Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

2008-09-06 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Lanny Marcus wrote: but I cannot find evolution-addressbook-export /usr/libexec/evolution/2.8/evolution-addressbook-export Craig: Cool. I just posted that I found a way around it (exporting .vcf and then using a converter on the web to .ldif and .csv formats) but you are correct, I

Re: [CentOS] Filezilla

2008-09-06 Thread Juan C. Valido
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 16:47 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Juan C. Valido a écrit : > > Does anyone know where I can get the filezilla package for CentOS 5.2. > > Thank you. > > My best bet would be to use the FC8 SRPM on rpm.pbone.net and try to > build that. > > Niki Kovacs > Thanks, I'll give

RE: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

2008-09-06 Thread Al Sparks
I was going to recommend roughly the same thing. Don't use RPM's, install his tools manually. When I did, I learned a lot of useful information about the internals of RedHat/CentOS (or any System V LUnix system for that matter). And with all due respect, of course, it brings me back to the days

Re: [CentOS] Unable to compile mod_jk on Centos 5.2 64-bit (solved)

2008-09-06 Thread ankush grover
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ankush grover wrote: >> Hi Friends, >> >> I am trying to compile mod_jk on Centos 5.2 64-bit but I am getting >> apxs not found. Whereas apxs is already there on the server > Hi, Problem was apr-devel 64 bit was not insta

Re: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

2008-09-06 Thread Jeff Kinz
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 05:51:15AM -0700, Al Sparks wrote: > Oh and the qmail server? My employer went Exchange. And slowly > but surely, the IT there is becoming more Microsoft with Linux > becoming more of an outlier. It's probably time for me to find > another job. It's hard, because I've be

Re: [CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

2008-09-06 Thread Guy Boisvert
Rob Townley wrote: On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Joseph L. Casale wrote: The Dlink DNS-323 looks exactly what you are asking of What a procedure to hack that thing! The problem I se

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic installing CentOS 5.2 in Parallels on iMac

2008-09-06 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The powernowk8 bug is in the CentOS-5.2 isos but apparently not in > previous versions. So, one way to get around the problem is to use > CentOS-5.1 install media and then update the kernel to the latest > version which is fre

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic installing CentOS 5.2 in Parallels on iMac

2008-09-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The powernowk8 bug is in the CentOS-5.2 isos but apparently not in >> previous versions. So, one way to get around the problem is to use >> CentOS-5.1

[CentOS] bonding theory question

2008-09-06 Thread Mag Gam
Hello All, I am currently using bonding with 2 NICs (using mode 0). Its been working well, but I am trying to understand how it works (I am a total newbie). mode=0 (balance-rr) Round-robin policy: Transmit packets in sequential order from the first available slave through the last. This mode prov

Re: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

2008-09-06 Thread NiftyClusters Mitch
Sorry this is slightly off topic. On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Jeff Kinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 05:51:15AM -0700, Al Sparks wrote: >> Oh and the qmail server? My employer went Exchange. And slowly >> but surely, the IT there is becoming more Microsoft with Linux

Re: [CentOS] bonding theory question

2008-09-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:57, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suppose data is being pushed out, it will go with 1st NIC and when it > gets overloaded it will use 2nd NIC. No. If you are using "balance-rr", one packet will go through the 1st NIC, and the next packet will go through the 2nd one

RE: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

2008-09-06 Thread RobertH
> Al wrote: > I was going to recommend roughly the same thing. > Oops, the word *source* can get you huh... ;-> What I actually recommended was going to the source website to fully understand the usage and internals. At the source website you can get the software source and the reasons behin

Re: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

2008-09-06 Thread Les Mikesell
Al Sparks wrote: There was a lot of rudeness and snarkyness on that list. They aren't kind to those they consider fools. DJB has his acolytes, much like Linus Torvalds does. I suspect that DJB's personality reflects the overall tone of DJB related online communities, much like Torvalds's pers

Re: [CentOS] bonding theory question

2008-09-06 Thread Mag Gam
Filipe: Thankyou! Your explanation helps a lot. Its makes more sense than reading mundane manuals :-) Actually, would there be a big performance boost when using mode4? Currently I am seeing 95% total throughput. Which isn't that bad. I am peaking at 238MB/sec (each gig/e connections) Also, mode

Re: [CentOS] mysql

2008-09-06 Thread mouss
nate wrote: Mad Unix wrote: However, am thinking to do the following mysqlhotcopy --allowold --flushlog -u --password= /var/backups/mysql/ mysqlhotcopy doesn't support InnoDB last I checked(past week). InnoDB is generally the suggested engine to use for MySQL th

Re: [CentOS] bonding theory question

2008-09-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 13:11, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, would there be a big performance boost when using mode4? Not necessarily, since balance-rr already gives you load-balancing. They actually implement it differently. balance-rr can spread packets of the same TCP connection

[CentOS] Time delaying (or time lagging)

2008-09-06 Thread happymaster23
Hello everyone, I have problem with time delaying on my CentOS powered server. I have tried to set time in BIOS and in OS (with saving time to BIOS), but time still delaying, so after month is about five minutes delayed. In past I was using this box with Windows and there wasn´t this time problem,

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

2008-09-06 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 22:28 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Craig White wrote: >> >> >> I just discovered that the mbox files are *not* the problem! Exporting >> >> my Address book from Evolution is not intuitively obvious. I

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

2008-09-06 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Lanny Marcus wrote: > but I cannot find evolution-addressbook-export >>> >>> >>> /usr/libexec/evolution/2.8/evolution-addressbook-export >> >> Craig: Cool. I just posted that I found a way around

Re: [CentOS] Time delaying (or time lagging)

2008-09-06 Thread John R Pierce
happymaster23 wrote: Hello everyone, I have problem with time delaying on my CentOS powered server. I have tried to set time in BIOS and in OS (with saving time to BIOS), but time still delaying, so after month is about five minutes delayed. In past I was using this box with Windows and there