Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Christopher Chan
> which show your swap partition, whereas on my problem system, 'swapon > -s' produces no output at all. > Maybe you configured the swap lv but forgot to tell the installer to use it as swap. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread John R Pierce
Ian Masters wrote: which show your swap partition, whereas on my problem system, 'swapon -s' produces no output at all. ok, that confirms your supposition, you have no swap configured. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Ian Masters
Christopher Chan wrote: > Maybe you configured the swap lv but forgot to tell the installer to use > it as swap. Well that's entirely possible. The logical volume manager had me fairly confused. I would have thought the installer might have told me that I had not set its file system type ... ___

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Christopher Chan
Ian Masters wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: >> Maybe you configured the swap lv but forgot to tell the installer to use >> it as swap. > > Well that's entirely possible. The logical volume manager had me fairly > confused. > > I would have thought the installer might have told me that I had not

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Ian Masters
Christopher Chan wrote: > Well...it won't do that...but it should raise a flag on no swap being > configured after you were done partitioning and assigning/setting > filesystems. As far as I can remember there was no such 'flag'. That's precisely the kind of thing that would have made me jittery a

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Christopher Chan
Ian Masters wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: >> Well...it won't do that...but it should raise a flag on no swap being >> configured after you were done partitioning and assigning/setting >> filesystems. > > As far as I can remember there was no such 'flag'. That's precisely the > kind of thing tha

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Ian Masters
Christopher Chan wrote: > Was it Centos 5 that you installed? IIRC, the Centos/RHEL 4 installer > would have asked you about the lack of swap assigned. I have only done > one Centos 5 installation and I did not miss telling it to use the swap > lv as swap so I cannot say whether the Centos 5 instal

Re: [CentOS] boot problems

2008-10-28 Thread fabian dacunha
dear All. Sorry for my earlier mail which i was not able to explain correctly as i said b4 i had installed centos 5.2 to be as a squid proxy server and it was working fine for over a month or so but 3 days back the machine after a reboot jus refused to boot. after the post it tries to boot and t

[CentOS] Re: Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-28 Thread dika ye
___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 00:21 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Ian Masters wrote: > > which show your swap partition, whereas on my problem system, 'swapon > > -s' produces no output at all. > > > > ok, that confirms your supposition, you have no swap configured. All this raised a question in my m

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 00:21 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Ian Masters wrote: > > which show your swap partition, whereas on my problem system, 'swapon > > -s' produces no output at all. > > > > ok, that confirms your supposition, you have no swap configured. Although I disagree, some on this

[CentOS] CESA-2008:0965 Important CentOS 4 i386 lynx - security update

2008-10-28 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0965 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0965.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: lynx-2.8.5-18.2.el4_7.1.i386.rpm src: lynx-2.8.5-18.2.el4_7.1.src.rpm signature.asc Description: Open

[CentOS] Checking if a user is 'Disabled'

2008-10-28 Thread Tom Brown
Hi I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i can enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does anyone know if there is a way for me to see the current status of the user? ie locked or unlocked? thanks _

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 16

2008-10-28 Thread centos-announce-request
x86_64.rpm SRC: ruby-1.8.1-7.el4_7.1.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081028/

Re: [CentOS] Checking if a user is 'Disabled'

2008-10-28 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i can > enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does anyone know > if there is a way for me to see the current status of the user?

Re: [CentOS] Checking if a user is 'Disabled'

2008-10-28 Thread Steve Huff
On Oct 28, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Tom Brown wrote: I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i can enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does anyone know if there is a way for me to see the current status of the user? ie locked or unlocked? t

Re: [CentOS] Checking if a user is 'Disabled'

2008-10-28 Thread Tom Brown
this should get you a list of all the users which have been disabled by means of `usermod -L`: perl -e 'open($SHADOW, "<", "/etc/shadow") or die( "$!\n" ); while ( <$SHADOW> ) { chomp; print "$1\n" if (/^([^:]*):!{1}[^!:]*:.*$/) } close( $SHADOW );' you'll need to run it as root. no do

Re: [CentOS] freenx 7.3?

2008-10-28 Thread Johnny Hughes
Les Mikesell wrote: > Has anyone built a freenx 7.3 for Centos 5? I'd like to be able to use > the session shadow mode on some machines. > Les, You can try the version of freenx here: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/nx/ (freenx-0.7.3 is there, the NX is same as released version) If it all

Re: [CentOS] Re: Problem selecting installation drive : 5.2

2008-10-28 Thread Johnny Hughes
Alex H. Vandenham wrote: > After much frustration and wasted time: > > Solution: Additional Boot option (undocumented) : nodmraid That either is or is not the solution ... depending on what you want :D dmraid (Device Manager RAID) is a package that provides the ability to recognize SOME "Fake R

Re: [CentOS] The relationship between udev and MAKEDEV

2008-10-28 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 00:21, Clint Dilks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. Is modifying /etc/makedev.d/01linux-2.6.x likely to cause me issues in > future ? Possibly, since this file is owned by the MAKEDEV rpm. If there is an upgrade in MAKEDEV, it may overwrite this file. Or if it doesn't,

[CentOS] Checking if a user is 'Disabled'

2008-10-28 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Tom Brown wrote: I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i can enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does anyone know if there is a way for me to see the current status of the user? ie locked or unlocked? [EMAIL PROTECTE

[CentOS] Re: Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-28-2008 3:25 AM William L. Maltby spake the following: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 00:21 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> Ian Masters wrote: >>> which show your swap partition, whereas on my problem system, 'swapon >>> -s' produces no output at all. >>> >> ok, that confirms your supposition, you

[CentOS] Re: Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-28 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-28-2008 2:36 AM dika ye spake the following: > > > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos 42. If you ask a

[CentOS] install 5.2 on new dv7z hp laptop

2008-10-28 Thread Jerry Geis
I am trying to install 5.2 on a new dv7z hp laptop. I use "linux noapic nolapic iommu=off " and I get a kernel dump on rtl8169. I dont need the network to install? how do I ignore the rtl8169 to install. I tried noprobe and then it doesnt recognize my SATA HD controller and I dont know yet whic

[CentOS] Re: install 5.2 on new dv7z hp laptop

2008-10-28 Thread Jerry Geis
Jerry Geis wrote: I am trying to install 5.2 on a new dv7z hp laptop. I use "linux noapic nolapic iommu=off " and I get a kernel dump on rtl8169. I dont need the network to install? how do I ignore the rtl8169 to install. I tried noprobe and then it doesnt recognize my SATA HD controller and

Re: [CentOS] Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-28 Thread Sean Carolan
> Yes, I've dealt with these people. If they turn off all ICMP, they often > drop fragments as well, making the problem even worse. You can sometimes get > them to listen by asking them if their Internet access seems a little > "weird" in that some sites work sometimes or downloads are slow or the

[CentOS] rtl8169 kernel dump

2008-10-28 Thread Jerry Geis
I installed 5.2 x86_64 on a new hp dv7z laptop using noprobe on the install line. After rebooting the rtl8169 causes the kernel to dump. Is there a parameter I can pass to it (somehow) to avoid the kernel dump??? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread nate
William L. Maltby wrote: > All this raised a question in my mind. What's the value of have a swap > managed by LVM? ISTM that: 1) swap is usually configured to be the I think the main reason would be simplicity, assuming you have other volumes created and not just a single VG with a single LV in

Re: [CentOS] Re: Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-28 Thread MHR
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 10-28-2008 2:36 AM dika ye spake the following: >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@ce

Re: [CentOS] Re: install 5.2 on new dv7z hp laptop

2008-10-28 Thread MHR
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jerry Geis wrote: >> >> I am trying to install 5.2 on a new dv7z hp laptop. >> I use "linux noapic nolapic iommu=off " and I get a kernel dump on >> rtl8169. >> I dont need the network to install? how do I ignore the rtl8169 t

Re: [CentOS] cpan2rpm and alternatives

2008-10-28 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Geoff Galitz wrote: cpan2rpm is getting relatively old, compared to some of the newer things that can be done with the CPAN and RPM build procedures. The latest version isn't available on its sourceforge site and the What are the newer procedures? I'll be needing to do t

[CentOS] Re: Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-28 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-28-2008 10:38 AM MHR spake the following: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Scott Silva > wrote: >> on 10-28-2008 2:36 AM dika ye spake the following: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> __

[CentOS] Re: install 5.2 on new dv7z hp laptop

2008-10-28 Thread Jerry Geis
>/ Jerry Geis wrote: />>/ />>/ I am trying to install 5.2 on a new dv7z hp laptop. />>/ I use "linux noapic nolapic iommu=off " and I get a kernel dump on />>/ rtl8169. />>/ I dont need the network to install? how do I ignore the rtl8169 to />>/ install. />>/ />>/ I tried noprobe and then it does

Re: [CentOS] freenx 7.3?

2008-10-28 Thread Les Mikesell
Johnny Hughes wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Has anyone built a freenx 7.3 for Centos 5? I'd like to be able to use the session shadow mode on some machines. Les, You can try the version of freenx here: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/nx/ (freenx-0.7.3 is there, the NX is same as released v

Re: [CentOS] cpan2rpm and alternatives

2008-10-28 Thread Les Mikesell
Dag Wieers wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Geoff Galitz wrote: cpan2rpm is getting relatively old, compared to some of the newer things that can be done with the CPAN and RPM build procedures. The latest version isn't available on its sourceforge site and the What are the newer procedures? I'll

[CentOS] Re: install 5.2 on new dv7z hp laptop

2008-10-28 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-28-2008 11:10 AM Jerry Geis spake the following: >> >> >/ Jerry Geis wrote: >> />>/ >> />>/ I am trying to install 5.2 on a new dv7z hp laptop. >> />>/ I use "linux noapic nolapic iommu=off " and I get a kernel dump on >> />>/ rtl8169. >> />>/ I dont need the network to install? how do I igno

Re: [CentOS] Re: Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-28 Thread MHR
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 10-28-2008 10:38 AM MHR spake the following: >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Scott Silva >> wrote: >>> on 10-28-2008 2:36 AM dika ye spake the following: --

[CentOS] Re: rtl8169 kernel dump

2008-10-28 Thread Jerry Geis
Jerry Geis wrote: I installed 5.2 x86_64 on a new hp dv7z laptop using noprobe on the install line. After rebooting the rtl8169 causes the kernel to dump. Is there a parameter I can pass to it (somehow) to avoid the kernel dump??? Thanks, Jerry I found a new driver (finally) - it works.

Re: [CentOS] Re: [OT] Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-28 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:57 -0700, MHR wrote: > Geez! You guys hammer on others all the time, but then you "forget" to "edit the subject line" when replying to "digests", as requested by TPB. ;-) I've done your (and the OP's) work for y'all. Now, unless someone says "curmu..." WHOOPS! This th

[CentOS] 'severe errors' listed in nightly logwatch emails

2008-10-28 Thread Ray Leventhal
HI folks, If this is the wrong forum for this question, please let me know (with a gentle pointer to the right place)...TIA for that. I've started to receive some 'Severe Errors' in my nightly logwatch emails. As the system had been initially misconfigured for logwatch emails, I've only rec

[CentOS] "core" installs of 5.2 missing crucial packages like yum, selinux-policy-targeted, vim-minimal, etc.

2008-10-28 Thread Johnny Tan
I had a 5.0 kickstart server which did "core" installs of CentOS (i.e.: "%packages --nobase"). I recently setup a 5.2 kickstart server. Using the same kickstart configs, I notice a few packages are always missing, notably: yum (!!), selinux-policy-targeted (even though I have "selinux --enfor

Re: [CentOS] "core" installs of 5.2 missing crucial packages like yum, selinux-policy-targeted, vim-minimal, etc.

2008-10-28 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 15:34, Johnny Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a 5.0 kickstart server which did "core" installs of CentOS (i.e.: > "%packages --nobase"). IMHO, that's a very bad idea. Unless your diskspace is very very tight (in which case you should probably look into DSL or an

[CentOS] Kickstart package groups

2008-10-28 Thread Francisco Puente
Hello, I'm building another kickstart CD, minimal, and creating my own repository. Is there any way I can get the list of files that a group (like @core o @base) will install? The idea is to put only those files in the repository to be included later in the iso file, and only those files, no

[CentOS] changing partition priority on install

2008-10-28 Thread Monty Shinn
Greetings. I am in the process of installing 5.1 64 bit on a server. The server has 2 3ware cards: 9550SX 12 port, and a 8006 2 port, both SATA. I want the 8006 board to be /dev/sda, and the 9550 to be /dev/sdb. My plan is to install the os on /dev/sda (8006), and data on /dev/sdb (9550).

Re: [CentOS] Re: [OT] Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-28 Thread MHR
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:13 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Geez! You guys hammer on others all the time, but then you "forget" to > "edit the subject line" when replying to "digests", as requested by TPB. > > ;-) > > I've done your (and the OP's) work for y'all. Now, unless

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart package groups

2008-10-28 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Francisco Puente wrote: Hello, I'm building another kickstart CD, minimal, and creating my own repository. Is there any way I can get the list of files that a group (like @core o @base) will install? Below my .sig is an XSLT stylesheet that will do the trick. Save it

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart package groups

2008-10-28 Thread Francisco Puente
Thanks a lot Paul, I'll give a try now, I'll post back the results Francisco Paul Heinlein wrote: On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Francisco Puente wrote: Hello, I'm building another kickstart CD, minimal, and creating my own repository. Is there any way I can get the list of files that a group (like

[CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-28 Thread David Miller
I have a CentOS 5.2 server running Apache 2.2.3 (yum installed) and drupal 6.5 on ESX 3.5. We're using Name Based Virtual Hosting on it - 2 hosts. The problem is that when I pull up a web page after not having accessed it for ~15+ minutes it takes between 10-12s to load fully. The 2nd page, 3rd pag

Re: [CentOS] "core" installs of 5.2 missing crucial packages like yum, selinux-policy-targeted, vim-minimal, etc.

2008-10-28 Thread Johnny Tan
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 15:34, Johnny Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had a 5.0 kickstart server which did "core" installs of CentOS (i.e.: "%packages --nobase"). IMHO, that's a very bad idea. Unless your diskspace is very very tight (in which case you should

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-28 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:30 -0500, David Miller wrote: > I have a CentOS 5.2 server running Apache 2.2.3 (yum installed) and > drupal 6.5 on ESX 3.5. We're using Name Based Virtual Hosting on it - > 2 hosts. The problem is that when I pull up a web page after not > having accessed it for ~15+ minut

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-28 Thread David Miller
--snip-- > > sounds sleepy - perhaps the mysql connections drop after inactivity and > then it takes that long to connect > > You might just want to set up a cron script that does a curl or wget of > a standard page every 2 minutes or so just to keep things active. > > Craig > > __

Re: [CentOS] "core" installs of 5.2 missing crucial packages like yum, selinux-policy-targeted, vim-minimal, etc.

2008-10-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Johnny Tan wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:34:29 -0400: > I had a 5.0 kickstart server which did "core" installs of > CentOS (i.e.: "%packages --nobase"). And you have a @core in there as well? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart package groups

2008-10-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Francisco Puente wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:57:32 -0300: > Is there any way I can get the list of files that a group (like @core o > @base) will install? yum groupinfo Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com __

RE: [CentOS] cpan2rpm and alternatives

2008-10-28 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Listing the RPM packages you need on the RPMforge mailinglist would be >sufficient to have them added (where possible). Dag, I can't tell you how much I would appreciate that though I don't envy this task. Aside from ASSP 2.0 needing many, it requires newer versions of modules that come in Perl

Re: [CentOS] "core" installs of 5.2 missing crucial packages like yum, selinux-policy-targeted, vim-minimal, etc.

2008-10-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Filipe Brandenburger wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:44:47 -0400: > why would you want to install > CentOS without the "base" packages? because it gives you more control over really unnecessary stuff, I don't need any CD-burning and other multimedia stuff on a webserver for instance. > All machin

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Christopher Chan
nate wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: All this raised a question in my mind. What's the value of have a swap managed by LVM? ISTM that: 1) swap is usually configured to be the I think the main reason would be simplicity, assuming you have other volumes created and not just a single VG with a s

Re: [CentOS] changing partition priority on install

2008-10-28 Thread Phil Schaffner
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:59 -0500, Monty Shinn wrote: > Greetings. > > I am in the process of installing 5.1 64 bit on a server. The server > has 2 3ware cards: 9550SX 12 port, and a 8006 2 port, both SATA. Any reason not to use 5.2? Will save a lot of updates, and perhaps some headaches. > I

Re: [CentOS] Re: Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Christopher Chan
Even though the recommended swap is 2 times system memory, I have never made a swap partition over 2 GB. Maybe I am also flirting with disaster, but haven't been bit yet in years. Usually a run away process that hits into swap gives enough time for the kernel to kill it off before the whole syst

Re: [CentOS] Re: install 5.2 on new dv7z hp laptop

2008-10-28 Thread Phil Schaffner
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:40 -0700, MHR wrote: > Heck, it's bad enough I talk to myself audibly Well, my grandma used to say it's OK to talk to yourself, but if you start answering yourself you're in trouble. Following this theory, you're OK, but I don't know about Jerry! :-) Phil P.S. - In

Re: [CentOS] boot problems

2008-10-28 Thread Phil Schaffner
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:31 +0300, fabian dacunha wrote: > dear All. > > Sorry for my earlier mail which i was not able to explain correctly > > as i said b4 Correct English really would not take that much more effort as compared to texting shortcuts, and would make it more likely that you might

[CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-28 Thread Dag Wieers
Hi all, The CentOS community is pretty limited in what we can do to the core distribution. Since our mantra is "aiming to be 100% compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux" we cannot fix bugs or improve the CentOS core without waiting for Red Hat to make those modifications first. We have limi

Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-28 Thread Ian Masters
Nate > If that volume is not in use by anything else you should > be perfectly able to do: > > mkswap /dev/VolGroup00/swap > swapon /dev/VolGroup00/swap > > then add something like this to fstab: > /dev/VolGroup00 swapswapdefaults 0 0 Shouldn't the fstab entry be