Thank you,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Alexander Farber
>> [r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
>> squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
>
> Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
> Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12...
> Latest 2.6 is STABLE22
Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Alexander Farber
>>> [r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
>>> squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
>> Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
>> Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12..
Sorin Srbu schrieb:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>> Scott Silva
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:45 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>>
>> I just had a Back
Alexander Farber wrote:
> Does anybody know of good Squid rpm's?
I have sourced our 2.6 packages from
http://people.redhat.com/mnagy/squid/ for the last few years without
problems.
Dean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Isaac Hailperin
>Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:13 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] kickstart won't kick-off via network
>
>
>> Especially since FDD aren't that com
> > this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
> > at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
> > is better maintained.
>
> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
"Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a de
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 11:48:29AM +0100, Isaac Hailperin wrote:
...
> I don't have problems either. In fact, ksdevice=bootif does not work for
> me.
please trim your footer/disclaimer when sending to a public mailing list
or send from another email adress.
Thanks,
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, Ce
> > I don't have problems either. In fact, ksdevice=bootif does not work for
> > me.
>
> How many NICs and connections do you have?
Two. Both are connected, but on one network there is nothing happening
at that stage, meaning no servers offering any services.
Isaac
___
Alexander Farber wrote:
>> Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
>> Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12...
>
> this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
> at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
> is better maintained.
Except you cannot really say,
Uh oh http://people.redhat.com/mnagy/squid/ doesn't have them yet...
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John Doe wrote:
> Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
> "Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a denial of service attack
> when processing specially crafted requests."
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Sorin Srbu schrieb:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>>> Behalf Of
>>> Scott Silva
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:45 PM
>>> To: centos@centos.org
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help
Hi
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 11:48:29AM +0100, Isaac Hailperin wrote:
> I don't have problems either. In fact, ksdevice=bootif does not work for
> me.
try ksdevice=link if you only have one interface plugged
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:1
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Toby Bluhm
>Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 3:44 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
>Oh, there's lots of bad stuff that can happen to your
Alan Sparks wrote:
> Since December there have been several kernel updates to the centosplus
> repository for centos4... but no updates to kmod-xfs or kmod-drbd82.
> Latest kernel is 2.6.9-78.0.13.plus.c4, but latest kmod-xfs is
> 2.6.9_78.0.5.plus.c4. Latest drbd82 kmod is also for 78.0.5.
>
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Alan Sparks wrote:
> Alan Sparks wrote:
>> Since December there have been several kernel updates to the centosplus
>> repository for centos4... but no updates to kmod-xfs or kmod-drbd82.
>> Latest kernel is 2.6.9-78.0.13.plus.c4, but latest kmod-xfs is
>> 2.6.9_78.0
> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
John Doe wrote on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:06:28 -0800 (PST):
> Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
> "Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a denial of service
> attack when processing specially crafted requests."
> "This bug is fixed by Squid versions 2.7.STABLE6, 3.0.STABLE1
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 18:39 +0100, Ian Forde wrote:
> In order to avoid this, you can use the "ksdevice=bootif" to use the
> interface from which the system booted...
good to know, thank you.
Isaac
_
Vorstand: Ertu Uysal, Axel Qu
Ramon Nieto wrote:
>> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
>
> Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
web server farm with somewhere around 100 requests/second for most of
the day. Are you sure you a
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:17:15 -0600:
>
> > The order of NIC detection/naming at bootup seems to be more or less
> > random as of Centos 5.x. How do you know which name to choose here?
>
> I find that I don't have any pro
Isaac Hailperin wrote:
>
>>
>>> The order of NIC detection/naming at bootup seems to be more or less
>>> random as of Centos 5.x. How do you know which name to choose here?
>> I find that I don't have any problems with this. I usually disable dhcp on
>> eth1 and have no cable in it during instal
> Especially since FDD aren't that common anymore... I'll see if I can't adapt
> my SOP:s to boot and install from network.
The set up is actually not too complicated. I really recommend it, you just
plug in
the computer and let it install.
There are various variants, you can either define what w
Alexander Farber wrote on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:20:49 +0100:
> this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
> at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
> is better maintained.
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Co
Isaac Hailperin wrote:
>>> I don't have problems either. In fact, ksdevice=bootif does not work for
>>> me.
>> How many NICs and connections do you have?
> Two. Both are connected, but on one network there is nothing happening
> at that stage, meaning no servers offering any services.
>
Mine us
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:17:15 -0600:
> The order of NIC detection/naming at bootup seems to be more or less
> random as of Centos 5.x. How do you know which name to choose here?
I find that I don't have any problems with this. I usually disable dhcp on
eth1 and have no cable
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ramon Nieto wrote:
>>> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
>> Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
>
> Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
> web server farm with somewhere around 100
p-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090204/0b05dcff/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:09:01 +0200
From: Pasi Pirhonen
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0973
Alexander Farber wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Ramon Nieto wrote:
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
>>> Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
>> Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
>> web server f
on 2-3-2009 11:57 PM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>> Scott Silva
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:45 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue he
on 2-4-2009 7:16 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> Of
>> Toby Bluhm
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 3:44 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue hel
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Dan Carl wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:13:50 -0600:
>
>
>> I followed the Wiki instructions for setting up *yum-priorities*.
>> I added the rpmforge repo
>> I installed clamd without a problem.
>> Now when I go to update I get conflicts with perl-Math-BigInt.
>>
>
> add
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> I just had a Back-UPS of about 1998 vintage burst into flames about 6 >months
> ago. Luckily, someone was near it and grabbed a fire extinguisher. It was a
> Saturday, and if this person hadn't been in on overtime, who knows what >would
> have
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:36:30 -0500
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Also, I am reminded that I need to take our 2 fire extinguishers to
> the fire station and pay them to discharge/recharge them.:-)
Are you sure you need a full discharge/recharge? I have several in my
theatre and they have to be inspec
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
>Scott Silva
>Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 8:01 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
>Looking again at the incident report, I think the unit
34 matches
Mail list logo
