Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

Rob Townley wrote: > You may want to look at a third party samba packager for better > documentation such as: > http://enterprisesamba.org/ More than the 25MB(!) of documentation which are in the samba packages we release? Ralph pgpkktOwX3s2m.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: [CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset

Spike Turner wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT): > The apache docs state that it does no harm well, that's wrong. Change alle your pages to be UTF-8 or remove it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com __

[CentOS] Thunderbird does not follow url links in Firefox

Since the recent update from firefox2 to firefox3 the links in my mails do no longer work. No window pops up. After some debug I found the problem. Let's share it with others that experience the same problem: I'm using Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (manually downloaded, that might have caused the problem,

RE: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

JohnStanley Writes: Check out the tcp nodelay samba option in smb.conf. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] tg3 ethernet card drops connection under heavy load

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:44:41AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote: > We have an HP DL360 server with dual on-board Tigon3 ethernet cards. ... > how I could troubleshoot this? why don't you start with the kernel version and architecture? -> uname -a -> /var/log/messages relevant lines? -> /sbin/ifconfig

Re: [CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Spike Turner wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT): > > > The apache docs state that it does no harm > > well, that's wrong. Change alle your pages to be UTF-8 or remove it. Yepp. Most charset problems I've found within apache came from that setting.

RE: [CentOS] Video driver questions

JohnStanley Writes: Didn't you say in another thread you had another OQO just like the one with the video problems? If so try to copy the xorg.config file from the working one to the one with the problems. Reboot after copying. Do lspci -v to make sure both cards are of the same chipset family. _

Re: [CentOS] tg3 ethernet card drops connection under heavy load

> why don't you start with the kernel version and architecture? > -> uname -a This server is running centos 3.9 Linux server.domain.com 2.4.21-57.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed May 7 06:10:55 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > -> /var/log/messages relevant lines? There was nothing out of the ordinary in /var

Re: [CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset

Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:31:21 +0200: > Change alle your pages to be UTF-8 or remove it. NB: Of course, you can also use AddDefaultCharset ISO-8859-1 if you can be sure that *all* the served documents will be that charset. If not, you better don't use it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl,

[CentOS] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

HW = HPQ DC7700 DuoCore 1.8GHz, 4 x 2GB RAM, 1 x 1TB SATA (AHCI) OS = CentOS-5.2 ix_64 (xen) I am experimenting with Xen and with virtual machines in general for the first time. In consequence I have many questions. However, the one that I wish answered at the moment is simple: Given a DVD cont

Re: [CentOS] tg3 ethernet card drops connection under heavy load

Hi, please leave the attribution when you reply ;) On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 08:27:34AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote: > > This server is running centos 3.9 > Linux server.domain.com 2.4.21-57.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed May 7 06:10:55 EDT > 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux 3.9 32 bits SMP latest kernel version.

[CentOS] Re: Installing a new VM on a xen box.

On Thu, October 9, 2008 09:47, James B. Byrne wrote: > HW = HPQ DC7700 DuoCore 1.8GHz, 4 x 2GB RAM, 1 x 1TB SATA (AHCI) > OS = CentOS-5.2 ix_64 (xen) > > I am experimenting with Xen and with virtual machines in general for the > first time. In consequence I have many questions. However, the one

RE: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

John wrote: > Check out the tcp nodelay samba option in smb.conf. > I have the following in my smb.conf # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 Actually it

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > More than the 25MB(!) of documentation which are in the > samba packages we release? > Yes the Enterprise Samba Docs are more than 28 Mb but are raw in that they refer to Samba 3.2.x as well as having links not working and charset specified in some files and unspecified

[CentOS] tg3 ethernet card drops connection under heavy load

We have an HP DL360 server with dual on-board Tigon3 ethernet cards. We are using eth0, eth1 is unused at the moment. Sometimes when the network interface is under heavy load, for example moving large file transfers over rsync or NFS, the network interface stops working and we lose all connection

RE: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

>XP Home was purposefully "crippled" by MS so it lacks networking features >in XP Pro and Win2k Pro. Yawn... Are you informed well enough to know how it was "crippled" as you say? I think not, it may not be a member of a Windows domain. That's it. It costs less. That's fair? I wonder if you apply

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 7

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

James B. Byrne wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:47:13 -0400 (EDT): > Given a DVD containing the CentOS-5.2_Final (i386) distribution mounted at > /media/CentOS_5.2_Final on Dom0, what argument do I pass to the "Install > Media URL" argument of the "Create a new virtual system" wizard" to > install the

Re: [CentOS] rpmforge, perl-dbd-mysql, yum, priorities, centos, and you

Anything like this would probably have to be an upstream thing. But it would probably be a good idea for people to put this into their kickstart configs... i think that the yum setup diverges from upstream already, so i don't see this as a big change from that. ___

[CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On: Centos 5.2, with httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 I tried to bring up a web server using an httpd.con that runs well on: Fedora 8, with httpd-2.2.8-1.fc8 as well as several earlier versions, going back to Fedora 4. On the Centos version, I cannot successfully: run a NameVirtualHost; exec

Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > On: Centos 5.2, with httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 > > I tried to bring up a web server using an > httpd.con that runs well > > On the Centos version, I cannot successfully: >run a NameVirtualHost; >execute a CGI. > > I can bring up a simple page if I avoid

Re: [CentOS] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

James B. Byrne wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:31:09 -0400 (EDT): > In the meantime, since the link given in the VMM GUI help file for the > example installation tree is defunct can some kind soul point me to a > resource that describes how to build sucha thing from a CentOS-5.2 distro > dvd? You can

Re: [CentOS] [OT] What is the best network monitoring tool?

Nate, Thanks for your response. Currently I have a lot of services to monitoring for example: Databases : Oracle - Mysql - MSSql WebServers: SunWebServer - SunJavaAppServer - Apache Systems: Windows - Linux Networking: Cisco Switch - Lan Interfaces Currently I look these projects: Groundwork an

[CentOS] [SOLVED] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

On Thu, October 9, 2008 10:31, James B. Byrne wrote: > In the meantime, since the link given in the VMM GUI help file for the > example installation tree is defunct can some kind soul point me to a > resource that describes how to build sucha thing from a CentOS-5.2 distro > dvd? From: Red Hat E

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

Joseph L. Casale wrote: XP Home was purposefully "crippled" by MS so it lacks networking features in XP Pro and Win2k Pro. Yawn... Are you informed well enough to know how it was "crippled" as you say? I think not, it may not be a member of a Windows domain. That's it. It costs less. That's fai

Re: [CentOS] [OT] What is the best network monitoring tool?

Alejandro schrieb: > Nate, > > Thanks for your response. > > Currently I have a lot of services to monitoring for example: > > Databases : Oracle - Mysql - MSSql > WebServers: SunWebServer - SunJavaAppServer - Apache > Systems: Windows - Linux > Networking: Cisco Switch - Lan Interfaces > > Current

Re: [CentOS] [OT] What is the best network monitoring tool?

Alejandro wrote: Nate, Thanks for your response. Currently I have a lot of services to monitoring for example: Databases : Oracle - Mysql - MSSql WebServers: SunWebServer - SunJavaAppServer - Apache Systems: Windows - Linux Networking: Cisco Switch - Lan Interfaces Currently I look these proj

Re: [CentOS] tg3 ethernet card drops connection under heavy load

Sean Carolan wrote: > We have an HP DL360 server with dual on-board Tigon3 ethernet cards. > We are using eth0, eth1 is unused at the moment. Sometimes when the > network interface is under heavy load, for example moving large file > transfers over rsync or NFS, the network interface stops working

[CentOS] [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

On Thu, October 9, 2008 12:09, James B. Byrne wrote: > > So: > # cd /path/to/vm/os/install_tree > # cp -pr /media/CentOS_5.2_Final ./ > > Thereafter the Install Media URL becomes: > /path/to/vm/os/install_tree/CentOS_5.2_Final > Well, RH implementation of xen appears far less useful from an expe

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

James B. Byrne wrote: > So, on my test machine that supports only paravirtualization I can only > run 64 bit versions of a supported paravirtualized guest OS. This limits > me to essentially CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 ix_64. I was hoping to be able to > run CentOS-5.2 i386 as a guest as there is no 6

[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:54 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] > Don't we all like puzzles? All those hundreds of pieces which look > similar? Is that blue one there sky or is it the water? The green one > over there - is it a tree? Is it a part of that house which has been > painted green? > >

Re: [CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:54 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] [...] IOW: What did you try to do? What happened? What did you expect to happen? What does your config look like? Are there any errors in the log file? Ralph [...] Indeed. Here is a summary: [

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

On Thursday 09 October 2008 12:31, nate wrote: > Now it looks like Red hat has woken up and seen it is > a dead end too and is moving to KVM as you mentioned. where did you read this? I have just started with xen too but I don't want to be left hanging...

[CentOS] Re: [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

on 10-9-2008 10:19 AM sbeam spake the following: > On Thursday 09 October 2008 12:31, nate wrote: >> Now it looks like Red hat has woken up and seen it is >> a dead end too and is moving to KVM as you mentioned. > > where did you read this? I have just started with xen too but I don't want to > b

[CentOS] Re: tg3 ethernet card drops connection under heavy load

on 10-9-2008 6:27 AM Sean Carolan spake the following: >> why don't you start with the kernel version and architecture? >> -> uname -a > > This server is running centos 3.9 > Linux server.domain.com 2.4.21-57.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed May 7 06:10:55 EDT > 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > >> -> /var/log/mes

[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:14:54 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote: [...] > What do you get in the error_log? I found the CGI problem (mia culpa), and the CGI is now working, but the NameVirtualHost still has a problem. NameVirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80 NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80 ... Order allo

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

2008/10/9 Guy Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > XP Home don't have: > > - The RDP server > - Offline Folders > - Dual CPU Support > - Greater Access Control (shares, files & folders) > - Multi-Language interface > > > Another annoyance is the lack of "address bar" in the W

[CentOS] Firefox3 for CentOS4 -- dependency on evolution28 packages?

I'd been putting off installing the FX3 packages because of some extensions I use that don't have upgrades. [*] However, when FX1.5 crashed on me today I decided to finally go ahead. Fired up yum and I'm told I have to install a slew of evolution28 library packages in order to install the firefox

[CentOS] Rebooting CentOS 5.2 XEN Guest

All, I have CentOS 5.2 XEN guests running on a CentOS 5.2 host. At one time when I issued an 'init 6' in one of the XEN guests it rebooted Now it seems to halt but virt-manager shows it as still running and the only way to get the guest to boot is to destroy the virtual machine and start it agai

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

Alexander Georgiev wrote: It does have "address bar". At least my copy of Windows XP Home has it. Regarding Dual CPU Support - "Windows Task Manager" shows 2 separate CPU Usage Histories for the CPU, which is Core3 CPU T7200. It has hyperthreading or something. "Home" supports a single multi

[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:07:08 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: [...] I have additional information that ServerName is not working. My system requires two virtual hosts with different values of ServerName. If they share an IP address, the system fails. But if each virtual host has a unique IP a

Re: [CentOS] Re: [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

Scott Silva wrote: > RedHat is moving to KVM because they bought it. > > http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2008/qumranet.html > > Why give cash to a competitor if you can keep it in-house? Going back even further http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid

Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

what's the purpose of that whole confusing configuration? If you want to use IP-based virtualhosts *any* of them needs a servername. And why do you enclose the Location statement in a virtualhost? Why don't you simply specify the real location? And I would use to make it look less like XML. >

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

James B. Byrne wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:27:15 -0400 (EDT): > Oh well, this was just a trial to see what was involved with virtualization. James, stop talking to yourself ;-) It's good to look at stock documentation, but it's not enough. Search this list archive for "xen" and have a look at th

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

Alexander Georgiev wrote: 2008/10/9 Guy Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Joseph L. Casale wrote: XP Home don't have: - The RDP server - Offline Folders - Dual CPU Support - Greater Access Control (shares, files & folders) - Multi-Language interface Another annoyance is the lack of "address bar"

Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:28:39 + (UTC): > In other words, ServerName alone fails to distinguish two > named virtual hosts. Oh, it sure does. If it is present in both - which it isn't in your config. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive

Re: [CentOS] Rebooting CentOS 5.2 XEN Guest

Brett Serkez wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:23:16 -0400: > At one time when I issued an 'init 6' in one of the XEN guests it > rebooted I usually use xm reboot from the host. You can also use reboot from within the guest. I remember *one* occurence quite a few months back where after an update I h

[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:31:19 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > what's the purpose of that whole confusing configuration? If you want to > use IP-based virtualhosts *any* of them needs a servername. And why do > you enclose the Location statement in a virtualhost? Why don't you > simply specify the real

[CentOS] Re: Installing a new VM on a xen box.

I decided to come at this from a different angle and acquired a "Centrina???" Intel white-box 64 bit Core2 Duo system with Intel VT technology. This should give me "full virtualization" capability for Xen. However, while the installer of the ix_64 package completes without problem (si long as the

[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:43:24 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:28:39 + (UTC): > >> In other words, ServerName alone fails to distinguish two named virtual >> hosts. > > Oh, it sure does. If it is present in both - which it isn't in your > config.

[CentOS] More Samba Questions

I have never setup a Samba server, and the recent thread here prompted to get on this I need to migrate two XP machines from using iSCSI to Samba. I thought the "+" preceding a username in the smb.conf file for a share definition told Samba to use the unix username? Unless I actually use swat to c

Re: [CentOS] More Samba Questions

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >I have never setup a Samba server, and the recent thread here prompted to >get on this I need to migrate two XP machines from using iSCSI to Samba. > >I thought the "+" preceding a username in the smb.conf file for a >share definition told Samba to use

Re: [CentOS] More Samba Questions

Joseph L. Casale wrote: I have never setup a Samba server, and the recent thread here prompted to get on this I need to migrate two XP machines from using iSCSI to Samba. I thought the "+" preceding a username in the smb.conf file for a share definition told Samba to use the unix username? Unles

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

Guy Boisvert wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:39:32 -0400: > The one i have here won't do that! Then you just add it. Believe it or not but the Windows Explorer (at least in XP, it lost some of this in Vista) is much more customizable than Gnome or KDE. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get yo

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

Nate wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:36:13 -0700 (PDT): > ut KVM offers more innovation > and faster features I would hope that it actually offers just "faster", but AFAIK that is what it doesn't. AFAIK a PV CentOS 5 on Xen runs much better and faster than in KVM. Is that true? I've used KVM only o

Re: [CentOS] Firefox3 for CentOS4 -- dependency on evolution28 packages?

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd been putting off installing the FX3 packages because of some > extensions I use that don't have upgrades. [*] However, when FX1.5 > crashed on me today I decided to finally go ahead. Fired up yum and > I'm told I have

Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:14:10 + (UTC): > I am therefore > left with the need to remove the VirtualHost that > has no ServerName. I can access the site with an > IP address, which, I think, this is meant to prevent. I still don't see the purpose of that virtual host.

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then you just add it. Believe it or not but the Windows Explorer (at least > in XP, it lost some of this in Vista) is much more customizable than Gnome > or KDE. > It has to be - it runs on a system that was cobbled togeth

RE: [CentOS] More Samba Questions

>Why would you put user names in the smb.conf file? The server is set to "user" hence the need to suggest what user's can access the share, right? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] More Samba Questions

>I've always had to use > >smbpasswd -a unixusername > >then give them a password for smb use... the catch-22 is that SMB uses >a completely different password hash algorithm than Unix/Linux >/etc/passwd(shadow) passwords, so you can't use the one for the other. > >Its much much easier if you

Re: [CentOS] More Samba Questions

Joseph L. Casale wrote: I've always had to use smbpasswd -a unixusername then give them a password for smb use... the catch-22 is that SMB uses a completely different password hash algorithm than Unix/Linux /etc/passwd(shadow) passwords, so you can't use the one for the other. Its much mu

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED - Sort Of] Installing a new VM on a xen box.

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I would hope that it actually offers just "faster", but AFAIK that is what > it doesn't. AFAIK a PV CentOS 5 on Xen runs much better and faster than in > KVM. Is that true? I've used KVM only once for a non-PV guest (old Suse > System) and not with the kernel module. I think

Re: [CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:43:24 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:28:39 + (UTC): In other words, ServerName alone fails to distinguish two named virtual hosts. Oh, it sure does. If it is present in both -

RE: [CentOS] More Samba Questions

>you know individual Windows DOMAIN\usernames can be added to the local >Administrators group on a workstation? yeah, but like I said, I didn't want a logged in user (can't even enable a locked screen saver) to be accessible by "someone". I could create perms denying this user explicitly etc but

Re: [CentOS] Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32

Mhr wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:43:36 -0700: > It has to be Doesn't really matter why ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://li

Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500: > You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that contains > Servername entries. No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he was using a virtual host without a ServerName directive. Kai -- Kai Sch

[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:42:06 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: [...] > > I still don't see the purpose of that virtual host. If it is for > "catching" IP only accesses there are several methods to do this. Look > for > "default virtualhost" in the apache documentation (and in the config > template comi

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird does not follow url links in Firefox

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Theo Band <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the recent update from firefox2 to firefox3 the links in my mails > do no longer work. No window pops up. After some debug I found the > problem. Let's share it with others that experience the same problem: > > I'm using T

Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

> Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500: > >> You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that contains >> Servername entries. > > No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he was using > a virtual host without a ServerName directive. > > Kai >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox3 for CentOS4 -- dependency on evolution28 packages?

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd been putting off installing the FX3 packages because of some > extensions I use that don't have upgrades. [*] However, when FX1.5 > crashed on me today I decided to finally go ahead. Fired up yum and > I'm told I have

Re: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core]

Edit /etc/modprobe.conf and add alias scsi_hostadapter2 ahci Then rebuild your initrd with mkinird mkinitrd -f /boot/initrd-$(uname -r).img $(uname -r) Then reboot and make the BIOS change. This should give you much better disk performance. James B. Byrne wrote: --

[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:03:13 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: >> Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500: >> >>> You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that >>> contains Servername entries. >> >> No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he w

Re: [CentOS] find

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> Sorry, I missed the "!" in the above paste: >> >> find . -type f -exec grep -il \!* {} \; -exec grep -i \!* {} \; -exec echo >> \; > > If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS), > > g

Re: [CentOS] Firefox3 for CentOS4 -- dependency on evolution28 packages?

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bart: What version of CentOS are you running on that box? CentOS 4.7. > Are you using GNOME? Yes. It appears that all the evolution28-* packages on which there is a dependency are related to the rendering engine (-pango,

Re: [CentOS] Firefox3 for CentOS4 -- dependency on evolution28 packages?

Bart Schaefer wrote: On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bart: What version of CentOS are you running on that box? CentOS 4.7. Are you using GNOME? Yes. It appears that all the evolution28-* packages on which there is a dependency are re

[CentOS] smartd and 3ware on centos5

Hi, I've CentOS5 box with 3ware RAID controller in it. I can't get the tw_cli command line tool to work, and smartd also barks on me. The tw_cli simply doesn't see the controller, no errors logged anywhere. When starting smartd, it is much more verbose. I'm getting a bunch of messages like thi