Hello,
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Brian McKerr wrote:
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd316373.aspx
thank you, I have the forward zones replicated from the
prim. DNS hosted at our Windows DC fine with this config:
# cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
# rpm -qa|grep
But the replication of the reverse zone doesn't work yet - I get
errors:
named[30219]: zone 42.121.10.in-addr.arpa/IN: refresh:
unexpected rcode (NXDOMAIN) from master 10.121.42.40#53 (source
0.0.0.0#0)
Maybe I need to use some other name there?
I'm reading out on "dig" tool currently, t
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Alain RICHARD
wrote:
> >But the replication of the reverse zone doesn't work yet - I get errors:
>
> >named[30219]: zone 42.121.10.in-addr.arpa/IN: refresh:
> >unexpected rcode (NXDOMAIN) from master 10.121.42.40#53 (source 0.0.0.0#0)
> You need to authorize the r
I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
same names and all. No go.
So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf file, fire
up SWAT and did the most basic config.
Even chmod 777 the dir
Ok, figured it out:
# cat /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf
options { directory "/var/named"; };
zone "internal.mycompany.com" IN {
type slave;
file "slaves/internal.mycompany.com";
masters { 10.121.42.40 port 53;};
check-names ignore;
};
zone "121.10.in-addr.arpa"
Ed Donahue wrote:
> vi /etc/init.d
>
> cahnge the number 5 to 3
>
> reboot
>
> fix driver
>
> change the 3 to 5
>
> reboot
or
# telinit 3
# compile whatever
# telinit 5
No reboot needed.
--
//Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi
I am trying to get a non privileged user to update config files for
apache httpd and have attempted the following:
I have set the following permissions:
setfacl -m user:deployer:--x /etc/httpd
setfacl -R -m u:deployer:rwx,o::--- /etc/httpd/conf.d
setfacl -R -m u:deployer:rwx,o::--- /etc/http
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> This again reflects my original experience with SELinux: massive
> resource hog and this is just a lowly loaded webserver. Naturally it
> seems to me that this doesn't seem like it should be the norm.
You do not need setroubleshoot to run selinux, so your comment up ther
>
> What would be the recommended practise for moving files own by a
> different user to another user if not via su and cp/mv?
>
rarely do we have root access to the machines, and make frequent use of scp
a group directory is really handy too
___
CentOS
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 17:46 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
> another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
> same names and all. No go.
>
> So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf fil
From: "gerhardus.geldenh...@gta-travel.com"
> I then have a script that is run as the deployer user to checkout config
> files from svn and copies it to /etc/httpd directory in the following
> way:
> cd /tmp/versioned-config;
> cp -Rfp --backup --suffix=.$(date +%F_%T) apache/etc/ /
>
> However
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
> another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
> same names and all. No go.
>
> So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf file, fire
> up SWAT and did the most
I am doing the following commands to "hide" the top and bottom panels on
gnome.
gconftool-2 -t int --list-type int --set
/apps/panel/toplevels/top_panel/auto_hide_size 0
gconftool-2 -t bool --list-type bool --set
/apps/panel/toplevels/top_panel/auto_hide true
gconftool-
What I say this as the compatibility of the system with hundreds dell
server, this is 100% with ADM processors, or not:
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi
I just installed CentOS 5.2 (x86_64), and everything was fine. After
installing the "epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm", and issuing "yum
check-update", I can see that "epel" is trying to upgrade to version 5.3.
First I didn't notice the problem, and after upgrading, I got the
message "error suma
Hi
When adding priority to a repo, like rpmforge or epel, is it better to
give the same priority or can give different priority to different
repos, ranking them?
thanks
Marcelo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
On 3/6/09, r...@zoioroxo.com.br wrote:
> What I say this as the compatibility of the system with hundreds dell
> server, this is 100% with ADM processors, or not:
Do you have a particular Dell Server in mind? What version of CentOS?
32 bit or 64 bit?
¿Tiene un Servidor de Dell? ¿Que modelo?
Reply
Hi List,
On one of our CentOS 5 (x64_86) servers, identical to a number of
other systems, I'm seeing some processes / services failing to run,
along with the following error in /var/log/messages:
Mar 2 23:25:07 someHostname kernel: wrapper-linux-x[24448] general
protection rip:805
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 15:02 +, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> Hi
>
> When adding priority to a repo, like rpmforge or epel, is it better to
> give the same priority or can give different priority to different
> repos, ranking them?
The purpose if priorities is to do exactly that: prevent highe
On 3/6/09, r...@zoioroxo.com.br wrote:
> What I say this as the compatibility of the system with hundreds dell
> server, this is 100% with ADM processors, or not:
FYI: It is not a good idea to be sending/reading email if you are
logged in as root. Do your email when you are logged in as a regular
On 3/6/09, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> I just installed CentOS 5.2 (x86_64), and everything was fine. After
> installing the "epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm", and issuing "yum
> check-update", I can see that "epel" is trying to upgrade to version 5.3.
>
> First I didn't notice the problem, and after u
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:26:54AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 3/6/09, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> > I just installed CentOS 5.2 (x86_64), and everything was fine. After
> > installing the "epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm", and issuing "yum
> > check-update", I can see that "epel" is trying to upgr
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 09:59 -0500, J Potter wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> On one of our CentOS 5 (x64_86) servers, identical to a number of
> other systems, I'm seeing some processes / services failing to run,
> along with the following error in /var/log/messages:
>
> Mar 2 23:25:07 someHostna
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> Hi
>
> When adding priority to a repo, like rpmforge or epel, is it better to
> give the same priority or can give different priority to different
> repos, ranking them?
Even better - leave them disabled by default and install/update specific
packages with --enablere
I'm trying to get hplip-2.7.12 installed, and I'm reasonably sure that I had
it installed on this box before my problems last month. Anyway, it will not
build at the moment. It stops the Configure with "configure: error: "cannot
find libjpeg support". However,
Package libjpeg - 6b-37.i386 is
From: Anne Wilson
> I'm trying to get hplip-2.7.12 installed, and I'm reasonably sure that I had
> it installed on this box before my problems last month. Anyway, it will not
> build at the moment. It stops the Configure with "configure: error: "cannot
> find libjpeg support". However,
> wa
Hello All,
Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
my most International subscribed groups.
I am looking for a recommendation for a domain name registrar I can
register my .co.za domain name with that won't 'yank my chains'. I
tried a couple attempts at registerin
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009, Glenn wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
>my most International subscribed groups.
>
>I am looking for a recommendation for a domain name registrar I can
>register my .co.za domain name with that won't 'yank my chains'
.0.16-3.c4.3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/libpng10-devel-1.0.16-3.c4.3.s390x.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size:
2009/3/6 Bill Campbell
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009, Glenn wrote:
> >Hello All,
> >
> >Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
> >my most International subscribed groups.
> >
> >I am looking for a recommendation for a domain name registrar I can
> >register my .co.za doma
The systems will be operating the Center 5.2 32-bit, below the model, one
will doubt that the system of controlling the media to do a RAID 0+1
PowerEdge SC1435 Processor AMD Opteron 2344HE Quad Core (1.7 GHz, 4x512
KB L2 cache, 1 GHz HyperTransport) - BRH8835 edit
Memory 8GB Memory, 667MHz (4x
Glenn wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
> my most International subscribed groups.
>
> I am looking for a recommendation for a domain name registrar I can
> register my .co.za domain name with that won't 'yank my chains'. I
> tried a co
At 12:01 PM 3/6/2009, you wrote:
>2009/3/6 Bill Campbell
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009, Glenn wrote:
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
> > >my most International subscribed groups.
> > >
> > >I am looking for a recommendation for a doma
Anne Wilson wrote:
> I'm trying to get hplip-2.7.12 installed, and I'm reasonably sure that I had
> it installed on this box before my problems last month. Anyway, it will not
> build at the moment. It stops the Configure with "configure: error: "cannot
> find libjpeg support". However,
>
>
could you please stay in your thread?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ray Van Dolson wrote on Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:30:09 -0800:
> While it's certainly a good idea to use yum-priorities, EPEL policy is
> such that its repository does not (should not) contain packages that
> conflict with base OS packages.
Would you really bet on that? I certainly won't. With no repo.
I have a test system: Centos 5.2 on an OQO, that has been hanging
hard. I have to unplug it and pull the battery so I can then cold start it.
This last time all I did was open a terminal window and SU to root, then
start the lastest build of SIP Communicator (which uses JRE 1.6.0_10).
I was
Glenn wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
> my most International subscribed groups.
>
> I am looking for a recommendation for a domain name registrar I can
> register my .co.za domain name with that won't 'yank my chains'. I
> tried a co
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>Right now I only have to do this for VMWare's drivers, I
>>build custom RPMs of the drivers and the tools and push
>>them out when I push out a new kernel so I don't need to
>>worry about this kind of thing.
>
> That's a cool idea...
> Care to share those two spec files? :
On Friday 06 March 2009 12:25:31 Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
> Glenn wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
> > my most International subscribed groups.
> >
> > I am looking for a recommendation for a domain name registrar I can
> > register
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:07:12AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] programs with no man pages?
Upstream (debian then Fedora ) there seems to be a man page.
SS(8)SS(8)
NAME
ss - another utility to investigate
I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID
(and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in
the mkinitrd package that causes it to enter an endless loop when there
are /dev/mapper/ devices present during the install process. There is a
patch to mki
Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:07:12AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] programs with no man pages?
> Upstream (debian then Fedora ) there seems to be a man page.
>
> SS(8)SS(8)
>
> NAME
Robert Heller napsal(a):
> I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID
> (and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in
> the mkinitrd package that causes it to enter an endless loop when there
> are /dev/mapper/ devices present during the install
on 3-6-2009 1:46 AM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
> I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
> another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
> same names and all. No go.
>
> So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf file
on 3-6-2009 9:23 AM r...@zoioroxo.com.br spake the
following:
> The systems will be operating the Center 5.2 32-bit, below the model, one
> will doubt that the system of controlling the media to do a RAID 0+1
>
>
> PowerEdge SC1435 Processor AMD Opteron � 2344HE Quad Core (1.7 GHz, 4x512
> KB L2
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:53 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 3-6-2009 1:46 AM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
> > I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
> > another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
> > same names and all. No go.
> >
>
47 matches
Mail list logo
