Hi all,
I'm trying to connect to a remote Widnows server from my CentOS 5.2 / KDE
3.5.4-11, but everytime I try and connect I get the following error:
Could not start rdesktop: make sure rdesktop is properly installed
And I connect using krdc rdp:/remote.host.name - but I also tried krdc rdp:/
1
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 05:31, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could not start rdesktop: make sure rdesktop is properly installed
krdc is just a front-end to several different tools (rdesktop,
vncviewer, etc.), it will call rdesktop to effectively open the
connection, so you will hav
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 05:31, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could not start rdesktop: make sure rdesktop is properly installed
>
> krdc is just a front-end to several different tools (rdesktop,
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone else was trying to get Centos 5.2 onto an EeePC
1000H?
My EeePC came with XP, and I planned to put Centos on it in a dual-boot
config. I've been struggling with this for a few evenings now, with some
success (the wired ethernet is atl1e (gigabit rather than 10/100) -
I gave up. I tried everything. Don't know what the problem was (buggy
bios/corrupt fs ) and don't care now. Taking too much time to
simply re-install grub (6hrs). I'm doing a complete re-install on the
laptop.
--
Robert Arkiletian
Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada
Fl_TeacherTool http:/
Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would
be detected by the raid 1 software.
Thanks,
Nataraj
___
Nataraj wrote:
Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would
be detected by the raid 1 software.
under normal operation,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:05:44 +0100
Peter Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But at the moment I'm stuck on the audio card. The system seems to
> detect it happily enough as Intel HDA, with a Realtek ALC269 chip, but
> there's no sound. I'm sure I've hit a similar problem in the past with
> the snd
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 11:12 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Nataraj wrote:
> > Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
> > bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
> > is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware wou
Frank Cox a écrit :
Not that it matters, but "model=toshiba" is the one that eventually worked.
Which is interesting because it's not a toshiba laptop.
The lesson here is, don't eliminate any entries as not relevant because your
machine isn't that model.
Same here. My wife has an ASUS laptop w
Nataraj wrote:
Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would
be detected by the raid 1 software.
Thanks,
Nataraj
I've been
Nataraj wrote:
Thank you John. I'm pretty sure that raid 5 or 6 would be safe, since
there is parity checking, however it sounds like this may not be the
case for raid 1.
the parity on raid5/6 is only checked if you run some sort of scrub, and
its used to regenerate a failed drive onto a s
Kay Diederichs wrote:
BTW, there is - even with current kernels - no speed gain in using
RAID1 - see http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelProjects/Raid1ReadBalancing .
except, thats wrong. I unwrapped a recent kernel source tarball from
kernel.org and found...
static struct mirror *choose_mirror(s
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 21:01 +0200, Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Nataraj wrote:
> > Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
> > bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
> > is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware wo
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:53 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Kay Diederichs wrote:
> > BTW, there is - even with current kernels - no speed gain in using
> > RAID1 - see http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelProjects/Raid1ReadBalancing .
>
> except, thats wrong. I unwrapped a recent kernel source tarball f
Hi all,
I just received a SunFire 880 machine and would like to install CentOS
on it I think it is possible but should be very interested on advices
and tips & tricks on how to do it the best way...
Thanks for your help...
M$-Internet Exploder est le cancer de l'Internet, voyez pourquoi ici :
ht
In my efforts to get the sound hardware working, I eventually decided to
try the latest vanilla kernel (2.6.27-rc6). I had a bit of a battle to
get it to work (it kept detecting the SATA disk as standard IDE, so
blocking the SATA drivers, and making the system run like a dog: I
finally fixed this b
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Nataraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
> bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
No. Reads are distributed over disks to increase performance.
> is whether bit e
Am 21.09.2008 um 22:59 schrieb Bernard 'Tux' Lheureux:
Hi all,
I just received a SunFire 880 machine and would like to install CentOS
on it I think it is possible but should be very interested on advices
and tips & tricks on how to do it the best way...
Thanks for your help...
Does CentOS a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 21.09.2008 um 22:59 schrieb Bernard 'Tux' Lheureux:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just received a SunFire 880 machine and would like to install CentOS
>> on it I think it is possible but should be very interested on advices
>>
On Sunday 21 September 2008 06:23:54 pm Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Well having spent a week on Solaris 10.. I can understand why. Most of
> the tools I am used to getting in a base install of CentOS are not
> there.. and I will be spending most of this week getting various tools
> installed so t
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Peter Arremann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 21 September 2008 06:23:54 pm Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Well having spent a week on Solaris 10.. I can understand why. Most of
>> the tools I am used to getting in a base install of CentOS are not
>> there..
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Robert Arkiletian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave up. I tried everything. Don't know what the problem was (buggy
> bios/corrupt fs ) and don't care now. Taking too much time to
> simply re-install grub (6hrs). I'm doing a complete re-install on the
> laptop
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Robert Arkiletian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I gave up. I tried everything. Don't know what the problem was (buggy
>> bios/corrupt fs ) and don't care now. Taking too much time to
>>
This makes sense. I'm pretty sure that tests that I've run in the past
using bonnie++ or iozone showed faster reads with raid1 than with a
single drive. I would think that if the drives are on seperate
controllers (and depending upon the performance/capacity of the drives
and controllers), the
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Hmmm that might be my problem. I had not looked at what additional
paths were there. The boxes I am supposed to support are 2.7,2.8,2.9
and 2.10 so I am going to have to figure out a way to 'unify' them as
much as possible without breaking the core application's needs.
Jason Pyeron wrote:
The mirrors are missing the headers folders which prevents up2date from working.
did you file an issue report for this ( http://bugs.centos.org ) ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 8:14 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Up2date for 4.7?
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > The mirrors are missing the headers folders whic
Hi;
I am porting my POSIX multithreaded application from SOLARIS to RHEL.
My application uses Sun RPC(with Automatic multithreading option).
In RHEL RPC I could not find any option for Automatic multithreading.
Please help me.
Regards,
Lingu
___
Cen
29 matches
Mail list logo
