On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37
>>>
>>
>> Would it be possible to migrate this info to a wiki page ? So more
>> people
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> There's your limit. However, you should check with your hardware if upping
> it is really desirable. With 4 GB I think you won't be able to handle much
> more anyway.
That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
two or three odd cgis on the machin
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> But I'm wondering where we need to put it ? I was thinking in either
> the general CentOS FAQ or in the CentOS 5 FAQ ? Anyone can think of a
> better place ?
I don't think people will find that when it's put in the FAQ, especially
if work is being done on that page (like add
Bob Taylor wrote:
> After installing my backup of /home and seeing firefox not restart, I
> started it from the command line with the immediate error:
>
> Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.5 and 1.9.0.5.
>
> I'm sorry, I'm at a complete loss. What's a GRE?
It's probably misspel
Hi;
Do you test in other file system? Like xfs or jfs?
You can use the "time" command to get the exate time:
# time cp /pathsource/file8g /pathdest/
Post here yours results.
[]s
Renato de Oliveira Diogo
Bacharel em Ciência da Computação
UNESP - B
>OK - well, I am pretty much sold on Alfresco but I can't guarantee that
>it will do the SSO with FF - it definitely will do AD and I think kicks
>Viewpoint butt.
Nice interface, do I understand this right: the only community version is
a dev snapshot, and it needs java (shudder)?
I just started
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 05:35 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >OK - well, I am pretty much sold on Alfresco but I can't guarantee that
> >it will do the SSO with FF - it definitely will do AD and I think kicks
> >Viewpoint butt.
>
> Nice interface, do I understand this right: the only community ver
Hi All,
I have an old (2004) Intel based server with 4G of ram running
Linux ndgonline.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST
2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
fully up to date using centOS rpms for apache, php, and mysql.
I have just changed from dmraid to md raid for the OS on mirro
Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
> Dear CentOS developers
>
> I would like to have ask some questions about the PostgreSQL and PHP
> packages in the current Testing repository for CentOS 5.
>
> In http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/TestingRepo there is a note, that the
> testing period is about 3 weeks. Curre
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:52:59 +0100:
> That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
> two or three odd cgis on the machine, you can flatten down the httpd
> binary quite a bit by throwing out unneeded modules.
>
> 500 to 750 clients shouldn't be tha
This finds all files modified 5 minutes ago.
find /home/*/ -cmin 5 -type f -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1
I want to find all files modified 5 or less minutes ago. How do I do
that? "find -mtime -1" only works in 24 hour increments.
Matt
___
CentOS mailing l
Matt wrote:
> This finds all files modified 5 minutes ago.
>
> find /home/*/ -cmin 5 -type f -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1
>
> I want to find all files modified 5 or less minutes ago. How do I do
> that? "find -mtime -1" only works in 24 hour increments.
-cmin -5
t
_
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> There's your limit. However, you should check with your hardware if upping
>> it is really desirable. With 4 GB I think you won't be able to handle much
>> more anyway.
>
> That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
> two
Rob Kampen wrote:
> How do I get some extra log info to track this down?
Have you tried to run 'show full processlist' on mysql while
the query is running? It should show all active queries, what
they are doing and how long they have been running for.
Also enable slow query logging and logging w
Renato de Oliveira Diogo wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Do you test in other file system? Like xfs or jfs?
> You can use the "time" command to get the exate time:
> # time cp /pathsource/file8g /pathdest/
>
> Post here yours results.
I like to use rsync with --progress so it shows realtime
updates on the status
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, nate wrote:
> Renato de Oliveira Diogo wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > Do you test in other file system? Like xfs or jfs?
> > You can use the "time" command to get the exate time:
> > # time cp /pathsource/file8g /pathdest/
> >
> > Post here yours results.
>
> I like to use rsy
Kai Schaetzl schrieb:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:52:59 +0100:
>
>
>> That really depends. If you only shove out static pages and have one or
>> two or three odd cgis on the machine, you can flatten down the httpd
>> binary quite a bit by throwing out unneeded modules.
>>
>> 5
>> find /home/*/ -cmin 5 -type f -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1
>>
>> I want to find all files modified 5 or less minutes ago. How do I do
>> that? "find -mtime -1" only works in 24 hour increments.
>
> -cmin -5
I cant believe I missed that. Thanks.
Matt
__
on 1-21-2009 7:14 AM Rob Kampen spake the following:
> Hi All,
> I have an old (2004) Intel based server with 4G of ram running
> Linux ndgonline.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST
> 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> fully up to date using centOS rpms for apache, php, and mysql.
>
Scott Silva wrote:
on 1-21-2009 7:14 AM Rob Kampen spake the following:
Hi All,
I have an old (2004) Intel based server with 4G of ram running
Linux ndgonline.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST
2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
fully up to date using centOS rpms fo
nate wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
How do I get some extra log info to track this down?
Have you tried to run 'show full processlist' on mysql while
the query is running? It should show all active queries, what
they are doing and how long they have been running for.
Also
I am migrating from Fedora 8 to CentOS 5.2
I have usb dvd
On F8 I have /etc/udev/rules/00-my-custom.rules
BUS=="scsi", SYSFS{vendor}=="TSSTcorp", SYSFS{model}=="CDDVDW SH-S203N
",SYMLINK="dvd",OWNER="rray"
When I plug in dvd I get
$ ll /dev/scd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Aug 25 08:17 /dev/scd1 ->
>
> > KeepAliveTimeout 150
>
>reduce this to 10 or 5.
>
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Kai,
what do you think about the "general Timeout
it is set to 300
ive never much thought about it, yet should we be consider and possible
reduce that one too?
- rh
___
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:13 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > After installing my backup of /home and seeing firefox not restart, I
> > started it from the command line with the immediate error:
> >
> > Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.5 and 1.9.0.5.
> >
>
Hello,
I have an error while try to install twinkle:
# yum install twinkle
[...]
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package twinkle.i386 0:1.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE) for package: twinkle
--> Finished Dependency Res
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> I am migrating from Fedora 8 to CentOS 5.2
> I have usb dvd
>
> On F8 I have /etc/udev/rules/00-my-custom.rules
> BUS=="scsi", SYSFS{vendor}=="TSSTcorp", SYSFS{model}=="CDDVDW SH-S203N
> ",SYMLINK="dvd",OWNER="rray"
> When I plug in dvd I get
> $ ll /dev/scd1
> lrwxrwx
This is great news, I'm sure CentOS will be a great release. My question
is will CentOS 5.3 support other architectures again? Namely IA64? I
suspect not as I've been waiting since 5.0 for it. Is there are hardware
issue, like not having any, that is delaying this?
--
James A. Peltier
Syste
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Farkas Levente wrote:
> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
>> I am migrating from Fedora 8 to CentOS 5.2
>> I have usb dvd
>>
>> On F8 I have /etc/udev/rules/00-my-custom.rules
>> BUS=="scsi", SYSFS{vendor}=="TSSTcorp", SYSFS{model}=="CDDVDW SH-S203N
>> ",SYMLINK="dvd",OWNER="rray"
>>
Mr.Vandeley wrote:
> I have an error while try to install twinkle:
> # yum install twinkle
> [...]
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package twinkle.i386 0:1.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated
> --> Processing Dependency: libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE) for package:
> Any id
Rob Kampen wrote:
nate wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
How do I get some extra log info to track this down?
Have you tried to run 'show full processlist' on mysql while
the query is running? It should show all active queries, what
they are doing and how long they have been running for.
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:40 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html
>
gee...when is it going to be ready? ;-)
seriously though, found this little tidbit which seems important to note
(under known issues)...
http://www.r
Bob Taylor wrote:
> > Try "sudo xulrunner --register-global", because somehow firefox believes
> > that it cannot find a working xulrunner instance on your machine.
>
> Your second request.
> # xulrunner --register-global
> #
> This returns nothing.
Yes, but does it work again after doing that? I
>To avoid this error, upgrade glibc first in a separate run:
Nice! So all the systems that autoupdate won't have the logic :)
Glad I don't do that...
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>To avoid this error, upgrade glibc first in a separate run:
>
> Nice! So all the systems that autoupdate won't have the logic :)
> Glad I don't do that...
Well we didn't get bitten by the problem on our 50 servers last
nigth... but we pro
Okay, it's been a while since I've messed with EL4, and apparently
I've gone stupid with respect to pam and properly enabling pam_tally2
in an appropriate fashion. My notes are for EL5, so if someone would
be so kind as to smack me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it.
--
During times of uni
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> Okay, it's been a while since I've messed with EL4, and apparently
> I've gone stupid with respect to pam and properly enabling pam_tally2
> in an appropriate fashion. My notes are for EL5, so if someone would
> be so kind as to smack me in the
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> I am migrating from Fedora 8 to CentOS 5.2
>>> I have usb dvd
>>>
>>> On F8 I have /etc/udev/rules/00-my-custom.rules
>>> BUS=="scsi", SYSFS{vendor}=="TSSTcorp", SYSFS{model}=="CDDVDW SH-S203N
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> Okay, it's been a while since I've messed with EL4, and apparently
>> I've gone stupid with respect to pam and properly enabling pam_tally2
>> in an appropriate fashion. My notes a
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Farkas Levente wrote:
> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>
>>> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
I am migrating from Fedora 8 to CentOS 5.2
I have usb dvd
On F8 I have /etc/udev/rules/00-my-custom.rules
BUS=="scsi", SYSF
I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
wrote:
> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
> Thanks,
You can install/run the CentOS-3 OS. CentOS-4 might run. I do not
think CentOS-5 would be able to be installed on the syst
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
> wrote:
>> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
>> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
>> Thanks,
>
> You can install/run the CentOS-3 OS. CentOS-4 might run. I do
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
Bring the memory up to 256Mb.
I have a number of test servers running on similar platforms. But you
have to get the memory up to at least 256Mb...
___
James A. Peltier wrote:
>
> CentOS 5 requires 512MB for installation
I had an EL5 install attempt fail on a VM with 512 MB of RAM. Big ugly
anaconda Python stack dump type error. Upped the RAM for the VM, and it
installed.
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
on 1-21-2009 3:42 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
>> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
>
> Bring the memory up to 256Mb.
>
> I have a number of test servers running on similar platforms. Bu
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:37 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
>> wrote:
>>> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
>>> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
>
> CentOS 5
You can install 5 on it, but you probably won't be too happy with it.
Make sure to have more than the default amount of swap installed.
On Jan 21, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
> wrote:
>> I have an old 400mHz Dell with
Just to comment that this was with an actual RH installation DVD, not
CentOS. The only systems I've installed CentOS on has had at least
1GB of RAM.
On Jan 21, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kevin Krieser wrote:
> You can install 5 on it, but you probably won't be too happy with it.
> Make sure to have m
Hi All,
Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm
being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why
we don't need to install an anti-virus or find an anti-virus to run on
our CentOS 5 servers.
> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
> Thanks,
> Mike.
My firewall is a Pentium 75 with 48 MB of RAM running CentOS 4.7 +
current. I did a text based install, and the install took a very long
time, but it works very well ..despit
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 12:19 +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm
> being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why
> we don't need to install a
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> The format is slightly different, and apparently I've caught a nasty
> case of the stupid. So far the things I'm trying aren't working, so I
> was hoping someone had a cut/paste example handy.
Oversight on my part. It was enabled, but not bei
On Jan 21, 2009, at 8:32 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
>> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
>> Thanks,
>> Mike.
>
> My firewall is a Pentium 75 with 48 MB of RAM running CentOS 4.7 +
> current. I did a text based install, and the inst
2009/1/22 Ian Forde :
> On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 12:19 +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm
>> being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why
>Whatever I do - it needs to be convincing enough to make the PCI
>compliance guy tick the box.
Eset has a current linux client, though their product *AND* support
suck the biggest one.
https://www.icsalabs.com/icsa/product.php?tid=dfgdf$gdhkkjk-
for more
HTH,
jlc
__
> Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm
> being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why
> we don't need to install an anti-virus or find an anti-virus to run on
> our CentOS 5 servers.
Ian Forde wrote:
>>
Yep - on the wikipedia page you referenced, look in the "Requirements"
section, section 5. It says: "Use and regularly update anti-virus
software on all systems commonly affected by malware"
<<
I doubt Amos's QSA is using Wikipedia as his reference, unfortunately. The
PCI D
Amos Shapira wrote:
> 2009/1/22 Ian Forde :
>
>> same network as the Linux hosts, that should take care of the sweet spot
>> of the AV argument. (Though if you're connected to a site via VPN or
>> private link that has Windows boxes, that may be a different story.)
>
> Rightso. You reminded me -
ClamAV is probably your best bet.
That said, the question is, what do you scan? It can be used several
ways, typically scanning files on demand... its not an intrusion
detection system like most MS Windows scanners, where it automatically
scans every file being read or written (while slowing
> 2. Alternatively - what linux anti-virus (oh, the shame of typing this
> word combination :() do you use which doesn't affect our systems
> performance too much.
>
Sophos AV if you have to get something on.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:19:27PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm
> being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why
> we don't need to in
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 22:31 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > > Try "sudo xulrunner --register-global", because somehow firefox believes
> > > that it cannot find a working xulrunner instance on your machine.
> >
> > Your second request.
> > # xulrunner --register-global
> > #
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 21:06 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > Yes, I know, it's really really embarrassing to have to ask but I'm
> > being pushed to the wall with PCI DSS Compliance procedure
> > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS) and have to either justify why
> > we don't need to install
RobertH wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:26:41 -0800:
> what do you think about the "general Timeout
>
> it is set to 300
>
> ive never much thought about it, yet should we be consider and possible
> reduce that one too?
I'm using 120, but I don't think reducing this value has much impact.
Kai
--
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry Brimer
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:33 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box
>
> > I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
> > and
Hi Friends,
We are running some of the Centos 5 32 bit, 5.2 64-bit systems. These
systems are ldap clients and the ldap server is Windows 2003 Server.
Sometimes 1 or 2 services on these servers sucks 100% cpu and the load
becomes high on the server.
Below is an example where one the httpd process
Ian Forde wrote:
>>
That depends upon how you define malware detection. Antivirus software
for Linux typically scans for Windows viruses and malware. On the other
hand, if you're talking about detection in the sense of Tripwire, or a
cron job that runs a 'rpm -V' every night, I completely agre
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 1-21-2009 3:42 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
>
>> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>>
>>> I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
>>> and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
>>>
>> Bring the memory up to 256Mb.
>>
>> I have a number o
68 matches
Mail list logo
