On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the 88E8042 shares the same driver as 88E8056, check out this forum thread:
>
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=12895&forum=40
>
> Scroll down to note #5 and get the kABI tracking
Thanks, Filipe,
that has lead me to exactly what I was looking for.
Dirk
--On 9. Dezember 2008 17:18:30 -0500 Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 15:02, Dirk H. Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I have configured vsftpd with virtual users for w
I have the following error messages on a CentOS server.
Googling did not identify the error.
[Wed Dec 10 09:22:02 2008] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
No log handling enabled - turning on stderr logging
Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none)
Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line
This does not look like httpd errors. These are missing MIBs, presumably
you have installed and (mis)configured NetSNMP.
Dirk
--On 10. Dezember 2008 09:50:28 + Vandaman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following error messages on a CentOS server.
> Googling did not identify the erro
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Vnpenguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> If the 88E8042 shares the same driver as 88E8056, check out this forum
>>> thread:
>>>
>>> http://www.centos.org/mod
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Vnpenguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If the 88E8042 shares the same driver as 88E8056, check out this forum
>> thread:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=f
Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
> This does not look like httpd errors. These are missing
> MIBs, presumably
> you have installed and (mis)configured NetSNMP.
>
> Dirk
That is from /var/log/httpd/error_log I have not installed and
misconfigured NetSNMP
Regards,
Vandaman.
HI,
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I can't find a Linux driver for it except one that appears to require me
>> to recompile a custom kernel. I find it on the Marvell website:
>>
>> http://www.marvell.com/drivers/search.do
>>
>
> No, you make a module with that downlaod. I also have the unfortuna
>I assume that based on your last message to the list of "is there
>another way to handle redirects other than installing an Apache
>server" and now this, there is no other way?
>
>I only ask because I am now setting up squid in my spare time and this
>is the next task to handle?
Yea, it doesn't l
2008/12/9 James Pifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was looking at my maillog and it looks like someone is trying to get
> into my pop3 server.
>
> Dec 9 15:28:54 mailserver dovecot: pop3-login: Aborted login: user=,
> method=PLAIN, rip=:::66.167.184.203, lip=:::192.168.1.2
Do you really nee
I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5
(http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en)
I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from:
http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/, and have the miredo source in
~/build/miredo-1.1.5.
I run ./configure (as the INSTALL text file tells me to do) and get the
e
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5
> (http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en)
>
> I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from:
> http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/, and have the miredo source in
> ~/build/miredo-1.1.5.
>
> I run ./configure (as the INSTALL
On Tue, December 9, 2008 4:54 pm, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:46 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
>>
>
>> With all this, when I click on a PDF, all works as expected. Can you
>> provide the link you're having problems with? Most of my downloads are
>> at a site that star
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:11 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote:
>
> On Tue, December 9, 2008 4:54 pm, William L. Maltby wrote:
> >
> >
> > Just an FYI: since I hadn't checked recently, I did an open file in FF
> > and picked a local PDF. All work. I could read it, save copy, etc.
> >
> >>
> >
> > --
>
> Al
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:11 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote:
>
> On Tue, December 9, 2008 4:54 pm, William L. Maltby wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:46 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> With all this, when I click on a PDF, all works as expected. Can you
> >> provide the link you're ha
Mark Belanger wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5
>> (http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en)
>>
>> I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from:
>> http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/, and have the miredo source in
>> ~/build/miredo-1.1.5.
>>
>>
On Wed, December 10, 2008 10:24 am, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:11 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, December 9, 2008 4:54 pm, William L. Maltby wrote:
>> >
>> >
>
>> > Just an FYI: since I hadn't checked recently, I did an open file in FF
>> > and picked a local PDF.
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:29 -0500, John wrote:
>
> > All of my settings look good in FF. Adobe plugin is enabled. Under apps I
> > have tried setting it to always ask, adobe, and the default evince. If I
> > open a local pdf in FF this will open. However if I attempt to open off of
> > the intern
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:30 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote:
>
> Ok. I can open PDFs from the web. We use squirrelmail for email and when
> trying to open a pdf within email I only get the save option. Sorry for
> the confusion I just assumed it was like this out on the internet as well.
NP. Glad you got
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:07 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Setting scheduler is global in C4 it can be set as a kernel option
> with a scheduler=deadline in grub.
> >>>
> >>> Is that an alias for "elevator=deadline" (which I
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, John wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:07 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Setting scheduler is global in C4 it can be set as a kernel option
> > with a scheduler=deadline in grub.
> > >>>
> > >>>
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:26 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> Thanks to all. For now I've stopped it using iptables. I tried stopping
> it at my router without success, yet another reason to replace it! I
> will also report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
My issues have gotten worse. Apparently over the las
> The Schedular is CFQ and can be changed on the fly to whatever Block
> Device you want it. It does not matter what load the system is under.
> Changing to Deadline on his specific block device will improve the I/O
> of the system unless it really being hammered. Keep in mind these
> changes will
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Kurt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Vnpenguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thank you for the note. Then, the OP can go directly to:
>>
>> http://centos.toracat.org/ajb/sk98lin/
>>
>> and install the driv
>> Thanks to all. For now I've stopped it using iptables. I tried stopping
>> it at my router without success, yet another reason to replace it! I
>> will also report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> My issues have gotten worse. Apparently over the last few days my ip
> address has gotten blacklisted
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:12:01AM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >> http://centos.toracat.org/ajb/sk98lin/
> Yes, Alan wanted to reach as many users as we can , so I helped a bit
> with spreading the words. I looked at my web log and was astonished
> by the number of visitors and downloads.
Does t
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 17:02 +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 December 2008, John wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:07 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> > > On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Setting scheduler is global in C4 it can be set as a kerne
Ned Slider wrote:
> Chris Boyd wrote:
>
>> You can keep compromised accounts from logging in via ssh with the
>> "AllowUsers" option in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file. Add that
>> option followed by a list of user names that you want to be able to
>> log in, ex:
>>
>> # Only let Fred Guru
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 17:02 +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 December 2008, John wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:07 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> > > On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Setting scheduler is global in C4 it can be set as a kerne
Hi,
quick(?) question: Has anybody seen that problem below? More important
question: Did anybody solve that?
This is my smb.conf (well, only the most important parts):
[global]
workgroup = FOOBAR
server string = My Server
map to guest = Bad User
preferred master = No
local ma
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:12:01AM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> >> http://centos.toracat.org/ajb/sk98lin/
>
>> Yes, Alan wanted to reach as many users as we can , so I helped a bit
>> with spreading the words. I looked a
James Pifer wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:26 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
>
>> Thanks to all. For now I've stopped it using iptables. I tried stopping
>> it at my router without success, yet another reason to replace it! I
>> will also report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> My issues ha
> Yes follow up to previous mail. That would be correct for those two. My
> opinions do not change however, I just saw the mail where it did not
> work because he has V4.x and needs to use grub.conf.
In grub.conf I have this:
---
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.
I am wanting to use a motherboard that uses the 8111b reaktek chip.
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b
This was great information.
My question is now that I have a compiled module for centos 5.2
is there any way I can include that module in a DVD or load the mo
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Mark Belanger wrote:
>
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5
>>> (http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en)
>>>
>>> I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from:
>>> http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/, and have the m
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:02:22 -0500
John Hinton wrote:
> If you are being blacklisted, email is almost certainly coming out of
> your server which contains spam. Depending on the lists, it could be
> spewing a lot.
Not necessarily. I had one helluva time getting my mailserver off of the SORBS
d
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008, James Pifer wrote:
>On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:26 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
>> Thanks to all. For now I've stopped it using iptables. I tried stopping
>> it at my router without success, yet another reason to replace it! I
>> will also report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>My i
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 17:50 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> quick(?) question: Has anybody seen that problem below? More important
> question: Did anybody solve that?
>
> This is my smb.conf (well, only the most important parts):
>
> [global]
> workgroup = FOOBAR
> server string
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:56 -0600, Matt wrote:
> > Yes follow up to previous mail. That would be correct for those two. My
> > opinions do not change however, I just saw the mail where it did not
> > work because he has V4.x and needs to use grub.conf.
>
> In grub.conf I have this:
>
> ---
> #bo
> I have see quite a few cases where spam is sent from webmail
> accounts (mostly squirrelmail) by crackers who get access via
> weak passwords found by imap/pop probes as you described.
>
> It's been my experience in the 15 years we have been doing
> support for regional ISPs that well over 50% of
Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008, James Pifer wrote:
>> My issues have gotten worse. Apparently over the last few days my ip
>> address has gotten blacklisted. No idea why. Even though I have a
>> commercial class cable modem service, my ip is residential because it
>> comes to my house.
Ned Slider wrote:
> Bill Campbell wrote:
>
>> Your IP address, 70.62.90.185, is listed on zen.spamhaus.org, and
>> you can probably go to their web site to see why it's listed.
>>
>
> It's listed on zen.spamhaus.org because it's in pbl.spamhaus.org which
> is a policy blocklist:
>
> http:/
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
>Ned Slider wrote:
>> Bill Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> Your IP address, 70.62.90.185, is listed on zen.spamhaus.org, and
>>> you can probably go to their web site to see why it's listed.
>>>
>>
>> It's listed on zen.spamhaus.org because it's in pbl.spam
John wrote:
> No offense but LOL same problem I had with Linux clients. Here is what I did;
> The only way I got this to work is add the mount entry to fstab.. auto-mount
> would not work right it would end up hanging the Linux client.
> //ethans27/SAN1 /mnt/SAN1 cifs
> user,uid=500,rw,suid,usern
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Hmmm. I haven't tried if "force user" breaks in the same way.
Wow, that doesn't break. Let me see if I can live with the consequences.
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpLsk2xE2UfD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 19:16 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Hmmm. I haven't tried if "force user" breaks in the same way.
>
> Wow, that doesn't break. Let me see if I can live with the consequences.
>
//ethans27/SAN1 /mnt/SAN1 cifs
user,uid=500,rw,suid,username=nobody,
> so, using a roadrunner mail server as a "smarthost" is the only viable
> choice
>
I looked at it too. On PBL. So it's possible that Time Warner just
recently updated the list or something?
Anyway, I tried setting up smarthost and was not able to get it to work,
but I was successful setting u
Bill Campbell wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:16:58 -0800:
> Your IP address, 70.62.90.185, is listed on zen.spamhaus.org, and
> you can probably go to their web site to see why it's listed.
Well, it's not his fault:
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL238253
Roadrunner is not meant for mailserve
I found a src.rpm for 1.1.5-1 for fc8 (not rh8!). I was able to rebuild
it on my Centos build system.
The rpms are identified as 1.1.5-1.i386.rpm, no el5 or other
identification was placed in the files. I don't see how to control this
when you rebuild from an existing src.rpm. Interestingly t
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:33:39PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I found a src.rpm for 1.1.5-1 for fc8 (not rh8!). I was able to rebuild
> it on my Centos build system.
>
> The rpms are identified as 1.1.5-1.i386.rpm, no el5 or other
> identification was placed in the files. I don't see how
on 12-10-2008 9:16 AM Bill Campbell spake the following:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008, James Pifer wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:26 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
>>> Thanks to all. For now I've stopped it using iptables. I tried stopping
>>> it at my router without success, yet another reason to replace
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 08:49 +0100 schrieb Dirk H. Schulz:
> I am running a Fedora 9 domU on CentOS 5.2 dom0, and it is quite
> unreliable. Every few days I have the following phenomenon:
So do i.
But for me, everything works like a charm.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux xen.unixkis
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:33:39PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I found a src.rpm for 1.1.5-1 for fc8 (not rh8!). I was able to rebuild
>> it on my Centos build system.
>>
>> The rpms are identified as 1.1.5-1.i386.rpm, no el5 or other
>> identification was pla
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:25 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Like this:
>
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-78.0.8.ELsmp ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
> elevater=deadline
>
The above should be all on one line.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
Hi all, I'm migrating from Gentoo to CentOS... I'm experiencing a
rather low performance in NFS r/w (as client).
NFS server is solaris (which exports zfs volumes via nfs). The very
same exports were mounted with the same parameters (auto,nosuid,exec)
on gentoo and centos server (bot x86_64)..
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> echo 'deadline' > /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
> -bash: /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler: No such file or directory
>
> ls -l /sys/block/sda/queue/
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root0 Dec 8 17:45 iosched
> -r--r--r-- 1 roo
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:33:39PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I found a src.rpm for 1.1.5-1 for fc8 (not rh8!). I was able to rebuild
>>> it on my Centos build system.
>>>
>>> The rpms are identified as 1.1.5-1.i386.r
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Davide Cittaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, I'm migrating from Gentoo to CentOS... I'm experiencing a
> rather low performance in NFS r/w (as client).
> NFS server is solaris (which exports zfs volumes via nfs). The very
> same exports were mounted with the
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Campbell wrote:
>> Your IP address, 70.62.90.185, is listed on zen.spamhaus.org, and
>> you can probably go to their web site to see why it's listed.
> It's listed on zen.spamhaus.org because it's in pbl.spamhaus.org w
James Pifer wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:26:53 -0500:
> Anyway, I tried setting up smarthost and was not able to get it to work,
You should then contact their support. It got to work.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
_
On Dec 10, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Russell Miller wrote:
Have you tried these measurements against a native Linux NFS server?
It might be a good data point to find out if this only happens against
Solaris.
Actually not, but I've tested other OS as client. Nothing compares to
centos :-(
I suspect
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 20:07 +0100 schrieb Davide Cittaro:
> Hi all, I'm migrating from Gentoo to CentOS... I'm experiencing a
> rather low performance in NFS r/w (as client).
I am not the Linux Expert when it comes to the nfs implementation,
but you should try two things:
1.) Nail Linux
Hi all,
I have setup a centos5.2 server (full updated) to serve iscsi disks
using scsi-target-utils package. This server has two network adapters,
one for remote administration and another to serve iscsi disk. How can I
bind iscsi target service to only one ip address??
Many thanks.
--
CL M
on 12-10-2008 8:02 AM James Pifer spake the following:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:26 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
>> Thanks to all. For now I've stopped it using iptables. I tried stopping
>> it at my router without success, yet another reason to replace it! I
>> will also report it to [EMAIL PROTECTE
> 2.) Use TCP, UDP Transmits are often slow these days. (mount
> option tcp)
Hmm, care to share any references for this? I'd be reaching for NFS over TCP
in a long-haul type environment, but would run it over UDP otherwise.
-John
___
CentOS mailing li
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 12-10-2008 8:02 AM James Pifer spake the following:
>> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:26 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
>>> Thanks to all. For now I've stopped it using iptables. I tried stopping
>>> it at my router without success, yet another reason to replace it! I
>>> will also rep
Thanks to all, I will double check either nfs server and client
options...
d
On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:01 PM, John Kordash wrote:
>> 2.) Use TCP, UDP Transmits are often slow these days. (mount
>> option tcp)
>
> Hmm, care to share any references for this? I'd be reaching for NFS
> over TCP in
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 15:01 -0500 schrieb John Kordash:
> > 2.) Use TCP, UDP Transmits are often slow these days. (mount
> > option tcp)
>
One Key Fact for UDP being much faster then TCP was
a.) The Lack of performant Hardware
(CPU Time was expensive and should not be shared for IO/I
I have a squid proxy running transparently, so in my firewall script
I run the following fairly early:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $LAN -p tcp -m multiport --dports 80,443 -j
REDIRECT --to-port 3128
This is a multihomed server so after this change the masquerading was
removed (as only web a
> >> define(`SMART_HOST',`smtp-server.carolina.rr.com')dnl
> >> MASQUERADE_AS(carolina.rr.com)dnl
> Or switch to postfix. I plunked "relayhost =
> smtp-server.roadrunner.com" into main.cf & away it went.
why change software just because one configuration line is different?
--
Spiro Harvey
MHR wrote:
>
> I think you meant nspluginwrapper - ndiswrapper is for Window$ drivers
> to run in Linux.
d'oh! brain segfault :)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin
James Pifer wrote:
> I've tried adding these lines to my sendmailmc and rebuilding it, but
> then nothing routes, not even local.
>
> define(`SMART_HOST',`smtp-server.carolina.rr.com')dnl
> MASQUERADE_AS(carolina.rr.com)dnl
> FEATURE(`allmasquerade')dnl
> FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope')dnl
>
wh
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Davide Cittaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all, I will double check either nfs server and client
> options...
>
> d
What is the kernel version of your CentOS? Some earlier version is
known to have an issue with NFS (client). For example:
http://bugs.
Makes sense to me.
Is the host that you are wanting to bypass your proxy on the same segment as
the $LAN interface defined in your rulesets?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I have a squid proxy running transparently, so in my firewall script
> I ru
>Makes sense to me.
Yea, I just don't know technically speaking where the -m mac should appear, in
the POSTROUTING line, or the first FORWARD line. Ultimately I would only
masq'ing to be done for this one device on port 443.
>Is the host that you are wanting to bypass your proxy on the same segm
Spiro Harvey wrote:
>
> why change software just because one configuration line is different?
>
Main point was the RR relay host works.
--
tkb
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I found a src.rpm for 1.1.5-1 for fc8 (not rh8!). I was able to rebuild
> it on my Centos build system.
>
> The rpms are identified as 1.1.5-1.i386.rpm, no el5 or other
> identification was placed in the files. I don't see how to cont
John Kordash wrote:
>> 2.) Use TCP, UDP Transmits are often slow these days. (mount
>> option tcp)
>
> Hmm, care to share any references for this? I'd be reaching for NFS over
> TCP in a long-haul type environment, but would run it over UDP otherwise.
At least in my case, both of the vendors I am
> > why change software just because one configuration line is
> > different?
> Main point was the RR relay host works.
So your solution is to change software?
Wouldn't it be smarter to figure out what the problem actually is?
Because as you say, the RR host doesn't appear to be the problem. So i
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am wanting to use a motherboard that uses the 8111b reaktek chip.
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b
> This was great information.
>
> My question is now that I have a compiled module for centos 5.2
> is there any way I can include that m
Spiro Harvey wrote on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:33:24 +1300:
> Let me do the math: zero, multiplied by zero, carry the zero...
It's simpler for non-experts to change the postfix configuration than to
change the sendmail configuration. So, why shouldn't he not suggest it?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin,
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
we dont use %rhel or %el5 in CentOS. You really want a %centos_ver in
there with either a 3 4 or 5
and yea, the %dist with ..el
in the CentOS buildsystem the %dist gets set automatically. And since
the distro uses .el5 and .centos.el5 etc, you should not normally be
usi
on 12-10-2008 4:32 PM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
> Spiro Harvey wrote on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:33:24 +1300:
>
>> Let me do the math: zero, multiplied by zero, carry the zero...
>
> It's simpler for non-experts to change the postfix configuration than to
> change the sendmail configuration.
> It's simpler for non-experts to change the postfix configuration than
> to change the sendmail configuration. So, why shouldn't he not
> suggest it?
because it's stupid, lazy advice.
1: it's easy for non-experts to edit the sendmail configuration too...
as long as they're editing the mc file,
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>
> we dont use %rhel or %el5 in CentOS. You really want a %centos_ver in
> there with either a 3 4 or 5
>
> and yea, the %dist with ..el
>
> in the CentOS buildsystem the %dist gets set automatically. And since
> the distro uses .el5 and .centos.el5
Hello,
Is there a generic built-in way on CentOS to overlook that a specific
process is alive and re-spawn it (or just run a configured command)
when it dies?
I know how to script things so a parent will watch its child, but was
wondering whether there is something more readily available instead
Amos Shapira wrote:
> Is there a generic built-in way on CentOS to overlook that a specific
> process is alive and re-spawn it (or just run a configured command)
> when it dies?
Monit
works well for me in a very diverse set of jobs and roles.
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008, nate wrote:
>John Kordash wrote:
>>> 2.) Use TCP, UDP Transmits are often slow these days. (mount
>>> option tcp)
>>
>> Hmm, care to share any references for this? I'd be reaching for NFS over
>> TCP in a long-haul type environment, but would run it over UDP otherwise.
>
>At
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote:
>> >> define(`SMART_HOST',`smtp-server.carolina.rr.com')dnl
>> >> MASQUERADE_AS(carolina.rr.com)dnl
>> Or switch to postfix. I plunked "relayhost =
>> smtp-server.roadrunner.com" into main.cf & away it went.
>
>why change software just because one configura
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's simpler for non-experts to change the postfix configuration than to
> change the sendmail configuration. So, why shouldn't he not suggest it?
>
According to my reading of this, you're asking, "Why should he suggest i
2008/12/11 Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Amos Shapira wrote:
>> Is there a generic built-in way on CentOS to overlook that a specific
>> process is alive and re-spawn it (or just run a configured command)
>> when it dies?
>
> Monit
>
> works well for me in a very diverse set of jobs and rol
Spiro Harvey wrote:
>> It's simpler for non-experts to change the postfix configuration than
>> to change the sendmail configuration. So, why shouldn't he not
>> suggest it?
>
> because it's stupid, lazy advice.
>
Will it not work? Will it make someone's brain rot and fall out? Could
one switch
Amos Shapira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a generic built-in way on CentOS to overlook that a specific
> process is alive and re-spawn it (or just run a configured command)
> when it dies?
>
> I know how to script things so a parent will watch its child, but was
> wondering whether there is somethi
93 matches
Mail list logo
