Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-12-01 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote on Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:51:45 +0200: > Then again Redhat guys have not yet commented about planned features for > RHEL6.. Of course, it's the current state of affairs as we think we know it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: ht

Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-12-01 Thread Vandaman
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Then again Redhat guys have not yet commented about planned > features for RHEL6.. > Quite a few people appear to be quite insecure on the basis of what they think is/is not going to happen. The bottom line is crystal-ball gazing should be left alone and people shoul

[CentOS] Bonding and network cards

2008-12-01 Thread David Hrbáč
Hi, I have been playing this weekend with bonding on PCI netcards and found that all of netcards I have, but old 3com, do not support MII. So bonding is not going to happen with them. Do you have some pci netcards supporting MII successfully running on bonging? Thanks, David Hrbáč _

Re: [CentOS] Bonding and network cards

2008-12-01 Thread Ralph Angenendt
David Hrbáč wrote: > Hi, > I have been playing this weekend with bonding on PCI netcards and found > that all of netcards I have, but old 3com, do not support MII. So > bonding is not going to happen with them. Do you have some pci netcards > supporting MII successfully running on bonging? That is

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail - STARTTLS not appear on one client

2008-12-01 Thread Radu Radutiu
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:30 PM, happymaster23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have Sendmail configured to use STARTTLS for authentication. On all > internet connections and computers (that I have tested) works > connection over encrypted SMTP flawlessly. Today I was setting up mail > clien

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 46, Issue 1

2008-12-01 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] Bonding and network cards

2008-12-01 Thread David Hrbáč
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a): > That is strange. But you shouldn't be needing mii, use_carrier should be > working with modern cards - if they come up at once. > > I have bonding on 2 Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T where the > card takes so long to come up that the bonding driver assumes th

[CentOS] script to monitor device to output file

2008-12-01 Thread chloe K
Hi ls there any script / program to check router / switch? eg: sh interface any error to output a file Thank you - Now with a new friend-happy design! Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger___

Re: [CentOS] Apache, SELinux, and document root on a different partition

2008-12-01 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Sunday, November 30, 2008 9:02 AM -0500 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You forgot one important bit: the actual denials. I don't find anything in /var/log/audit/audit.log nor /var/log/messages. audit.log looks like the right place but it's not logged anything since J

[CentOS] auditd not logging to file

2008-12-01 Thread Kenneth Porter
I'm finding that auditd will in fact log to the console if I run it with -f (don't fork). But it's not writing the entries to /var/log/audit/audit.log. I think I have enough disk space. The default config suspends auditing when free space falls below 50 and 75 megabytes, and df shows over 6 GB

Re: [CentOS] Apache, SELinux, and document root on a different partition

2008-12-01 Thread Kenneth Porter
Here's what I'm seeing logged. (Newlines added to make it easier to see the log line boundaries with wrapping.) It looks like it's failing to traverse the root directory to get to the directory with the content in it, but why doesn't it fail on /var/www/html or home directory content, which must

[CentOS] question on yum-downloadonly

2008-12-01 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi I found yum-downloadonly and executed my command do that and save the dependencies in my current directory. Now when I execute my command: rpm -i mypackage all the dependencies are not found even though they are in the current directory. if I do a "yum install mypackage" (and its in the c

Re: [CentOS] Apache, SELinux, and document root on a different partition

2008-12-01 Thread Rick Barnes
Kenneth Porter wrote: Here's what I'm seeing logged. (Newlines added to make it easier to see the log line boundaries with wrapping.) It looks like it's failing to traverse the root directory to get to the directory with the content in it, but why doesn't it fail on /var/www/html or home direct

Re: [CentOS] question on yum-downloadonly

2008-12-01 Thread Steve Huff
On Dec 1, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: I found yum-downloadonly and executed my command do that and save the dependencies in my current directory. Now when I execute my command: rpm -i mypackage all the dependencies are not found even though they are in the current directory. if I

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Places like where I am, cell phone charges are very high if connection is >> for longer periods. I've got a USB Thundercom modem but could not get it >

Re: [CentOS] Mail and list server downtime

2008-12-01 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote: there will be a downtime of the mail and list server tomorrow evening from around 20:00 UTC and a few (hopefully) hours after that. This means that there will be no mail traffic at that time to and from centos.org domains. We need to move away mail

Re: [CentOS] question on yum-downloadonly

2008-12-01 Thread Les Mikesell
Jerry Geis wrote: Hi I found yum-downloadonly and executed my command do that and save the dependencies in my current directory. Why not let them go where yum wants them? Now when I execute my command: rpm -i mypackage all the dependencies are not found even though they are in the current

[CentOS] Sound problem in Dell inspiron 1525

2008-12-01 Thread Ern jura
After installing CentOS 5.2 on my Dell inspiron 1525 laptop, the sound was inactive, I then installed Alsa-Driver, Alsa-utils, Alsa-plugins and Alsa-libs the ATrpms site. The speakers then work fine, but when I plug in headphones, the sound begins to fade out and eventually becomes completely quiet

Re: [CentOS] Mail and list server downtime

2008-12-01 Thread Ray Leventhal
Paul Heinlein wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote: We need to move away mail from the current machine to a new machine, as our old mailserver is a bit unreliable at the moment (the hardware is showing its age). Thanks, Ralph, to you and any other volunteer sysadmins who maintain

[CentOS] How to delay failed ssh auth

2008-12-01 Thread James B. Byrne
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Veiko Kukk > Sent: 28 November 2008 07:06 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] How to delay failed ssh auth > > Hi! > > I need to delay failed ssh password authentication as an additional > measur

[CentOS] chmod for directories only

2008-12-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I want to change the permissions on directories, recursively to: drwxr-xr-x but keep the files within the directory tree as: -rw-r--r-- But I can't find an option for chmod to only affect directories. I suppose it won't hurt (in this case) to set the x for the files, but I want some consist

Re: [CentOS] chmod for directories only

2008-12-01 Thread nate
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I want to change the permissions on directories, recursively to: > > drwxr-xr-x > > but keep the files within the directory tree as: > > -rw-r--r-- > > But I can't find an option for chmod to only affect directories. I > suppose it won't hurt (in this case) to set the x f

Re: [CentOS] chmod for directories only

2008-12-01 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I want to change the permissions on directories, recursively to: > > drwxr-xr-x > > but keep the files within the directory tree as: > > -rw-r--r-- > > But I can't find an option for chmod to only affect directories. I > suppose it won't hurt (in t

Re: [CentOS] script to monitor device to output file

2008-12-01 Thread nate
chloe K wrote: > Hi > > ls there any script / program to check router / switch? > > eg: sh interface any error Use SNMP, that's what it's there for. All good routers/switches expose SNMP counters for interface errors which you can collect either by hand with snmpget or something, or use someth

[CentOS] following Centos wiki headless install, but applying to FC10

2008-12-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I have successfully built an install CD following the instructions at: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall Now I am trying to do the same with FC10 and I am failing in two ways. I have tried to find a similar howto for even FC9, but have not found the right google magic.

[CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Russell Miller
Hi, I was hoping someone would have an idea of what's going on here... We have two NFS issues. One of which is certainly centos based, one of which we're not sure of. First issue is: As of Centos 5, we can't make simultaneous access to a directory via NFS. To duplicate, I cd into a share in tw

Re: [CentOS] chmod for directories only

2008-12-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Bill Campbell wrote: On Mon, Dec 01, 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I want to change the permissions on directories, recursively to: drwxr-xr-x but keep the files within the directory tree as: -rw-r--r-- But I can't find an option for chmod to only affect directories. I suppose it won't

Re: [CentOS] chmod for directories only

2008-12-01 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:53, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to change the permissions on directories, recursively to: > drwxr-xr-x > > but keep the files within the directory tree as: > -rw-r--r-- > > But I can't find an option for chmod to only affect directories. I su

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Russell Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I was hoping someone would have an idea of what's going on here... > > We have two NFS issues. One of which is certainly centos based, one of > which we're not sure of. > > First issue is: As of Centos 5, we can't ma

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Miguel Medalha
US Robotics produces a USB modem that they present as compatible with Linux. It even has a sticker on the box stating that. The product's page is here: http://www.usr.com/products/modem/modem-product.asp?type=features&sku=USR5637 Linux Format magazine has a review of this modem on their Christ

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Olaf Mueller
Russell Miller wrote: Hello. > directory via NFS. To duplicate, I cd into a share in two windows, > copy a > 1G file in the first window, and just do an ls in the other. The ls > will hang until the write is done. > Has anyone seen problems like this? How did you solve them? Your nfs settings

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Russell Miller
All 5.2 versions have this problem. --Russell On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Russell Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi, I was hoping someone would have an idea of what's going on here... > > > > We have two NFS i

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Russell Miller
> > Example settings from my /etc/auto.* (automount): > * > -fstype=nfs4,rw,tcp,port=2049,soft,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,nosuid > ://& > > Maybe the options *async* and the settings for rsize and wsize could be > helpful for you? We're using nfs3 over tcp. rsize and wsize are 32768. Async is

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Russell Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All 5.2 versions have this problem. > > --Russell You might want to look into upstream bugzilla reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436004 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448130 and se

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > US Robotics produces a USB modem that they present as compatible with Linux. > It even has a sticker on the box stating that. > The product's page is here: > http://www.usr.com/products/modem/modem-product.asp?type=features

Re: [CentOS] following Centos wiki headless install, but applying to FC10

2008-12-01 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:10:32 -0500: > prompt 1 > timeout 0 I'd say you want to set prompt 0 if you don't want a prompt. A short timeout should basically do the same, but an 0 sometimes means "indefinite". > > I still get prompted. > Any pointers to where to get help on

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > US Robotics produces a USB modem that they present as compatible with Linux. > It even has a sticker on the box stating that. > The product's page is here: > http://www.usr.com/products/modem/modem-product.asp?type=features

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Russell Miller
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Russell Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > All 5.2 versions have this problem. > > > > --Russell > > You might want to look into upstream bugzilla reports: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Olaf Mueller
Russell Miller wrote: Hello. > We're using nfs3 over tcp. rsize and wsize are 32768. Async is > default, though I've tried sync. > > Funny thing is, turning on nfs debug and trying to trigger this > problem > seems to cause data corruption. Once it even managed to corrupt the > local disk w

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Russell Miller
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Olaf Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > Funny thing is, turning on nfs debug and trying to trigger this > > problem > > seems to cause data corruption. Once it even managed to corrupt the > > local disk writes to the points where the journals aborted and I

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Olaf Mueller
Russell Miller wrote: Hello. > We're using nfs3 over tcp. rsize and wsize are 32768. Async is > default, though I've tried sync. Try rsize=8192 and wsize=8192. And my settings for /etc/hosts.allow, maybe helpful? portmap:127.0.0. 192.168.0. lockd: 127.0.0. 192.168.0. rquotad:

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Russell Miller
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Olaf Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Russell Miller wrote: > > Hello. > > > We're using nfs3 over tcp. rsize and wsize are 32768. Async is > > default, though I've tried sync. > Try rsize=8192 and wsize=8192. And my settings for /etc/hosts.allow, > maybe hel

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Olaf Mueller
Russell Miller wrote: Hello. >> > We're using nfs3 over tcp. rsize and wsize are 32768. Async is >> > default, though I've tried sync. >> Try rsize=8192 and wsize=8192. And my settings for /etc/hosts.allow, >> maybe helpful? > I can try it. But there's a reason that we're using 32768, apparen

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Ramon Nieto
> That's a slow V.92 modem. The HSDPA modems will go up to 7.2 Mbps. > Broadband and Wireless. :-) It will work for me, i use the V.92 modems to get a serial console on the remote firewalls when the internet link (ADSL) is down and check what happened. Best. ___

Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-12-01 Thread chloe K
no. he can subnet it Typically ISP can assign /20. but client can subnet it two networks /22 /22 or 16 networks /24 Thank you John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: chloe K wrote: > you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow > you shoul

Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-12-01 Thread chloe K
sorry. it should be 2 networks /21 4 networks /22 /22 or 16 networks /24 Thank you John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: chloe K wrote: > you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow > you should subnet it > no, no, NO. his eth1 connec

Re: [CentOS] Apache, SELinux, and document root on a different partition

2008-12-01 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Monday, December 01, 2008 10:26 AM -0500 Rick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Try this: # grep httpd /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2why The output should explain why you are getting the permission denials. Alas, it didn't really tell me more than what I could see in the log lines. W

Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-12-01 Thread John R Pierce
chloe K wrote: > no. he can subnet it > > Typically ISP can assign /20. but client can subnet it > he is on a cable modem, with a single IP on his neighborhood segment. how exactly does he subnet this? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h

Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-12-01 Thread Ross Walker
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:25 PM, chloe K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> chloe K wrote: >>> you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow >>> you should subnet it >>> >> >> no, no, NO. his eth1 connection is from his ISP. He /has/ to use >>

Re: [CentOS] following Centos wiki headless install, but applying to FC10

2008-12-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote on Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:10:32 -0500: > > >> prompt 1 >> timeout 0 >> > > I'd say you want to set prompt 0 if you don't want a prompt. A short > timeout should basically do the same, but an 0 sometimes means > "indefinite". > > >> I still get p

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Ramon Nieto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's a slow V.92 modem. The HSDPA modems will go up to 7.2 Mbps. >> Broadband and Wireless. :-) > > It will work for me, i use the V.92 modems to get a serial console on > the remote firewalls when the internet link (ADS

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Miguel Medalha
Well, you never mentioned broadband or wireless... Your original post only referred to "USB or PCI dialup modems". ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Miguel Medalha
In Europe at least, the Huawei modems provided by Vodafone work with Linux out of the box. Someone I know bought a Asus EeePC with Linux and the modem just worked on the first attempt. It seems that Vodafone is actively supporting Linux. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] Two NFS issues

2008-12-01 Thread Russell Miller
> Ok, but the portmap service have to run on the server. Correct me if I > get wrong, but the CentOS clients are asking the server for the port to > use and this is what portmap does. Actually I have a little more information, but I'm having a hard time putting the pieces together. It looks like

[CentOS] My God, it is full of stars

2008-12-01 Thread Ralph Angenendt
And it is fast! And big! And louder! What is? The new CentOS mail server is, which coincidentally also hosts the mailing lists you are reading right now. After three short hours and (AFAICS) no lost mail we now have the following situation: The mailq on the old mail server now is empty, while

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Ramon Nieto
> Well, you never mentioned broadband or wireless... Your original post > only referred to "USB or PCI dialup modems". That's correct Miguel, in my original post i only referred to USB or PCI dialup modems. Lanny mentioned wireless broadband. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] My God, it is full of stars

2008-12-01 Thread Ned Slider
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > And it is fast! And big! And louder! > > What is? The new CentOS mail server is, which coincidentally also hosts > the mailing lists you are reading right now. > > After three short hours and (AFAICS) no lost mail we now have the following > situation: > > The mailq on

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Europe at least, the Huawei modems provided by Vodafone work with > Linux out of the box. Someone I know bought a Asus EeePC with Linux and > the modem just worked on the first attempt. It seems that Vodafone is > active

Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-12-01 Thread Christopher Chan
> Not getting Xen into the kernel earlier is going to be Xen's downfall. > XEN will never make into the kernel. Period. I never paid any attention to Xen but I had to lately for get Windows virtualized for new Centos desktops here at the school. What is the first thing that Centos 5 loaded? T

Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-12-01 Thread Christopher Chan
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Brett Serkez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Xen wont be in RHEL6 - KVM will >> What insight can be offered on this change? Is this a business or >> technical

Re: [CentOS] USB or PCI dialup modem supported by Centos

2008-12-01 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Ramon Nieto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, you never mentioned broadband or wireless... Your original post >> only referred to "USB or PCI dialup modems". > > That's correct Miguel, in my original post i only referred to USB or > PCI dialup modems. Lanny mentio

Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-12-01 Thread MHR
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Not getting Xen into the kernel earlier is going to be Xen's downfall. >> > > XEN will never make into the kernel. Period. I never paid any attention > to Xen but I had to lately for get Windows virtualized for new Cen

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] My God, it is full of stars

2008-12-01 Thread Dag Wieers
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Everybody else: Send even more mails! The infrastructure for that is here now! Please do not awake the gods of spam ! -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] My God, it is full of stars

2008-12-01 Thread Spiro Harvey
> > Everybody else: Send even more mails! The infrastructure for that > > is here now! > Please do not awake the gods of spam ! Lucky you told us, I was just about to start my spam-dance to see if the gods would bestow more emails upon us. The goat thanks you for saving his life too. I don't kno

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] My God, it is full of stars

2008-12-01 Thread MHR
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Spiro Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lucky you told us, I was just about to start my spam-dance to see if > the gods would bestow more emails upon us. > > The goat thanks you for saving his life too. > > I don't know what I'm going to do with this alter though

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] My God, it is full of stars

2008-12-01 Thread Spiro Harvey
> Perhaps you can alter it into an altar :) that was my keyboard's fault. It can't spell. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-12-01 Thread Christopher Chan
>> So I will be kissing Centos 5 bye bye for the school desktops and >> switching to Ubuntu Hardy. When RHEL6 and therefore Centos 6 comes out, >> hopefully I can come back to Centos... > > There are other virtualization solutions that run with/on CentOS > I did leave one other detail out..

[CentOS] Educentos?

2008-12-01 Thread Christopher Chan
Is there an Edubuntu equivalent for Centos? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Educentos?

2008-12-01 Thread Ian Blackwell
Christopher Chan wrote: > Is there an Edubuntu equivalent for Centos? > The K12LTSP is based on CentOS. http://k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page Cheers, Ian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list Cent

Re: [CentOS] Educentos?

2008-12-01 Thread Christopher Chan
Ian Blackwell wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: >> Is there an Edubuntu equivalent for Centos? >> > The K12LTSP is based on CentOS. > http://k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page > Oh, I know about the LTSP project. But I am not looking for a terminal server. Edubuntu is not a terminal se

Re: [CentOS] Educentos?

2008-12-01 Thread Les Mikesell
Christopher Chan wrote: > Ian Blackwell wrote: >> Christopher Chan wrote: >>> Is there an Edubuntu equivalent for Centos? >>> >> The K12LTSP is based on CentOS. >> http://k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page >> > > Oh, I know about the LTSP project. But I am not looking for a terminal >

Re: [CentOS] Educentos?

2008-12-01 Thread Christopher Chan
Les Mikesell wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: >> Ian Blackwell wrote: >>> Christopher Chan wrote: Is there an Edubuntu equivalent for Centos? >>> The K12LTSP is based on CentOS. >>> http://k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page >>> >> Oh, I know about the LTSP project. But I am not

Re: [CentOS] Educentos?

2008-12-01 Thread Les Mikesell
Christopher Chan wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> Christopher Chan wrote: >>> Ian Blackwell wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: > Is there an Edubuntu equivalent for Centos? > The K12LTSP is based on CentOS. http://k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page >>> Oh, I know a