Re: [CentOS] realtime backup

CentOS List schrieb: >> For a speedy backup, could put the db on LVM. Then your procedure >> > would > >> be shutdown/freeze db, make lv snapshot, startup/unfreeze db, >> rsync/backup data, remove snapshot. >> > That's what I'd suggest too, but

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

From: James B. Byrne > I have a USB meory key (Kingston) that I formally used with a > CentOS-5.2 (32bit) system. When I plug it into a connector slot the > light on the key comes on but there are no entries created in /media > and no entries made to the /var/log/messages file. Maybe not enough

Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start

On Wednesday 18 February 2009 23:36:33 Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 20:25:44 Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Anne Wilson > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 18:50:03 Lann

Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? (update)

Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 14:09, Alain Terriault wrote: > removing all my centos+ kernels and using kmod on top of redhat kernels > fix my nfs lock problem. Do you mean you replaced the CentOS-Plus kernel with a kernel from RedHat? Or are you using a CentOS-Base (instead of Plus) kernel now?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap

Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET wrote: > I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new > SATA disk, the system don't detects it . > > Any idea of what the problem is? Even though it's hotplug, you have to give Linux a command so that it will sca

Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars

And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. :-( Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock

Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:08, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am trying to hwclock to set the time. (hwclock -w) > this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. > hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device. > Any thoughts? Do you have SELinux enabled? Have you checked /var/log/audit/aud

Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock

> > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:08, Jerry Geis > wrote: > >/ I am trying to hwclock to set the time. (hwclock -w) > />/ this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. > />/ hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device. > />/ Any tho

Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars

On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:31:59 Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome > and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. > Not the same at all. You try doing a recovery from a screwed-up windows registry. I

Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars

On 19/02/2009, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:31:59 Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome > > and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. > > > Not the same at all. You try doing a reco

[CentOS] help with alternatives

I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives. First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set itself up as an alternative? But second, if I was to configure it myself, the syntax is a

Re: [CentOS] help with alternatives

On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: > I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 > system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives. > > First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set > itself up as an alternative? > >

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for abackup server?

> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid > config for abackup server? > > Hi there, > > I am currently setting up a server that will house my > backups (simply > > using rsync). > > > > This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max > > drive space

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

Message-ID: <499cc7d9.9050...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:15:45 +0530, partha chowdhury wrote: > what do /sbin/lsusb and fdisk -l show ? [r...@inet04 ~]# /sbin/lsusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID : Bus 001 Device 001: ID : Bus 007 Device 001: ID : Bus 003 Device 002: I

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed into on of the front panel usb ports but it matters not so long as I can mount it. Thanks for t

[CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

Greetings list- I have a Samba-centric question to ask. I have a particular user who claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of a share but NOT delete them. To my knowledge, the aforementioned permissions require the user to have write access to the shar

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:31 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: > Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted > it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized > immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed > into on of the front panel usb

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

on 2-19-2009 11:54 AM Tim Nelson spake the following: > Greetings list- > > I have a Samba-centric question to ask. I have a particular user who claims > Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of > a share but NOT delete them. To my knowledge, the aforementione

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

Tim Nelson wrote: > I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can > give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible > or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >Hi, > >On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET wrote: >> I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new >> SATA disk, the system don't detects it . >> >> Any idea of what the problem is? > >Even though it's ho

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

At Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:31:26 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted > it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized > immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed > into on of t

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate wrote: > Tim Nelson wrote: > >> I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can >> give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible >> or not. > > It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, bu

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

- "MHR" wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate > wrote: > > Tim Nelson wrote: > > > >> I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping > someone can > >> give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is > possible > >> or not. > > > > It may be possibl

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: > - "MHR" wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate >> >> wrote: >>> Tim Nelson wrote: >>> I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping >> someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whe

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

- "Scott Silva" wrote: > on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: > > - "MHR" wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate > > >> wrote: > >>> Tim Nelson wrote: > >>> > I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping > >> someone can > give me a

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

on 2-19-2009 1:53 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: > - "Scott Silva" wrote: >> on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: >>> - "MHR" wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate >> wrote: > Tim Nelson wrote: > >> I've been around and around on this top

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

On Thursday 19 February 2009 04:29:03 pm MHR wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate wrote: > > Tim Nelson wrote: > >> I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone > >> can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is > >> possible or not. > >

[CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Anyone know where I can find one? -- Dick Holland ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

Tim Nelson wrote on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:54:41 -0600 (CST): > I have a particular user who > claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify > existing files of a share but NOT delete them. Not samba-specific. The sticky bit could help in this if I recall right. If you regularly

[CentOS] iptables question

Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching le

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 18:46 -0600, ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: > Hi, > > I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: > > BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] > > BOX B [1 ip] > > I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX > A to BOX B (192

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: > Hi, > > I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: > > BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] > > BOX B [1 ip] > > I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX > A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) a

[CentOS] ip6tables forwarding rule

I have 2 boxes that act as IPv6 routers. One with 2 physical interfaces, the other with 6 vlan 'interfaces' on one physical interface plus a second physical interface. On both systems I have in /etc/sysconfig/network IPV6FORWARDING=yes But if I have my 'basic' ip6tables service running, only

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get Trying 192.168.0.1... telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] O

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

>I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel >DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be >nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. > >Anyone know where I can find one? That 965 mobo uses the X3000 IGA, so you can prolly add rpmforge and inst

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM, wrote: > I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX > A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. While i haven't done this before, i believe the answer you're looking for lies in SNAT. It would seem the requirem

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: > I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get > > Trying 192.168.0.1... > telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused > > I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. I assume that you are not

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

There are a few on there and I'm telnetting from a different box on that network. I'll dig around some more and eventually figure it out. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

> > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Barry Brimer > > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question > > > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte.

[CentOS] testing

test.. please ignore.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > The other side of the coin (as I think you mentioned) is that many are > not comfortable having LVM handle the mirroring. Are its mirroring > abilities as mature or fast as md? It's certainly not documented as > well at the very least. :)

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Dick Holland >Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:26 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 >resolution? > >I'm trying to find

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Joseph L. Casale >Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 2:32 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 >resolution? > >That 965

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Sorin Srbu >Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:12 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 >resolution? > >>I'm trying to

Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock

Jerry Geis wrote: > after running "hwclock --debug" the two files you mentioned above > did not have anything extra added. Just curious, you are running this on real hardware right not a virtual machine? nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 08:12 +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Dick Holland > >Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:26 PM > >To: centos@centos.org > >Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 18:32 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel > >DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be > >nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. > > > >Anyone know where I can find one? > >