Peter Cai wrote:
PS: the background of this problem is that Postgresql's "order by"
command depends on the sort result of the OS.
AFAIK PostgreSQL will determine its own locale from the system locale
when it's initdb'ed for the first time, that locale will then be used
for all databases even i
I already did that.
The problem is not that the locale is not correct, but even if it's
correct, the sort order is wrong.
The result provided by pg is the same as the "sort" command.
It shows that pg use OS's facility to sort string.
Someone told me it's a bug of glibc. So I checked it and foun
Hi folks
Today we had a kernel panic. On the RSA-Console[0] we could only see
that the process splunkd was causing the panic. We found nothing else
in logs.
Howto debug this panic? Howto avoid in future?
regards
Sven
[0] http://bayimg.com/image/makbaaabh.jpg
Sven wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Today we had a kernel panic. On the RSA-Console[0] we could only see
> that the process splunkd was causing the panic. We found nothing else
> in logs.
Setup a netdump server to log the panic.
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
I inherited an ancient Dell Latitude C840 and recently installed CentOS 5.2 on
it. It worked fine for the most part, but when I left it overnight and came
back the next morning, the screen blacked out and wouldn't come back unless I
did a hard reset. Even though I turned off all the power mana
hmmm, usually ctrl-alt f1 would fix this. Sine that isn't working,
have u tried switching to external vga and back. That did the trick
for me on Dell Latitude C610's.
On 9/9/08, Joe Tseng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I inherited an ancient Dell Latitude C840 and recently installed CentOS 5.2
>
Yeah I tried that too but no luck. I know the Fn button works since I'm always
able to pop open the DVD tray.
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:53:13 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] LCD blanks out overnight
>
> hmmm, usually ctrl-alt f1 would fix this.
Joe Tseng wrote:
> I inherited an ancient Dell Latitude C840 and recently installed CentOS 5.2
> on it. It worked fine for the most part, but when I left it overnight and
> came back the next morning, the screen blacked out and wouldn't come back
> unless I did a hard reset. Even though I turned
I know my laptop didn't crash because I'm able to put it into suspend mode.
Thanks for the tip; I'll try it out.
I also changed my BIOS and told it to disable power savings when plugged in.
Maybe one of the two will help...
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 06:57:44 -0700
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] LCD bl
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 09:39 -0400, Joe Tseng wrote:
> I inherited an ancient Dell Latitude C840 and recently installed
> CentOS 5.2 on it. It worked fine for the most part, but when I left
> it overnight and came back the next morning, the screen blacked out
> and wouldn't come back unless I did a
>
> I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic connects to the
> cable modem, which has 15m d and 2m up, but speed tests barely come back
> at 5mb down including road runner's internal speed test. I hook up my
> laptop to the same modem, same port, using the same cable and I get 17m
On Fri, September 5, 2008 11:41, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I have a couple of oddities that I hope someone here can clarify for me.
>
> OS = CentOS-5.2 all updates applied to date.
I have discovered that the dynamic system process monitor is a Gnome Panel
Applet which is installed by right clicking
Thanks I read about that, but I am having a hard time forcing duplex, I don't
remember the exact error it was giving me at the moment but from what I read it
looks like a driver issue.
-- Original Message --
From: "RobertH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Cen
I was thinkging drivers myself, I'm not bonding the nics btw.
-- Original Message --
From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 01:34:32 -0400
>
>
>
>David Petruzzella Wrote:
>
>-Original Message-
>From:
Not a laptop it is a server with dual nics mtu set at 1500, 1 nic directly to
the cable modem the other to my lan.
-- Original Message --
From: "Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 23:46:40 -0600
>>I h
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 at 10:23pm, Yanagisawa, Koji wrote
Hello,
I have a storage offering some 11 TB of space. I'd happily use ext3 and NFS
export to 4 client machines, but 8 TB seems to be the tested maximum. I'd
really like one mount point for the whole 11 TB. Since GFS offers
lock_nolock
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM, David Petruzzella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks I read about that, but I am having a hard time forcing duplex, I don't
> remember the exact error it was giving me at the moment but from what I read
> it looks like a driver issue.
Would you please follow this
I have one server that I can not edit the /etc/grub/grub.conf file. I get
permission denied
as root. I can change other files just not grub.conf. after unmounting
/dev/hda from /boot
and mounting under /g for a test the same things occurs. Even in single
mode I can not
modify / delete / move the f
-- Original Message --
From: MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:52:24 -0700
>On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM, David Petruzzella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks I read about that, but I am having a hard time
Quoting Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have one server that I can not edit the /etc/grub/grub.conf file. I get
> permission denied
> as root. I can change other files just not grub.conf. after unmounting
> /dev/hda from /boot
> and mounting under /g for a test the same things occurs. Even in single
>Not a laptop it is a server with dual nics mtu set at 1500, 1 nic directly to
>the cable modem the other to my lan.
MTU has nothing to do with laptops, it has to do with TCP/IP.
Aside from a previous posters duplex setting (good catch on his part) its
possible that MTU is an issue. Some ISP's do
-- Original Message --
From: "Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:40:48 -0600
>>Not a laptop it is a server with dual nics mtu set at 1500, 1 nic directly to
>>the cable modem the other to my lan.
For those of you using CentOS 4, is anyone having trouble with autofs 4.1.3?
I'm seeing (with 60second unmount timeout) what appears to be an apparent race
condition where a script touches an automount directory at about (the same
second according to logs) the same time the unmount is triggere
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 23:46 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic connects to the
> >cable modem, which has 15m d and 2m up, but speed tests barely come back at
> >5mb down including road runner's internal speed test. I hook up my laptop to
> >t
-- Original Message --
From: Ric Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:56:58 -0400
>
>On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 23:46 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> >I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic conne
on 9-9-2008 11:40 AM Joseph L. Casale spake the following:
Not a laptop it is a server with dual nics mtu set at 1500, 1 nic directly to
the cable modem the other to my lan.
MTU has nothing to do with laptops, it has to do with TCP/IP.
Aside from a previous posters duplex setting (good catch o
John Kordash wrote:
>
> For those of you using CentOS 4, is anyone having trouble with autofs 4.1.3?
> I'm seeing (with 60second unmount timeout) what appears to be an apparent
> race condition where a script touches an automount directory at about (the
> same second according to logs) the same ti
>
> I got my information about the MTU setting from doing google searches and
> the message boards on broadband reports as well as doing the tweak test on
> broad band reports.
>
>
It appears you are on Comtrash where everything is CoMtRaSHtIc.
Good for you. Dance a jig.
Stop beating the MTU
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid39_gci1328938,00.html
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
>
> I got my information about the MTU setting from doing google searches and
> the message boards on broadband reports as well as doing the tweak test on
> broad band reports.
>
David
I also noticed that if you
dig dlsi.com
it appears to come up as 0.0.0.0
huh?
Good for you.
maybe you sho
>
>
> Is SELinux enabled?
>
>
> What do you get for these?:
>
> lsattr /boot/grub/grub.conf
> ls -la /boot/grub/grub.conf
>
> Is there anything in /var/log/audit or /var/log/messages?
I should have stated that SELinux is disabled.
Here is a listing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# lsattr /boot/grub/gru
Jay wrote:
>>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# lsattr /boot/grub/grub.conf
> i /boot/grub/grub.conf
chattr -i /boot/grub/grub.conf
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> I know DJB from the IETF; quite the personality. And actually before
> that as he went to UofM, and I went to MSU... But then the IETF is
> filled with people that stand out; it draws us together.
>
> I need the deamontools for the HIPL DNS proxy, and was looking for what
> my options were for s
Thanks ! that worked
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- Original Message --
From: Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:22:53 -0700
>This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
>
I agree but this is a newer ambit modem and if it was the case t
-- Original Message --
From: "RobertH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:32:33 -0700
>>
>> I got my information about the MTU setting from doing google searches and
>> the message boards on broadband reports as we
>
> 1. Comcrap is not available in my area I am on road runner biz through
> bright house with 15m down and 2 up and static ip.
>
> 2. Already tested without the internal nic running
>
> 3. Tried with a router in between and the result is the same.
>
> 4. I do agree about the negotiation aspec
-- Original Message --
From: "RobertH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 13:19:41 -0700
>>
>> 1. Comcrap is not available in my area I am on road runner biz through
>> bright house with 15m down and 2 up and static i
David Petruzzella wrote:
I got my information about the MTU setting from doing google searches and the
message boards on broadband reports as well as doing the tweak test on broad
band reports.
MTU's need to match the lowest value in the path between endpoints not
just your adjacent connect
-- Original Message --
From: Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:46:53 -0500
>David Petruzzella wrote:
>>
>> I got my information about the MTU setting from doing google searches and
>> the message bo
on 9-9-2008 1:07 PM David Petruzzella spake the following:
-- Original Message --
From: Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:22:53 -0700
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 24
-- Original Message --
From: Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:00:01 -0700
>This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
>
I tried that and I don't think I got ethtool to respond properly
I see, when I trace the domain you are sending email from I assumed it was
you on a comcast link.
Or maybe roadrunner resells comcast in your area or comcast bought
roadrunner in your area?
The dlsi.com dig pointing at 0.0.0.0 was interesting.
Never ever seen dns point to 0.0.0.0
It just m
-- Original Message --
From: "RobertH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:36:11 -0700
>>
>> I got my information about the MTU setting from doing google searches and
>> the message boards on broadband reports as we
-- Original Message --
From: Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:07:24 -0700
>This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
>
who knows its been a long time since I talked with anyone at my
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:00, Scott Silva wrote:
> Either way, ethtool should show you detected and current link states on
> the connection ;
That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work.
~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
No data available
And yes I have eth0 up and
Dear Filipe,
How I do setup iso-8859-1 for pt_BR (portuguese Brazilian) in file i18n ?
Is it possible change LANG="pt_BR.UTF-8" for LANG="iso-8859-1" ? It
config correct ?
Thanks again
Adriano Frare
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 20:44, Adriano Frare <[EMAIL PRO
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:00, Scott Silva wrote:
Either way, ethtool should show you detected and current link states on
the connection ;
That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work.
~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
No data availa
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:00, Scott Silva wrote:
Either way, ethtool should show you detected and current link states on
the connection ;
That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work.
~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
No data available
And
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 18:10, Adriano Frare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How I do setup iso-8859-1 for pt_BR (portuguese Brazilian) in file i18n ?
>
> Is it possible change LANG="pt_BR.UTF-8" for LANG="iso-8859-1" ? It config
> correct ?
No, you set LANG="pt_BR" or LANG="pt_BR.iso-8859-1"
Th
on 9-9-2008 3:07 PM Robert Spangler spake the following:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:00, Scott Silva wrote:
Either way, ethtool should show you detected and current link states on
the connection ;
That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work.
~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0
Setting
Robert Spangler wrote:
> And yes I have eth0 up and running.
>
What network driver?
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Nobody has any idea on this one? Can someone perhaps recommend another
list or forum where more people might be familiar with buildinstall?
Perhaps I'll try the anaconda list...
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:21:23PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
> When using buildinstall and CentOS 5.2 to c
My wife's office server was compromised today. It appears
they ssh'ed in through account pcguest which was set up for
Samba. (I don't remember setting up that account, but maybe I
did.) At any rate, I found a bazillion "ftp_scanner" processes
running. A killall finished them off quickly, I nuked th
Hi ya'll,
Running v5 ..
I have 2 Linksys PCI cards running already without any problems. These
were recognized by the system as ADMTek NC100 cards, per usual... they run
on eth0 and eth2 ... have for months no problems.
I added a third Linksys PCI card to the mobo, fired the computer up, an
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Miark wrote:
My wife's office server was compromised today. It appears
they ssh'ed in through
ehh? exposed to the public internet? oh my ;)
account pcguest which was set up for Samba. (I don't
remember setting up that account, but maybe I did.)
ssh will of course hon
Yeah pull the network plug first. Then boot up with a knoppix CD to
backup your data and/or image the disk, then reload. I'm sure you could
do a full audit of the system but reloading is likely much quicker.
A word to the wise on the account pcguest, if it was one you created,
set the shell to
Gary wrote:
> Can someone give me input on the steps needed to get this third NIC
> recognized please.
run lspci to try to identify what network controller chip is on
the third NIC. If that doesn't help then look at the chip on the
physical card itself, and use google to try to match that up with
nate wrote:
Linksys probably uses something shitty like Realtek chips or
something, or worse(?)
the same model name linksys card could potentially use a half dozen
different chips depending on the version #, makes life real fun.
___
CentOS mai
I'm getting this error just recently. Is this something to be concerned
with?? Running CentOS 5.2. Kernel 2.6.18-53.el5
Thanks for any considerations, Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
Hi Nate,
It is the same Linksys card that is already recognized. CentOS effectively
uses the Linksys as ADMTek NC100 for Linksys immediately recognized with
no problem. It just will not recognize this third card at all, not even
seeing it using lspci, which shows no Ethernet controller for the sam
Hi John,
oh, boy.. will check on it early tomorrow... thanks.
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:40:00 -0700 UTC (9/9/2008, 11:40 PM -0500 UTC my time),
John R Pierce wrote:
>> Linksys probably uses something shitty like Realtek chips or
>> something, or worse(?)
>>
J> the same model name linksy
Gary wrote:
Hi Nate,
It is the same Linksys card that is already recognized. CentOS effectively
uses the Linksys as ADMTek NC100 for Linksys immediately recognized with
no problem. It just will not recognize this third card at all, not even
seeing it using lspci, which shows no Ethernet controll
Hi John,
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:01:51 -0700 UTC (9/10/2008, 12:01 AM -0500 UTC my
time), John R Pierce wrote:
>> It is the same Linksys card that is already recognized. CentOS effectively
>> uses the Linksys as ADMTek NC100 for Linksys immediately recognized with
>> no problem. It just will not
Gary wrote:
> J> does LSPCI not even show the 3rd card?!?
>
> No, not at all...
If the PCI bus doesn't see it there's no way to get it working
in linux(or any other OS for that matter).
Perhaps there is an IRQ conflict, check the IRQs on the system,
and try the NIC in a different PCI slot. Try d
Hi Nate,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:29:38 -0700 (PDT) UTC (9/10/2008, 12:29 AM -0500 UTC my
time), nate wrote:
>> J> does LSPCI not even show the 3rd card?!?
>>
>> No, not at all...
n> If the PCI bus doesn't see it there's no way to get it working
n> in linux(or any other OS for that matter).
nate wrote:
Gary wrote:
J> does LSPCI not even show the 3rd card?!?
No, not at all...
If the PCI bus doesn't see it there's no way to get it working
in linux(or any other OS for that matter).
Perhaps there is an IRQ conflict, check the IRQs on the system,
and try the NIC in a differ
John R Pierce wrote:
>
> IRQ's are fully sharable on PCI, all PCI devices can use a single
> hardware IRQ with no problems.
In theory yes, in practice these days usually yes but it's by no
means a guarantee it will work. It's been a few years since I
had IRQ sharing issues, but when it did happen
68 matches
Mail list logo
