Per Qvindesland wrote:
> Hello List
>
> I am just wondering if anyone knows if RedHat did realease a power pc
> version of rhel 4, I have looked around and I see some packages that says
> that it is for rhel 4 ppc but I am a bit unsure since our suppliers says no
> there is only for version 5.
>
> I have a number of vhosts configured with SuexecUserGroup
> to run the scripts with limited privileges and the dept. web-site on one
> of them. The problem is the webmaster can't read online context help
> which comes with the cms the site is using. Most help files (>2K) have
> *.php.html extensi
Hi
Thanks for your feedback.
In the company we are working for we are looking at buying a p520 system
with HACMP, that it why I am looking for a ppc version.
Kind regards
Per Qvindesland
On 1/31/09 9:45 AM, "Fabian Arrotin" wrote:
> There is a PPC64 RHEL4.x but you need an IBM Power machine
Per Qvindesland wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> In the company we are working for we are looking at buying a p520 system
> with HACMP, that it why I am looking for a ppc version.
>
>
I'd run AIX on that. PowerHA (formerly known as HACMP) is still
primarily an AIX cluster, wi
On Friday 30 January 2009 22:20:17 Glenn wrote:
> At 04:57 PM 1/30/2009, you wrote:
> >On Friday 30 January 2009 20:51:53 Glenn wrote:
> > > Are you located in U.S., U.K. or Europe? I couldn't tell?
> >
> >UK
> >
> >Anne
>
> Reason I asked is because APC has refurbished UPS for half price with
> fr
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
>> So -- has anyone gotten 1.1.15 Seamonkey working with the latest flash
>> plugin on Centos? I don't want to update Seamonkey on the Centos box if
>> its not working.
>>
>>
> One thing -- that should've been v1.1.14 instead of ...15 above.
no problem here, with
Hey folks !
I am facing the following problems with internet on my acer aspire 2920 laptop
running centos 5.2 ; whenever I launch mozilla firefox 3 beta 5 it takes at
least one and a half hours just to load the homepage http://www.google.com/ig
which in my windows partition takes just under 1
Dear All,
i am using squid-2.5STABLE
Below error message occurs if the site is accessed through proxy server.
same problem occurs for many other sites likes dkc1.digikey.com
But the same site opens clearly without any problem if accessed directly.
Please help
Thanks in advance.
ER
Hi John
We are having a test on a Power with Rhel 5 on Tuesday as a proof of
concept, the system is from what I understand from IBM supporting fully
HACMP for rhel 5, but we will be kicking off in the first installs with rhel
4 since it will be as similar as possible to our current centos 4.4
envi
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Toby Bluhm
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 8:05 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
> John wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> >> http://en.wikipedia
On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:29:32 John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Toby Bluhm
> > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 8:05 AM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help n
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Thom Paine
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 1:11 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding
>
> Well after running into more issues with the connections, we
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 12:01 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
>
> On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:29:32 John wr
There has been some discussion about PPC on this list, and I was
looking at the CentOS homepage, and it states that support for the PPC
architecture is in progress.
Is there actually a V5 (CentOS) PPC download? I have been looking for
it on the site without luck.
For example http://mirror.c
Thom Paine wrote:
>
> It doesn't necessarily make sense. This entire project doesn't make
> sense. The issue is that we are sending confidential patient records
> through a private network.
>
> Instead of using something like PKI encryption (like I use at the
> police station where I also work), t
dnk wrote:
> There has been some discussion about PPC on this list, and I was
> looking at the CentOS homepage, and it states that support for the PPC
> architecture is in progress.
>
> Is there actually a V5 (CentOS) PPC download? I have been looking for
> it on the site without luck.
>
> For exam
Thanks for all reply.
it works with $()
Thanks again everbody.
2009/1/30 William L. Maltby :
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 15:56 -0500, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 13:59, R P Herrold wrote:
>> > or for those who are used to being burned:
>> > [ 0$NUMBEROFPRO -gt 150
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:29 AM, wrote:
> Hey folks !
> I am facing the following problems with internet on my acer aspire 2920
> laptop running
> centos 5.2 ; whenever I launch mozilla firefox 3 beta 5 it takes at least one
> and a half hours
Run a ping to some nearby well-known IP, such as y
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 09:33 -0800, dnk wrote:
> There has been some discussion about PPC on this list, and I was
> looking at the CentOS homepage, and it states that support for the PPC
> architecture is in progress.
>
> Is there actually a V5 (CentOS) PPC download? I have been looking for
>
On 31-Jan-09, at 10:13 AM, Tosh wrote:
> dnk wrote:
>> There has been some discussion about PPC on this list, and I was
>> looking at the CentOS homepage, and it states that support for the
>> PPC
>> architecture is in progress.
>>
>> Is there actually a V5 (CentOS) PPC download? I have been lo
dnk wrote:
> On 31-Jan-09, at 10:13 AM, Tosh wrote:
>
>> dnk wrote:
>>> There has been some discussion about PPC on this list, and I was
>>> looking at the CentOS homepage, and it states that support for the
>>> PPC
>>> architecture is in progress.
>>>
>>> Is there actually a V5 (CentOS) PPC dow
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Joseph L. Casale
>> wrote:
>>
Still not sure why it produces an .xml
file instead of .avi or something else, but if I RFM, I will probably
figure that out.
>>> Welc
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 12:57 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding
>
> Thom Paine wrote:
> >
> > It doesn't necessarily make sen
Per Qvindesland wrote:
\> In the company we are working for we are looking at buying a p520 system
> with HACMP, that it why I am looking for a ppc version.
RHEL 4 and 5 both works great on the IBM power systems. Ditto for
PowerHA (nee HACMP) version 5.4 for both AIX and Linux.
With the p520, I
Sorry for the delayed response, needed to dreg the memory banks
John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rob Kampen
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:30 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks an
>I did some reading about Cinelerra last night and they call it Render
>or Rendering, when you are finished editing and want to Save. They
>save the video and audio files separately. I guess that's how we are
>able to see some programs on DirectTV in English or in Spanish
>And, movies on DVDs..
dnk wrote:
> There has been some discussion about PPC on this list, and I was
> looking at the CentOS homepage, and it states that support for the PPC
> architecture is in progress.
>
> Is there actually a V5 (CentOS) PPC download? I have been looking for
> it on the site without luck.
>
>
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rob Kampen
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY
>
> Sorry for the delayed response, needed to dreg the memory bank
Dan Carl wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:13:50 -0600:
> I followed the Wiki instructions for setting up *yum-priorities*.
> I added the rpmforge repo
> I installed clamd without a problem.
> Now when I go to update I get conflicts with perl-Math-BigInt.
add check_obsoletes = 1 to the /etc/yum.d/prio
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 16:36, Scott Silva wrote:
> If you really need the newer version you might have to --force it.
Bad advice. This is the exactly same reason why installing from CPAN
is not recommended under CentOS.
RPM is designed to prevent you from installing something that could
ri
30 matches
Mail list logo
