-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Al Sparks
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:17 PM
To: Centos List
Subject: [CentOS] Installing perl modules using yum?
I'm trying to install swatch using rpmbuild.
I'm getting dependency errors saying t
got a centos5.2 web/database server thats on a public coloc, its dmesg
fills up with
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/8032 shrinks window
354477433:354478918. Repaired.
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/8032 shrinks window
354477433:354478918. Repaired.
TCP: Tre
There were a ton of replies to the DKIM thread so I thought I'd chip in
with what Yahoo have stated on their website,
Q What are some best practices when sending to Yahoo! Mail?
A http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/postmaster-15.html
Apologies if this has been mentioned before in t
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:23:50 +0200:
> That's supposed to help with what regarding his problem?
Hotmail seems to delete all mail from domains without SPF if it's not
coming from the MX. Yahoo might be doing the same.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Con
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 9-24-2008 2:23 PM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
>> I get it via mail.centos.org which clearly isn't a server you would
>> allow to send mails out as @hoffman.com when you set up SPF for your
>> domain. So if I drop mails which don't have a "correct" SPF record -
>>
Craig White wrote:
> well it's not just yahoo as I know for certain that AOL also requires
> reverse DNS to match just like all the mail servers that I maintain also
> require matching reverse DNS.
>
> Your problem - if you actually want to solve it instead of tossing the
> blame to others like ya
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Bob Hoffman wrote:
> >
> > Yeato hell with yahoo. I will just make all
> members use a different
> > email service. Aint worth the effort.
>
> I think this conversation is at a point where it would make
> more sense
> on a yahoo / email specific list.
Agreed! Its a
> >
> > I think this conversation is at a point where it would make
> more sense
> > on a yahoo / email specific list.
>
> Agreed! Its amazing to see the childishness of not being able
> to get one's server in order, ignoring Yahoo's FAQ's and then
> this kind of BS.
>
> Thanks,
> Josh.
>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Um, no one has ignored yahoos mail practices.
> My server is set up correctly.
> I even took the step of adding spf.
> I talked to others with the same issue that use dkim
> It is still grey listed.
>
> After talking with yahoo, they indicate the change of ip
> addresses/serv
Josh wrote
>Agreed! Its amazing to see the childishness of not being
>able to get one's server in order, ignoring Yahoo's
>FAQ's and then this kind of BS.
>
> Looking at the headers of the mail you have just sent from a
> yahoo client you have not followed to the letter Yahoo's
> requirement
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> From: Sergio Belkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [CentOS] Proxy with no cache
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Wednesday, 3 September, 2008, 2:53 PM
> Hi,
> I'd want to install a proxy server but I no need
> cache, what software
> do you recommend me?
>
> thanks in a
mouss wrote:
Andrew Norris wrote:
Or am I missing something?
"double lookup" is IP -> name -> IP. you don't do name -> IP -> name.
Ok, I guess I've always thought about it backwards. Thanks for setting
me straight.
--
Andrew Norris
Systems Administrator
Locus Telecommunications
[EMAIL PR
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I think this conversation is at a point where it would make
more sense
on a yahoo / email specific list.
Agreed! Its amazing to see the childishness of not being able
to get one's server in order, ignoring Yahoo's FAQ's and then
this kind of BS.
Thanks,
Josh.
Um, no
mouss wrote:
.
.
.
I don't like Josh mail, yours is worst.
I dunno about that. I mean after a long thread where you try to make
sure you are doing the right thing on your end before going upstream to
complain, you get to be called childish, ignorant and full of BS. I'd be
pissed too.
BTW
Josh Donovan wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Yeato hell with yahoo. I will just make all
members use a different
email service. Aint worth the effort.
I think this conversation is at a point where it would make
more sense
on a yahoo / email specific list.
Agreed! Its
>
> Karanbir post was brief and to the point. yours is a personal attack.
> Even if Bob missed your excellent recommendation, there is no
> reason to get mad.
> ___
I gotta agree that we need to close this thread. It seems whether a mailing
list o
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:23:50 +0200:
That's supposed to help with what regarding his problem?
Hotmail seems to delete all mail from domains without SPF if it's not
coming from the MX. Yahoo might be doing the same.
oh please no. hotmail don't dele
on 9-25-2008 5:21 AM Bob Hoffman spake the following:
Josh wrote
Agreed! Its amazing to see the childishness of not being
able to get one's server in order, ignoring Yahoo's
FAQ's and then this kind of BS.
Looking at the headers of the mail you have just sent from a
yahoo client you have
Scott Silva wrote:
> An entry from localhost is very common on a webmail server. It shouldn't
> break anything, it is just a relay.
Enough time has been wasted on the DKIM thread so I'm not reading the main
thread but what was Hoffman thinking looking up my headers on a webmail
client? I'm not
Toby Bluhm wrote:
BTW - very informative thread.
I wonder if someone might take the bits of info in this thread and put
it into a wiki page around Mail Servers and perhaps start a best
practices section...
Would
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos#head-49a3d6a9a0c95cff0676b0209eae985780e41678
I once had firefox x86_64 installed (because it was the default).
But that one has problems with plugins (flash, java), which are
much easily solved by using the i386 version.
So I unstalled firefox, and installed it again using:
yum install firefox.i386
This worked, and even the plugins work
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Paul Bijnens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Today came the update for firefox 3.0.2.
>
> So I did "yum update". The depencies included xulrunner and devhelp.
>
> However, yum complained about a conflict between xulrunner 1.9.0.1
> being incompatible. So I erased x
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:23:50 +0200:
>
>> That's supposed to help with what regarding his problem?
>
>Hotmail seems to delete all mail from domains without SPF if it's not
>coming from the MX. Yahoo might be doing the same.
I don't t
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
BTW - very informative thread.
I wonder if someone might take the bits of info in this thread and put
it into a wiki page around Mail Servers and perhaps start a best
practices section...
Would
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos#head-49a3d6a9a0c95cff067
Paul Bijnens wrote:
yum install firefox.i386
it pulls in xulrunner as well, but two different versions for two different
architectures (???):
My mistake. I did fix it immediately, but it takes 30 min or so for the
changes to filter through.
What happened :
the xulrunner and xulrunner-dev
on 9-25-2008 9:58 AM John Hinton spake the following:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
BTW - very informative thread.
I wonder if someone might take the bits of info in this thread and put
it into a wiki page around Mail Servers and perhaps start a best
practices section...
Would
How to solve this issue?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rescue]# yum update xulrunner
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirror.silyus.net
* updates: mirror.silyus.net
* addons: mirror.silyus.net
* extras: mirror.silyus.net
Setting up Update Process
Resolving
Mad Unix wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/xulrunner from install of xulrunner-1.9.0.2-5.el5
conflicts with file from package xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2
yum clean metadata;
then try again .
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:15:01 -0700
John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know thats because of random bogosity coming in from the internet, and
> I really don't care. can I suppress that from filling up the dmesg
> buffer so I can see more important things like scsi soft errors?
Block
I am working on the Centos wiki instructions for doing an install via vnc:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
CD is all burned and ready to go. I then thought about the viewer
settings particularly the port number and firewall rules.
When I connect vncviewer to a vncserve
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My mistake. I did fix it immediately, but it takes 30 min or so for the
> changes to filter through.
>
> What happened :
>
> the xulrunner and xulrunner-devel multilib pkgset missed the update, and the
> metadata update
> > Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >> Toby Bluhm wrote:
> >>> BTW - very informative thread.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I wonder if someone might take the bits of info in this thread and
> >> put it into a wiki page around Mail Servers and perhaps
> start a best
> >> practices section...
> >>
>From hotmail,
Scott Silva wrote:
.
.
.
A "one stop
shop" on everything CentOS.
I like that approach better. A new list for email only would probably
lead to email threads on *both* lists, users being reminded to take the
discussion to the other list, etc.
--
Toby Bluhm
Alltech Medical Systems Ameri
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Your problem - if you actually want to solve it instead of tossing the
blame to others like yahoo is...
# host mail.creativeprogramdesigners.com
mail.creativeprogramdesigners.com has address 72.35.68.58
# host 72.35.68.58
58.68.35.72.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
cre
on 9-25-2008 2:15 AM John R Pierce spake the following:
got a centos5.2 web/database server thats on a public coloc, its dmesg
fills up with
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/8032 shrinks window
354477433:354478918. Repaired.
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/803
Les Mikesell wrote:
Mail isn't supposed to be rejected for this, but some places probably
do. A more correct approach is to have one name with the A record and
the matching ptr and make all of the other names CNAMEs.
no, no, no! CNAMES are discouraged as they create additional work
fo
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:22:24 -0700
Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't you love some of the more "interesting" messages from the kernel?
While amusing, if you read up a bit on what the error message is actually
telling you, you will find that it really is a pretty good short-form
descr
Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:15:01 -0700
John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know thats because of random bogosity coming in from the internet, and
I really don't care. can I suppress that from filling up the dmesg
buffer so I can see more important things like scsi soft
on 9-25-2008 10:55 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
I am working on the Centos wiki instructions for doing an install via vnc:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
CD is all burned and ready to go. I then thought about the viewer
settings particularly the port number
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:15 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> got a centos5.2 web/database server thats on a public coloc, its dmesg fills
> up with
>
>
> TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/8032 shrinks window
> 354477433:354478918. Repaired.
> TCP: Treason uncloaked! Pe
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
.
.
.
A "one stop shop" on everything CentOS.
I like that approach better. A new list for email only would probably
lead to email threads on *both* lists, users being reminded to take
the discussion to the other list, etc.
My point is we go unhelpe
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-25-2008 10:55 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
I am working on the Centos wiki instructions for doing an install via
vnc:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
CD is all burned and ready to go. I then thought about the viewer
settings particu
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:30:36 -0700
John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> they come from random IPs all over the place. further, the port they
> are sent to is a shoutcast service port, so I can't exactly block that.
A place to start:
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/bogon-list.html
--
John R Pierce wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Mail isn't supposed to be rejected for this, but some places probably
do. A more correct approach is to have one name with the A record and
the matching ptr and make all of the other names CNAMEs.
no, no, no! CNAMES are discouraged as they crea
Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this
stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean).
So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions
across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It
appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn'
Quoting David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this
> stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean).
>
> So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions
> across two servers. I used Piranha to add anoth
on 9-25-2008 11:43 AM John Hinton spake the following:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
.
.
.
A "one stop shop" on everything CentOS.
I like that approach better. A new list for email only would probably
lead to email threads on *both* lists, users being reminded to take
the discussi
On Thu, September 25, 2008 14:13, Barry Brimer wrote:
> Is the service itself active?
>
> Do you have a line above these that says something like:
>
> virtual example.com {
> active = 1
Yes; and it shows as active in Piranha, too, and nannys got started for
the three real servers. It just
First try did not work
dnk wrote:
On 24/09/08 8:27 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
Only thing I don't know how to do is have vncviewer in 'listen' mode.
I am the one that wrote that wiki article. How to pu
John Hinton wrote:
> Toby Bluhm wrote:
> > Scott Silva wrote:
> > >
> > > A "one stop shop" on everything CentOS.
> >
> > I like that approach better. A new list for email only would
> > probably lead to email threads on *both* lists, users being
> > reminded to take the discussion to
> > the ot
on 9-25-2008 12:31 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
First try did not work
dnk wrote:
On 24/09/08 8:27 AM, "Robert Moskowitz"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
Only thing I don't know how to do is have vncviewer in 'listen' mode
Quoting David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, September 25, 2008 14:13, Barry Brimer wrote:
>
> > Is the service itself active?
> >
> > Do you have a line above these that says something like:
> >
> > virtual example.com {
> > active = 1
>
> Yes; and it shows as active in Piranha
John R Pierce wrote:
>
> got a centos5.2 web/database server thats on a public coloc, its dmesg
> fills up with
>
>
> TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/8032 shrinks window
> 354477433:354478918. Repaired.
> TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/8032 shrinks window
>
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-25-2008 12:31 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
First try did not work
dnk wrote:
On 24/09/08 8:27 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
Only thing I don't know how to do is have vncview
on 9-25-2008 1:09 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-25-2008 12:31 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
First try did not work
dnk wrote:
On 24/09/08 8:27 AM, "Robert Moskowitz"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadl
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-25-2008 2:15 AM John R Pierce spake the following:
got a centos5.2 web/database server thats on a public coloc, its
dmesg fills up with
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.135.195.32:64905/8032 shrinks window
354477433:354478918. Repaired.
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 8
On Thu, September 25, 2008 14:43, Barry Brimer wrote:
> Quoting David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> On Thu, September 25, 2008 14:13, Barry Brimer wrote:
>>
>> > Is the service itself active?
>> >
>> > Do you have a line above these that says something like:
>> >
>> > virtual example.co
It is working.
Got through disk druid to set the drive how I like, then did the desktop
setup.
It is now formatting the drive, and should be all installed before
long. Then the updates :)
And finally fix up the anaconda-ks.cfg so I can use it to build the
other 3 the same way...
Sc
Found this old message about formatting a USB drive and it leaves a few
questions for me:
I am going to format it as ext3 to keep permissions. I don't need to
use this drive on any M$ system.
Do I unmount the drive after inserting it before I issue:
mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
BTW, when I do a 'ma
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 17:05, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I unmount the drive after inserting it before I issue:
> mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
Yes, if it's mounted, unmount it before running the mkfs command.
> BTW, when I do a 'man mkfs.ext3' it takes me to the man pages for mke2fs
Quoting David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, September 25, 2008 14:43, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > Quoting David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, September 25, 2008 14:13, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is the service itself active?
> >> >
> >> > Do you have a line
Toby Bluhm wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
> .
> .
> .
>> A "one stop shop" on everything CentOS.
>>
>
>
> I like that approach better. A new list for email only would probably
> lead to email threads on *both* lists, users being reminded to take the
> discussion to the other list, etc.
We have n
Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:15 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> got a centos5.2 web/database server thats on a public coloc, its dmesg
>> fills
>> up with
>> TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 84.158.80.177:61931/8032 shrinks window
>> 3243232020:3243237180. Repaired.
>>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Found this old message about formatting a USB drive and it leaves a few
> questions for me:
>
Would you please stop top-posting?
Thanks.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@c
On 9/24/08, lingu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> *I am running centos 4 update 5. I want to limit user connection(maximum
> 10 simultaneous connection are only allowed) to server
> (for telnet & ssh sessions).In the mean time i like to remove all dead and
> idle connections(ssh & telnet session) of
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, you can't. Those messages turn up in the kernel ring buffer (aka dmesg). I
> don't find anything in the rsyslog (or rklogd) manual page on filtering or
> redirecting those.
>
> I might be wrong, but ...
It's entirel
I just reformatted an 8Gb USB drive as ext3.
While as FAT32, it was reported as having well over 7Gb free (did not
note the exact capacity).
I reformatted with mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
Now it is reported (oh, this is with properties in Nautilus) as having
6.8Gb capacity (free space actually).
D
on 9-25-2008 4:31 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
I just reformatted an 8Gb USB drive as ext3.
While as FAT32, it was reported as having well over 7Gb free (did not
note the exact capacity).
I reformatted with mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
Now it is reported (oh, this is with properties in Na
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 19:40, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does this makes sense that ext3 has less available space than fat32?
>
> Ext3 reserves some space for root by default. I think it is like 5 or 10 %.
> That might be it.
5% by default.
You can change it to 1% for your filesys
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 19:31 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I just reformatted an 8Gb USB drive as ext3.
>
> While as FAT32, it was reported as having well over 7Gb free (did not
> note the exact capacity).
>
> I reformatted with mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
>
> Now it is reported (oh, this is with pr
William L. Maltby wrote:
Yes, for the reasons the others posted. However, if you know the
"profile" of what you'll have on there, a substantial amount of space
can be recovered by 1) make sure you have large block size and 2)
reducing the i-nodes allocated to suit.
Do a little thinking before y
lingu wrote:
Dear all,
*
I am running centos 4 update 5. I want to limit user connection(maximum
10 simultaneous connection are only allowed) to server
(for telnet & ssh sessions).In the mean time i like to remove all dead
and idle connections(ssh & telnet session) of more that 24 hours.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:47 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: DKIM
Toby Bluhm wrote:
> BTW - very informative thread.
>
I wonder if someone might take the bits
74 matches
Mail list logo
