Re: [CentOS] Cron daemon with better precision?

2009-01-19 Thread John Doe
> I'm on the hunt for a cron scheduler that supports definitions to the second. > Obviously, every cron daemon supports minute/hour/etc but I have a special > application that requires finer granularity. > > I know I know... someone will say "The load will be horrendous on your > system" > or

[CentOS] Status of PostgreSQL and PHP in Testing

2009-01-19 Thread Peter Hopfgartner
Dear CentOS developers I would like to have ask some questions about the PostgreSQL and PHP packages in the current Testing repository for CentOS 5. In http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/TestingRepo there is a note, that the testing period is about 3 weeks. Currently, the PostgreSQL and PHP package

Re: [CentOS] Cron daemon with better precision?

2009-01-19 Thread David Hrbáč
Tim Nelson napsal(a): > Greetings list- > > I'm on the hunt for a cron scheduler that supports definitions to the second. > Obviously, every cron daemon supports minute/hour/etc but I have a special > application that requires finer granularity. > > I know I know... someone will say "The load w

Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.7 or 5.2 32 bits O.S. for ORACLE DB server??

2009-01-19 Thread Morten Torstensen
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Not true. The comparison of PAE to EMS/XMS is completely bogus, the > technologies aren't alike at all. PAE does *NOT* involve any bank > switching; a system using PAE can "address that 16 GB all at once". > Comparing PAE to EMS/XMS has the same level of validity as

Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.7 or 5.2 32 bits O.S. for ORACLE DB server??

2009-01-19 Thread Morten Torstensen
Warren Young wrote: > All this aside: you aren't seriously trying to talk this guy into using > PAE mode, are you? Are you not, in fact, just being pedantic, yet agree > with me on the most important point, which is that he should be using a > 64-bit OS and application here? I hope he is not.

Re: [CentOS] Starting slapd: /bin/bash: /tmp/start-slapd.K12378: Permission denied

2009-01-19 Thread brettwiesner
Maybe that's it actually. Here's the output of the mount cmd... /dev/hdv1 on / type ufs (defaults) none on /proc type proc (defaults) none on /dev/pts type devpts (gid=5,mode=620) /vservers//tmp on /tmp type ufs (bind,noexec) /vservers//var/tmp on /var/tmp type ufs (bind,noexec) It looks

[CentOS] Wifi card - Intel PRO 5300

2009-01-19 Thread MOKRANI Rachid
Hi, I'm trying to use my wireless connection on a HP 8530w laptop with no success. My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92) The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300 Is somenone try it with success ? Please, any help will be appreciated. Best regards. __ Ce message (et

Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding

2009-01-19 Thread Thom Paine
> In the case of the OP, I would urge him to evaluate if that network > topology really makes sense. Does it make sense having two hosts with > two different connections? In that case, does it make sense to run > services like mail/web servers on these hosts? Shouldn't they be > dedicated routers/f

Re: [CentOS] Starting slapd: /bin/bash: /tmp/start-slapd.K12378: Permission denied

2009-01-19 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 18:54, Brett Wiesner wrote: > $ sudo /etc/init.d/ldap start > Starting slapd: /bin/bash: /tmp/start-slapd.l14891: Permission denied Your /tmp/ is mounted with noexec. To work around this, create a directory where the script can be written to and executed (can be owne

Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding

2009-01-19 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:58, Thom Paine wrote: > I think option 2 will work best for me. The box and connection on > y.y.y.y is strictly for communicating with this other mail server I > need to relay out, and receive only patient records mail from. If I > rewrite the packets to appear to b

Re: [CentOS] Wifi card - Intel PRO 5300

2009-01-19 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, MOKRANI Rachid wrote: > I'm trying to use my wireless connection on a HP 8530w laptop with no > success. > > My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92) > The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300 > > Is somenone try it with success ? > Please, any help will be appreciated. Please

Re: [CentOS] Wifi card - Intel PRO 5300

2009-01-19 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, MOKRANI Rachid wrote: >> My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92) >> The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300 >> >> Is somenone try it with success ? >> Please, any help will be appreciated. > > Please look at our fine CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Wifi card - Intel PRO 5300

2009-01-19 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, MOKRANI Rachid wrote: >> >>> My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92) >>> The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300 >>> >>> Is somenone try it with success ? >>> Please, any help will

Re: [CentOS] Wifi card - Intel PRO 5300

2009-01-19 Thread Ned Slider
Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> >>> Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit. >> And firmware for the iwl* drivers will become available from RPMforge >> as soon as Dag has a chance to push

Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding

2009-01-19 Thread John
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Thom Paine > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:59 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding > > > In the case of the OP, I would urge him to evaluate if that

Re: [CentOS] Wifi card - Intel PRO 5300

2009-01-19 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ned Slider wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit. >>> And firmware for the iwl* drivers will become available from R

Re: [CentOS] Wifi card - Intel PRO 5300

2009-01-19 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ned Slider wrote: > >> Dag Wieers wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > > Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit.

[CentOS] prettyprint problem in CentOS 5.2

2009-01-19 Thread tbuchanan
I'd like to ask for help with a problem in CentOS 5.2 when printing from the command line with the prettyprint option selected. Program students print out their code with the command: lpr -P -o prettyprint -o job-sheets=none The prettyprint option, as you know, puts a banner with file name a

[CentOS] Help with a good recovery plan.. Linux rescue?

2009-01-19 Thread Glenn
Hello All, I have a machine that crashed. Some part of the motherboard (power supply-related) went south. The motherboard, CPU and memory have been replaced with a much newer architecture. The OS and data are intact on two SATA drives that were RAID1 with LVM. I am going to use 'linux rescue'

Re: [CentOS] Help with a good recovery plan.. Linux rescue?

2009-01-19 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009, Glenn wrote: >Hello All, > >I have a machine that crashed. Some part of the motherboard (power >supply-related) went south. > >The motherboard, CPU and memory have been replaced with a much newer >architecture. The OS and data are intact on two SATA drives that were >RAID1

[CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-19 Thread Sean Carolan
What do you use for monitoring your Apache Tomcat servers? I have used jconsole to manually connect and look at the statistics. I'm wondering if there are any standard tools for watching the health of the java process. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

[CentOS] (OT) Firewall Question

2009-01-19 Thread Jun Salen
Hi List, I am not familiar with the commands of IPtables so I want use tools on top of it. What do you suggest. Can I make test of it inside CentOS on top of VMWare server with only one LAN inteface? I try to use Pfsense, I believe it has easy to understand GUI but it fails to install on my des

Re: [CentOS] Starting slapd: /bin/bash: /tmp/start-slapd.K12378: Permission denied

2009-01-19 Thread Brett Wiesner
Thanks! That worked! On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 18:54, Brett Wiesner > wrote: > > $ sudo /etc/init.d/ldap start > > Starting slapd: /bin/bash: /tmp/start-slapd.l14891: Permission denied > > Your /tmp/ is mounted with noexec. >

Re: [CentOS] (OT) Firewall Question

2009-01-19 Thread Kenneth Burgener
On 1/19/2009 8:28 PM, Jun Salen wrote: > I am not familiar with the commands of IPtables so I want use tools on top of > it. What do you suggest. Can I make test of it inside CentOS on top of VMWare > server with only one LAN inteface? I try to use Pfsense, I believe it has > easy to understand

Re: [CentOS] Help with a good recovery plan.. Linux rescue?

2009-01-19 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Can I use 'linux rescue' to fix that OS up to boot it? The kernel >panics in its current state (because the hardware architecture is so >strikingly different). What is the methodology of fixing the kernel >in this circumstance? You likely don't have block device modules for whatever controller