Hello List
Apologies but is there anyone that knows where I can download a x86_64 dvd
iso?
Regards
Per Qvindesland
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Apologies but is there anyone that knows where I can download a x86_64 dvd
> iso?
>
>
You wont find a DVD iso for 4.3 from http as its bigger than the
standard apache filesize limit
http://vault.centos.org/4.3/isos/i386/
Either get the CD iso's and make them into a DVD iso yourself or
>
> http://vault.centos.org/4.3/isos/i386/
>
>
clearly that link should be
http://vault.centos.org/4.3/isos/x86_64/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi
Cheers, I decided to rather download the 4.3 server version then trying to
find a 4.3 dvd download.
Regards
Per Qvindesland
On 1/8/09 10:33 AM, "Tom Brown" wrote:
>
>>
>> Apologies but is there anyone that knows where I can download a x86_64 dvd
>> iso?
>>
>>
>
>
> You wont find a D
Per Qvindesland wrote on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:24:26 +0100:
> Apologies
You would not need to apologize if you would stop hijacking other threads.
If you send a new question then hit the "new message" button, please!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Service
Hello List
I am having a second thing and this time I made sure that I did not hijack
any other threads :-)
I have a pptp vpn server that works just fine except from dns, I can ping a
server and it will resolv but no packages are being received, does anyone
have any clues on how to sort this out?
Per Qvindesland wrote on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:50:59 +0100:
> I have a pptp vpn server that works just fine except from dns, I can ping a
> server and it will resolv but no packages are being received,
Maybe it's just me, but I don't understand this. Does "except from dns" mean
you have some probl
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:55:19 -0500:
> Then I went into the BIOS and set it for the fan to always run while on
> AC.
Wow, I didn't know there are BIOS settings for *that*.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactiv
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:55:19 -0500:
>
>
>> Then I went into the BIOS and set it for the fan to always run while on
>> AC.
>>
>
> Wow, I didn't know there are BIOS settings for *that*.
I guess it falls under the power management catagory. Since
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:26:35 -0500:
> I guess it falls under the power management catagory. Since your on AC,
> you are not worried about battery performance, so keep the fan going and
> don't be so fancy with managing temperature
Well, yes, I just haven't seen it in
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 01:28:41PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:55:19 -0500:
>
> > Then I went into the BIOS and set it for the fan to always run while on
> > AC.
>
> Wow, I didn't know there are BIOS settings for *that*.
Some have it, some don't. Y
Hi list!
While regular backup solutions like amanda or bacula are very good at
their job, ie keeping point2point copies of the files currently on
disk, I find them less suited for archiving - having unused files move
to tape in duplo and stay there until requested. I've even read of
multi-tier sol
>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM, in message
<77c4f5c60901080737ka0ee2fbr7f6badc9fc48e...@mail.gmail.com>, Bent Terp
wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> While regular backup solutions like amanda or bacula are very good at
> their job, ie keeping point2point copies of the files currently on
> disk, I fin
René Standfest wrote:
> We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo
> (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying
> problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like
> Thunderbird with Lightning) and has a rea
> > We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo
> > (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying
> > problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like
> > Thunderbird with Lightning) and has a really functional
Bo Lynch wrote:
> Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list.
>
> We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware
> style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are
> using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any
> recommendations/opi
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I develop on OpenGroupware, not SOGo, but both use SOPE's LDAP
> library/bindings. If the DSA supports LDAPv3 binds you shouldn't have
> any problems using it.
>
> I'd recommend OpenLDAP any day, as it is far-and-away the faster and
> more feature-reach DSA. But I v
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Max Hetrick schrieb am 08.01.2009 17:23:
>> We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo
>> (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying
>> problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like
>> Thunderbird with Li
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:59 PM, CM wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:16:08 -0800
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
>>
>> >
>> > So, is there a way to change a file into a directory? Or am I
>> > crazy?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > mhr
>> No and Maybe! ;-P
>
> I beg to differ on the first answer: anything c
Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within
Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on
01-20-2008 and, as far as I can tell, there's been no action other than
it being acknowledged. I've also search
on 1-8-2009 4:28 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
> Per Qvindesland wrote on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:50:59 +0100:
>
>> I have a pptp vpn server that works just fine except from dns, I can ping a
>> server and it will resolv but no packages are being received,
>
> Maybe it's just me, but I don't u
on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
> Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within
> Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on
> 01-20-2008 and, as far as I can tell, there's bee
on 1-8-2009 2:33 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
> on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
>> Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within
>> Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329
>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assig
Scott Silva wrote:
> The bug page gives you the status. It was assigned (to Karanbir), and
he ack'ed it. If it was fixed, it would
> be resolved. It shouldn't be that hard to apply the fix manually and
your legal department is too rigid if they
> are that picky about a fix to "free" software. I c
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
>>> Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs
>>> within Centos?
-- view it in a web browser, and optionally 'monitor' it so
emails of updated state are received
-- offer to buy s
Chris Schanzle wrote:
> Forgive me if this email is inappropriate, but are i686 packages going
> to be made available? They were in the original 5.2 release and in the
> base install on modern CPU's. Thanks! --Chris
yes! they are in the upgrade queue, should be online in 45 min or so.
--
K
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Warren, Eucke wrote:
> I appreciate the response. If you recall I did post the link so it's a
> safe assumption that I read the page and understood it's content. What
> I'm after is whether there's any other information channel that might
> not be so obvious for
on 1-8-2009 3:14 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> The bug page gives you the status. It was assigned (to Karanbir), and
> he ack'ed it. If it was fixed, it would
>> be resolved. It shouldn't be that hard to apply the fix manually and
> your legal department is too rigi
Lanny Marcus Wrote:
> Does that mean that your Legal Department does not permit you to
upgrade your box, to get the latest packages,
> issued for Security & Stability reasons? 5.1, as you are well aware,
is not the latest and greatest.
That is correct. What they approve is based on the contents
Warren, Eucke wrote:
> Lanny Marcus Wrote:
>
>> Does that mean that your Legal Department does not permit you to
>>
> upgrade your box, to get the latest packages,
>
>> issued for Security & Stability reasons? 5.1, as you are well aware,
>>
> is not the latest and greatest.
>
> Th
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 1-8-2009 3:14 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
>> I appreciate the response. If you recall I did post the link so it's a
>> safe assumption that I read the page and understood it's content. What
>> I'm after is whether there's any oth
Scott Silva wrote:
> You might want to hint to your legal department that unpatched servers
sitting on the internet are just waiting > to be hacked and exploited.
The fact that they make you sit with an older version without any
patches says that
> they have no idea how much damage can be done, or
I have a CentOS 5.2 i386 Development server that has a rpm db problem that I
can't seem to solve.
I have followed all the advice on Daniel Berrange's page on rpm db recovery:
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/notes/rpmrecovery.html
With no results, all I get from "rpm -qa" is list of two public
on 1-8-2009 3:41 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Scott Silva
> wrote:
>> on 1-8-2009 3:14 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
>
>>> I appreciate the response. If you recall I did post the link so it's a
>>> safe assumption that I read the page and unders
on 1-8-2009 3:55 PM Brian Lynch spake the following:
> I have a CentOS 5.2 i386 Development server that has a rpm db problem that I
> can't seem to solve.
>
> I have followed all the advice on Daniel Berrange's page on rpm db recovery:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/berrange/notes/rpmrecovery.html
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Warren, Eucke wrote:
>
> I am restricted to 5.1 as approved by legal. 5.2 is not approved so 5.3
> isn't an option either. Once I can sort out whether something
> "official" will fix this I can then determine how to pursue this
> internally. A workaround fix does
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Tony Placilla
wrote:
> We use SAM-FS to do just that here in the libraries.
> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/What_are_QFS_and_SAM/
Thanks for the pointer! Do you use SAM with QFS or ZFS? Or some sort of combo?
/Bent
__
On Wed, January 7, 2009 7:19 pm, Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:54 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote:
>
>>
>> So are you required to run zimbras release of these packages?
>>
>> If you are forced to use them then how delayed are the releases.
>> Are you able to use something other than amavis an
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009, Bo Lynch wrote:
>On Wed, January 7, 2009 7:19 pm, Craig White wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:54 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote:
...
>> zimbra is pretty much of a closed box in that they have already decided
>> what / how / where you will run stuff and no, you can't run anything
>>
Hi - when I'm running CentOS 4.4, and I run the
command
yum update nfs
which version of NFS do I get - the version for
CentOS 4.4, or the version for CentOS 4.7
(which I presume is the latest release)?
Any help would be appreciated.
--
Article. VI. Clause 3 of the constitution of the Unit
Hi Folks,
Is here someone, which has experiences with tesseract-ocr and CentOS 5?
Where are suitable rpm's?
Thx
Timothy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
found suitable rpm on
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/5020161/com/tesseract-2.01-1.fc7.i386.rpm.html
and it works.
Bye
Timothy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
43 matches
Mail list logo
