Re: [CentOS] Custom install DVD with new (SB600 chipset & Intel network) kernel modules

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 14:57 +0900, Keith Wilkinson wrote: > First, congratulations on the fabulous CentOS Wiki. > > About the only information that I haven't found on it > is how to create a custome install DVD with > added kernel modules -- e.g. when the standard > install DVD does not suppor

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

Lanny Marcus ha scritto: > > I now have the mbox files on my hard drive. I think that is the default > with Evolution. I assume google backs up their gmail servers, but > having a local copy, my own backup, is a plus. > Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could install a local imap

RE: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

Lanny Marcus <> scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM: >> You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One >> Million Great British Pounds) > > Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $ "Great British Pound"? I didn't know UK stopped using Pounds Sterling.

Re: [CentOS] compiling libarchive

Mag Gam wrote: > Has anyone been able to compile libarchive and archivemount? I want to > use this with fuse. > > The compile is very tough for libarchive, I keep getting > tar/write.c:730: error: `EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS' undeclared (first use in > this function) e2fsprogs-devel is missing on your mac

Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

On Friday 05 September 2008 09:45:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Lanny Marcus <> scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM: > >> You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One > >> Million Great British Pounds) > > > > Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $ >

Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote / napísal(a): Lanny Marcus <> scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM: You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One Million Great British Pounds) Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $ "Great British Pound

RE: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Anne Wilson >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:16 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list > >On Friday 05 September 2008 09:45:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>

RE: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Romeo Ninov >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:24 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list > You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00

Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

Sorin Srbu wrote / napísal(a): -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Romeo Ninov Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:24 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list You have been approved for pay

[CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

I am looking for something that I can hack away like a NSLU2 but that thing only has one disc and worst of all its 100m interface. Anyone know of a device you can load Linux on that has maybe 2 discs like a NAS200 with a gig nic? I need a quiet device to act as a tftp-dhcp/web/dns system. I tho

Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

On Friday 05 September 2008 13:24:52 Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Anne Wilson > >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:16 AM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

On Friday 05 September 2008 13:42:35 Romeo Ninov wrote: > > I did. Just forgot to paste in the wiki-link. To fast fingers. 8-) Does > > anybody actually ever use the formal long name? > >   > >   > > According to my personal experience not so often, but at the end that's > official form, ISO standa

RE: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Anne Wilson >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 2:49 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list > >> >> >> You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:

Re: [CentOS] compiling libarchive

Thanks Ralph. Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I keep getting this error now: gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wall -W -MM archivemount.c > dep gcc -larchive -lfuse -o archivemount archivemount.o archivemount.o(.text+0x1474): In function `save': : undefined

Re: [CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

Joseph L. Casale wrote: I am looking for something that I can hack away like a NSLU2 but that thing only has one disc and worst of all its 100m interface. Anyone know of a device you can load Linux on that has maybe 2 discs like a NAS200 with a gig nic? I need a quiet device to act as a tftp-d

Re: [CentOS] Compiling v6tun from KAME

Rob Townley wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I need vtun working over IPv6. The version from rpmforge does not seem to support IPv6 (binds to 0.0.0.0:5000 if I specify binding to

Re: [CentOS] compiling libarchive

On Friday 05 September 2008, Mag Gam wrote: > Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I > keep getting this error now: > > gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wall -W -MM archivemount.c > dep > gcc -larchive -lfuse -o archivemount archivemount.o Unless I'm mistaken, o

[CentOS] Filezilla

Does anyone know where I can get the filezilla package for CentOS 5.2. Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] gFTP IPv6 bug

I found the following bug report that matches what I am seeing with the gFTP we have in Centos: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350813 This is an old bug that they claim has been fixed in CVS. Has that been applied to what we are running? Becuase gFTP crashes for me on IPv6 using

Re: [CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

Toby Bluhm ha scritto: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> I am looking for something that I can hack away like a NSLU2 but that >> thing only has one disc >> and worst of all its 100m interface. Anyone know of a device you can >> load Linux on that has >> maybe 2 discs like a NAS200 with a gig nic? I nee

Re: [CentOS] Filezilla

Juan C. Valido a écrit : Does anyone know where I can get the filezilla package for CentOS 5.2. Thank you. My best bet would be to use the FC8 SRPM on rpm.pbone.net and try to build that. Niki Kovacs ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org htt

Re: [CentOS] USB flash drive and VMs (Was Curmudgeoning)

"Marcelo Roccasalva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Flash support under qemu seems to be about the same as CD-ROM support. That > is, you can access a device present at start up but it's not swappable. You can swap cdrom from qemu monitor. I haven't tried, but I think the same thing can be a

RE: [CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

>The Dlink DNS-323 looks exactly what you are asking of What a procedure to hack that thing! >> The problem I see with going the all-in-one NAS route is that down the >> road, there's always some function you'd like to add - but you can't. >> You've hit the limitations of the box. That's why I w

Re: [CentOS] compiling libarchive

I got it to work. Thanks all! On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Peter Kjellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 05 September 2008, Mag Gam wrote: >> Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I >> keep getting this error now: >> >> gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -DNDE

[CentOS] Gnome Desktop Questions?

I have a couple of oddities that I hope someone here can clarify for me. OS = CentOS-5.2 all updates applied to date. 1. On the gnome desktop in the top panel (or menu bar) I have an icon for "System Monitor" which runs the application "gnome-system-monitor". On my other desktop CentOS-5.2 syste

Re: [CentOS] Configuring an Intel 3945 wireless card: partial success

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi a écrit : >> Trouble is that the iwl3945 module is disabled in the distro kernel. >> However, it is enabled in the centosplus kernel. So, the quickest way >> to test it is to install the cplus kernel. > > I figur

Re: [CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

Joseph L. Casale wrote: What's involved in building an embedded version of CentOS for a Soekris or similar small mobo? Is that a feat worth considering or is the work involved huge? Centos 5 supports 686 or better. I *think* the geode is a 586 type cpu. Something like Puppy or DSL would pro

[CentOS] Re: kickstart debug

Jerry Geis wrote: >/ How do you go about debugging the kickstart file? / By trying stuff, reading documentation or doing research. You know, community is about give and take and not only taking. I've yet to see *ONE* answer from you, it's always just "ask, ask, ask", even with stuff which can e

Re: [CentOS] Re: kickstart debug

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:38 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > > Jerry Geis wrote: > > > How do you go about debugging the kickstart file? > > > > By trying stuff, reading documentation or doing research. You know, > > community > > is about give and take and not only taking. I've yet to see *ONE* answ

[CentOS] Virtual email with Postfix, MySQL and Dovecot problem

Hello all, Anyone of you success to install virtual email with Postfix, MySQL and Dovecot on CentOS 5.2 ? I am running: mysql-server-5.0.45-7.el5, postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql and dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 on CentOS 5.2 box and can not make it work. All deamons (mysqld, postfix master, d

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

Gordon Messmer wrote: Both of those appear to indicate that the server in the colo facility is receiving the SYN packets. What possible reasons are there that it would not reply with SYN+ACK? Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces?

Re: [CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

Joseph L. Casale wrote: The Dlink DNS-323 looks exactly what you are asking of What a procedure to hack that thing! The problem I see with going the all-in-one NAS route is that down the road, there's always some function you'd like to add - but you can't. You've hit the limitations of the bo

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: Lanny Marcus ha scritto: I now have the mbox files on my hard drive. I think that is the default with Evolution. I assume google backs up their gmail servers, but having a local copy, my own backup, is a plus. Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could inst

Re: [CentOS] Gnome Desktop Questions?

James B. Byrne wrote: I have a couple of oddities that I hope someone here can clarify for me. OS = CentOS-5.2 all updates applied to date. 1. On the gnome desktop in the top panel (or menu bar) I have an icon for "System Monitor" which runs the application "gnome-system-monitor". On my other

Re: [CentOS] Gnome Desktop Questions?

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:41 AM, James B. Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a couple of oddities that I hope someone here can clarify for me. > > OS = CentOS-5.2 all updates applied to date. > > 1. On the gnome desktop in the top panel (or menu bar) I have an icon for > "System Monitor" whic

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

Florin Andrei wrote: Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces? There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back to the office. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 card reader automount

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:54:53 -0600 Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having given this more thought, I'm wondering if the problem may be that the > reader isn't reporting the presence of the card. Since nothing appears to > happen when a card is inserted into the reader, Centos has no way of

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

Gordon Messmer wrote: Florin Andrei wrote: Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces? There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back to the office. If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 card reader automount

Frank Cox a écrit : I've just got a card reader and it doesn't automount. I can mount it manually with "mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/temp" and that works fine. I would prefer to have it automount and give me the desktop icon. Unfortunately, I don't yet know enough about the automounting mechanism to k

Re: [CentOS] Re: kickstart debug

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > HTH (?) > Jeeze, Bill, do you have to be such an a$$-kisser? (KIDDING! RBFG and all that) mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mai

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 card reader automount

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The person who owns the computer in question just sent me an email to say that > the card reader is now working. She plugged in her flash drive and that > didn't > work either, so she rebooted the machine and now the flash

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

Florin Andrei wrote: If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run the tests with it non-promiscuous. Just to make sure the SYN is actually received by that system. I ran the test again with "tcpdump -i eth0 -p" and then thinking better of it, with "tcpdump -i any". In both cases

Re: [CentOS] Gnome Desktop Questions?

On Sep 5, 2008, at 11:41, James B. Byrne wrote: Can somebody tell me how to get these minor, but for me very desirable, changes made to the second system? The only difference between the two systems that I can recall is that one (the first) was upgraded from 4.6 while the second (the more

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

Gordon Messmer wrote: Florin Andrei wrote: If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run the tests with it non-promiscuous. Just to make sure the SYN is actually received by that system. I ran the test again with "tcpdump -i eth0 -p" and then thinking better of it, with "tcpdump

Re: [CentOS] Re: kickstart debug

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:07 -0700, MHR wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM, William L. Maltby > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > HTH (?) > > > > Jeeze, Bill, do you have to be such an a$$-kisser? > > (KIDDING! RBFG and all that) <*chuckling and all that*> It's a hangover from m

Re: [CentOS] OT: workstation recommends: Thinkmate?

- Original Message > From: John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2008 7:54:40 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: workstation recommends: Thinkmate? > > MHR wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Barry Olddog wrote: > > > >> I'm just

Re: [CentOS] Virtual email with Postfix, MySQL and Dovecot problem

Lunix1618 wrote: Hello all, Anyone of you success to install virtual email with Postfix, MySQL and Dovecot on CentOS 5.2 ? I am running: mysql-server-5.0.45-7.el5, postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql and dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 on CentOS 5.2 box and can not make it work. All deamons (mysqld,

[CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

Is this available for Centos? If so where? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: kickstart debug

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:18 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The hoomon brain is a wonderful associative processor. Sometimes I think > mine is a little warped. > >From one warped hoomon to another - it ain't just sometimes, friend! ;^) mhr ___

Re: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:01:54PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Is this available for Centos? > > If so where? Search for qmailtoaster. They used to maintain src RPM's back before qmail was released to the public domain. There might be some binaries out there either maintained by them or oth

Re: [CentOS] OT: workstation recommends: Thinkmate?

I'm not going to speak on the Intel vs. AMD issue. However, I've bought 10 workstations and 5 servers from Thinkmate over the last year. I've been pretty happy with them. They use quality components, we have direct numbers for people there. I like their website, when we've had to RMA something,

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:29:22AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Florin Andrei wrote: > > > >Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a > >multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces? > > There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back > to the office. Sound

Re: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is this available for Centos? If so where? Possibly start at the below URL and then Google ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mai

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 9-2-2008 1:44 PM MHR spake the following: > > I still have a pair of 40 MB MFM half-height 5.25" drives in the garage > somewhere. I don't think I have an interface card even if I cared what was > on them. Probably DOS 3.3

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

Florin Andrei wrote: And you do capture *all* traffic, right? Don't filter out anything. Well, I'm filtering out the ports that are busy (http and https, imap and imaps, and smtp), but I'm testing access to ssh, since the problem appears to be independent of the port. I get the delays on po

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

on 9-2-2008 1:44 PM MHR spake the following: On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Scott Silva wrote: I remember when 1 GB *hard* drives didn't exist! I still have a few - a 20MB Tulin TL225 that was HUGE when it first came out, and a couple of Seagates, one is 120MB and one is 512MB. Oh, and I a

[CentOS] Remove old kernel

I've switched from the xen kernel to regular kernel and trying to remove the xen one is giving me an error: [root@ ~]# rpm -e kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5 error: Failed dependencies: xen-hypervisor-abi = 3.1 is needed by (installed) xen-3.0.3-64.el5_2.1.i686 [root@ ~]# uname -r 2.6.18-92

Re: [CentOS] Remove old kernel

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 20:00, Ed Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've switched from the xen kernel to regular kernel and trying to remove the > xen one is giving me an error: > > [root@ ~]# rpm -e kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5 > error: Failed dependencies: > xen-hypervisor-abi = 3.1 is

Re: [CentOS] Weird TCP problem

Stephen Harris wrote: Sounds like the remote server may actually be busy and the number of outstanding connections is reaching the listen() backlog queue, so the remote server isn't doing an accept() and so the three way handshake isn't completing. That thought crossed my mind, too. However,

Re: [CentOS] Remove old kernel

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Filipe Brandenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 20:00, Ed Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've switched from the xen kernel to regular kernel and trying to remove the >> xen one is giving me an error: >> >> [root@ ~]# rpm -e kernel-xen-

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could install a local imap server (over wich you'll can do all the backups that you like) and keep it in sync with google with imapsync (rpmforge repository). Looks simple and straightforward to do: http://nivox.blogspot.c

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 21:38 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > > > Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could install a local imap > > server (over wich you'll can do all the backups that you like) and keep it > > in > > sync with google with imapsync (rpmforge rep

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

Lanny Marcus wrote: I just discovered that the mbox files are *not* the problem! Exporting my Address book from Evolution is not intuitively obvious. I found a web page from May 2006, that says: "Export the evolution address book with the evolution-addressbook-export utility in csv format" and

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

Craig White wrote: I just discovered that the mbox files are *not* the problem! Exporting my Address book from Evolution is not intuitively obvious. I found a web page from May 2006, that says: "Export the evolution address book with the evolution-addressbook-export utility in csv format" and

Re: [CentOS] OT: Migration from Evolution to Thunderbird (Thunderbird mbox files)

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 22:28 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > >> I just discovered that the mbox files are *not* the problem! Exporting > >> my Address book from Evolution is not intuitively obvious. I found a web > >> page from May 2006, that says: > >> "Export the evolution a

Re: [CentOS] OT: Home NAS device

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> The Dlink DNS-323 looks exactly what you are asking of >>> >> >> What a procedure to hack that thing! >> >> The problem I see with going the all-in-one NAS route is that down the road, the

RE: [CentOS] DJB's daemontools package

With all due respect... Do any of you that gave advice on finding DJB software in rpm format use any of the software that you are giving advice on finding in rpm format or otherwise? If you do use it, you can do better. :-) If not, well... then you are talking out yer' rear ends. It is best