Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
William L. Maltby ha scritto: > > Yep. Only a few copies of the superblock and the i-node tables are > written by the file system make process. That's why it's important for > files systems in critical applications to be created with the check > forced. Folks should also keep in mind that the defa

[CentOS] virt-install error: "virDomainLookupByName() failed got unknown HTTP error code 400"

2008-08-25 Thread Graeme West
Hi there, I've been happily installing VMs in CentOS 5.2's Xen implementation using virt-manager. However, my latest attempt to use the install wizard in virt-manager failed when I got to the networking screen. The 'forward' button was unresponsive, and I was unable to proceed. I checked the vi

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread Stephen Harris
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > So again my question is: > can I use dd to "test" the disk? what about > > dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sda bs=512 > > Is this safe on a full running system? Has to be done at runlevel 1 or with a > live cd? Do not do this on a mounte

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:43 +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > William L. Maltby ha scritto: > > > > Yep. Only a few copies of the superblock and the i-node tables are > > written by the file system make process. That's why it's important for > > files systems in critical applications to be created

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 06:36 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > > So again my question is: > > can I use dd to "test" the disk? what about > > > > dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sda bs=512 > > > > Is this safe on a full running system? Has t

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 42, Issue 8

2008-08-25 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

[CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

2008-08-25 Thread Ian jonhson
Hi, My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know how to yum the kernel source codes. Any help? Thanks in advance. Ian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

2008-08-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Ian jonhson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know > how to yum the kernel source codes. > > Any help? First look in http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source and then http://wiki.centos.org/H

Re: [CentOS] LVM not removing LV

2008-08-25 Thread Toby Bluhm
Mag Gam wrote: There are too many mount points. Close to 120. I am fairly certain this volume is not mouted. I did a grep -i lvname /proc/mounts Maybe a daemon is still holding your lv device open? Somewhere, maybe this list, I remember a similar discussion where the culprit was a backup ag

Re: [CentOS] Yum corrupting RPMs

2008-08-25 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
On Aug 24, 2008, at 9:25 PM, "Tom Lanyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi list, Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a 5.0 DVD I think). The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm -- checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large po

[CentOS] syslinux and isolinux

2008-08-25 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi I copied the centos 5.2 x86_64 DVD to a USB pen drive formatted for FAT32. I then ran syslinux -sf /dev/sdc1 to get it to boot. I mounted it, and did cp isolinux/vmlinuz . cp isolinux/isolinux.cfg syslinux.cfg the setup the MBR. THe device booted but I got an error message about unknown comm

Re: [CentOS] LVM not removing LV

2008-08-25 Thread Mag Gam
Its impossible trying to find that deamon. lsof or fuser are no use :-( I just rebooted and was able to remove the LV without any problems. On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Toby Bluhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mag Gam wrote: >> >> There are too many mount points. Close to 120. I am fairly cert

[CentOS] Second Xen NIC not being recognized?

2008-08-25 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
I've got a Xen domU running Centos 5.2 (dom0 is also Centos 5.2) with two NICs configured. Both NICs show up in the Xen hardware details display. Looking at dmesg output from rebooting the domU, I see both eth0 and eth1 appearing there. But network configuration only knows about eth0, the one th

RE: [CentOS] Second Xen NIC not being recognized?

2008-08-25 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Both NICs show up in the Xen hardware details display. >Looking at dmesg output from rebooting the domU, I see both eth0 and eth1 >appearing there. By chance did you set the macs manually? Are they valid, look for a typo? I recall hearing about this behavior in lieu of that mistake. jlc ___

RE: [CentOS] Second Xen NIC not being recognized?

2008-08-25 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Mon, August 25, 2008 11:21, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>Both NICs show up in the Xen hardware details display. >>Looking at dmesg output from rebooting the domU, I see both eth0 and eth1 >>appearing there. > > By chance did you set the macs manually? Are they valid, look for a typo? > I recall he

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

2008-08-25 Thread Mihai T. Lazarescu
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:14:19PM +0800, Ian jonhson wrote: > My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know > how to yum the kernel source codes. This should download the .src RPM in the current dir: yumdownloader --source kernel yum-utils should be installed first. Mihai _

[CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?"

2008-08-25 Thread MHR
Is there a setting somewhere in the "global" arena of CentOS that controls whether or not "hidden" (.prefixed) files are displayed in file lists? I've noticed that, at home, primarily, when I use any file access dialogue window, particularly in OOo and Evolution, all my "hidden" files are shown al

[CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

2008-08-25 Thread Scott Silva
on 8-22-2008 6:00 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The version of Google Earth

[CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

2008-08-25 Thread Scott Silva
on 8-23-2008 12:08 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:34 PM, John R Pierce wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: Question: How do I determine whether or not the CPU in this box (I think it's an Intel Celeron 2.6 GHz) supports SSE2 or not? I suspect the CPU does *not* support

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread Nifty Cluster Mitch
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > William L. Maltby ha scritto: > > > > Yep. Only a few copies of the superblock and the i-node tables are > > written by the file system make process. That's why it's important for > > files systems in critical applications to be c

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread Nifty Cluster Mitch
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:24:24AM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > "Badblocks" (which really should be invoked via mke2fs or e2fsck rather > than manually) has useful, but limited, utility in ensuring reliability. > And it does require some small storage space in the file system. And it > does

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:03 -0700, Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:24:24AM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > > > (potentially) lost on an existing file system. It's best utility is at > > FS creation and check time. It also has use if you can un-mount the FS > > (ig

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 + SELinux + Apache/PHP + Postfix

2008-08-25 Thread Art Age Software
Thanks - appreciate the info. Still, I would like to understand why these denials are occurring during what should be a pretty typical use case: namely sending emails from a web app. Does anyone have any insight into this? >If these denials do not interfere with the normal workflow >of the applica

[CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

2008-08-25 Thread Scott Silva
on 8-25-2008 11:36 AM Scott Silva spake the following: on 8-22-2008 6:00 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus

RE: [CentOS] Second Xen NIC not being recognized?

2008-08-25 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I set the second one manually; copied the first one and added one. > >vif = [ "mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:5f,bridge=pubbr", >"mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:60,bridge=virtbr" ] Looks good to me? >Interfaces are associated with both bridges properly, but only an eth0 >device appears in the domU. > >If the low-order

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

2008-08-25 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:49 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > > >> > > Try cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep sse2 > > > I guess I need to finish reading the thread before I reply. ;-D He-he! And don't let things distract you from snipping! ;-) > With good cheer, -- Bill _

[CentOS] slow Perl on CentOS 5

2008-08-25 Thread Florin Andrei
If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this blog: http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/ In a nutshell: some Perl apps are 100x slower on RedHat / CentOS 5 compared to other distributions. Bugzilla entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

2008-08-25 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-22-2008 6:00 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: >> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

2008-08-25 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:25 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:49 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >> > >> >> >> > Try cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep sse2 >> > >> I guess I need to finish reading the thread before I reply. ;-D > > He-he! And don't let things distract

[CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

2008-08-25 Thread Scott Silva
on 8-25-2008 1:25 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: I guess I need to finish reading the thread before I reply. ;-D He-he! And don't let things distract you from snipping! ;-) Got it! More snipping, less sipping! ;-P With good cheer, -- MailScanner is like deodorant...

RE: [CentOS] Second Xen NIC not being recognized?

2008-08-25 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Mon, August 25, 2008 15:24, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>I set the second one manually; copied the first one and added one. >> >>vif = [ "mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:5f,bridge=pubbr", >>"mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:60,bridge=virtbr" ] > > Looks good to me? Thanks for the second set of eyes. It's amazing what I c

RE: [CentOS] Second Xen NIC not being recognized?

2008-08-25 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>As in /usr/sbin/system-config-network? The yes. Or something else >(probably officially called "network manager")? At this point there are Well, I am probably about to be char broiled in flame, but I just edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth{n} and what ever else like resolv.conf by han

RE: [CentOS] Second Xen NIC not being recognized?

2008-08-25 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Mon, August 25, 2008 16:55, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>As in /usr/sbin/system-config-network? The yes. Or something else >>(probably officially called "network manager")? At this point there are > > Well, I am probably about to be char broiled in flame, but I just edit > /etc/sysconfig/network-

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread Nifty Cluster Mitch
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:43:18PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:03 -0700, Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:24:24AM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > > > > > > > (potentially) lost on an existing file system. It's best utility is at > >

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

2008-08-25 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 15:36 -0700, Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:43:18PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:03 -0700, Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:24:24AM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >

RE: [CentOS] RH's servers breached

2008-08-25 Thread Tony Wicks
>> > >> >So there are new packages anyway in spite of the other bits. >> >> Hi all, have I missed something or is there a CentOS update for 5x but none >> for 4x ? I've made sure my mirror is synced and looked around at a few >> others but can't seem to see an update ? > >I just fired up my 4.6 an

Re: [CentOS] Yum corrupting RPMs

2008-08-25 Thread NiftyClusters Mitch
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Tom Lanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a > 5.0 DVD I think). > > The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig' > test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a la

[CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

2008-08-25 Thread MHR
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:33 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a setting somewhere in the "global" arena of CentOS that > controls whether or not "hidden" (.prefixed) files are displayed in > file lists? > Never mind - apparently if you right-click in the file list and select "show hi

[CentOS] apache

2008-08-25 Thread Mad Unix
How can I pass the following Oracle 10g variables to my apache? ORACLE_BASE=/u01/oracle ORACLE_HOME=/u01/oracle/10g ORACLE_SID=king LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/lib LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32=$ORACLE_HOME/lib32 PATH=$PATH:$ORACLE_HOME/bin NLS_LANG=AMERICAN_AMERICA.AR8MSWIN1256; export NLS_LANG NLS_DATE_FO

[CentOS] data rate on NIC card

2008-08-25 Thread Gopinath Achari
hi how to check the data rate on the nic card in centos i.e, at what speed the data is transmitted and received on ethernet interface in terms of kbps or bps any command is available in centos 5.1 regards, Gopinath M __

[CentOS] screen not sourcing .bashrc

2008-08-25 Thread Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists)
Hi everyone, I use the "screen" command from time to time and what i would still have to figure out how to do is for it to be able to source .bashrc and read my user-defined configuration (aliases for example). I have already added the "source /root/.bashrc" line on /root/.screenrc but it doesn't

[CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

2008-08-25 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > Does anyone know what causes this error? > I have setup a local CentOS repository, with mrepo, and can succesfully use > it for updates & installation of just about anything. Yet, this error comes > up. > > Here's

Re: [CentOS] data rate on NIC card

2008-08-25 Thread Michel van Deventer
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 11:20 +0530, Gopinath Achari wrote: > hi > > > how to check the data rate on the nic card in centos > i.e, at what speed the data is transmitted and received on > ethernet interface in terms of kbps or bps > any command is available in centos

Re: [CentOS] data rate on NIC card

2008-08-25 Thread Gopinath Achari
thank u. this tool is very usefull On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 08:48 +0200, Michel van Deventer wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 11:20 +0530, Gopinath Achari wrote: > > hi > > > > > > how to check the data rate on the nic card in centos > > i.e, at what speed the data is transm