Re: [CentOS] Installing kernel RHEL-5.3 on CentOS 5.2 (x86_64)

2009-01-14 Thread Tosh
> nate wrote: >> Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I tried to install the kernel Red Hat 5.3 x86_64 (2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64) >>> with the command: >>>rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64.rpm >>> but there is problem with dependecy: ecryptfs-util< 44. How to solve >>> problems with depenc

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

2009-01-14 Thread Kay Diederichs
Stewart Williams schrieb: ... > ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) > ata1.00: ATA-7: GB0250C8045, HPG1, max UDMA/133 > ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) > ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > ata2

Re: [CentOS] Postfix header check help - SOLVED

2009-01-14 Thread Plant, Dean
mouss wrote: > Plant, Dean a écrit : >> Hi list, >> >> I have a requirement for a mail server that only allows email to pass >> with a particular word in the subject line. >> >> Reading the header checks docs for Postfix I thought I may be able >> to add this rule: >> >> !/^Subject: .*dingdong/

[CentOS] hardware info

2009-01-14 Thread ann kok
Hi How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory No need to turn off the machine Thank you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] hardware info

2009-01-14 Thread James Bensley
Look in the /proc directory, use the cat command and read the files in there, cpuinfo, memory etc ;) 2009/1/14 ann kok > Hi > > How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory > No need to turn off the machine > > Thank you -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--

Re: [CentOS] hardware info

2009-01-14 Thread John Doe
> Hi > > How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory > No need to turn off the machine > > Thank you Look in /proc or use a tool that sumarize it nicely (sosreport or others)... And look at the quickspecs documentation of your server. Even better, use your vendor utilities (if provided)

Re: [CentOS] hardware info

2009-01-14 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hi Also have a look in /proc directory another greate way then just dmidecode if also lspci to view all your pci devices. Per On 1/14/09 12:59 PM, "ann kok" wrote: > Hi > > How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory > No need to turn off the machine > > Thank you > > > >

Re: [CentOS] hardware info

2009-01-14 Thread Rainer Duffner
ann kok schrieb: > Hi > > How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory > No need to turn off the machine > > yum install dmidecode Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] hardware info

2009-01-14 Thread David Hrbáč
ann kok napsal(a): > Hi > > How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory > No need to turn off the machine Try lshw. David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] hardware info

2009-01-14 Thread Les Mikesell
Rainer Duffner wrote: > ann kok schrieb: >> Hi >> >> How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory >> No need to turn off the machine >> >> > > > > yum install dmidecode > And if you need it over a lot of machines, look at ocsinventory-ng which will send it to a server and database i

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-14 Thread Sam Drinkard
Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >>After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started >> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on any >> pages or tabs. >> > > I am running Firefox on CentOS 5.2

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-14 Thread Sam Drinkard
Robert wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote: >> >> >>>After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started >>> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on any >>> pages or tabs. >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-14 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:07 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote: > > > >>After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started > >> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on an

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-14 Thread Sam Drinkard
William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:07 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >> Lanny Marcus wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote: >>> >>> After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started seeing some problems,

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox (Solved)

2009-01-14 Thread Sam Drinkard
Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the ~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir, restarted FF and all works as advertized now. Thanks for the help and suggestions guys... Sam ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@ce

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox (Solved)

2009-01-14 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:09 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the > ~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir, > restarted FF and all works as advertized now. Glad to hear that! Y'know those 'ritas are corrupting influence

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Scott Mazur wrote on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:08:22 -0600: > AFAIK the DHCP client has no authority to register dynamic dns regardless of > how the client machines are configured. It's the DHCP server that decides to > update BIND and this can be turned on or off. My guess is your DHCP server is > co

[CentOS] How to install TP-LINK WN321G driver on CentOS 5.2

2009-01-14 Thread Xiaobo Zhu
Hi, Would anyone who has prior experience please share me the steps for the subject? Many thanks! [r...@zhu ~]# uname -a Linux zhu.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux Cheers, Xiaobo ___ CentOS mailing li

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 47, Issue 5

2009-01-14 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-14 Thread Tosh
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Could it be this simple? > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen. >> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV >> files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso >>

[CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

2009-01-14 Thread James B. Byrne
I am encountering an odd problem with su. Up until quite recently I was able to connect to one of my servers (CentOS-5.2) via ssh as an ordinary user and then, from the shell, perform an $ su -l to obtain root access. Now when I try to do this I see the following: $ su -l Password: su: incorrect

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

2009-01-14 Thread nate
James B. Byrne wrote: > Any ideas as to what might be happening here and how I might fix it? It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ? >From a 5.1 system: -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

[CentOS] Areca 1220 kernel lockups

2009-01-14 Thread William Taylor
Has anyone experienced any problems with Areca raid cards specifically the 1220 causing kernels to lock up? We are running 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5xen on 64bit. We have "areca_cli rsf info" run once an hour from cron to check for raid raid issues. Having this running seems to cause the box to loc

[CentOS] NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller

2009-01-14 Thread Alexander Shtrikman
Hello, I can't get NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller working with CentOS 5.2 (HP Pavilion a6500f Desktop PC) Any tip will be highly appreciated :-) Thanks, Alex. __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at gi

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-14 Thread Scott Mazur
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:31:26 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote > Scott Mazur wrote on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:08:22 -0600: > > > AFAIK the DHCP client has no authority to register dynamic dns regardless of > > how the client machines are configured. It's the DHCP server that decides > > to > > update BIND a

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox (Solved)

2009-01-14 Thread Sam Drinkard
William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:09 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >> Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the >> ~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir, >> restarted FF and all works as advertized now. >> > > Glad to hear that

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox (Solved)

2009-01-14 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-14-2009 8:15 AM William L. Maltby spake the following: > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:09 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: >> Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the >> ~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir, >> restarted FF and all works as advertized now. >

[CentOS] csgfs 4 really outdated

2009-01-14 Thread Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes
Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this version???. Best regards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Does CentOS 5 support USB 1 ?

2009-01-14 Thread Russell Bell
We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4. Now we can't use the USB port. dmesg returns: usbcore: deregistering driver usb-storage Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage USB Mass Storage support registered. USB Universal Host Controller

[CentOS] stack overflow

2009-01-14 Thread Peter Doherty
Hi, I've got a fileserver that runs Centos 5.2. It's been stable otherwise stable for maybe a year or more, and now it's crashed three times since Saturday. The first two times the computer was completely unresponsive, and there was nothing on the console, and nothing in the logs. I was

Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS 5 support USB 1 ?

2009-01-14 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:34 -0700, Russell Bell wrote: > We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4. > Now we can't use the USB port. dmesg returns: > > usbcore: deregistering driver usb-storage > Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... > usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

2009-01-14 Thread James B. Byrne
On Wed Jan 14 17:16:01 UTC 2009, nate centos at linuxpowered.net wrote: > It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ? > > From a 5.1 system: > > -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su This is what I have on that host: # ll /bin/su -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /b

Re: [CentOS] csgfs 4 really outdated

2009-01-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote: > Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh > updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this > version???. What are you missing? GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.el4_7.5.src.rpm is the latest kernel which is available on ftp.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

2009-01-14 Thread James B. Byrne
I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s /usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are: $ ll $(which su) -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much. I am certain that I have not been changing file modes in /usr

Re: [CentOS] stack overflow

2009-01-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Peter Doherty wrote: > 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 20 09:34:18 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 > GNU/Linux Have you tried this with the current kernel for centos5? -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell

Re: [CentOS] stack overflow

2009-01-14 Thread nate
Peter Doherty wrote: > Hi, > > Jan 14 03:06:21 fs2 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request > at virtual address fc7ff0aa that makes me think bad ram. Run memtest86 or some other memory tester. It may take a day or two or three for it to pick up errors. nate _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

2009-01-14 Thread nate
James B. Byrne wrote: > I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s > /usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are: > > $ ll $(which su) > -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su > > And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much. > > I am certain that I have

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

2009-01-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
James B. Byrne wrote on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:52 -0500 (EST): > Does anyone have any idea how this change could occur? There are some security tools that could be configured to reset SUID bits on files in certain paths with their default templates. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get you

Re: [CentOS] upgrade question. - when to reboot

2009-01-14 Thread Kenneth Burgener
On 1/9/2009 9:49 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > Brian wrote: > >> Is there a list of packages that after update require a reboot, other then >> kernel? >> > For updates other than the kernel, there is almost always an answer > short of a full reboot. But, finding that answer and being 100% >