As far as i know you don't need to change anything in your xorg.conf. if
you have any horizontal / vertical sync settings (Hz) in your conf you
can remove them. DVI is digital and don't need them.
correct me please if Im wrong.
Marco
MHR wrote:
I have an LCD monitor with both VGA and DVI con
I've been playing and comparing frequency scaling between AMD and Intel
CPUs yesterday and there seem to be great differences between AMD and
Intel and some gotchas. This is all on CentOS 5.2 with latest Xen kernels
(which are supposed to be powersaving-enabled since 5.2).
AMD:
It seems once I
Thanks Dag. I'm wondering if I'll have a similar problem with a multi CD
ROM set instead of the one DVD? The system loaded RHEL WS 3, update 4
Taroon just fine from CD's. I'm leaning towards the same issue you
mention. The large DVD ISO image is not recognizable by the system. At
the time the s
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I've been playing and comparing frequency scaling between AMD and Intel
CPUs yesterday and there seem to be great differences between AMD and
Intel and some gotchas. This is all on CentOS 5.2 with latest Xen kernels
(which are supposed to be powersaving-enabled since 5.2).
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:31:19 +0200:
> I have a somewhat related question. That very new AMD CPU mentioned above
> was not recognized by CentOS 5.2 and the current frequency was shown as
> 80 (instead of 250), although it was running in full speed. The
> latest kernel
Ned Slider wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:09:39 +0100:
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=15484&forum=37
Thanks for the URL, see below!
>
> Bottom line - the power saving between having frequency scaling enabled
> or not was surprisingly small (only 2-3W). It would appe
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ned Slider wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:09:39 +0100:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=15484&forum=37
Thanks for the URL, see below!
Bottom line - the power saving between having frequency scaling enabled
or not was surprisingly small (only 2-3W)
Ned Slider wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:16:25 +0100:
> acpi-cpufreq was
> autoloaded in response to enabling C1E and EIST features in the BIOS
> (which one is responsible I don't know as I enabled both together).
Ah, it must have been enabled by C1E. I don't know if I have that or can
enable i
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 08:41 -0400, Ed Westphal wrote:
> Thanks Dag. I'm wondering if I'll have a similar problem with a multi CD
>
> mention. The large DVD ISO image is not recognizable by the system. At
> the time the system was put together, there were no DVD ISO images, just
> CD. The DVD
Hello William;
Are you thinking BIOS update for the motherboard or for the DVD
drive, or both? The motherboard has Intel's latest and greatest. The DVD
drive I'm not so sure of. It's been awhile since I looked at it's status
vis-a-vis bios versions. I've not found bios updaters under Linux.
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:31:19 +0200:
> Actually, not the latest kernel. The CentOS xen boot (hypervisor) kernel
> /xen.gz-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 (and maybe earlier) ones calculates the frequency
> correct, the Xen 3.2 boot kernel (xen.gz-3.2) from the Xen 3.2 package
> offered at x
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:59:49 +0200:
> 5 minutes later: oh, yes, it does! Now I got it to 0% idle and current
> frequency jumped to 2333000 (although current scaling frequency was still
> shown at 200, on AMDs both figures rise).Looks like a clear bug in the
> centrino ker
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 12:50 -0400, Ed Westphal wrote:
> Hello William;
>
> Are you thinking BIOS update for the motherboard or for the DVD
> drive, or both? The motherboard has Intel's latest and greatest. The
Both. On CD and DVD drives, I've always checked for updated BIOSs.
> DVD drive I
On Sunday, August 03, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
...I have an older low-voltage AMD CPU (probably about 2 years
on the market) that is recognized as X2 3800+ but frequency
scaling fails because it miscalculates the current speed to
800 MHz as well. Is there anything I can do about that
nate wrote:
...
Sample memory usage(32-bit):
root 4059 0.0 0.2 11616 4532 ?S04:02 0:01
/usr/sbin/snmpd -Lsd -Lf /dev/null -p /var/run/snmpd.pid -a
...
64-bit:
root 2792 0.0 0.0 88028 5700 ?S04:02 0:02
/usr/sbin/snmpd -Lsd -Lf /dev/null -p /var/run/snmpd
Matt wrote:
I am upgrading a server that mounts in a rack. Its going on the
cheapest socket 775 CPU I can buy and in a 1u rack case. All its for
is keeping some log files and doing some simple MYSQL/PHP database
stuff. Not a work horse at all. Anyway, is it better to go 64bit or
32bit for the
16 matches
Mail list logo
