Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread John
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Moeller > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 2:59 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device > > Good Morning, > > iptables -L

Re: [CentOS] Regd: Clarification on Linux Upgrade

2009-02-09 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Balaji wrote on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:03:42 +0530: > My question is upgrade from CD/DVD without yum Use yum. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

[CentOS] CentOS promotion

2009-02-09 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
I've been to FOSDEM this weekend and noticed the small number of CentOS people at the booth. The Ubuntu people work with Local Community Teams to support and promote the distro. I think it would be beneficial for CentOS to setup a similar structure. At the moment it's mostly sysadmins who introdu

Re: [CentOS] Regd: Clarification on Linux Upgrade

2009-02-09 Thread John Doe
> >These questions are all answered by reading the archive of this mailing list. >My question is upgrade from CD/DVD without yum http://www.google.fr/search?q=centos+install+upgrade First answer... Look for "Download Instructions" and for "Upgrade Options and process recommendations" JD

Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi again, > Yes that would be correct Marcus echo it into /proc or in /etc/sysctl.conf > would be > # Controls IP packet forwarding > net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 This is what I have done already. sysctl -p gives me: net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 net.ipv4.conf.default.ac

Re: [CentOS] real SATA RAID

2009-02-09 Thread Hal Martin
As many people have stated in this thread, 3ware and Areca make some good hardware RAID solutions. Software RAID using mdadm works too, quite well, I might add. I was one of those people who stayed away from software RAID in linux, thinking it was too complicated and difficult, I was wrong. It's d

Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread Agile Aspect
Marcus Moeller wrote: > Good Morning, > > iptables -L -v now shows: > > 0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 eth0anywhere > anywherestate NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED > > But the packages are still dropped: > > Feb 9 10:48:20 firewall kernel: DROP-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 > SRC=192.168.10

[CentOS] Problems with mysql multi-master after update.

2009-02-09 Thread Alessandro Ren
Hello, after I updated from mysql-5.0.22 CentOS 5.0 to mysqld-5.0.45 in CentOS 5.2, mysql looses master-slave sync after one node reboots. I've noticed that the slave doest not respect the informantion on master.info, instead, it tries to read the informantion from the master server

Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi, >> iptables -L -v now shows: >> >> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 eth0anywhere >> anywherestate NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED >> >> But the packages are still dropped: >> >> Feb 9 10:48:20 firewall kernel: DROP-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 >> SRC=192.168.100.192 DST=172.28.2.161 LEN

Re: [CentOS] What is the System Event Log?

2009-02-09 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Monday 09 February 2009, Timothy Murphy wrote: > My Dell PowerEdge T105 running Centos-5.2 > has started crashing fairly often (3 times in the last 2 hours). > The message on the screen tells me to look at the System Event Log. > Is this just /var/log/messages ? No, the SEL is maintained on the

[CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Jake
Good morning: We're about to start moving our public DNS to in-house managed servers. My first thought was "Linux + BIND" and we're done. Someone in another business unit's IT dept. has suggested tinydns be used. >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really had any community

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Rainer Duffner
Jake schrieb: > Good morning: > > We're about to start moving our public DNS to in-house managed > servers. My first thought was "Linux + BIND" and we're done. Someone > in another business unit's IT dept. has suggested tinydns be used. > >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't

Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Marcus Moeller wrote on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:23:02 +0100: Google for that as a string > iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 and you will see quite a few hits, also in German. For instance http://www.linuxforen.de/forums/showthread.php?t=81200 It seems you are either doing something wrong or testi

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread centos
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:22:42 -0500 Jake wrote: > >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really > >had > any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on > rpmforge are for red hat 6 and red hat 7. I very much dislike the > idea of compiling my own because of all th

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:58:38AM -0800, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:22:42 -0500 > Jake wrote: > > > >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really > > >had > > any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on > > rpmforge are for red hat

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Rainer Duffner
Ray Van Dolson schrieb: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:58:38AM -0800, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > The problem is that it is not very modular. You must decided on which features (=patches) you want to incorporate and then build the RPM accordingly. We use tinydns+dnscache almost exclusively

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Les Mikesell
cen...@911networks.com wrote: > >> >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really >>> had >> any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on >> rpmforge are for red hat 6 and red hat 7. I very much dislike the >> idea of compiling my own because of all the overhead

Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread Michael Peterson
Hello, The system you are trying to forward with has at least two nics on different networks? However you are trying to forward between aliases on one nic that is located on your internal network? And the other nic connects to a DMZ or gateway network? This system is not a decicated routing/forw

Re: [CentOS] CentOS promotion

2009-02-09 Thread Fabian Arrotin
Michel Daggelinckx wrote: > I've been to FOSDEM this weekend and noticed the small number of CentOS > people at the booth. > > The Ubuntu people work with Local Community Teams to support and promote > the distro. > > I think it would be beneficial for CentOS to setup a similar structure. > At th

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote: >Ray Van Dolson schrieb: >> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:58:38AM -0800, cen...@911networks.com wrote: >> > > >The problem is that it is not very modular. > >You must decided on which features (=patches) you want to incorporate >and then build the RPM acc

Re: [CentOS] CentOS promotion

2009-02-09 Thread David Hrbáč
Fabian Arrotin napsal(a): > > PS : Fosdem pictures are now online and presentations are available on > the Fosdem2009 wiki page Fabian, I see only redirect page on http://wiki.fosdem.org/ Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 48, Issue 4

2009-02-09 Thread Scott Silva
I am just curious, but why does the announce digest show up on the general list and not the announce list? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS promotion

2009-02-09 Thread Fabian Arrotin
David Hrbáč wrote: > Fabian Arrotin napsal(a): >> PS : Fosdem pictures are now online and presentations are available on >> the Fosdem2009 wiki page > > Fabian, > I see only redirect page on http://wiki.fosdem.org/ > Regards, > David Hrbáč David, i was speaking about *our* wiki, not the Fosdem o

Re: [CentOS] rpmforge

2009-02-09 Thread Scott Silva
> > I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus > Thanks for the help Ruckus stirs itself on most mailing lists! Overworked sysadmins just need to go get a cup of coffee and count to 10 before they hit "reply", or at least before they hit "send". I know that dealing with dwindling IT budgets and angry m

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Jake
Thank you very much for all of your feedback. It really sounds like i got two general replies: "eh, I wouldn't use it" (a minority) and "We do some complicated stuff to make it meet our needs and we love it." (majority) For us, ease of management is really key to having success with our technical

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:07:30PM -0500, Jake wrote: > Thank you very much for all of your feedback. It really sounds like i > got two general replies: > > "eh, I wouldn't use it" (a minority) and "We do some complicated stuff > to make it meet our needs and we love it." (majority) > > For us, e

Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread Marcus Moeller
Dear Michael, > The system you are trying to forward with has at least two nics on > different networks? > However you are trying to forward between aliases on one nic that is > located on your internal network? > And the other nic connects to a DMZ or gateway network? > This system is not a decic

Re: [CentOS] CentOS promotion

2009-02-09 Thread David Hrbáč
Fabian Arrotin napsal(a): > David, i was speaking about *our* wiki, not the Fosdem one ;-) > http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Fosdem2009 Well :o) that's "... something completely different". :o) Thanks, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:/

Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device

2009-02-09 Thread Agile Aspect
Marcus Moeller wrote: > Hi, > > >>> iptables -L -v now shows: >>> >>> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 eth0anywhere >>> anywherestate NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED >>> >>> But the packages are still dropped: >>> >>> Feb 9 10:48:20 firewall kernel: DROP-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 >>> S

[CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted

2009-02-09 Thread John Hinton
FYI. I just had all of the squirrelmail prefs for all the users on one of my servers disappear. I have never had anything like this happen ever before. I'm in the process of finding the needle in the haystack of logs to try to get a handle on this. I'm sending this to the list as a heads up. Se

Re: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted

2009-02-09 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Mon, February 9, 2009 5:14 pm, John Hinton wrote: > FYI. I just had all of the squirrelmail prefs for all the users on one > of my servers disappear. I have never had anything like this happen ever > before. I have seen this couple of times several years ago (more than 3) with an older version

Re: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted

2009-02-09 Thread John Hinton
Marko A. Jennings wrote: > On Mon, February 9, 2009 5:14 pm, John Hinton wrote: > >> FYI. I just had all of the squirrelmail prefs for all the users on one >> of my servers disappear. I have never had anything like this happen ever >> before. >> > > I have seen this couple of times several

Re: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted

2009-02-09 Thread John Hinton
John Hinton wrote: > Marko A. Jennings wrote: > >> On Mon, February 9, 2009 5:14 pm, John Hinton wrote: >> >> >>> FYI. I just had all of the squirrelmail prefs for all the users on one >>> of my servers disappear. I have never had anything like this happen ever >>> before. >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Christopher Chan
Jake wrote: > Good morning: > > We're about to start moving our public DNS to in-house managed > servers. My first thought was "Linux + BIND" and we're done. Someone > in another business unit's IT dept. has suggested tinydns be used. >>From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't re

Re: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

2009-02-09 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 15:07 -0500, Jake wrote: > Thank you very much for all of your feedback. It really sounds like i > got two general replies: > > "eh, I wouldn't use it" (a minority) and "We do some complicated stuff > to make it meet our needs and we love it." (majority) > > For us, ease of

Re: [CentOS] real SATA RAID

2009-02-09 Thread Christopher Chan
/me puts on salamander suit. Hal Martin wrote: > As many people have stated in this thread, 3ware and Areca make some > good hardware RAID solutions. I don't know about Areca but 3ware certainly. I have never come across issues with any 3ware boards hardware-wise. I suppose you have an opinion

[CentOS] process accounting - track PIDs

2009-02-09 Thread nate
Hello -- I've done some searching but haven't come up with much yet, I was wondering if there was a way to track PID creation and what command was assigned to a PID? I am trying to track down a locking issue with NFS/NLM where the client PID that initiates the unlock request is not the same PID t

Re: [CentOS] Sun Java on CentOS 5

2009-02-09 Thread Nataraj
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:09 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > The wiki has a long procedure for installing Sun JDK 1.6 but not JRE. > What's the benefit to installing the JDK this way (repackaging it)? This is described to some extent in the wiki. My understanding is that the jdk is the developmen

Re: [CentOS] rpmforge

2009-02-09 Thread David . Mackintosh
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:50:37AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote: > > I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus > > Ruckus stirs itself on most mailing lists! > > Overworked sysadmins just need to go get a cup of coffee and count to 10 > before they hit "reply", or at least before they hit "send". cen...@cen

Re: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted

2009-02-09 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, John Hinton wrote: > FYI. I just had all of the squirrelmail prefs for all the users on one > of my servers disappear. I have never had anything like this happen ever > before. I'm in the process of finding the needle in the haystack of logs > to try to get a handle on this

[CentOS] Scripting Oddity

2009-02-09 Thread David G. Miller
I've been playing around with qemu and wanted to make the guest OS instance visible on my network. This meant getting bridging and tun/tap working. After getting things working by pasting command from the CentOS wiki article plus adding a few enhancements, I decided to capture the process in

Re: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted

2009-02-09 Thread John Hinton
Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, John Hinton wrote: > > >> FYI. I just had all of the squirrelmail prefs for all the users on one >> of my servers disappear. I have never had anything like this happen ever >> before. I'm in the process of finding the needle in the haystack of logs >

Re: [CentOS] Scripting Oddity

2009-02-09 Thread Stephen Harris
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 08:22:02PM -0700, David G. Miller wrote: > I've been playing around with qemu and wanted to make the guest OS > instance visible on my network. This meant getting bridging and tun/tap > working. After getting things working by pasting command from the [snippage] I do

[CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache

2009-02-09 Thread Anto Marky
Hi, I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of doing it? How do I do the clustering and what tools do I need to use? Do I have those tools, I use CentOS , Do i have any tools in CenOs which comes default in it? And how do I do apache load balancing? should I rely on apa

Re: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache

2009-02-09 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Anto Marky wrote: > Hi, > I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of > doing it? How do I do the clustering and what tools do I need to use? Do I > have those tools, I use CentOS , Do i have any tools in CenOs which comes > default in i

Re: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache

2009-02-09 Thread David Hrbáč
Fajar Priyanto napsal(a): > > This is a good start to give you some overview: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-linux-ha/index.html Then, you can go here: http://code.google.com/p/ath/ David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.

Re: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache

2009-02-09 Thread Anto Marky
Hi, Thanks for the link. On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Anto Marky wrote: > > Hi, > > I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of > > doing it? How do I do the clustering and what tools do I need to use? Do

Re: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache

2009-02-09 Thread Anto Marky
Hi, Thanks for the link. On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM, David Hrbáč wrote: > Fajar Priyanto napsal(a): > > > > This is a good start to give you some overview: > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-linux-ha/index.html > > Then, you can go here: > http://code.google.com/p/ath/

Re: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache

2009-02-09 Thread Victor Padro
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Anto Marky wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the link. > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Anto Marky >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of >> > do