RE: [CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

> > Patrick Derwael wrote: > > */[Patrick Derwael] /* > > The point is that Parallel supports exactly CentOS 4.4 and 5.0, Fedora > > 4 and 6 and RHEL 4ES and 5ES. > > > Primary focus of this policy is to address the > specific issue you are running up against My only issue is that I want to be

RE: [CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

> Do you have a link to this application's website? Maybe we could determine > why it might be stuck to a limited set of OS releases. If a software can't > keep up with a limited subset of OS updates, maybe they are concerned more > costs then security. Scott, more info here: http://www.parall

RE: [CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

> But, read that table carefully. It says "CentOS 5" not "CentOS 5.0" > "CentOS 5" tracks the current point release and is now equivalent > to "CentOS 5.2". Running "CentOS 5.0" means you do not receive any > updates from a subsequent point release and are locked into the > package versions that w

RE: [CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

Patrick Derwael wrote: > My only issue is that I want to be able to get support from Parallels, and > (I know software vendors!!) it would be too easy for them to say "Sorry, > your OS version is not supported"... I suggest you contact the vendor to verify whether or not CentOS 5.1 and 5.2 and on

RE: [CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

> I suggest you contact the vendor to verify whether or not CentOS 5.1 > and 5.2 and onwards are supported. I suspect if they support something > as generic as "RHEL 5 ES" and they support CentOS 5.0 then they'll > support all versions of CentOS 5.0. Since CentOS 5.2 is based off > of RHEL ES 5.2.

[CentOS] LVM not removing LV

I am using RHEL 5.1 with custom kernel. I have a LV I am trying to remove and its keep complaining its open. I have unmounted the filesystem, lsof shows nothing, fuser shows nothing. I am certain a reboot will fix it, but I don't know why this occurs. Can anyone shed some light on this? Are ther

Re: [CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

> Do you have a link to this application's website? Maybe we could > determine why it might be stuck to a limited set of OS releases. If a > software can't keep up with a limited subset of OS updates, maybe they > are concerned more with costs then security. > > > The OP is happily incorrect on

RE: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

You can place the statement in /etc/sysconfg/static-routes. This file will be used when the network starts up. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ABBAS KHAN Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:38 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Is there a way

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this to work in a streamlined fashion. i didn't have success with the /etc/sysconfig

Re: [CentOS] LVM not removing LV

Mag Gam wrote: > I am using RHEL 5.1 with custom kernel. > > > I have a LV I am trying to remove and its keep complaining its open. I > have unmounted the filesystem, lsof shows nothing, fuser shows > nothing. I am certain a reboot will fix it, but I don't know why this > occurs. Can anyone shed so

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Rob Townley wrote: > Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for > CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two > different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this > to work in a streamlined fashion. Two default gatewa

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Rob Townley napsal(a): > Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for > CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two > different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this > to work in a streamlined fashion. > > i didn't h

[CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

I have 4 disks in a RAID5 array. I want to add a 5th. So I did mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/sde1 This worked but, as expected, the disk isn't being used in the raid5 array. md3 : active raid5 sde1[4] sdd4[3] sdc3[2] sdb2[1] sda1[0] 2930279808 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UU

Re: [CentOS] LVM not removing LV

nate wrote: Mag Gam wrote: I am using RHEL 5.1 with custom kernel. Might be something about your custom kernel that affects lvm operations. It could be you have a version mis-match in lvm components in your system. I have a LV I am trying to remove and its keep complaining its open. I hav

Re: [CentOS] LVM not removing LV

Toby Bluhm wrote: nate wrote: . . . Verify that it's deactivated with the lvdisplay command Current versions of lvm/lvremove will do that automatically. . . . but verifying is still a good idea. -- Toby Bluhm Alltech Medical Systems America, Inc. _

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>There are two times when this becomes an issue. One is on x86_64 >>systems where build deps can cross architectures, and the other is >>when using systems like openvz/virtuozzo where the glibc is often >>replaced or oth

Re: [CentOS] postfix mysql_pgsql update?

John Thomas wrote: Should postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql be updated for: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0839.html and, if so, may I humbly request it? I will look into this today, at the moment the openssh issue takes priority! News on that front in the next few hours. I know

[CentOS] system-config-kickstart

When I run this command on centos 5.2 it just sets there nothing ever happens. Any ideas? I have ran it on two centos 5.2 machines. I can control C out. I am running it as root and a normal user both. Same thing - just sits there. jerry ___ CentOS ma

[CentOS] RH's servers breached

What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ? http://www.redhat.com/security/data/openssh-blacklist.html Regards, kfx ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] system-config-kickstart

Jerry Geis wrote: When I run this command on centos 5.2 it just sets there nothing ever happens. It's an X application. Can you run X programs the way you're logged in? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark Phone: +45 33 27 5

[CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors; I found on this page how to identify the sectors and force a write on them to trigger the relocation of bad sectors on the disk: http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/BadBlockHowTo.txt My question is: since I'm too lazy to follow all the

[CentOS] Various OpenGL apps crashing in CentOS 5?

Hi All, I'm experiencing odd behaviour with various OpenGL apps I'm (trying to) use. I have an IBM Thinkpad X60s with the Intel GMA chipset, the 945GM to be precise. I have glxinfo/glxgears working normally, disabled composite in xorg.conf and everything seems fine. However, there are a few

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors; Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools, and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS can see should not be relied upon, it should be considered a failed disk. Disks automatically k

RE: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

>which xen rpms did you install? The ones from centos, or the ones from >xensource? Rolled my own from the 3.2.0 srpm. >Generally when building for x86_64, it's best to remove all traces of >x86 packages on the system. How do you do this at install? Wouldn't that be cleaner? I suppose a rpm comm

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

nate ha scritto: > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: >> I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors; > > Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools, > and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS > can see should not be relied upon, it should be considered a > fail

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 08:59 -0700, nate wrote: > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > > I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors; > > Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools, Second that! > and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS > can see should not b

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > For what I understand Offline uncorrectable means that the sector would be > relocated the next time it is accessed for writing... so it is on a "wait > for > relocation" status. > I don't know of any other way to force this relocation other tha actually > writing over th

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:26 AM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > Not sure myself but the manufacturer's testing tools have > non destructive ways of detecting and re-mapping bad sectors. > Of course a downside to the manufacturer's tools is they often > only support a l

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 18:07 +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > nate ha scritto: > > > For what I understand Offline uncorrectable means that the sector would be > relocated the next time it is accessed for writing... so it is on a "wait for > relocation" status. If my memory is still good (I don't

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

William L. Maltby wrote: > ?? Uncertain about "spares has been exhausted". I don't recall where I read it, and I suppose it may be misinformation, but it made sense at the time. The idea is the disks are not made to hold EXACTLY the amount of blocks that the specs are for. There are some extra bl

Re: [CentOS] RH's servers breached

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:43:08PM +0200, kfx wrote: > What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ? > > http://www.redhat.com/security/data/openssh-blacklist.html That will only test for compiled RPMS of certain OpenSSH packages. Those RPMS have been signed by the PGP key, so either the key se

Re: [CentOS] Various OpenGL apps crashing in CentOS 5?

On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 17:55 +0200, Rubin wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm experiencing odd behaviour with various OpenGL apps I'm (trying to) > use. I have an IBM Thinkpad X60s with the Intel GMA chipset, the 945GM > to be precise. I have glxinfo/glxgears working normally, disabled > composite in xorg

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>which xen rpms did you install? The ones from centos, or the ones from >>xensource? > > Rolled my own from the 3.2.0 srpm. > >>Generally when building for x86_64, it's best to remove all traces of >>x86 packages on the s

[CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

on 8-22-2008 7:01 AM David Hrbáč spake the following: Rob Townley napsal(a): Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this

[CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

on 8-22-2008 12:10 AM Patrick Derwael spake the following: Do you have a link to this application's website? Maybe we could determine why it might be stuck to a limited set of OS releases. If a software can't keep up with a limited subset of OS updates, maybe they are concerned more costs then

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:33 -0700, nate wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > > ?? Uncertain about "spares has been exhausted". > > I don't recall where I read it, and I suppose it may be > misinformation, but it made sense at the time. The idea is > the disks are not made to hold EXACTLY the am

[CentOS] Re: OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

on 8-22-2008 9:07 AM Lorenzo Quatrini spake the following: nate ha scritto: Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors; Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools, and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS can see should no

[CentOS] A couple of minutes on GnuPG and signing files

There has been a notice of a breach (see: CVE-2007-4752) as to some binary content upstream of CentOS. I do not address that matter here beyond stating that the CentOS team have responded to the matter, and will continue this review process: updated 22 Aug 2008 CentOS acknowledge CVE

Re: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Scott Silva wrote: >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse >> Iface >> 212.47.23.188 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 00 >> eth0 >> 192.168.38.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 >> eth1 >>

Re: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Scott Silva wrote: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 212.47.23.188 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.38.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.36.0192.168.38.254 255.255.255.

[CentOS] A couple of minutes on GnuPG and signing files

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, R P Herrold wrote: ... Hopefully this attched writeup will transit the CentOS mailing list manager intact. I also include it inline below, but this may mangle the signature. 'attached' of course -- part of the 'orc_orc' spelling authenticity test. ;) Following up on m

RE: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Hasn't this been hashed over several times in the past year to the same end result? :-) It appeared to me the original issue (this time) was being able to do primary and secondary dns on one box with different ip addresses because the registrar needed two different ip addresses when registering

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

ABBAS KHAN wrote: I'm adding the default gateway to the route through "route add default gw 10.10.10.10 " which is also shown in "route -n" but the problem is that as soon as I restart the network through /etc/init.d/network restart; the route sets to default one...! SO, my

[CentOS] Re: system-config-kickstart

Jerry Geis wrote: When I run this command on centos 5.2 it just sets there nothing ever happens. Any ideas? I have ran it on two centos 5.2 machines. I can control C out. I am running it as root and a normal user both. Same thing - just sits there. jerry I created a new user, logged in as th

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

> So then I tried the next step: > mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 /dev/md3 > But now I have problems... > mdadm: Cannot set device size/shape for /dev/md3: Invalid argument What happens, if you add --size=max ? - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki *

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:26:01PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > > So then I tried the next step: > > mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 /dev/md3 > > But now I have problems... > > mdadm: Cannot set device size/shape for /dev/md3: Invalid argument > > What happens, if you add > --size=max % mdadm --

Re: [CentOS] Disk quotas for Sendmail

Alexander Dalloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribio (21.8.2008 16:44) > What I would do is following: change this line in the Makefile > > $(CC) $(OPTS) $(DEFINES) $(EFENCE) -o milterquota milterquota.c > $(SENDMAIL_OBJ)/libmilter/libmilter.a $(SENDMAIL_OBJ)/libsm/libsm.a -pthread > > replace $(SENDMAI

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 9:37am, Akemi Yagi wrote On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: which xen rpms did you install? The ones from centos, or the ones from xensource? Rolled my own from the 3.2.0 srpm. Generally when building for x86_64, it's best to

RE: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

RobertH wrote: > > Hasn't this been hashed over several times in the past year to the same end > result? I think so.. > It appeared to me the original issue (this time) was being able to do > primary and secondary dns on one box with different ip addresses because the > registrar needed two diffe

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

>> What happens, if you add >> --size=max Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribio (22.8.2008 20:27) > % mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 --size=max /dev/md3 > mdadm: can change at most one of size, raiddisks, and layout > > "--size=max" is for use when a failed disk is replaced with a bigger one

RE: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

>Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise >you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686. Joshua, Any way to simply not install them when doing an install? jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Florin Andrei wrote: ABBAS KHAN wrote: I'm adding the default gateway to the route through "route add default gw 10.10.10.10 " which is also shown in "route -n" but the problem is that as soon as I restart the network through /etc/init.d/network restart; the route sets to d

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:41:25PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > How about simply > % mdadm --grow /dev/md3 % mdadm --grow /dev/md3 mdadm: no changes to --grow > What do you get with > % mdadm --detail /dev/md3 /dev/md3: Version : 00.90.01 Creation Time : Wed Aug 20 08:44:30 200

Re: [CentOS] RH's servers breached

> What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ? I'd like to know if CentOS has been affected by RH's compromise. Can someone please comment? AFAIK, CentOS builds from RHEL SRPMs right? So as Rui mentioned the script that RH provided is useless. They do give the version info of the compromise

RE: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:41am, Joseph L. Casale wrote Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686. Any way to simply not install them when doing an install? Unfortunately, not that I'm aware of. -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:41am, Joseph L. Casale wrote > >>> Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise >>> you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686. >> >> >> Any way to simply not install them wh

[CentOS] OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

The version of Google Earth I installed last December was working great this morning. Then, I decided to update to the latest version and when I tried to do that with yum, I didn't have the right name for the package (now, I think it may be "google-earth"), so I downloaded the file (GoogleEarthLinu

RE: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:41:25PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > > How about simply > > % mdadm --grow /dev/md3 > > % mdadm --grow /dev/md3 > mdadm: no changes to --grow > > > What do you get with > > % mdadm --detail /dev/md3 > > /dev/md3: > Number Major

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:22am, Akemi Yagi wrote On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:41am, Joseph L. Casale wrote Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686.

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:25:20PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > I don't think you can grow it without backing it up, destroying > it, rebuilding it with 5 devices, then restoring. You _can_... but it requires a newer kernel. See, for example, http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Growing#A

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

Stephen Harris wrote: A RAID-5 set can be expanded by adding extra drives. This requires "restriping" the array which means (almost) every block must be written to a different place. This option allows such restriping to be done while the array i

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Les Mikesell wrote: Florin Andrei wrote: It would be very nice if the init.d script would allow the sysadmin to do something like "service network saveroutes". I always thought that would be a neat feature. Routes only work when you can reach the next hop. That is, if you try to add a ro

RE: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

John R Pierce wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > A RAID-5 set can be expanded by adding extra drives. This > > requires "restriping" the array which means (almost) every > > block must be written to a different place. > > > > This option allows such restripin

Re: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:12 PM, RobertH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hasn't this been hashed over several times in the past year to the same end > result? > > :-) > > It appeared to me the original issue (this time) was being able to do > primary and secondary dns on one box with different ip

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:50:29PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > It would probably be faster to backup, rebuild and restore too... The whole reason I need to extend like this is because I don't have any easy way of backing up 1.3Tbytes of data. While the rebuild is happening the existing volu

RE: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

>> For people who are interested, yum-3.2.17-0_beta is in the *testing* >> repo at this moment. That fixed it! Its installing now... >When Joseph said "when doing an install", I assumed that meant at system >install time. I know of no way of doing a pure x86_64 install via >anaconda (although I'

RE: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:50:29PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > It would probably be faster to backup, rebuild and restore too... > > The whole reason I need to extend like this is because I > don't have any > easy way of backing up 1.3Tbytes of data. > > While the

Re: [CentOS] Various OpenGL apps crashing in CentOS 5?

Hi, it is strange, I have the laptop Acer 5204 and the desktop with the same GPU (945GM and 945G). OpenOffice and GoogleEarth work fine without any problem. Vaclav Rubin wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm experiencing odd behaviour with various OpenGL apps I'm (trying > to) use. I have an IBM Thinkpad X6

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues with Dev groups

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:22am, Akemi Yagi wrote Any way to simply not install them when doing an install? >>> >>> Unfortunately, not that I'm aware of. >> >> There is a known issue with yum. See, for example,

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Florin Andrei wrote: > >> ABBAS KHAN wrote: >> >>> I'm adding the default gateway to the route through "route add default gw >>> 10.10.10.10 " which is also shown in "route -n" but >>> the problem is tha

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:05:30PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > Or you could just boot from a LiveCD of a distro that was this and > run a conversion there, it would make it unavailable during the > conversion though. *grin* My first email on this subject... I w

Re: [CentOS] RH's servers breached

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Scott Beardsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ? > > I'd like to know if CentOS has been affected by RH's compromise. Can someone > please comment? AFAIK, CentOS builds from RHEL SRPMs right? So as Rui > mentioned the scr

RE: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:05:30PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > Stephen Harris wrote: > > > Or you could just boot from a LiveCD of a distro that was this and > > run a conversion there, it would make it unavailable during the > > conversion though. > > *grin* My f

Re: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:31:31PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > I wouldn't use Ubuntu or any Debian based distro cause it's EVMS just > might bugger up the LVM config... Huh. Dunno what EVMS is, but thanks for the warning! > Instead of a second machine, how about an external disk enclosure?

[CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

on 8-22-2008 10:01 AM nate spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 212.47.23.188 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 00 eth0 192.168.38.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U

Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?

Rob Townley wrote: Routes only work when you can reach the next hop. That is, if you try to add a route through an interface that is not up, the command will fail and the route will not be added. If you want a route to be added when an interface comes up, there is already a p

RE: [CentOS] Growing RAID5 on CentOS 4.6

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:31:31PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > I wouldn't use Ubuntu or any Debian based distro cause it's EVMS just > > might bugger up the LVM config... > > Huh. Dunno what EVMS is, but thanks for the warning! EVMS is like a storage management fr

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The version of Google Earth I installed last December was working > great this morning. Then, I decided to update to the latest version > and when I tried to do that with yum, I didn't have the right name for > the package

Re: [CentOS] RH's servers breached

On Aug 22, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: Russ has posted some information about this to planet.centos.org, but basically at this point it does not appear to affect the CentOS population. Karanbir has been crawling through the build system to verify this, and we may release an announcement

Re: [CentOS] RH's servers breached

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Paul Norton wrote: On Aug 22, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: Russ has posted some information about this to planet.centos.org, but basically at this point it does not appear to affect the CentOS population. Karanbir has been crawling through the build system to verif

Re: [CentOS] RH's servers breached

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Paul Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see an announcement for the packages on the announce list, but no more > informamtion anywhere from the CentOS team (Planet or ML). Are these > packages "just to be safe" or was there something actually found? There's a

[CentOS] CentOS position on systems intrusion at Red Hat

Earlier in the day today Red Hat made an announcement [1] that there had been an intrusion into some of their computer systems last week. In the same announcement they mention that some of the packages for OpenSSH on RHEL-4 ( i386 and x86_64 ) as well as RHEL-5 ( x86_64 ) were signed by the intrude

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The version of Google Earth I installed last December was working >> great this morning. Then, I decided to update to the latest version >> and when I tried

Re: [CentOS] LVM not removing LV

I can't even deactivate it. On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Toby Bluhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toby Bluhm wrote: >> >> nate wrote: > > . > . > . >>> >>> Verify that it's deactivated with the lvdisplay command >>> >> >> Current versions of lvm/lvremove will do that automatically. >> > > > .

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The version of Google Earth I installed last December was working >>> great thi

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit) (SOLVED)

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: T

Re: [CentOS] LVM not removing LV

Mag Gam wrote: > I can't even deactivate it. Can you post output of lvdisplay -v vgdisplay -v mount Not sure what to suggest at this point I've never had lvremove not work for me, though my lvms have always been setup in a real basic configuration. nate _

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

Lanny Marcus wrote: Question: How do I determine whether or not the CPU in this box (I think it's an Intel Celeron 2.6 GHz) supports SSE2 or not? I suspect the CPU does *not* support SSE2. this gets fun. AFAIK, there's several generations of Celerons and its quite frustrating to tell them

[CentOS] Adding new Hard disk to server with RAID-5

Hi all, I have Dell 2950 III with RAID-5 installed and managed by hardware Raid controller, I also use LVM when install CentOS. Now I get more 03 Hard disk and I would like to add it in to the running system. My question is: 1) if new hard disks add in to the machine, I have to rebuild the RA

Re: [CentOS] Adding new Hard disk to server with RAID-5

#1.) It should just appear as unpartitioned space to the OS. You can then partition it and add that partition to one of your LVs, and then use the LVM and ext filesystem tools to grow your existing LV and then resize the filesystem to fit. Good articles on LVM: - http://kbase.redhat.com/faq

Re: [CentOS] USB drive detected, but nothing gets mounted.

On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:46 -0700, nate wrote: > MHR wrote: > > > So, is this a bug in the automounter? Is there a reason why a > > removable (flash) drive MUST have a label for the automounter to see > > it? This doesn't happen with flash memory cards (compact flash, SD), > > just USB flash (di

Re: [CentOS] USB drive detected, but nothing gets mounted.

On Saturday 23 August 2008 07:28:22 Mark Hull-Richter wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:46 -0700, nate wrote: > > MHR wrote: > > > So, is this a bug in the automounter? Is there a reason why a > > > removable (flash) drive MUST have a label for the automounter to see > > > it? This doesn't happen

Re: [CentOS] USB drive detected, but nothing gets mounted.

On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 07:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Saturday 23 August 2008 07:28:22 Mark Hull-Richter wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:46 -0700, nate wrote: > > > MHR wrote: > > > > So, is this a bug in the automounter? Is there a reason why a > > > > removable (flash) drive MUST have