Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I just applied the BIND updates. > > Then I fixed the one file that had a second include of named.ca > (remembered that from last time) and did a 'service named restart', and > it failed. Never heard about someone having to apply that fix - do you have a bug entry fr

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > What is there available for Centos? ffmpeg, mencoder. > Now that Audacity is no longer available to us... Have you tried helping to resolve that issue with rpmforge? Ralph pgpzqRDmiB4Uw.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ C

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > What is there available for Centos? Now that Audacity is no longer > available to us... > Which version of CentOS are you running? (version and architecture please) I have audacity working perfectly, I do compile it myself, but can make it available in an rpm package ___

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host

> No, the main problem is that A is behind my ISP's NAT. I want to access it > from C (yes, I'll be travelling a lot and C might be just about anywhere). > But the problem is that since A is behind a NAT, the connection must be > initiated from A's side to C. Also, since C might be behind some othe

[CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

Has anyone worked around the display size limit on units like the ASUS eee? They list a 800x480 display resolution, and I have encountered Gnome dialogs that require at least 800x600 to see the button on the bottom of the panel. ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

Not a fix, but holding down the ALT key on a few window managers will allow moving the window without the title bar being present. On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Has anyone worked around the display size limit on units like the ASUS > eee? They list a 800x480 display

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

On Sunday 11 January 2009 13:18:36 Kwan Lowe wrote: > Not a fix, but holding down the ALT key on a few window managers will allow > moving the window without the title bar being present. > Also, if you are running a distrubution with KDE4, there is 'laptop' theme that minimises decorations and gi

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

John R Pierce wrote: > Stewart Williams wrote: >> I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and install ed >> CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on it. >> >> It has the following spec: >> >> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3065 @ 2.33GHz >> 4GB ECC memory >> 4 x 250GB SATA hard disks running at 1.5GB/s >> >> O

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

William Warren wrote: > Stewart Williams wrote: >> I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and install ed >> CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on it. >> >> It has the following spec: >> >> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3065 @ 2.33GHz >> 4GB ECC memory >> 4 x 250GB SATA hard disks running at 1.5GB/s >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 08:12 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Has anyone worked around the display size limit on units like the ASUS > eee? They list a 800x480 display resolution, and I have encountered > Gnome dialogs that require at least 800x600 to see the button on > the bottom of the panel

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 10:54 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 08:12 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Has anyone worked around the display size limit on units like the ASUS > > eee? They list a 800x480 display resolution, and I have encountered > > Gnome dialogs that req

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:13 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter > > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > What is there available fo

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:10:54 +0100: > The files under there belong to root:named and are 644 (except rndc.conf > which is 640). No file there belongs to named:named. named.acl isn't shipped > with bind. I had named.conf with root.root (and it was working). That got changed

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

david.mackint...@xdroop.com wrote on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:57:18 -0500: > good answer. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:13 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter > > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > What is there available fo

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

David Mackintosh wrote: > From: david.mackint...@xdroop.com > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:14:22AM +, Vandaman wrote: > > > Its not the time to be nannying people > > over how to behave on mailing list. > > What is your contribution to the topic? Or are you one of those who has been top-po

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

On Jan 11, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Stewart Williams wrote: > William Warren wrote: >> Stewart Williams wrote: >>> I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and >>> install ed >>> CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on it. >>> >>> It has the following spec: >>> >>> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3065 @ 2.33GHz

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

*Whut do U mean? I don't get it lol.* On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:14:22AM +, Vandaman wrote: > >> Its not the time to be nannying people >> over how to behave on mailing list. > > > > -- > /\oo/\ > / /()\ \ David Mackintosh | > d...@xdroop.

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I had named.conf with root.root (and it was working). That > got changed by the > update to root.named. Which apparently is the correct > ownership according to > you and it still works. When I installed bind just a few > weeks ago I had to > create all the files manuall

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Am 11.01.2009 um 18:36 schrieb Ross Walker: > > If all your doing is serving a single file to a handful of PCs then a > 2 drive mirror will be more then enough. > Actually, he could put it on a swap-backed tmpfs and serve it directly from RAM. Seeing that he has 4GB of it... If it's really o

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I didn't notice that before but I see that there are a lot of errors already > before the update: > > Jan 11 16:38:00 chacha named[11307]: client 192.168.1.228#1994: view > internal: > update 'bolera.lan/IN' denied You have a windows machine on the network and it gets its

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Ross Walker wrote: > On Jan 11, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Stewart Williams > wrote: > >> William Warren wrote: >>> Stewart Williams wrote: I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and install ed CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on it. It has the following spec: Int

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

On Jan 11, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 11.01.2009 um 18:36 schrieb Ross Walker: >> >> If all your doing is serving a single file to a handful of PCs then a >> 2 drive mirror will be more then enough. >> > > > Actually, he could put it on a swap-backed tmpfs and serve it dir

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

On Jan 11, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Stewart Williams wrote: > Ross Walker wrote: >> On Jan 11, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Stewart Williams >> wrote: >> >>> William Warren wrote: Stewart Williams wrote: > I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and > install ed > CentOS 5.2 x8

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Has anyone worked around the display size limit on units like the ASUS > eee? They list a 800x480 display resolution, and I have encountered > Gnome dialogs that require at least 800x600 to see the button on > the bottom of the panel. T

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Stewart Williams wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > >> Stewart Williams wrote: >> >>> The block I/O is the thing that concerns me as mostly I am serving a >>> 650MB file via samba to 5 clients and I think this is where I need the >>> speed. >>> >> is this a sequential or random access

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +, Vandaman wrote: > What is your contribution to the topic? Or are you one of those who > has been top-posting and posting in html? Hmmm... I appear to be: - posting in non-HTML text - bottom posting - trimming I presume that if you are truely intere

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Stewart Williams wrote: > > I am no expert on RAID, so you have opened my eyes to somethings I > wasn't aware of. > > I am considering disabling the onboard RAID in the BIOS and > re-installing CentOS and configuring the 4 drives as RAID 10 just to see > what the performance is like. Yes, unle

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

David Mackintosh wrote: > > Would you like the joke explained to you in more detail? > What time will your mummy come home. You should not be playing on a mailing list like this. :-) We have the serious business of CentOS to talk about. Regards, Vandaman.

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

John R Pierce wrote: > Stewart Williams wrote: >> John R Pierce wrote: >> >>> Stewart Williams wrote: >>> The block I/O is the thing that concerns me as mostly I am serving a 650MB file via samba to 5 clients and I think this is where I need the speed. >>> is th

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Stewart Williams wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Stewart Williams wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Stewart Williams wrote: The block I/O is the thing that concerns me as mostly I am serving a 650MB file via samba to 5 clients and I think this is where I need the spee

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Stewart Williams wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: >> Stewart Williams wrote: >>> I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and install ed >>> CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on it. >>> >>> It has the following spec: >>> >>> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3065 @ 2.33GHz >>> 4GB ECC memory >>> 4 x 250GB SATA ha

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Hi Rob, Rob Kampen wrote: > Hi, I too run quickbooks (2007) and offer the following scenario - 5 > user licences (actually 2 times three user package were purchased). > Previously I used version 2004 and this allows much better sharing of > the data file, unfortunately I got sucked into an upgra

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Hi Stuart Stewart Williams wrote: Hi Rob, Rob Kampen wrote: Hi, I too run quickbooks (2007) and offer the following scenario - 5 user licences (actually 2 times three user package were purchased). Previously I used version 2004 and this allows much better sharing of the data file, unfortun

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

> I've not used it, but have noticed that Gnome in particular uses lots > of screen real-estate versus other WMs. "GNOME" is not a window manager. The real-estate required by various applications and dialogs won't change by switching window managers; all window managers do is decorate windows. _

[CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen. So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso image that I can archive and burn audio CDs to use as they get used up. ___

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

John wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt >> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:13 AM >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter >> >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >>>

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

Anne Wilson wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2009 13:18:36 Kwan Lowe wrote: > >> Not a fix, but holding down the ALT key on a few window managers will allow >> moving the window without the title bar being present. >> >> > Also, if you are running a distrubution with KDE4, there is 'laptop' t

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

Robert, --- On Sun, 1/11/09, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > From: Robert Moskowitz > Subject: Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 4:53 PM > John wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org > >> [mailto:cen

Re: [CentOS] Dealing with 800x480 displays

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> I've not used it, but have noticed that Gnome in particular uses lots >> of screen real-estate versus other WMs. > > "GNOME" is not a window manager. The real-estate required by various > applications and dialogs won't change by switc

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host

on 1-9-2009 12:41 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following: > Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are sysadmins here or > there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-) > > I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years (yes, > I know, it sounds ridiculous,

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

on 1-11-2009 9:49 AM Jim Perrin spake the following: > *Whut do U mean? I don't get it lol.* > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, > > wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:14:22AM +, Vandaman wrote: >> >>> Its not the time to be nannying people >>> over ho

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Vandaman wrote: > David Mackintosh wrote: > >> >> Would you like the joke explained to you in more detail? >> > > What time will your mummy come home. You should not be playing > on a mailing list like this. :-) > > We have the serious business of CentOS to talk a

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host

> the connection must be initiated from C's side to A. This simply cannot work > simultaneously, so I tried to make use of my public server B which can be > used as a "bridge" between A and C. So, A connects to B, C connects to B, and > then A and C communicate. Roughly speaking... > > That wa

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > John wrote: > >>> -Original Message- >>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org >>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt >>> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:13 AM >>> To: centos@centos.org >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter >>

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

Robert Moskowitz wrote: Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen. So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso image that I can archive and burn audio CDs to use as they

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

On Saturday 10 January 2009 9:37:43 pm Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I just applied the BIND updates. > > Then I fixed the one file that had a second include of named.ca > (remembered that from last time) and did a 'service named restart', and > it failed. In messages I found: > > Jan 10 21:31:17 z9m9

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 7:54 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter > > John wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> F