On Monday 02 February 2009 21:51:31 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Here's your problem. :)
> >
> >Microsoft do things their own way and assume that's how everybody likes
> >it.
>
> That's funny, I am using OL as well, and I don't have a problem with
> headers/footers or Microsoft trying to tell me to d
Timothy Kesten wrote on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:59:56 +0100:
> Don't know why not with glibc-common.
tried again?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@c
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Les Mikesell
>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:20 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
>> I've been buying from the Smart-UPS and Back-UPS rang
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>John R Pierce
>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:49 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
>> Oh, didn't know about Best Power. Is that something
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Morten Torstensen
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:56 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding
>
> John wrote:
> > I am an open source person but when
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>John R Pierce
>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:52 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> I've been buying from the Smart-U
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Spiro Harvey
>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:47 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] unsubscribe
>
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
>
>Here's your problem. :)
>
>Mic
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 08:51:32 Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf
>
> Of
>
> >John R Pierce
> >Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:52 PM
> >To: CentOS mailing list
> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency
Hi Peter
I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds, initializes
and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can try to have Linux
initialize all 4 cores?
--
TIA
Paolo
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009,
Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds,
> initializes and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can
> try to have Linux initialize all 4 cores?
>
You're probably booting the single CPU kernel.
Try booting the kernel ending wi
Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have CentOS 5.2 installed on a computer (the same one that I just posted
> a message on: Intel DG33BU motherboard) and for even though audio is
> reported to be found and working Linux just doesn't play anything through
> the speakers. The computer dual boots Linux
Agile Aspect wrote:
> Paolo Supino wrote:
> > Hi Peter
> >
> > I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds,
> > initializes and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can
> > try to have Linux initialize all 4 cores?
> >
> You're probably booting the single CPU kerne
Hi Agile
There's no non SMP kernel in CentOS 5.x (check out:
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-d70935212ce3b7b072b0075c1807a4bd3ea175b7).
dmesg boot output (taken from /var/log/dmesg) shows the following lines:
Linux version 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 (mockbu...@builder16.centos.org) (gcc
version
Hi Ralph
Which brings me back to my original post: how do I enable multicore on a
DG33BU motherboard, booting with pci=nommconf didn't change the situation
:-(
--
TIA
Paolo
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Ralph Angenendt
> wrote:
> Agile Aspect wrote:
> > Paolo Supino wrote:
> > > Hi P
Paolo Supino wrote:
> Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ acpi=off
>
> Unfortunately I still have only 1 core used ...
As said: Try with "pci=nommconf" only. And please trim your mails >:)
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpKcASV1Mq5X.pgp
Description: PGP sign
Hi
I have CentOS 5.2 installed on a computer (the same one that I just posted
a message on: Intel DG33BU motherboard) and for even though audio is
reported to be found and working Linux just doesn't play anything through
the speakers. The computer dual boots Linux/Windows and when in Windows
sou
Am Tuesday 03 February 2009 09:31:42 schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> Timothy Kesten wrote on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:59:56 +0100:
> > Don't know why not with glibc-common.
>
> tried again?
I tried it quite often. Always the same result.
Timothy
___
CentOS mailing
Hi Ralph
You're right and I'm partially wrong: I changed /boot/grub/menu.lst from
acpi=off to pci=nommconf and rebooted the system expecting it to come up
with the new command line parameters. As you've shown me in the paste of the
dmesg output I posted this isn't the case. Which makes me wonder,
Hi
Here's my /boot/grub/grub.conf content:
grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg.
# root (hd0
Hello list,
I try to do an automated network installation of centos 5.2, following
the redat documentation at
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/sysadmin-guide/pt-install-info.html
However, when installing I get promptet for various things, like which
network interface I w
Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> The symlinks aren't broken: the grub.conf file is located in
> /boot/grub/. /etc/grub/menu.lst points to it and so does /etc/grub.conf ...
> [r...@server grub]# ls -l /etc/grub.conf /boot/grub/menu.lst
> /boot/grub/grub.conf
> -rw--- 1 root root 974 Feb
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
> Here's my /boot/grub/grub.conf content:
> grub.conf generated by anaconda
> #
> # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
> # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that
> # all kern
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Isaac Hailperin
>Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:46 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: [CentOS] kickstart won't kick-off via network
>
>What I did:
>First a manual install form DVD. I t
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:39 +0200, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
> Here's my /boot/grub/grub.conf content:
> grub.conf generated by anaconda
> #
> # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this
> file
> # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that
> #
Hi William
You're right ... I do have 2 HDs and my root is not what I thought it is!
Here is what is happening with this system:
It has a SIL SATA RAID0/1 card installed with 2x 160GB SATA HDs connected to
it. The card is configured to mirror between the HDs (RAID1). But as I saw
now Linux actua
the sil is fraid or fakeraid..it's actually software raid done by a
binary often proprietary driver,..if you want to do raid one buy a real
hardware raid card or use the linux mdraid.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
Hi
I can't wait until CentOS 5.3 is released :-( The bigger issue is that I
also have windows xp running as a guest inside a vmware server (version 2)
and since vmware doesn't discover the audio devices properlly (because linux
claims to not have them), there's no sound in Windows ...
--
TIA
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:17 +0200, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi William
>
> I didn't trun acpi back on (it's a sure way to freeze the computer).
> I did however find out that Linux ignores the RAID1 that is set by the
> SIL SATA card I have installed :-( See my last post (just a few
> minutes ago)
Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
>
> I can't wait until CentOS 5.3 is released :-( The bigger issue is that I
> also have windows xp running as a guest inside a vmware server (version 2)
> and since vmware doesn't discover the audio devices properlly (because linux
> claims to not have them), there's no
> >Now since I get asked all these questions at boot time, I suspect that
> >the kickstart file is not there to answer these questions.
>
> It does use it, it just doesn't find the network-block in ks.cfg. Does your
> ks.cfg contain some lines for the networking?
Yes:
# Kickstart file automatic
Hey folks!
Does any one have an idea as to when centOS 5.3 will be out and if so then I
would like to hear from you coz I am waiting for it day and night coz I heard
that the kernel of centos 5.3 will have inbuilt support for intel pro/wireless
3945 wifi card ( I have been trying to install th
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
>
> > append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
> > ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_centos5.2/cnode/ks.cfg
>
> this is not enough, you have to tell PXE about t
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:57:26PM +, kmadananteshwar.vb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hey folks!
> Does any one have an idea as to when centOS 5.3 will be out and if so
> then I would like to hear from you coz I am waiting for it day and
> night coz I heard that the kernel of centos 5.3 will have in
Ahh, here we go:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=371341 “upgrade to 5.1
breaks autofs for automounted home directories” – see especially
comment #13 which describes the symptom, and #25 which explains what
the fix is hidden in the records as. Fix appears to be to use kernel
kernel-2.6
Hi
I've installed CentOS 5.2 (i386) in a computer with a DG33BU motherboard
... When I installed it it crashed because of ACPI issues. Searching Google
I found that I need to turn ACPI off in order to successfully install
CentOS, which I did.
After a while I noticed that because of ACPI is off
Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
> append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
> ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_centos5.2/cnode/ks.cfg
this is not enough, you have to tell PXE about the network, which nic to
use etc. I think there is a tutorial abou
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:57 AM, wrote:
> Hey folks!
> Does any one have an idea as to when centOS 5.3 will be out
Please see
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37
>and if so then I would like to hear from you coz I am waiting for it day and
>night coz I hea
Hi Ray,
on the URL http://twitter.com/centos you can get some status updates about
centos 5.3 from a centos developer, otherwise wait and see.
best regards
Gregor Gruener
- Original Message -
From: "Ray Van Dolson"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] C
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've installed CentOS 5.2 (i386) in a computer with a DG33BU motherboard
> ... When I installed it it crashed because of ACPI issues. Searching Google
> I found that I need to turn ACPI off in order to successfully install
> CentOS, which
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Doe wrote:
> > While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.wisegeek.com/
> > * Connection to 174.132.22.20 Failed
>
> First, maybe you should post to the squid mailing list...
> Did you check your timeout values?
>
> JD
>
>
>
>
> _
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Isaac Hailperin wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
>>
>>> append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
>>> ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_centos5.2/cnode/ks.cfg
>> this is not enough, you
Hi Peter
The symlinks aren't broken: the grub.conf file is located in /boot/grub/.
/etc/grub/menu.lst points to it and so does /etc/grub.conf ...
[r...@server grub]# ls -l /etc/grub.conf /boot/grub/menu.lst
/boot/grub/grub.conf
-rw--- 1 root root 974 Feb 3 13:59 /boot/grub/grub.conf
lrwxrwx
Hi William
I didn't trun acpi back on (it's a sure way to freeze the computer). I did
however find out that Linux ignores the RAID1 that is set by the SIL SATA
card I have installed :-( See my last post (just a few minutes ago) with
more details.
--
TIA
Paolo
Greetings,
I am quite surprised that ericsson was not even mentioned in the UPS thread
Rajagopal
Disclosure: I am not an employee or anyway related to Ericsson except
for asking them for couple of quotations (in India -- yeah _we_ need
UPS the most. NExt to diesel power gnerators fondly refe
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 11:17 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Isaac Hailperin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> >> Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
> >>
> >>> append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
> >>> ks=http://9.0.0.1/al
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
> The voltage has been fairly constant here over the years since I started using
> UPS and logging the voltage and stuff, 238V more or less constantly. It rarely
> drops below 236V or over 240V. We mainly use the UPS:es to have controlled
> shutdowns should the power fail enti
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi Ralph
>
> You're right and I'm partially wrong: I changed /boot/grub/menu.lst from
> acpi=off to pci=nommconf and rebooted the system expecting it to come up
> with the new command line parameters. As you've shown me in the paste of
> the dmesg
Anne Wilson wrote:
> Actually, I have one box attached to a BackUPS that is about 15 years old,
> and
> has never had a replacement battery. It holds the box through power
> variations, and can supply power for a couple of minutes - enough to allow a
> shutdown, since that box is never running
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
>Isaac Hailperin wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>>> Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
>>>
append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_ce
Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've installed CentOS 5.2 (i386) in a computer with a DG33BU
> motherboard ... When I installed it it crashed because of ACPI issues.
> Searching Google I found that I need to turn ACPI off in order to
> successfully install CentOS, which I did.
> After a while I
On 2/3/2009 6:06 AM, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds,
> initializes and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can
> try to have Linux initialize all 4 cores?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> TIA
> Paolo
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009
No, I only have one mailserver with one domain I'm managing with about
30 users. I think I have the routing working properly now, as well as
the acl's.
I put some route statements on eth2 for the private network and that
seems to have resolved issues.
I do have an authentication issue with ldap,
on 2-3-2009 1:29 AM Anne Wilson spake the following:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 08:51:32 Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>>> Behalf
>> Of
>>
>>> John R Pierce
>>> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:52 PM
>>
on 2-1-2009 11:56 PM fabian dacunha spake the following:
> Dear All,
>
>
> I have a Centos 5.2 server used as a squid proxy server for quite sometime
> and was workin fine
>
> after a power failure the system refused to boot
>
> i jus see the grub boot load screen n then hangs
>
> so using the
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:49 PM, MHR wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
>>> If I use "system-config-display" or "system-config-display --reconfig"
> :::
>>> shown as Nvidia NV11 (GeForce2 MX/MX400). CentOS 5.2
Ian Forde wrote:
>
> append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
> ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_centos5.2/cnode/ks.cfg
this is not enough, you have to tell PXE about the network, which nic
to
use etc. I think there is a tutorial about doing PXE in
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 2-3-2009 2:35 PM Thom Paine spake the following:
>> Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
>>
>> I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
>>
> It is never recommended to upgrade major versions. You might get away with it,
> and you migh
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
> I have a system that was originally installed with RHEL 3 x86_64, and
> I've since 'updated' it to CentOS 3 via installing yum and
> centos-release, then running a yum update.
>
> is there any way I can force -all- installed packages to be replaced
> with
I have a system that was originally installed with RHEL 3 x86_64, and
I've since 'updated' it to CentOS 3 via installing yum and
centos-release, then running a yum update.
is there any way I can force -all- installed packages to be replaced
with their centos analogs just to be sure its all cons
Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
--
-=/>Thom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 2-3-2009 2:35 PM Thom Paine spake the following:
> Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
>
> I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
>
It is never recommended to upgrade major versions. You might get away with it,
and you might spend even more time chas
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Lanny Marcus
> wrote:
>> If I use "system-config-display" or "system-config-display --reconfig"
>> although I get a message that I need to log out of GNOME, to have the
>> new file written, for new Display Re
on 2-3-2009 4:31 PM Christopher Chan spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 2-3-2009 2:35 PM Thom Paine spake the following:
>>> Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
>>>
>>> I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
>>>
>> It is never recommended to
John R Pierce wrote:
> all the BackUPs I've ever seen have been simple relay switched units.
> when the power is on, you're getting unfiltered power (except for a MOV
> based surge protector), when the power is out, it switches to the
> "modified square wave" inverter output.
John,
There a
tech wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> all the BackUPs I've ever seen have been simple relay switched units.
>> when the power is on, you're getting unfiltered power (except for a MOV
>> based surge protector), when the power is out, it switches to the
>> "modified square wave" inverter
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Isaac Hailperin
>Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:56 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] kickstart won't kick-off via network
>
>Now in conjunction with the kernel paramete
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Les Mikesell
>Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 6:42 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
>> hospital with power-backups up to yinyang. But it fa
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
>Scott Silva
>Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:45 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
>I just had a Back-UPS of about 1998 vintage burst into f
69 matches
Mail list logo
