Re: [CentOS] Issues with Ldap client on Centos 5

2009-01-22 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hello, On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:41, ankush grover wrote: > We are running some of the Centos 5 32 bit, 5.2 64-bit systems. These > systems are ldap clients and the ldap server is Windows 2003 Server. How exactly? Are you using nss_ldap to get user ids from AD? Are you authenticating to AD usin

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Rainer Traut
Am 22.01.2009 02:19, schrieb Amos Shapira: > 2. Alternatively - what linux anti-virus (oh, the shame of typing this > word combination :() do you use which doesn't affect our systems > performance too much. http://www.f-prot.com/products/corporate_users/unix/ has some Linux AV products. Rainer

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Warren Young wrote: > James A. Peltier wrote: > > > > CentOS 5 requires 512MB for installation > > I had an EL5 install attempt fail on a VM with 512 MB of RAM. Big ugly > anaconda Python stack dump type error. Upped the RAM for the VM, and it > installed. You need a combined(!) 768MB of RAM

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > 1. Has anyone here gone though such a procedure and got good arguments > > against the need for anti-virus? > > There is no good argument against running malware detection on any > sever. > > > 2. Alternatively - what linux anti-virus (oh, the shame of typing this >

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Michael Simpson
On 1/22/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Warren Young wrote: > > James A. Peltier wrote: > > > > > > CentOS 5 requires 512MB for installation > > > > I had an EL5 install attempt fail on a VM with 512 MB of RAM. Big ugly > > anaconda Python stack dump type error. Upped the RAM for the VM, and it > >

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 22 January 2009 09:35:11 Ralph Angenendt wrote: > What do you do with clamav on a linux server? Especially: How is it run > by you? What do you think it protects you against on a linux server? 1 - it protects you against passing on any windows viruses to windows users 2 - it satisfied

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Brett Serkez
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive > and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it? Depends on what you want to use it for. I have successfully run CentOS on PIIIs with as little as 256MB of memory, but with limited

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 22 January 2009 09:35:11 Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > What do you do with clamav on a linux server? Especially: How is it run > > by you? What do you think it protects you against on a linux server? > > 1 - it protects you against passing on any windows viruses to wi

Re: [CentOS] help with udev rules needed

2009-01-22 Thread Farkas Levente
rra...@comcast.net wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Farkas Levente wrote: > >> rra...@comcast.net wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Farkas Levente wrote: >>> rra...@comcast.net wrote: > I am migrating from Fedora 8 to CentOS 5.2 > I have usb dvd > > On F8 I have /etc/udev/rules/00-

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 12:16 +, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 22 January 2009 09:35:11 Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > What do you do with clamav on a linux server? Especially: How is it run > > by you? What do you think it protects you against on a linux server? > > 1 - it protects you against p

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:31:20 +0100: > You need a combined(!) 768MB of RAM and Swap to successfully install > CentOS 5.2 (see the release notes). in graphics mode. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Dougal Ballantyne
I install many Xen domU systems with 256MB running CentOS 5.x. If you use text base installer, you should have no issues. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Michael Simpson wrote: > On 1/22/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> Warren Young wrote: >> > James A. Peltier wrote: >> > > >> > > CentOS 5 requ

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 22 January 2009 12:46:46 Craig White wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 12:16 +, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Thursday 22 January 2009 09:35:11 Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > What do you do with clamav on a linux server? Especially: How is it run > > > by you? What do you think it protects y

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Anne Wilson wrote: > I'm sure there are plenty of people that can give Ralph detailed information > about using it efficiently. Sorry, I do not want to know how to "use clamav efficiently", I am just wondering what good clamav will do on a server, as there aren't really any hooks into file writi

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Matt Shields
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Ralph Angenendt > wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > I'm sure there are plenty of people that can give Ralph detailed > information > > about using it efficiently. > > Sorry, I do not want to know how to "use clamav efficiently", I am just > wondering what good clama

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 14:15 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > I'm sure there are plenty of people that can give Ralph detailed > > information > > about using it efficiently. > > Sorry, I do not want to know how to "use clamav efficiently", I am just > wondering what good c

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread John Plemons
I use AVG, they have a nice and clean Real Time Scanning piece of software for Linux see http://www.grisoft.com for general info http://www.avg.com/download-7?prd=avl to download for the different flavors of Linux I use it on my Linux boxes as well as all of my Windows Clients and Servers

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Matt Shields wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Ralph Angenendt > > > As far as I know there is no AntiVirus solution for Linux which works > > the same as all the solutions under Windows do. And if you do not have > > real time scanning on a server/workstation, an anti virus scanner > > do

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
John Plemons wrote: > I use AVG, they have a nice and clean Real Time Scanning piece of > software for Linux Oh. So maybe dazuko now isn't a resource hog anymore? Thanks, that is the first time I've heard about a component like that. Cheers, Ralph pgpZ9MNNThjn6.pgp Description: PGP signature

[CentOS] disable rquotad and pop

2009-01-22 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi all, I am trying to find out how to disable rquotad and pop (port 443) for rquotad /etc/sysconfig/nfs has it quoted out but yet it is running? How do I disable it? also what about pop? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.

[CentOS] OT: Infrastructure Documenting

2009-01-22 Thread Joseph L. Casale
We are moving all our (limited and badly organized) documentation to a wiki. Anyone got any examples/pointers to a hierarchy that made logical sense? We are hoping to move everything from topology to application specific notes in to the wiki. Given the size of this task, I only want to do this once

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Kwan Lowe
> Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm > being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why > we don't need to install an anti-virus or find an anti-virus to run on > our CentOS 5 servers.

Re: [CentOS] disable rquotad and pop

2009-01-22 Thread Jerry Geis
Rick, For rquota this shows: ps ax | grep rquota 3140 ?Ss 0:00 rpc.rquotad 15025 ?Ss 0:00 rpc.rquotad 21509 ?Ss 0:00 rpc.rquotad 21590 pts/2S+ 0:00 grep rquota grep RQUOTA /etc/sysconfig/nfs #RQUOTAD="/usr/sbin/rpc.rquotad" #RQUOTAD_PORT=875 #RPCRQUOTAD

[CentOS] SquirrelMail Sending Under Wrong Username

2009-01-22 Thread John Hinton
CentOS team... as is already bug reported and marked solved... as we await the upstream repair for this. It was reported that this was happening on CentOS 5. You likely already know, but it also happens on CentOS 4. For those unaware. It seems that SquirrelMail has an issue which allows mail t

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Matt
> None... clamav, amavis, etc... are used for protecting Windows boxes > behind the Linux boxes. If you aren't running any Windows hosts on the FYI, clamav also detects linux based viruses. There are linux based viruses. Rkhunter is also good to run on a linux server as well. http://en.wikiped

Re: [CentOS] disable rquotad and pop

2009-01-22 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jerry Geis wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:22:16 -0500: > for rquotad /etc/sysconfig/nfs has it quoted out but yet it is running? > How do I disable it? > > also what about pop? service name start/stop chkconfig name off to disable starting Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Co

[CentOS] disable rquotad and pop

2009-01-22 Thread Jerry Geis
> > Jerry Geis wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:22:16 -0500: > > >/ for rquotad /etc/sysconfig/nfs has it quoted out but yet it is running? > />/ How do I disable it? > />/ > />/ also what about pop? > / > service name start/stop > > chkconfig name off to disable starting > Sure I familiar with th

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Warren Young
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Warren Young wrote: >> James A. Peltier wrote: >>> CentOS 5 requires 512MB for installation >> I had an EL5 install attempt fail on a VM with 512 MB of RAM. Big ugly >> anaconda Python stack dump type error. Upped the RAM for the VM, and it >> installed. > > You need a

Re: [CentOS] disable rquotad and pop

2009-01-22 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jerry Geis wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:45:21 -0500: first, could you please *reply* and keep in the thread and not send new messages when you reply? > Sure I familiar with those commands, problem is there is not rquota > service... SO these dont help. Fine. Why didn't you say so in your origi

[CentOS] PHP 5.2 on Centos4

2009-01-22 Thread John Clement
Bit of an emergency as I'm told this laptop has to leave here in 15 minutes, I've gone ahead and configured, made, installed PHP 5.2 but an httpd restart still only sees the old PHP 5.0.4, I think there's a fairly simple way to get it to find the 5.2 version I've just installed but can't think what

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread nate
Amos Shapira wrote: > 2. Alternatively - what linux anti-virus (oh, the shame of typing this > word combination :() do you use which doesn't affect our systems > performance too much. I highly recommend Sophos antivirus: http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/endpoint/security-and-control/8.0

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Morten Torstensen
Rainer Traut wrote: > Am 22.01.2009 02:19, schrieb Amos Shapira: > >> 2. Alternatively - what linux anti-virus (oh, the shame of typing this >> word combination :() do you use which doesn't affect our systems >> performance too much. > > http://www.f-prot.com/products/corporate_users/unix/ > has

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread John Plemons
But again you said it, Symantic is trash With my history of machine crashes caused by their I can do it better altitude, Run don't walk from Symantic John Plemons ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:31:20 +0100: > > >> You need a combined(!) 768MB of RAM and Swap to successfully install >> CentOS 5.2 (see the release notes). >> > > in graphics mode. And really it is a performance question as long as you have 256M of re

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > 1. Has anyone here gone though such a procedure and got good arguments > > > against the need for anti-virus? > > There is no good argument against running malware detection on any > > sever. > > > 2. Alternatively - what linux anti-virus (oh, the shame of typing

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in 5.3

2009-01-22 Thread Florin Andrei
Peter Kjellstrom wrote: > > I disagree. On most raid-controllers we use XFS has a significant advantage > over Ext3 when it comes to large sequential writes. Ext3 gets nowhere near > the bare metal performance. > > So, in short, I think it will be interesting to see how Ext4 performs for > thi

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Ross Walker
On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:31:20 +0100: >> >> >>> You need a combined(!) 768MB of RAM and Swap to successfully install >>> CentOS 5.2 (see the release notes). >>> >> >> in graphics mode. > > And re

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-22 Thread Florin Andrei
Craig White wrote: > > seriously though, found this little tidbit which seems important to note > (under known issues)... > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Known_Issues.html > > When upgrading from an earlier version of Red Hat

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> > > 1. Has anyone here gone though such a procedure and got good arguments >> > > against the need for anti-virus? >> > There is no good argument against running malware detection on any >> > sever. >> >

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-22 Thread Ned Slider
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Tim Verhoeven wrote: >> But I'm wondering where we need to put it ? I was thinking in either >> the general CentOS FAQ or in the CentOS 5 FAQ ? Anyone can think of a >> better place ? > > I don't think people will find that when it's put in the FAQ, especially > if work is

Re: [CentOS] OT: Infrastructure Documenting

2009-01-22 Thread Glenn Enright
Hierarchies are as diverse and personal as they come. What is more important is to have your site be searchable. To that end you might invest in adding search tags to each document. So that you have access to them all in a flat way as well as the hierarchy. --Glenn 2009/1/23 Joseph L. Casale : >

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread David G. Miller
Amos Shapira wrote: > Hi All, > > Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm > being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why > we don't need to install an anti-virus or find an anti-virus

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Ross Walker wrote: > On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz > wrote: > > >> Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> >>> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:31:20 +0100: >>> >>> >>> You need a combined(!) 768MB of RAM and Swap to successfully install CentOS 5.2 (see the r

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM, David G. Miller wrote: > Amos Shapira wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm >> being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify

Re: [CentOS] OT: Infrastructure Documenting

2009-01-22 Thread Brian Mathis
In a wiki, you are typically shooting for a flat structure, and the links in the pages organically make a structure. As already said, searching is the key. In the past, with Word docs or even text files, you needed to impose a hierarchy because it made things easier to find. Now you just need to

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ned Slider wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Remove the "Stay in touch at planet centos" link and put a prominent > > link like "Stay in touch with 5.3 development" on there? > > Can we get a page created - say something like, CentOS-5.3 Release > Status, and then worry about where to link it

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > What do you do with clamav on a linux server? > > You scan the server for malware. When? Every day via crontab? That can be much too late. Every hour? That can be much too late. Every 10 minutes? That can be much too late - and your server is busy scanning the f

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 on Centos4

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
John Clement wrote: > Bit of an emergency as I'm told this laptop has to leave here in 15 minutes, > I've gone ahead and configured, made, installed PHP 5.2 but an httpd restart > still only sees the old PHP 5.0.4, I think there's a fairly simple way to > get it to find the 5.2 version I've just in

[CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
I hope someone familiar with the way Linux processes files can enlighten me on the following: I recently replaced an old Windows 2000 server with a new machine running CentOS 5.2. It uses Samba 3.2.7 to serve a network of Windows XP clients. We are a newspaper. We use Acrobat Distiller to batc

[CentOS] lvm metadata recovery

2009-01-22 Thread Brian Krusic
Hi all, I am looking for a way to recover my primary VolGroup00 that has my root partition. Here is my scenario; 1 - I add an external drive to my VolGroup00 which is sdc1. 2 - I make that external drive a snapshot of my / 3 - After I remove that new volume of sdc1 using lvremove, all os fine.

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:28:41 + Miguel Medalha wrote: > My question is: how is the order of files determined by Linux when a > particular order is not explicitly required by a program? http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/linux-newbie/111044-change-order-files-directory.html I have no idea if th

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
> http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/linux-newbie/111044-change-order-files-directory.htm I searched Google too, and I read that page. That doesn't work for us: the Windows users won't touch anything on the server (or Linux, for that matter) and I am not there every day. The file names change cons

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:46:29 + Miguel Medalha wrote: > I searched Google too, and I read that page. That doesn't work for us: > the Windows users won't touch anything on the server (or Linux, for that > matter) and I am not there every day. The Windows users wouldn't have to know that they

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 21:24 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > What do you do with clamav on a linux server? > > You scan the server for malware. > When? Every day via crontab? That can be much too late. Every hour? That can > be much too late. Every 10 minutes? Tha

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 on Centos4

2009-01-22 Thread John Clement
2009/1/22 Ralph Angenendt : > John Clement wrote: >> Bit of an emergency as I'm told this laptop has to leave here in 15 minutes, >> I've gone ahead and configured, made, installed PHP 5.2 but an httpd restart >> still only sees the old PHP 5.0.4, I think there's a fairly simple way to >> get it to

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Les Mikesell
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> What do you do with clamav on a linux server? > > You scan the server for malware. > > There is nothing special about LINUX here. The whole "don't run > services as root" business is just so much noise. It isn't about > protecting the *server* it is about prot

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Les Mikesell
Miguel Medalha wrote: > I hope someone familiar with the way Linux processes files can enlighten > me on the following: > > I recently replaced an old Windows 2000 server with a new machine > running CentOS 5.2. It uses Samba 3.2.7 to serve a network of Windows XP > clients. > > We are a newsp

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> > There is nothing special about LINUX here. The whole "don't run > > services as root" business is just so much noise. It isn't about > > protecting the *server* it is about protecting the *data* which is > > accesses [hopefully] by services which are *not* root. It is about the > > data and

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread John R Pierce
Miguel Medalha wrote: > I hope someone familiar with the way Linux processes files can enlighten > me on the following: > ... > On the Windows server, Distiller processes the files by filename order: > > M09010901A001C.ps > M09010901A002C.ps > M09010901A003C.ps > Windows NTFS uses B-Tree for i

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 on Centos4

2009-01-22 Thread Scott Moseman
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Why do you compile software on your own > when you don't know how to do it correctly? > Is PHP 5.2 available through yum for CentOS 4? If so, I'm interested, because mine's only at 5.1. Thanks, Scott

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 on Centos4

2009-01-22 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM, John Clement wrote: > Bit of an emergency as I'm told this laptop has to leave here in 15 minutes, > I've gone ahead and configured, made, installed PHP 5.2 but an httpd restart > still only sees the old PHP 5.0.4, I think there's a fairly simple way to > get it t

[CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Michael St. Laurent
What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the latest updates support it? -- This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the United States Government, Department of State, International Traffic & Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR 120-130) which require

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Ross Walker
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Ross Walker wrote: >> On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz >> wrote: >> >> >>> Kai Schaetzl wrote: >>> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:31:20 +0100: > You need a combined(!) 768MB of RAM and S

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Tru Huynh
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:18:05PM -0800, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the > latest updates support it? according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3 oh, I should not reply, nor read your mail according to your footer ;) (not a US Lega

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 14:06 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > Miguel Medalha wrote: > > I hope someone familiar with the way Linux processes files can enlighten > > me on the following: > > ... > > On the Windows server, Distiller processes the files by filename order: > > > > M09010901A001C.ps > > M

[CentOS] ftp and iptables

2009-01-22 Thread Agile Aspect
Hi - I have a ftp server running version 2.0.7 of vsftpd on a CentSO 5.2 server using iptables behind a Linksys router. The setup works for UNIX machines on either side of the Linksys router. For the Windows machines it only works if they're behind the Linksys router - ftp does NOT work if they'r

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:18:05PM -0800, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the > > latest updates support it? > according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3 > > oh, I should not reply, nor read your mail according to your footer ;) >

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Les Bell
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> CLAMAV, or any package, isn't THE answer, it is part of an answer. And PCI/DSS requires a server be scanned on a regular basis. Fighting against that directive just makes no sense. You should scan an entire system on some interval regardless of OS. << It's worth

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the > latest updates support it? Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file considerably, or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or in

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Les Bell
"Michael St. Laurent" wrote: >> I hate that stupid thing but the suits have insisted on it. My apologies for any implied insult. << Just so you know, such disclaimers are *all* bluster and have no legal force whatsoever (with one exception: privileged attorney-client communications). If someon

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the > > latest updates support it? > according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3 Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? -- This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the United States Gover

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file considerably, > or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or > information from this mailing list. We have people with .gov email > addresses participating (NASA, etc.) and none of them have Sig files > like that. Welcom

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
> The Windows users wouldn't have to know that they are "touching" anything on > the server. If that script will in fact work and getting it to run at the > appropriate time is the only problem, then set up something from the Windows > box > to trigger it on your server. "Click the pretty icon r

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread William Warren
> > > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? > > hedidnotask...this search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Michael St. Laurent wrote: >> > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the >> > latest updates support it? > >> according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3 > > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? This will probably take the

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Michael St. Laurent wrote: >> Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file considerably, >> or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or >> information from this mailing list. We have people with .gov email >> addresses participating

Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-01-22 Thread Les Mikesell
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> Yes, but the scan has to be specific for the kind of problem you want to >> detect. > > The presence of a malware pattern - it is pretty straight forward. Only for known instances of malware. > > This doesn't make sense. No amount of updating will protect you fr

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-22 Thread Agile Aspect
Ross Walker wrote: > Why is that? Old school habit or is there a real benefit? > > Swap performance should be equally good whether it be raw disk, raw > partition, LVM logical volume or even a flat file on today's kernels, > but maybe there is something I am unaware of The downside of file syst

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? > > > > > hedidnotask...this > > search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:) Sorry folks. I'll go back to lurking now. -- This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the Unite

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:46:00 -0800 Michael St. Laurent wrote: > It's not a Sig file unfortunately. The Exchange mail server used here > stamps it on every outgoing email. I've asked the Exchange admin about > putting in an exception for my mail account. I forwarded your first email to not...@ha

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 22.01.2009 um 23:52 schrieb Lanny Marcus: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Michael St. Laurent > wrote: >>> Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file >>> considerably, >>> or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or >>> information from this mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
> If you are processing on the linux side and not via samba, and > your program will take a list of files on the command line instead of > groveling through the directory itself, you might simply start it with a > wild-card filename on the command line. The shell will sort the list as > it ex

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
> If the linux FS is efs2, maybe the "dir_index" option of mke2fs will doo > what you want? See "man mke2fs". It says it uses hashed b-trees, but for > speed. > That is the kind of information I am looking for. Thank you! ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 20:28 +, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I hope someone familiar with the way Linux processes files can enlighten > me on the following: > > I recently replaced an old Windows 2000 server with a new machine > running CentOS 5.2. It uses Samba 3.2.7 to serve a network of Windows

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
> You might want to look closely at the file names in Linux. > > Windows is not case sensitive but Linux is. > > In Windows, you cannot create the 2 files, TEST.DOC and test.doc in the > same directory but in Linux you can. It may be that some of these files > are stored differently as in file1.ps

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 22.01.2009 um 23:59 schrieb Frank Cox: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:46:00 -0800 > Michael St. Laurent wrote: > >> It's not a Sig file unfortunately. The Exchange mail server used >> here >> stamps it on every outgoing email. I've asked the Exchange admin >> about >> putting in an exception f

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Les Mikesell
Miguel Medalha wrote: >> If you are processing on the linux side and not via samba, and >> your program will take a list of files on the command line instead of >> groveling through the directory itself, you might simply start it with a >> wild-card filename on the command line. The shell will

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? > > > > > hedidnotask...this > > search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:) I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts or not though. -- This e-mail may contain technical information

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > The quick/dirty fix might be to cifs-mount a windows directory where the > linux side wants to see it and let the windows side work natively if > that gives the behavior you want. Using the automounter might help if > the windows side is not

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in 5.3

2009-01-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4. >> I am moving/copying image files lately 8G file and it is slow. I am >> hoping that ext4 really speeds that

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
Well, you must concede that it is *somewhat* ridiculous to read a one-line innocent email containing a twelve-line dense disclaimer... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Michael St. Laurent wrote: > > > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? > > > > > > > > hedidnotask...this > > > > search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:) > > I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts or not > though. Sur

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Miguel Medalha wrote: > Well, you must concede that it is *somewhat* ridiculous to read a > one-line innocent email containing a twelve-line dense disclaimer... Yes, but it is not his fault. Now let us all laugh at his employer and be finished with it. Other people in here cannot trim their rep

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in 5.3

2009-01-22 Thread Miguel Medalha
"Real World Benchmarks Of The EXT4 File-System" http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_benchmarks&num=1 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

2009-01-22 Thread Les Mikesell
Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> The quick/dirty fix might be to cifs-mount a windows directory where the >> linux side wants to see it and let the windows side work natively if >> that gives the behavior you want. Using the automounter might help if

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in 5.3

2009-01-22 Thread Les Mikesell
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >>> Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4. >>> I am moving/copying image files lately 8G file and it is slow. I am >>> hoping that ext4 really speeds that up. >> I don't think it will speed things up much. 8GB files are mostly >> hardwa

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Michael St. Laurent wrote: >> > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? >> > >> hedidnotask...this >> >> search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:) > > I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-22 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> > I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts or not > > though. > > > Money is very nice and it does count and it does help. Hopefully, your > companies money and not your own... No need to lurk. Yes, it's money from the fools who insist on the stupid disclaimer. Justice of a

[CentOS] cpu load monitoring

2009-01-22 Thread Dave Stevens
Hi, I have a server running Centos 5.2 and am implementing a GIS mapserver app. I have some sample logs from another implementation that give me an idea of bandwidth requirements but I would like to check the cpu load. I can not be at the server during the test and am interested in knowing if t

[CentOS] Question on upgrading hardware

2009-01-22 Thread Bob Hoffman
For centos 5.x Two questions regarding upgrading hardware or system. 1- If I were to shut off the server and add more ram, switch out ram, remove one of the two cpus, or replace the two cpus with bigger or smaller ones.Would I just be able to restart the server or would I have to do something

  1   2   >