Re: [CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0

2008-12-16 Thread Andrew Allen
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 00:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Andrew Allen wrote on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:24:52 +: > > > I recently emailed an important jpeg image to a colleague, but when he > > tried to insert it into a document it 'failed'. It appears that when > > jpegs are attached to messages,

[CentOS] sendmail outbound help needed

2008-12-16 Thread Gopinath Achari
Hi All, I want to set up a sendmail server on Centos 5.2 Pc. This server should be able to send and receive mails outbound. i have purchased a domain name. can you help on this. -- Regards, Gopinath M ___ CentOS mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] Problems compiling PostgreSQL package from FC8 on CentOS 5

2008-12-16 Thread Peter Hopfgartner
Pintér Tibor wrote: > http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/reporpms/repoview/pgdg-centos.html > > t > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Hey, this would save me a lot of time. Do they differ signifi

Re: [CentOS] Problems compiling PostgreSQL package from FC8 on CentOS 5

2008-12-16 Thread John R Pierce
Peter Hopfgartner wrote: > Pintér Tibor wrote: > >> http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/reporpms/repoview/pgdg-centos.html >> > Hey, this would save me a lot of time. Do they differ significantly from > the Fedora/RedHat packages for things like directory layout and default > configuration? > no

Re: [CentOS] Force to install 64 bit packages only

2008-12-16 Thread Jim Wildman
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Sergio Belkin wrote: > How to configure yum for install only 64 bit packages? > man yum.conf look for the word exact -- Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE j...@rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.com "Society in

Re: [CentOS] Force to install 64 bit packages only

2008-12-16 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > How to configure yum for install only 64 bit packages? With the current version of yum (3.2.8), the easiest way is to add an exclude line in yum.conf like: exclude=*.i386 *.i686 Note that you might want to remove all i386/i585 packages tha

Re: [CentOS] sendmail outbound help needed

2008-12-16 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Gopinath Achari wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:40:08 +0530: > I want to set up a sendmail server on Centos 5.2 Pc. This server should be > able to send and receive mails outbound. i have purchased a domain name. can > you help on this. This list is really not for basic and OT stuff like this. Apa

Re: [CentOS] sendmail outbound help needed

2008-12-16 Thread Chris Boyd
On Dec 16, 2008, at 3:10 AM, Gopinath Achari wrote: > Hi All, > > I want to set up a sendmail server on Centos 5.2 Pc. > This server > should be > able to send and receive mails outbound. i have purchased a domain > name. can > you help on this. The classic outline is

Re: [CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0

2008-12-16 Thread John
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Allen > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:42 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0 > > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 00:31 +01

Re: [CentOS] kontact request

2008-12-16 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 04:42:14 Gopinath Achari wrote: > Hi All, > > I am using kontact (internally uses kmail) as mail > client. when i > receive attachments in mail. its displayed in smart format as default. How > can i set inline as default. any idea on this option.

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 46, Issue 7

2008-12-16 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] sendmail outbound help needed

2008-12-16 Thread Bob Hoffman
> The classic outline is here: > > http://www.sendmail.org/tips/virtualHosting > I found that page somewhat distressing as a first time user. Looks like they upgraded it to the right version (last year it was out of date and missing the whole generics file thing) It will not help you much wi

Re: [CentOS] Force to install 64 bit packages only

2008-12-16 Thread Marco Benton
Sergio Belkin wrote: > How to configure yum for install only 64 bit packages? > > thanks in advance > Just thought I throw in that an "official" Sun Java 64bit browser plugin is now available. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.ce

[CentOS] IBM Type 8795-1ux LTO-3

2008-12-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
I have an LTO-3 as described in the subject. I've installed lin_tape and lin_taped RPMs for RHEL 5 but still it doesn't work. /var/log/lin_tape.trace has: /dev/IBMtape opened. lin_taped Tue Dec 16 15:53:18 2008 Failed to detect any tape drives. lin_taped Tue Dec 16 15:53:18 2008 Failed t

[CentOS] Force to install 64 bit packages only

2008-12-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
How to configure yum for install only 64 bit packages? thanks in advance -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list

Re: [CentOS] Force to install 64 bit packages only

2008-12-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
2008/12/16 Marco Benton : > Sergio Belkin wrote: >> How to configure yum for install only 64 bit packages? >> >> thanks in advance >> > > Just thought I throw in that an "official" Sun Java 64bit browser plugin > is now available. > Thanks for all answers -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.

Re: [CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:05, William L. Maltby wrote: > /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link This message is not generated by "yum", but by "ldconfig" (as the message itself is actually saying). When "yum" installs a new library, the RPM contains instructions to run

Re: [CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0

2008-12-16 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Andrew Allen wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:41:32 +: > I'll just have to pass the image to my > colleague by means other than email. Still one step missing: did he actually view it with an image viewer? If he can then it won't help to provide it by "other means" as it is the image itself that

Re: [CentOS] sendmail outbound help needed

2008-12-16 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hi, not sure why you would like to use sendmail, I would much more prefer qmailtoaster if you are not to well know with the setup of mail servers QMT-ISO it is configured for Centos. But here is some links that might help you out with the config of Sendmail: http://www.howtoforge.com/pe

[CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread William L. Maltby
Ran yum update this A.M. Got this. Is it a problem for rpmforge, CentOS or just me? Maybe not a problem at all? /etc/ld.so.conf.d files are "box stock", so there were no clues there. TIA for any insight. === Running Transaction Updating : c

Re: [CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 12:43 -0500, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:05, William L. Maltby > wrote: > > /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link > > This message is not generated by "yum", but by "ldconfig" (as the > message itself is actually s

Re: [CentOS] Force to install 64 bit packages only

2008-12-16 Thread John R Pierce
Marco Benton wrote: > Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> How to configure yum for install only 64 bit packages? >> >> thanks in advance >> >> > > Just thought I throw in that an "official" Sun Java 64bit browser plugin > is now available. > last I looked, with Sun Java you had to install both t

Re: [CentOS] Force to install 64 bit packages only

2008-12-16 Thread Marco Benton
John R Pierce wrote: > Marco Benton wrote: >> Sergio Belkin wrote: >> >>> How to configure yum for install only 64 bit packages? >>> >>> thanks in advance >>> >>> >> Just thought I throw in that an "official" Sun Java 64bit browser plugin >> is now available. >> > > last I looked, with

[CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

2008-12-16 Thread ArcosCom Linux User
After upgrade my laptop, I discovered a low performance on it. The laptop is a 2,73GHz Intel centrino and from some kernels versions to now, it had a good performance, the cpu scaling worked fine. Now, I discover that forcing in /etc/sysconfig/cpuspeed the governors and/or max/min speeds, it don'

Re: [CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0

2008-12-16 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: > I recently emailed an important jpeg image to a colleague, but when he > tried to insert it into a document it 'failed'. It appears that when > jpegs are attached to messages, they become 'corrupted' - is this a > known problem with evolution,

Re: [CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 14:20, William L. Maltby wrote: > Since I know nothing of the scripts (python?) Usually they're Bourne shell script. You can see the scripts used by cups-libs with this command: rpm -q --scripts cups-libs > I thought I'd better seek some help. Always a good call! :

Re: [CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:05 AM, William L. Maltby wrote: > Ran yum update this A.M. Got this. Is it a problem for rpmforge, CentOS > or just me? Maybe not a problem at all? Bill: I have PUP running and this morning got the alert that updates were available. I had PUP (which I believe is a front

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

2008-12-16 Thread MHR
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:31 PM, ArcosCom Linux User wrote: > After upgrade my laptop, I discovered a low performance on it. > > The laptop is a 2,73GHz Intel centrino and from some kernels versions to > now, it had a good performance, the cpu scaling worked fine. > > Now, I discover that forcing

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Davide Cittaro
Hi all, after some double checks and test I still have CentOS nfs client performance not exciting... Just for the record nfs server is Solaris 10. With CentOs client I reach at most ~ 80 MB/s on a gigabit ethernet... I should be satisfied, as it is close to real-world ethernet performance.

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

2008-12-16 Thread ArcosCom Linux User
GNOME will have any problem if I "chkconfig --level 345 cpuspeed off"? Thanks El Mar, 16 de Diciembre de 2008, 22:27, MHR escribió: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:31 PM, ArcosCom Linux User > wrote: >> After upgrade my laptop, I discovered a low performance on it. >> >> The laptop is a 2,73GHz Int

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 22:40 +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: > Hi all, after some double checks and test I still have CentOS nfs > client performance not exciting... Just for the record nfs server is > Solaris 10. With CentOs client I reach at most ~ 80 MB/s on a gigabit > ethernet... I should be

Re: [CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:46 -0500, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 14:20, William L. Maltby > wrote: > > Since I know nothing of the scripts (python?) > > Usually they're Bourne shell script. > > You can see the scripts used by cups-libs with this command: > rpm -

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Davide Cittaro wrote: > Hi all, I'm migrating from Gentoo to CentOS... I'm experiencing a > rather low performance in NFS r/w (as client). > NFS server is solaris (which exports zfs volumes via nfs). The very > same exports were mounted with the same parameters (a

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Davide Cittaro
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Craig White wrote: larger rsize/wsize values do not necessarily translate to faster and I was of the opinion that going over 65536 wasn't going to help at all. With some NFS servers, a smaller rsize/wsize is better. (8192 or 16384) but that is the point of tuni

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Davide Cittaro
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Which version of CentOS are you using? The upstream kernels have had issues at different points with NFS performance (the 2.6.18 had a bunch of problems that were fixed in 2.6.20-22 time frame and have had to be backported.. then there w

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 00:00 +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Craig White wrote: > > > > > > > > larger rsize/wsize values do not necessarily translate to faster and > > I > > was of the opinion that going over 65536 wasn't going to help at > > all. > > With some NF

Re: [CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:42 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:05 AM, William L. Maltby > wrote: > > Ran yum update this A.M. Got this. Is it a problem for rpmforge, CentOS > > or just me? Maybe not a problem at all? > > Bill: I have PUP running and this morning got the alert

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Davide Cittaro
On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Craig White wrote: out of curiousity...why are you using the plus kernel? Do you need it to support particular hardware? Is it possible to boot/test with the standard kernel? :-) Good question! I've enabled plus repository and yum wanted to install plus ker

Re: [CentOS] Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link

2008-12-16 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 17:51 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:46 -0500, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > >> One of the steps "ldconfig" does is creating symbolic links for > > >> libraries, using the name that is hard-coded inside the library. > I'm goin

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

2008-12-16 Thread Kai Schaetzl
ArcosCom Linux User wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:31:30 +0100 (CET): > The laptop boots fine with the correct speed (usual speed), but when the > init scripts run the service cpuspeed, the performance goes low: Only > wants 800MHz!! sounds pretty much like it's working as it should. It goes down w

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread MHR
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Davide Cittaro wrote: > > > Great! I'm 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.centos.plus! I don't se 2.6.20 in yum > updates... is there any unstable repository I should enable? You're playing with fire now. Newer kernels are not necessarily backwards compatible, and major breaks c

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread MHR
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Davide Cittaro wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Craig White wrote: > > out of curiousity...why are you using the plus kernel? Do you need it to > support particular hardware? Is it possible to boot/test with the > standard kernel? > > :-) Good question! I'v

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread John R Pierce
MHR wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Davide Cittaro > wrote: > >> Great! I'm 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.centos.plus! I don't se 2.6.20 in yum >> updates... is there any unstable repository I should enable? >> > > You're playing with fire now. Newer kernels are not necessarily > backwards

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Russell Miller
> Well, you got what you asked for. There's lots of info on the > centos.org web site, including info about the standard vs. plus > repositories. You need to make an informed decision there, which it > looks like you're moving towards, so keep going. > Interestingly, as a project for work I've b

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread nate
Russell Miller wrote: > I have some pretty graphs, but the long and short of it is, while the > read times are comparable, the write times for the stock kernel.org > kernel are over twice as fast. I mean it's pretty much blowing the > RHEL/CentOS kernel out of the water. What sort of I/O control

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Russell Miller
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:10 PM, nate wrote: > Russell Miller wrote: > >> I have some pretty graphs, but the long and short of it is, while the >> read times are comparable, the write times for the stock kernel.org >> kernel are over twice as fast. I mean it's pretty much blowing the >> RHEL/Cent

[CentOS] Bogus ssh complaints about dns

2008-12-16 Thread drew einhorn
Hi, If I ssh to a CentOS5 box using just the hostname, not the full name, resulting from appending domain name from the search record in resolv.conf it says the ip maps to the correct full name it gets from reverse dns, and claims the full name does not map back to the ip, but it does as verified

Re: [CentOS] Bogus ssh complaints about dns

2008-12-16 Thread nate
drew einhorn wrote: > I browsed through the man pages for ssh, sshd, > ssh_config, and sshd_config and did not spot > anything that was misconfigured. But I could have > missed something check your /etc/hosts file for any entries related to the system your connecting to. nate

Re: [CentOS] Bogus ssh complaints about dns

2008-12-16 Thread drew einhorn
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:52 PM, nate wrote: > drew einhorn wrote: > > > I browsed through the man pages for ssh, sshd, > > ssh_config, and sshd_config and did not spot > > anything that was misconfigured. But I could have > > missed something > > > check your /etc/hosts file for any entries rel

[CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Spiro Harvey
Just wondering if anyone can replicate this issue On CentOS 5.2, using vim 7.0.237, I'm having a consistent issue across all my centos boxen. if I try and access the help files direct (as root), such as ":help tutor" I get: "usr_01.txt.gz" [readonly][noeol][converted] 11L, 4393C E434: Can't

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote: > Just wondering if anyone can replicate this issue > > On CentOS 5.2, using vim 7.0.237, I'm having a consistent issue across > all my centos boxen. Is it me, or do you have a newer vim than CentOS is shipping ? [r...@rhun ~]# rpm -q vim-common

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Spiro Harvey
just as a followup, if I ungzip a file, and edit the tags file to reflect the new name, it displays properly. putting it back returns its state to the regular fubar. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz signature.asc Descript

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote: > >> Just wondering if anyone can replicate this issue >> >> On CentOS 5.2, using vim 7.0.237, I'm having a consistent issue across >> all my centos boxen. > > Is it me, or do you have a newer vim than CentOS is

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote: > just as a followup, if I ungzip a file, and edit the tags file to > reflect the new name, it displays properly. > > putting it back returns its state to the regular fubar. After looking into this, you can see if it only happens when using 'vi' without a

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Spiro Harvey
> > Is it me, or do you have a newer vim than CentOS is shipping ? > > [r...@rhun ~]# rpm -q vim-common > > vim-common-7.0.109-4.el5_2.4z > > Is it possible you messed something up yourself ? > > And before everyone gets on top of me for being rude. I can confirm > this happens on 7.0.109

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Spiro Harvey
> I think this is normal behaviour for 'vi' as it does not support > gzipped help pages. Seems the case for RHEL too, so it is not > specific to CentOS. You might want to to check the same on Fedora > too ? yes, it seems you're right.. I just figured that out in another post coming the list's way.

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 22:12, Spiro Harvey wrote: > Just wondering if anyone can replicate this issue > > if I try and access the help files direct (as root), such as ":help > tutor" I get: > > If I press enter, it shows me what appears to be the output of a binary. This is a bug long k

Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?

2008-12-16 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 16:15 -0800, Russell Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:10 PM, nate wrote: > > Russell Miller wrote: > > > >> I have some pretty graphs, but the long and short of it is, while the > >> read times are comparable, the write times for the stock kernel.org > >> kernel are

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

2008-12-16 Thread Tom Diehl
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 22:12, Spiro Harvey wrote: >> Just wondering if anyone can replicate this issue >> >> if I try and access the help files direct (as root), such as ":help >> tutor" I get: >> >> If I press enter, it shows me wha

[CentOS] glibc

2008-12-16 Thread Mad Unix
Am having the following error: [r...@intra.sdc:rescue]$yum update glibc Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.silyus.net * updates: mirror.silyus.net * addons: centos.intergenia.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de Excluding Packages in global ex

[CentOS] Bug - Error: Missing Dependency: libgaim.so.0 is needed by package nautilus-sendto

2008-12-16 Thread Kenneth Burgener
I have a minimal installation of CentOS, and I wanted to then install X Windows and the GNOME desktop. I then tried the following, which failed on a dependency: $ yum -y groupinstall "X Window System" "GNOME Desktop Environment" --> Running transaction check ---> Package nautilus-sendto

Re: [CentOS] Bug - Error: Missing Dependency: libgaim.so.0 is needed by package nautilus-sendto

2008-12-16 Thread Kenneth Burgener
Kenneth Burgener wrote: > I have a minimal installation of CentOS, and I wanted to then install > X Windows and the GNOME desktop. I then tried the following, which > failed on a dependency: > > $ yum -y groupinstall "X Window System" "GNOME Desktop Environment" > > --> Running transaction che