Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Mark Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone want to try and get this built on C5.2? > ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/SRPMS/perl-5.8.8-40.fc8.src.rpm > > the above runs in about .4 sec, while on C5.2 it takes 8-12 seconds. > Can not

[CentOS] Logwatch doesn´t report on dovecot

Hi List, Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of the log entries (var/log/maillog) are processed at all. Should I file a bug report on this? Upstream? cheers Henry

Re: [CentOS] Help me

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:00 +0530, Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote: > Hi, > > Yes I know what your saying ok! I didn't ask him any descent question > but I gave a solution based on my experience. So why hell r u guy's > coming after me and as you said in the world of IT there are lot of > perhaps OK

Re: [CentOS] slow Perl on CentOS 5

Akemi Yagi wrote: should explore the problem further with TUV and the CentOS community. If a fix is not forthcoming from TUV, I reluctantly suggest that we get together with the CentOS people and fork this portion of the distro, perhaps standardizing on Perl 5.10 . There are people in the Perl c

Re: [CentOS] Logwatch doesn ´t report on dovecot

henry ritzlmayr wrote: > Hi List, > > Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 > > However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of > the log entries (var/log/maillog) are processed at all. > > Should I file a bug report on this? Upstream? See

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

nate schrieb: Rainer Traut wrote: Ok, think I found the cause... The server I try to install to has heartbeat/cluster software installed. I already has a group with GID 90: Makes sense then, where did heartbeat/cluster software come from? If it's a supported package on RHEL-based systems it s

[CentOS] Re: Logwatch doesn´t report on dovecot

Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2008, 11:03 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt: > henry ritzlmayr wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 > > > > However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of > > the log entries (var/log/maillog)

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 42, Issue 9

ckage Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-ann

Re: [CentOS] restarting static-routes-ipv6

Barry Brimer wrote: Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 and NOT restart the network. Is there a way to do this??? I know about ifup and ifdown for interfaces, but what about routing (and IP6 at that). Ha

Re: [CentOS] apache

I done this and it works vi /etc/sysconfig/httpd # Configuration file for the httpd service. # # The default processing model (MPM) is the process-based # 'prefork' model. A thread-based model, 'worker', is also # available, but does not work with some modules (such as PHP). # The service mu

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

Rob Townley wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Craig White wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 23:28 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Craig White wrote: O

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:02:22PM +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > William L. Maltby ha scritto: > >From "man badblocks": > > > > -n Use non-destructive read-write mode. By default only a non- > >destructive read-only test is done. This option must not be > >combined

[CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

I'm using CentOS 5.0,5.1, and 5.2 on several systems where I'm seeing this problem. Hello, I'm seeing a weird problem that perhaps someone has run into with groups. First, a little background. I was made aware of a problem with CentOS 5 where if the nscd password cache is clear and someon

Re: [CentOS] Help me

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:00 +0530, Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote: > Hi, > > Yes I know what your saying ok! I didn't ask him any descent question > but I gave a solution based on my experience. So why hell r u guy's > coming after me First, don't get offended. If you've been on any/many lists for

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:34 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > I'm using CentOS 5.0,5.1, and 5.2 on several systems where I'm seeing > this problem. > > Hello, I'm seeing a weird problem that perhaps someone has run into > with groups. > > First, a little background. > I was made aware of a proble

[CentOS] Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

Hi, I am running Centos 4 (fully updated on this box). I removed the old DVD writer (/dev/hdc) and installed a new LG GH20 "Internal Super Multi DVD Rewriter" with a SATA interface - this shows up as /dev/scd0. When I insert a pre-recorded DVD autorun mounts it and displays the contents wit

Re: [CentOS] Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 19:38 +0200, Chris Geldenhuis wrote: > Hi, > > I am running Centos 4 (fully updated on this box). > > I removed the old DVD writer (/dev/hdc) and installed a new LG GH20 > "Internal Super Multi DVD Rewriter" with a SATA interface - this shows > up as /dev/scd0. > > When

Re: [CentOS] Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

William L. Maltby wrote: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 19:38 +0200, Chris Geldenhuis wrote: Hi, I am running Centos 4 (fully updated on this box). I removed the old DVD writer (/dev/hdc) and installed a new LG GH20 "Internal Super Multi DVD Rewriter" with a SATA interface - this shows up as /dev/

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:34 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: I'm using CentOS 5.0,5.1, and 5.2 on several systems where I'm seeing this problem. Hello, I'm seeing a weird problem that perhaps someone has run into with groups. First, a little background. I w

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 14:53 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:34 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > >> I'm using CentOS 5.0,5.1, and 5.2 on several systems where I'm seeing > >> this problem. > >> > >> Hello, I'm seeing a weird problem

Re: [CentOS] Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 20:13 +0200, Chris Geldenhuis wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 19:38 +0200, Chris Geldenhuis wrote: > > LG GH20 > >> > >> I am using Verbatim DVD-RDL blanks. Did a quick perusal of the Verbatim and LG specs. Looks OK. > >> > >> When I try to

Re: [CentOS] Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Chris Geldenhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > Thanks for the quick response - I did try to format with dvd+rw tools but > also got a respnse that the media was not recordable. AFAIK it should not be > required. > I usually use K3B for all my CD and

Re: [CentOS] Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wednesday 27 August 2008 20:27:15 MHR wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Chris Geldenhuis > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > Thanks for the quick response - I did try to format with dvd+rw tools but > > also got a respnse that the media was not recordable. AFAIK it shoul

[CentOS] RADVD address timeouts

I am using RADVD to assign IPv6 addresses. It works for 'static' devices. I want it to work for devices that move to different networks without having to restart the network on those devices. So if I have a notebook on network Lab1 getting prefix 2607:7:4:1::64 and moves to network Lab2 wher

[CentOS] Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:19:01PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > My updated 5.2 has these >cdrdao-1.2.1-2.i386 >cdrecord-2.01-10.i386 >xcdroast-0.98a15-12.2.2.i386 > > Rpmforge has only the development rpm for the current cdrecord. > > I don't have atrpm on my system. You might c

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 14:53 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:34 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: >> I'm using CentOS 5.0,5.1, and 5.2 on several systems where I'm seeing >> this problem. >> >> He

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:07 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 14:53 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > >> Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:34 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > >> >> I'm using CentO

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:07 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 14:53 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: >> Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:34 -0400, Mark Hennes

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:35 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:07 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > >> Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 14:53 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > >> >> Quoting Craig W

[CentOS] Unable to install CentOS 5.2 on New HP Intel Core 2 Quad

Our new lab has HP Intel Core 2 Quad systems with DVD/CDRW and SATA. I can provide the model number if needed. They stop on kernel startup when trying to boot the CentOS 5.2 boot CD. It is during ACPI. I have tried linux noprobe and linux pci=noacpi and linux noprobe pci=noacpi. I still cannot

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:35 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:07 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: >> Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 14:53 -0400, Mark Hennes

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Mark Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, I agree, it makes no sense to operate a machine with ldap accounts if > it has no network connection, but at least one should be able to log in as > root. To clarify, here'

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:56 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > well, it hardly makes any sense to use ldap for user accounts and start > > up with networking off but I would recommend that you adhere to the > > advice at the top of the file and run 'authconf

RE: [CentOS] Unable to install CentOS 5.2 on New HP Intel Core 2 Quad

>Our new lab has HP Intel Core 2 Quad systems with DVD/CDRW and SATA. >I can provide the model number if needed. > >They stop on kernel startup when trying to boot the CentOS 5.2 boot CD. >It is during ACPI. Model #'s would be good, even some cheap units have quad cores now, so its Impossible to g

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Mark Hennessy wrote: > perhaps switch to a different network connection, whatever. If I > can't log in as root, my only recourse is to powercycle the machine > and go into single-user mode. Now, multiply that by 100. This is why > I need to get this working. Phew, seems like people don't know

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:07:26PM -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > With networking, no trouble at all, but with those timeouts of 30 > seconds and without those changes to nsswitch.conf, it takes a while > for the first root login to succeed even though it is using local auth. If you have ldap g

Re: [CentOS] Unable to install CentOS 5.2 on New HP Intel Core 2 Quad

They stop on kernel startup when trying to boot the CentOS 5.2 boot CD. It is during ACPI. Fedora 10 Live will not but up either. I am using Fedora 9 from Live and DVD Install to teach a fall class and it works fine. Are the CentOS and fed 10 DVDs of a similar type, and different to the DVD you

Re: [CentOS] Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 23:33 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:19:01PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > I don't have atrpm on my system. You might check there and see if they > > have later packages. Just be aware that many months ago that repo was > > less trusted (IIRC

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

On Tuesday 26 August 2008 16:17, Ned Slider wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> My understanding is that --dport can only specify a single port > >> (--dport 80) or port range (--dport 137:139) inclusive. Use of the > >> multiport module allows up to 15 ports (or port ranges) to be > >> spe

RE: [CentOS] iptables question

>http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html Nice doc, any ideas on how to print it (or many chapters easily) so I can haul with me on my plane ride this weekend? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mail

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 18:19 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:07:26PM -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > > With networking, no trouble at all, but with those timeouts of 30 > > seconds and without those changes to nsswitch.conf, it takes a while > > for the first root login t

[CentOS] Re: iptables question

on 8-27-2008 4:27 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following: http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html Nice doc, any ideas on how to print it (or many chapters easily) so I can haul with me on my plane ride this weekend? Thanks! jlc E-mail me offlist and I can get make a pdf if you wa

[CentOS] Re: iptables question

on 8-27-2008 4:27 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following: http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html Nice doc, any ideas on how to print it (or many chapters easily) so I can haul with me on my plane ride this weekend? Thanks! jlc Or here is a link to a non chunk version http://ipt

[CentOS] System goes into read only mode - not the same as posted earlier

Hello all, I’m at my wits end trying to resolve this. We are running centos 4.5 on Intel hardware. Dual SCSI disk drives mirrored on an LSI Logic controller. Every once in a while and not always on the same server and not only on the local SCSI Drives. System A – Dual internal drives on

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:56 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > well, it hardly makes any sense to use ldap for user accounts and start > up with networking off but I would recommend that you adhere to the > advice a

[CentOS] Strategy for using CentOS on laptops in an NIS environment

We use NIS (ypbind) and Kerberos at work for all our Linux and Unix systems. Home directories are mounted via autofs from an NIS map. Everything works just fine as long as all network resources are available (however, things turn ugly when the NIS servers are not reachable). Some users a

[CentOS] yum provides on centos 5.2

I am trying things like "yum provides alsamixer" on centox 5.2 i386 and x86_64 also "yum provides vi" "yum provides gvimdiff" "yum provides dumpiso" "yum provides uname" All of these return "no matches found" is something broke??? These are just examples. I was trying to do "yum provides xf86M

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 20:41 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:56 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: > >> Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> > well, it hardly makes any sense to use ldap for user accounts and start > >> > u

Re: [CentOS] yum provides on centos 5.2

On Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I am trying things like "yum provides alsamixer" on centox 5.2 i386 and x86_64 also "yum provides vi" "yum provides gvimdiff" "yum provides dumpiso" "yum provides uname" All of these return "no matches found" is something broke???

Re: [CentOS] yum provides on centos 5.2

Jerry Geis wrote: I am trying things like "yum provides alsamixer" on centox 5.2 i386 and x86_64 also "yum provides vi" "yum provides gvimdiff" "yum provides dumpiso" "yum provides uname" All of these return "no matches found" is something broke??? These are just examples. I was trying to do

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 20:41 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:56 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: >> Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > well, it hardly makes any sense to use ldap for

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Rob Townley wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>Craig White wrote: >> >>On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 23:28 -0400, Robert Moskowitz w

Re: [CentOS] yum provides on centos 5.2

Include the path: Doesn't that defeat the purpose? My favourite use of the "whatprovides" feature of yum is could find things that aren't on my system. I'd prefer not to go on a wild path chase. :) This looks like a bug to me. On CentOS 5.1 (yum 3.0.5): # yum provides uname | awk '/i386|n

HIP - was Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

Rob Townley wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Um, as the original poster, I WANT IPv6. Not make IPv4 lookups faster by ignoring records. Further testing has IPv6 working just fine. Thing is when I

Re: [CentOS] nsswitch.conf, ldap, local groups problem

Mark, Probe with this line: authconfig --enablelocauthorize --updateall Regards, Alejandro www.linuxiso.com.ar Argentina 2008/8/27 Mark Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Quoting Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 20:41 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: >> >>> Quoting Craig Whi

Re: [CentOS] Unable to install CentOS 5.2 on New HP Intel Core 2 Quad

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> They stop on kernel startup when trying to boot the CentOS 5.2 boot CD. >> It is during ACPI. >> Fedora 10 Live will not but up either. >> I am using Fedora 9 from Live and DVD Install to teach a f

Re: [CentOS] Strategy for using CentOS on laptops in an NIS environment

Alfred von Campe wrote: > Creating local accounts with the same UIDs and local home directories > solves most of the problems. However, I can't create a local account > with useradd while ypbind is running because it complains that that > account already exists. Is there a better way to create a

Re: HIP - was Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Rob Townley wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>Um, as the original poster, I WANT IPv6. Not make IPv4 lookups >>faster by ignori

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Jeff Kinz wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:04:21PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: >> >> >>> Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel >>> between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? >>> >>> >> >>

Re: HIP - was Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

Rob Townley wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Rob Townley wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] yum provides on centos 5.2

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 13:50 +1200, Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote: > > Include the path: > > Doesn't that defeat the purpose? My favourite use of the "whatprovides" > feature of yum is could find things that aren't on my system. I'd prefer > not to go on a wild path chase. :) > > Th

Re: [CentOS] yum provides on centos 5.2

Steve Tindall wrote: Looks like the new “feature� went a bit too far the other way. Roger that. From too much to not enough. We must bring balance back to the force. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz

Re: [CentOS] Strategy for using CentOS on laptops in an NIS environment

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:45:05PM -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote: > We use NIS (ypbind) and Kerberos at work for all our Linux and Unix > systems. Home directories are mounted via autofs from an NIS map. > Everything works just fine as long as all network resources are > available (however,

[CentOS] problem with slave dns servers

Hi, I have 4 bind9 dns installed on centos 4. My primary dns server went down and all of my domains doesn't resolve even if the 3 slave dns is up and running. Im not sure where to configure this is it in my domain registration or in bind? -- Regards, Mark Quitoriano Blog | http://mark.quitorian