On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 22:08 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> I have a dual boot CentOS 5.2 / FC4 machine, and recently I have bought a new
> widescreen tft monitor. I used to use a plain 4:3 crt, and after plugging the
> 16:9 tft naturally X needed reconfiguring. This was easy in FC4, and seemed
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:03 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nov 2 01:56:11 mhrichter smartd[3121]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295
> Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
> Nov 2 01:56:11 mhrichter smartd[3121]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295
> Offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> In each case, i
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marko Vojinovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a dual boot CentOS 5.2 / FC4 machine, and recently I have bought a new
> widescreen tft monitor. I used to use a plain 4:3 crt, and after plugging the
> 16:9 tft naturally X needed reconfiguring. This was easy in
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mhr wrote on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:59:40 -0700:
>
>> The one problem I've seen and posted here was w.r.t. smartd error
>> reports showing 2^32 - 1 errors on one of the disks (probably my
>> system disk) every few minutes.
>
> H
Hello list,
Last week i read a interesting artice about Red Hat Enterprise IPA /
Free IPA.
Is there a Repository for this packages yet?
Greetings
Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
John R Pierce wrote:
I recently put Cent 5.2 (64 bit) on a new server using a Supermicro
pdsbm-ln2+ sys board. I did the original installation at home using the
5.2 dvd I got via torrent.
Try a software-RAID.
(I just assume you used the built-in RAID, which is more likely than
not a cheap p
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
This is not CentOS-specific, hence OT.
I need a list of all email users on my system (there are hundreds of them).
The list could be extracted from /etc/aliases and the virtusertable.
Does anyone know of a script that would do this automatically? It would have
to
- exclude c
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
>
> I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks
> listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk
> processing, tagging images, etc.
>
> Its part image d
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
>>
>> I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks
>> listed above, its very good and fairly
Am 02.11.2008 um 20:57 schrieb Lanny Marcus:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks
l
Sebastian Marten wrote:
Hello list,
Last week i read a interesting artice about Red Hat Enterprise IPA /
Free IPA.
Is there a Repository for this packages yet?
you can always call your redhat sales guy and talk to them about it.
on the CentOS front, Tim is leading up the effort on IPA / Dire
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting
>>> for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome
>>> environment.)
>>>
>>> www.digikam.org
>>
>> Michael: Thank you. I will lo
Hi folks
We migrated storage from local disk to SAN with:
# rsync -avz /mnt/lvol00045/* /lvol00045
Why there is a difference in size? How to explain this? Do we have
inconsistency? What we did wrong?
[...]
/dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045_old
10321208 3930336 6286016 39% /m
Sven wrote:
Hi folks
We migrated storage from local disk to SAN with:
# rsync -avz /mnt/lvol00045/* /lvol00045
Why there is a difference in size? How to explain this? Do we have
inconsistency? What we did wrong?
[...]
/dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045_old
10321208 3930336 6
John R Pierce wrote:
Sven wrote:
Hi folks
We migrated storage from local disk to SAN with:
# rsync -avz /mnt/lvol00045/* /lvol00045
Why there is a difference in size? How to explain this? Do we have
inconsistency? What we did wrong?
[...]
/dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045_old
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Gopinath Achari
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I installed Panda antivirus for linux but it uses Dazuko
>> module for updating virus definition downloaded from internet to v
16 matches
Mail list logo
