Hi, I'm having problems with perl.
I'm receivings this e-mails from logwatch everyday and appears to be a
problem with perl.
I explain a bit before expose the errors that I received: I tried to
download all perl* packages, uninstall the repeated ones and reinstall all
packages where installed.
I
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:29:29PM +0200, ArcosCom Linux User enlightened us:
> I'm having problems with perl.
> I'm receivings this e-mails from logwatch everyday and appears to be a
> problem with perl.
>
> I explain a bit before expose the errors that I received: I tried to
> download all perl*
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 14:05 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:46 AM, William L. Maltby
>
> >> Then, I did some reading on the Google site. Question: How do I
> >> determine whether or not the CPU in this box (I think it's an Intel
> >> Celeron 2.6 GHz) supports SSE2 or not?
>What are you trying to achieve? If your trying to get an IP
>before the installation starts, you should use DHCP, or
>statically assign it using kickstart.
Its for an iSCSI install with gPXE. Whats the correct syntax for getting the
dhcp client to acquire an ip? I just ended up using ifconfig...
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Its for an iSCSI install with gPXE. Whats the correct syntax for getting the
> dhcp client to acquire an ip? I just ended up using ifconfig...
The installer will automatically get an address via DHCP if
a DHCP server is available. No syntax needed. You can even
"statical
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Damian S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff.
> Here is a less biased viewpoint:
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-study-70-percent-say-red-hat-more-secure-than-windows.html
>
> Its further interesting to note that
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:46 AM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 14:05 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:46 AM, William L. Maltby
>>
>
>> >> Then, I did some reading on the Google site. Question: How do I
>> >> determine whether or not t
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 12:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Damian S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff.
> > Here is a less biased viewpoint:
> > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-study-70-percent-say-red-hat-more-sec
>> I see an announcement for the packages on the announce list, but no more
>> information anywhere from the CentOS team (Planet or ML). Are these
>> packages "just to be safe" or was there something actually found?
>
>There's a CVE associated with a different (unrelated) bug in how ssh
>handled
As I said in the e-mail, I reinstalled all CentOS 5.2 perl* packages that
I had installed.
I have no idea about perl and how to fight versus it. I only know:
1) This system where a FC5 some years ago with no problem.
2) I upgraded to CentOS 5 (a year ago) with no problem.
3) I upgraded to
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:32 +1200, Tony Wicks wrote:
>
> >
> >So there are new packages anyway in spite of the other bits.
>
> Hi all, have I missed something or is there a CentOS update for 5x but none
> for 4x ? I've made sure my mirror is synced and looked around at a few
> others but can't
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of them
are corrupted and fail the GPG check.
This seems to b
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Tom Lanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
> 5.0 DVD I think).
>
> The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
> test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a la
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:54:05AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
> 5.0 DVD I think).
>
> The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
> test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large porti
On 25/08/2008, at 11:37 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
How are you sync'ing the RPM's on your internal mirror? Do you run
createrepo locally to generate the metadata yourself or just rely on
the mirror's information?
We just sync 1:1 and rely on the mirror's metadata. As far as I know,
there sho
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:42:14AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> On 25/08/2008, at 11:37 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
>> How are you sync'ing the RPM's on your internal mirror? Do you run
>> createrepo locally to generate the metadata yourself or just rely on
>> the mirror's information?
>
> We just s
On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of
them are cor
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:10:25PM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
>> 5.0 DVD I think).
>>
>> The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksi
On 25/08/2008, at 12:17 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What's the exact error you get from yum? One thing you can do is to
check the output of sha1sum against the RPM in the Yum cache on the
client machine and compare that against the checksum value stored in
the primary.xml.gz file for one of the b
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 16:42, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> vncserver: The USER environment variable is not set.
>
> So, is it set or not?
>
> It's usually set by /etc/profile, so if it's no
last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS 146G I
found the smartd running , I did not request such daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pons]# tail -f /var/log/messages
Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Home page is
http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
Aug 25 08:27:30 Power
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:39:39 +0200
Mad Unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can i disable it
You can disable it with chkconfig or through the GUI "services" menu.
> do i really need it on my system
It depends on your requirements. Read up a bit on what it does and make your
own decision fro
Mad Unix wrote:
last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS
146G I found the smartd running , I did not request such daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pons]# tail -f /var/log/messages
Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Home page is
http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
since am using Harware RAID controller, am gonna disable it... and use the
monitoring tools of dell
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:50 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mad Unix wrote:
>
>> last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS 146G
>> I found the sm
25 matches
Mail list logo
