S.Tindall wrote on Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:47:06 -0400:
> The cpuspeed changelog may be relevant:
>
> [quote]
> * Thu Mar 06 2008 Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - Disable freq scaling by default on AMD rev F and earlier cpus
> when running xen, due to clock instability (#435321)
> [/quote]
Tha
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
S.Tindall wrote on Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:47:06 -0400:
The cpuspeed changelog may be relevant:
[quote]
* Thu Mar 06 2008 Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Disable freq scaling by default on AMD rev F and earlier cpus
when running xen, due to clock instability (#435321)
[/quot
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Mufit Eribol wrote:
I have a LV on RAID mounted as /mnt/raid. Then /mnt/raid/var is
symlinked to /var.
I was afraid you were going to say that.
Go back to single user mode.
mkdir /new_var
cd /mnt/raid/var
tar cf - . | ( cd /new_var ; tar xvf - )
Make sure both dirs loo
NiftyClusters Mitch wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:43 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 16:13 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
Mufit Eribol wrote:
.
. that you would correctly try to
fsck the *device*.
First back
Dear All,
Currently i am using HP x6600 Server and I have installed RHEL4 Update
4 AS Linux and
RHEL4 Update 4 Support Cluster Suite in my server
I am new in fence and can any one help me how to configure HP ILO fence
in my server
and HP ILO Fence Functionality
Regards
-S.Balaji
___
Ned Slider wrote on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:34:57 +0100:
> quote
> # Frequency scaling on AMD rev F CPUs under Xen can result in
> # timekeeping problems for fully virtualized guests, so we disable
> # it by default.
> if [ -d /proc/xen ] && [ "$cpu_vendor" == AuthenticAMD ] \
>
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:57:20 +0200:
> I disagree about the reason. I think they are actually not so efficient. At
> least not if I compare to a low-voltage CPU.
Just checked how much that AMD 4850e CPU drains under various conditions.
There are *huge* differences. I checked w
Mufit Eribol wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Mufit Eribol wrote:
I have a LV on RAID mounted as /mnt/raid. Then /mnt/raid/var is
symlinked to /var.
I was afraid you were going to say that.
Go back to single user mode.
mkdir /new_var
cd /mnt/raid/var
tar cf - . | ( cd /new_var ; tar xvf - )
Ma
I am doing some testing and am having to make many changes to /etc/hosts
Is there a way to reload the /etc/hosts file without doing a service
network restart?
I hope that in a while I can run BIND with a bunch of faked-out zone
files (did this once to crack a Vonage PAP2). But for right now,
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am doing some testing and am having to make many changes to /etc/hosts
>
> Is there a way to reload the /etc/hosts file without doing a service
> network restart?
That doesn't need to be reloaded *except* if you use the name service
caching daemon (nscd). Then "servic
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am doing some testing and am having to make many changes to /etc/hosts
Is there a way to reload the /etc/hosts file without doing a service
network restart?
Takes effect immediately. Do you not get the changes right away?
--
Toby Bluhm
Alltech Medical Systems Amer
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:57:20 +0200:
I disagree about the reason. I think they are actually not so efficient. At
least not if I compare to a low-voltage CPU.
Just checked how much that AMD 4850e CPU drains under various conditions.
There are *huge* diffe
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am doing some testing and am having to make many changes to /etc/hosts
>
> Is there a way to reload the /etc/hosts file without doing a service
> network restart?
There is no need to reload the hosts file, it's read in real time.
Some things like firefox maintain their
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am doing some testing and am having to make many changes to /etc/hosts
Is there a way to reload the /etc/hosts file without doing a service
network restart?
I 'forgot' to restart network after a change and did a ping6 and it worked.
Ergo, I think my information is
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am doing some testing and am having to make many changes to /etc/hosts
Is there a way to reload the /etc/hosts file without doing a service
network restart?
That doesn't need to be reloaded *except* if you use the name service
cachi
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:08:55 +0200:
> Hm, it occurs to me now that the older cpu where the time warning doesn't
> appear runs already on Xen 3.2.1 which may already have some patch to
> avoid this bug. Or it simply doesn't report it anymore :-)
The warning is gone after upgra
Hi,
I had found on the list that i can improve the performance of GFS with small
files if i adapt the size of the rsbtbl_size/lkbtbl_size values.
But it also found that this has to be done after loading the dlm module, but
before the lockspace is created. What means "before the lockspace is cr
Ned Slider wrote on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:51:41 +0100:
> Were you able to observe any drops in VCore voltage between load, idle
> (2500MHz) and 1000MHz with lm_sensors?
I can't get any other sensor data than the core temperatures.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive In
Has there been any updates to support encrypting the whole disk in 5.2?
If not, Is anyone doing this and can point me to some good
documentation?
Thanks
Dean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I think TrueCrypt (www.truecrypt.org) will do this.
On 4 Aug, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Plant, Dean wrote:
Has there been any updates to support encrypting the whole disk in
5.2?
If not, Is anyone doing this and can point me to some good
documentation?
Thanks
Dean
on 8-2-2008 12:04 PM Jay Leafey spake the following:
nightduke wrote:
Hi i want to fetchmail from a pop server and check every email to any
rbl spamhaus,spamcop,etc and if match at any rbl the email will be
deleted.
It's possible to do this?
Thanks
Nightduke
If you've got fetchmail configur
Hello:
I have a machine running CentOS 5.2
I added two IP addresses to eth0 by copying
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
to
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1
and changing the relevant IP info.
I am now seeing outbound connections
fa
On Monday, August 04, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
...The older one is a 3800+ EE and the newer one is a 4850e
which I bought right after it became available. Unless rev. G
and up are only quad core CPUs at least the latter 45nm one
should be rev G or up, too. But I can't find a definiti
On Monday 04 August 2008, Plant, Dean wrote:
> Has there been any updates to support encrypting the whole disk in 5.2?
As for booting from an encrypted root-filesystem I don't know. But any normal
filesystem or swap can be encrypted with the normal linux blockdevice
encryption functionality (dm-
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 16:51 +0100, Plant, Dean wrote:
> Has there been any updates to support encrypting the whole disk in 5.2?
There hasn't been any built-in support until Fedora 9, so perhaps at the
earliest it would be 5.3 if at all. There are however, ways you can
implement it yourself. The
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:00, Neil Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas why this is happening?
Because you have two different default gateways. In that case, Linux
will "rotate" between them, using one or the other for each outgoing
packet.
If you want all your outgoing traffic to go t
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Any ideas why this is happening?
Try looking at this?
http://www.clintoneast.com/articles/multihomed.php
In general I try to make sure my systems only have 1 default
gateway, makes life a lot easier. Leave the multi homing to
the routers(or my preference layer 3 switches).
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Mufit Eribol wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Mufit Eribol wrote:
I have a LV on RAID mounted as /mnt/raid. Then /mnt/raid/var is
symlinked to /var.
I was afraid you were going to say that.
Go back to single user mode.
mkdir /new_var
cd /mnt/raid/var
tar cf - . | ( cd /new_va
We were previously running 5.1 x86_64 and recently updated to 5.2
using yum. Under 5.1 we were having problems when running jobs using
torque and the solution had been to add the following items to the
files noted
"* softmemlock unlimited" in /etc/security/limits.conf
"sessio
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:28 AM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... The above 64-bit system has 16G, the 32-bit
> system above has 2G.
>
If you have a system with 8x the size of memory than another system,
it will _need_ more memory just to run.
I run 64-bit CentOS 5.2 on a system with 4GB of
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008, nate wrote:
>Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>
>> Any ideas why this is happening?
>
>Try looking at this?
>http://www.clintoneast.com/articles/multihomed.php
>
>In general I try to make sure my systems only have 1 default
>gateway, makes life a lot easier. Leave the multi homing to
>the
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently i am using HP x6600 Server and I have installed RHEL4 Update 4 AS
> Linux and
> RHEL4 Update 4 Support Cluster Suite in my server
> I am new in fence and can any one help me how to configure HP ILO fence in
> my server
>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008, Bill Campbell wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 04, 2008, nate wrote:
>>Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>>
>>> Any ideas why this is happening?
>>
>>Try looking at this?
>>http://www.clintoneast.com/articles/multihomed.php
>>
>>In general I try to make sure my systems only have 1 default
>>gateway, ma
I have googled for this and also grepped the hplip sources without
finding it. It is used to convert the models.dat file into models.xml. I
need to insert my printer data into this file as it is not in the 5.2
hplip rpm. Could anyone help? I do not want to replace 5.2 rpm with a
newer one. Thanks.
Filipe:
I removed the GATEWAY line from the :0 and :1 files
and now everything seems to be working perfectly.
I don't understand how that works since the IP addresses
from :0 and :1 are on a different subnet than the one
for eth0 and they have a different gateway. I guess
I don't understand the
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 15:31, Neil Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand how that works since the IP addresses
> from :0 and :1 are on a different subnet than the one
> for eth0 and they have a different gateway. I guess
> I don't understand the finer points of networking.
The
S.Tindall wrote on Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:08:03 -0400:
> http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopCPUFilter.aspx
Thanks, nice tool!
> Checking the cpuinfo on systems using a 4850e (G2) and a 4600+ EE
> (F2) both give "cpu family: 15", so they have included the Gs in
> the excluded group, too.
Yeah. T
Bill Campbell wrote:
> It's worth noting that some software allows one to specify the outgoing IP
> (e.g. using inet_interfaces in postfix or sourceaddress with innd).
That certainly makes sense when you have multiple IPs that are
routed by the same default gateway(most often in the same subnet,
Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
Currently i am using HP x6600 Server and I have installed RHEL4 Update
4 AS Linux and
RHEL4 Update 4 Support Cluster Suite in my server
I am new in fence and can any one help me how to configure HP ILO
fence in my server
and HP ILO Fence Functionality
Regards
-S.Bala
MHR wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:28 AM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... The above 64-bit system has 16G, the 32-bit
system above has 2G.
If you have a system with 8x the size of memory than another system,
it will _need_ more memory just to run.
I run 64-bit CentOS 5.2 on a system wi
Hi All,
I am trying to understand the purpose of rsyncd. Why does it exist?
Why not just use rsync ad-hoc or via script?
Also, to a more serious note. I need to keep a filesystem on 1 server
and another server synced by.
What is the best way to do this? I want to have /source and /target to
be ex
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to understand the purpose of rsyncd. Why does it exist?
> Why not just use rsync ad-hoc or via script?
The rsyncd is optional. I did not use it by myself, so can't comment on that.
>
> Also, to a more se
Mag Gam wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to understand the purpose of rsyncd. Why does it exist?
Why not just use rsync ad-hoc or via script?
well, if you use rsync -> rsyncd, there's no encryption, so less CPU
overhead, so faster transfers, but there's also less security, so this
should only b
On Monday 04 August 2008 11:35:18 pm Mag Gam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to understand the purpose of rsyncd. Why does it exist?
> Why not just use rsync ad-hoc or via script?
This is explained in the rsync documentation, read the man page for more info.
You either need to use rsync with a r
44 matches
Mail list logo
