Re: [CentOS] resize LVM (ext3)

Thanks guys for help! Work is done, everything went fine .. Have a nice day, D. On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:24 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 10:15 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >> > >> Reduce the filesystem to 78G or 79G with resize2fs, then redu

Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?

Hi, for what it's worth, I'm running CentOS 5 with the planet-core, planet-ccrma and novell-mono repos which exist for centos/rhel5 these days. The planet-core repo contains the 2.6.24.7 with realtime patches and other goodness for audio/video stuffs. I've been using this setup for about 6 months

Re: [CentOS] nfs mounted /home and selinux

On Thursday 30 October 2008 21:00:35 Marc Wiatrowski wrote: > I'm trying to set the context on an nfs mounted /home. I believe > exactly like in Redhat's Deployment Guide at > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.2/html/Deployme >nt_Guide/ch45s02s03.html > > > On my system

Re: [CentOS] [OT] List of all email users

John R Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (30.10.2008 17:39): > and what about the user accounts in /etc/passwd ? Hm, yes, never thought of that! That would be a very good (certainly easy) approach, though with its own limitations (it misses those users whose mail is forwarded in /etc/aliases

Re: [CentOS] VMWare Sandbox

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:59:46PM -0700, John R Pierce enlightened us: > nate wrote: > >ESX is not based on linux at all. ESX(not ESXi) includes > >a service console that is based off of RHEL-3 though > >that is for management only, virtualization runs entirely > >within the hypervisor which is tr

Re: [CentOS] OT - Please don't feed the Troll(s)

David Mackintosh wrote: > [...] ignorant, unappreciative, self-centered, and emotionally immature [...] You tripped the irony detector. That's exactly what I was thinking. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l

[CentOS] offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

Dear All, its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help i have been running a mil server with sendmail and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl. i had other servers which are alredy out now that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already been out of my sendmail

Re: [CentOS] offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

fabian dacunha wrote: > its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help > i have been running a mil server with sendmail > > and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl. > > i had other servers which are alredy out now > that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already

Re: [CentOS] offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

Ralph Angenendt wrote: fabian dacunha wrote: its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help i have been running a mil server with sendmail and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl. i had other servers which are alredy out now that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org

Re: [CentOS] offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >> fabian dacunha wrote: >> >>> its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n >>> help >>> i have been running a mil server with sendmail >>> >>> and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.or

Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?

Phil Schaffner wrote: IMHO should be a separate repo, or at least a naming scheme that would let people still use the "traditional" centos-plus kernels Sure, thats a bridge to cross when we have someone offering to maintain this. And I was already thinking along those lines.. - KB _

Re: [CentOS] VMWare Sandbox

John R Pierce wrote: does ESX have all its own direct hardware support? Yes it does. You shall be OK if you want to go for branded hardware from Sun, Dell, HP, IBM etc. But for the whitebox PC, it is quite (and sometimes costly) to get the right combination. My best combo are now : a. get

[CentOS] Re: offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

> > Anyone have any experience dealing with SURBL? I have a client who's > domain and IP is not listed in SURBL, but their client in China is using > SURBL and my client's emails are getting blocked. Can't seem to find > how SURBL is blocking them > Could the client in China either have an old

Re: [CentOS] Re: offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Anyone have any experience dealing with SURBL? I have a client who's > > domain and IP is not listed in SURBL, but their client in China is using > > SURBL and my client's emails are getting blocked. Can't seem t

Re: [CentOS] offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

Thanks guys for ur immediate reply do apprecite i try to incoporate some of the RBLS and check it out regards simon > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> >>> fabian dacunha wrote: >>> its a offtopic question but really a

[CentOS] OT: SA/Apache "Best Practice"?

Alle, Here is our situation: Our customer leases their machines from us and contract us to to manage them (as far as all systems administration issues). The customer does not have root access to any machine (by their own choice, as they want us to be responsible if something goes awr

Re: [CentOS] offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

At 01:34 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: Thanks guys for ur immediate reply do apprecite i try to incoporate some of the RBLS and check it out regards simon Depending upon your outcome, there are other methods you can use to modify for better results. You may find inserting the RBL in sendmail

[CentOS] Re: offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

on 10-31-2008 10:14 AM Matt Shields spake the following: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Scott Silva > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > > > > Anyone have any experience dealing with SURBL? I have a client who's > > domain and IP is not listed in S

Re: [CentOS] OT: SA/Apache "Best Practice"?

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Camron W. Fox wrote: [Our customer has] asked, that we change the default directory permission/ownership of /var/www/html,cgi-bin, instead of using the Documentroot and ScriptAlias parameters in the apache configuration. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 11 2008 /var/www/c

[CentOS] Re: OT: SA/Apache "Best Practice"?

on 10-31-2008 10:32 AM Camron W. Fox spake the following: > Alle, > > Here is our situation: > > Our customer leases their machines from us and contract us to to > manage them (as far as all systems administration issues). The customer > does not have root access to any machine (by their

Re: [CentOS] OT: SA/Apache "Best Practice"?

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Camron W. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >What argument, if any, would you use to try and convince the customer > that this is a bad idea/bad practice? Well, it's entirely possible that on update, the permissions they set will be overridden since the httpd

Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Michael Semcheski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> The GIMP probably is going to require a very *long* learning curve. It > >> has the power of > >> Adobe Photoshop and may not be something c

Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps

At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc. Its part image database and part image manipulator. Link? Please? Digicam gives too many h

Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps

On Friday 31 October 2008 19:26:20 Glenn wrote: > At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: > >I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks > >listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk > >processing, tagging images, etc. > > > >Its part image database and pa

Re: [CentOS] [OT] List of all email users

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008, Jussi Hirvi wrote: >John R Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (30.10.2008 17:39): >> and what about the user accounts in /etc/passwd ? > >Hm, yes, never thought of that! That would be a very good (certainly easy) >approach, though with its own limitations (it misses those

Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 31 October 2008 19:26:20 Glenn wrote: >> At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: >> >I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks >> >listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports

[CentOS] LDAP and expired passwords

CentOS 5.2 with OpenLDAP 2.3.27, nss_ldap_253.13, using TLS, i686 and x86_64. If a user with an expired password (shadowLastChange + shadowMax < current day) logs in to a system where ldap.conf points first to a consumer-only LDAP server, the password change operation (exop) proceeds and fails

Re: [CentOS] LDAP and expired passwords

On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:32 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: > CentOS 5.2 with OpenLDAP 2.3.27, nss_ldap_253.13, using TLS, i686 and > x86_64. > > LDAP password information update failed: Referral > > If I comment out "ssl start_tls", the referral to the master is followed > and the password

Re: [CentOS] LDAP and expired passwords

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Scott McClanahan wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:32 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: CentOS 5.2 with OpenLDAP 2.3.27, nss_ldap_253.13, using TLS, i686 and x86_64. LDAP password information update failed: Referral If I comment out "ssl start_tls", the referral to the m

Re: [CentOS] offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help

Fabian dacunha wrote on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:49:18 +0300 (AST): > its a offtopic question That doesn't mean that you can't give it a meaningful subject. Thanks. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _

Re: [CentOS] LDAP and expired passwords

Hi, On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 18:32, Steve Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does the common name in the certificate or the x509 v3 extensions match >> the hostname used in the referral in your slapd.conf? Is the >> certificate issued by the ldap server you are being referred to signed >> by a

Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps

Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One request that I got more often lately is Google Picasa. I vaguely > remember having downloaded and installed it once. As far as I know, it's a > closed-source Windows app that comes with a WINE emulation layer. Not > exactl