appro 1957 Mbs as I feel i
should have Swap Partition of 4 Gbs for a 2 Gbs Ram yes I am hosting
about 12 sites and domains
on Name-based Virtual Hosts, I got it I have to add some more Gbs of Ram.
one more thing on this system there are lost of cron jobs acti
This is kind of a new area for me so I thought I would get the lists opinion.
I have a avi video that I need to edit. The main thing that I need to
accomplish is to maybe cut the top 1/3 of the frame and blur out a few
faces. What would you guys recommend for an app that would accomplish
this? Than
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Bo Lynch wrote:
> This is kind of a new area for me so I thought I would get the lists opinion.
> I have a avi video that I need to edit. The main thing that I need to
> accomplish is to maybe cut the top 1/3 of the frame and blur out a few
> faces. What would you
Michael Peterson wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:44:43 -0500:
> What do you mean by this?
> Is this because you changed the original post and you thought I was
> replying to the other part of the original post.
Sorry? I did not "change" anything. You replied to *my* posting with
questions to the o
>+ /home/drew/bin/MegaCli -AdpPRSetDelay 168 -a0
>^MInvalid input at or near token -AdpPRSetDelay
>
>Doesn't like the syntax
Looks like the manual is outdated, you should have
ran a -h :)
Turns out this is the correct syntax:
MegaCli -AdpPR -Dsbl|EnblAuto|EnblMan|Start|Stop|Info|{SetDelay Val}
On Wed, March 11, 2009 8:30 am, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Bo Lynch
> wrote:
>> This is kind of a new area for me so I thought I would get the lists
>> opinion.
>> I have a avi video that I need to edit. The main thing that I need to
>> accomplish is to maybe cut the top
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Bo Lynch wrote:
> On Wed, March 11, 2009 8:30 am, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Bo Lynch
>> wrote:
>>> This is kind of a new area for me so I thought I would get the lists
>>> opinion.
>>> I have a avi video that I need to edit. The main th
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>+ /home/drew/bin/MegaCli -AdpPRSetDelay 168 -a0
>>^MInvalid input at or near token -AdpPRSetDelay
>>
>>Doesn't like the syntax
>
> Looks like the manual is outdated, you should have
> ran a -h :)
>
Hmm.
I've seen a bunch of bad syntax in
>I have loaded cinelerra from rpmforge but I'm having a really hard time
>getting the avi to even show up in it.
I don't know cinelerra, and if you can believe, I don't have a single CentOS
box w/ a desktop but I would presume you have to demux the audio and video
into separate files as that is h
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:35:43 +
> From: Karanbir Singh
> Subject: [CentOS-announce] Services outage for : projects.centos.org
>
> Starting at 2300 UTC Mar 11 2009, there will be 2 (two) hours of
> outage for all services host
Life is much better now that I'm using -h instead of the manual.
I have a new question about policies
Direct and DisDskCache makes sense
Cached and EnDiskCache makes sense
not so sure about
Directand EnDskCache
Cached and DisDsk Cache
Do they make sense?
--
Drew Einhorn
___
Linux Advocate wrote:
>> The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD,
>> ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive.
>>
>>
> if you could install centos 3 on this hardware, then centos 5.x should
> work...any error messages from the console?
>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Joseph L. Casale
>
> Last time I heard of cinelerra, I looked at the docs and they looked very
> good.
I've tried it. Alas, it would crash so often that it was unusable.
I've used Kino a little. It didn't crash but I haven't done much with
it besides re-arrange
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 18:07:26 Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Joseph L. Casale
>
> > Last time I heard of cinelerra, I looked at the docs and they looked very
> > good.
>
> I've tried it. Alas, it would crash so often that it was unusable.
> I've used Kino a little. It d
>Life is much better now that I'm using -h instead of the manual.
>
>I have a new question about policies
>
>Direct and DisDskCache makes sense
>Cached and EnDiskCache makes sense
>
>not so sure about
>
>Directand EnDskCache
>Cached and DisDsk Cache
>
>Do they make sense?
I believe Cached|Di
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 09 March 2009 13:40, John Doe wrote:
>
there's
also:
rpm -qa dbus-python\*
to check that something is installed.
>>> That simply returns
>>> dbus-python-0.70-7.el5
>>>
>> In case you did not try it already, have you trie
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>Life is much better now that I'm using -h instead of the manual.
>>
>>I have a new question about policies
>>
>>Direct and DisDskCache makes sense
>>Cached and EnDiskCache makes sense
>>
>>not so sure about
>>
>>Direct and EnDskCache
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 3/10/09, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
>>
>>> I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve my
>>> problem.
>>> I have not tried any other search engines yet.
>>> There is not a search fo
John R Pierce wrote:
> Michael Peterson wrote:
>
>> The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD,
>> ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive.
>>
>>
>
> probably more important than any of the data you've given there is, what
> chipset on the
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
>
>> I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve my problem.
>> I have not tried any other search engines yet.
>> There is not a search for the CentOS list so I am creating a new post.
>>
On 3/11/09, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Joseph L. Casale
>> Last time I heard of cinelerra, I looked at the docs and they looked very
>> good.
>
> I've tried it. Alas, it would crash so often that it was unusable.
> I've used Kino a little. It didn't crash but I haven't d
on 3-11-2009 1:44 PM Michael Peterson spake the following:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
>>
>>> I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve my problem.
>>> I have not tried any other search engines yet.
>>> There is
I've been experiencing some intermittent problems accessing at NetApp
server via NFS and automount. I'm running CentOS 5.2 (fully updated)
on all my servers and workstations. Usually, everything is working
just fine, when suddenly we get the following error:
/bin/sh: /home/epd/srcref/sw
Hello,
I noticed something unusual today.
If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
I'm using.
I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 and i386:
$ echo test >test.txt
$ ls -l test.txt
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed something unusual today.
>
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
>
> I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 an
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hello,
I noticed something unusual today.
If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
I'm using.
I tried this on several CentOS 5 machine
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> $ echo test >test.txt
>> $ ls -l test.txt
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 filbranden filbranden 5 Mar 11 17:24 test.txt
>> $ du -h test.txt
>> 8.0K test.txt
>
>> I could not find any differences that would explain the behaviour.
>> Have you seen this before? Can you reproduce it on
On Wed, March 11, 2009 5:51 pm, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed something unusual today.
>>
>> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
>> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
>> I'm u
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed something unusual today.
>
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
>
> I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 and
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:23 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
>
># sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_mem
>net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 98304131072 196608
># sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_rmem
>net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 409687380 4194304
># sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_wmem
>net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096
> So these seem fine to me (i.e., the max is greater than 32768). Is
> there an NFS (as opposed to TCP) setting I should be tweaking? Any
> ideas why the NetApp is issuing those warnings? Any other
> suggestions on how to debug this problem?
Sounds like a very interesting problem. The
how do I prevent gnome_panel from starting up?
once its started I can do "gnome-session-remove gnome_panel"
But I dont want it to startup at all.
How can I do that?
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Michael Peterson
wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
>>
>>> I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve
>>> my problem.
>>> I have not tried any other search engines yet.
>>> There is
On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Alfred von Campe
wrote:
> I've been experiencing some intermittent problems accessing at NetApp
> server via NFS and automount. I'm running CentOS 5.2 (fully updated)
> on all my servers and workstations. Usually, everything is working
> just fine, when suddenly w
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:29 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed something unusual today.
>
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
>
> I tried this on severa
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 17:29, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
> file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
> I'm using.
Found it! It's not related to CentOS 4 or 5 (I found a C4 machine in
which sm
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Found it! It's not related to CentOS 4 or 5 (I found a C4 machine in
> which small files took 8kb of diskspace and a C5 machine in which
> small files took 4kb). It's related to SELinux being enabled or not.
> Casually most of my C4 machines had SELinux disabled and mo
38 matches
Mail list logo
