[CentOS] Errors using custom install disk

2009-03-04 Thread John Kennedy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (Sorry if this is a dupe. Sent originally from unregistered email address) All, I am trying to make a custom install CD for CentOS 5.2. I am building the iso in a VirtualBox image and testing the iso in another VirtualBox image so I don't keep wasting

[CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?

2009-03-04 Thread Marten Lehmann
Hello, I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for multiple architectures are installed: yum install sqlite-devel Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.intergenia.de * updates: centos.intergenia.de * addons: centos

Re: [CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?

2009-03-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Marten Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for > multiple architectures are installed: See, for example, for a solution: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=17812 > Thats pretty annoy

Re: [CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?

2009-03-04 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:47:51 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hello, > > I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for > multiple architectures are installed: This is normal for a 64-bit Intel/AMD flavored system. You have both the 64-bit libraries and the 32-bit

Re: [CentOS] Need Broadcom 4311 firmware for CentOS 5

2009-03-04 Thread Robert Nichols
Robert Heller wrote: > At Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:29:48 -0600 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> Any hope of getting my laptop's Broadcom BCM94311 wireless running >> on CentOS 5? I find lots of references to using fwcutter to get >> the needed firmware from Windows drivers, but there's a Catch-22:

[CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

2009-03-04 Thread Maxim Odinintsev
Good Day! We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully on CentOS 4.5. This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will be solved in version 5.3? Sorry for my English ;( -- wbr - Ma

Re: [CentOS] 32 or 64 bit (4 gb ram)

2009-03-04 Thread dnk
On 3-Mar-09, at 3:01 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 03.03.2009 um 23:57 schrieb Jerry Franz: > >> >> >> >> Paul Hussein wrote: >>> there still doesnt seem to be a 64bit java plugin >> >> You can use the 32bit plugin if you change the launcher script to >> launch >> the 32 bit version of firefox

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

2009-03-04 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-4-2009 6:49 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following: > Good Day! > > We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server > with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully > on CentOS 4.5. > This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

2009-03-04 Thread Maxim Odinintsev
Scott Silva wrote: > Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. > Hello Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to reinstall. Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which OS install on its, withou

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

2009-03-04 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-4-2009 8:25 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following: > Scott Silva wrote: >> Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. >> > Hello > > Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to > reinstall. > Now we want to buy some new server

Re: [CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?

2009-03-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:47:51 +0100 Marten Lehmann wrote: > How can I get rid of it? If all you need exists in x86_64, there is no need to use i386 packages. You may try to uninstall all all non x86_64 and noarch packages (doing test run first): rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}.%{ARCH}\n" | grep -v 'x86_64

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

2009-03-04 Thread Ross Walker
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Maxim Odinintsev wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: >> Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. >> > Hello > > Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to > reinstall. > Now we want to buy some new servers

[CentOS] Centos 5.x SElinux issues

2009-03-04 Thread Chuck Campbell
I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday. I took the default selinux configuration. After that I ran yum update and found 600 plus updates and installs. I let it go to do the updates and during that process I saw a large number of issues in the selinux troubleshooter. I also

[CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread Todd Cary
When doing my updates, I got this message: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0. 13.EL;49a Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server that sits in the corner and does it's job of faithfully providing services without me touching it ex

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread Spiro Harvey
> The result is that I have forgotten my > Linux know how! and your google know-how. I just googled it and got bucketloads of results. Maybe you should try that. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz signature.asc Descriptio

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: > When doing my updates, I got this message: > > error: unpacking of archive failed on > file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0. > 13.EL;49a > > Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server > that sits in the corner and does

Re: [CentOS] ext3 heavy file fragmentation with NFS write

2009-03-04 Thread Nifty Cluster Mitch
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:31:01AM +0100, Andrzej Szymański wrote: > > Does anybody know how to avoid the file fragmentation when a file is > created over NFSv3? > > A file created locally is OK: > dd bs=32k if=/dev/zero of=test count=32x1024 conv=fsync > filefrag test > test: 10 extents found,

[CentOS] Olivier Castien/Roncq/Infofrance/FRA/TZG est absent.

2009-03-04 Thread Olivier_Castien
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 04/03/2009 de retour le 09/03/2009. Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez contacter l'équipe technique d'infofrance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.x SElinux issues

2009-03-04 Thread Phil Schaffner
Chuck Campbell wrote: > I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday. > I took the default selinux configuration. > > After that I ran yum update and found 600 plus updates and installs. That's a lot of updates. Do you really mean CentOS 5 rather than 5.2? > I let it go to do th

[CentOS] HPLIP 3.9.2

2009-03-04 Thread Roger Wells
on Centos 5.2 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus Has anyone gotten HPLIP 3.9.2 to work? If so what was done about python-dbus and PyQt4-dbus? They don't seem to included after installing PyQt4-4.4, sip 4.4.5, and hplip 3.9.2. thanks, roger wells -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, R

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread Todd Cary
Bill - Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed, *but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them. Here is a sample: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1310809 Mar 17 2008 initrd-2.6.9

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 14:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: > Bill - > > Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now > there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed, > *but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them. > > Here is a samp

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:38:45 -0800 Todd Cary wrote: > Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now > there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed, > *but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them. # yum install yum-utils # p

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread Todd Cary
Bill - I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on how many to remove? Todd William L. Maltby wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: When doing my updates, I got this message

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.x SElinux issues

2009-03-04 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Chuck Campbell wrote: > I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday. If you really updated from 5.0 to 5.2 ... > I took the default selinux configuratio > **Unmatched Entries** (Only first 10 out of 49031 are printed) > audit: audit_backlog=262 > audit_backlog_limit=256 > aud

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-4-2009 2:48 PM Todd Cary spake the following: > Bill - > > I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then > enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on how > many to remove? > > Todd > > William L. Maltby wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0

Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?

2009-03-04 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 14:48 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: > Bill - > > I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then > enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on > how many to remove? I suspect you have a minor mess-up in /etc/yum.conf (man yum.conf). II

Re: [CentOS] HPLIP 3.9.2

2009-03-04 Thread Mark Pryor
--- On Wed, 3/4/09, Roger Wells wrote: > From: Roger Wells > Subject: [CentOS] HPLIP 3.9.2 > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 1:26 PM > on Centos 5.2 > 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus > > Has anyone gotten HPLIP 3.9.2 to work? If so what was > done > about pyth

[CentOS] head scratcher update

2009-03-04 Thread Craig White
perhaps my mind isn't working today. I'm trying to update a system that hasn't been updated in a while which I believe is CentOS 5.2 but it's possible that it's 5.1. I am pretty sure that it has php installed from CentOS-Extras and when I do yum update, it's stumbling on php --> Finished Dependen

Re: [CentOS] head scratcher update

2009-03-04 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:42 -0700, Craig White wrote: > perhaps my mind isn't working today. > > I'm trying to update a system that hasn't been updated in a while which > I believe is CentOS 5.2 but it's possible that it's 5.1. I am pretty > sure that it has php installed from CentOS-Extras and wh

[CentOS] gnet-2.0, gio-2.0

2009-03-04 Thread Ondrej Filip
I asked on Saturday and I didn't get reply. I'm trying again. I'm porting one project to centos where we use gnet and gio libraries. Will be these libraries part of centos in future? I'm not sure what relationship is between these libraries and glib. Regards Ondrej Filip