-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Akemi Yagi
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 10:47 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS
5.2
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:29 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
could you describe in more detail?
--On 4. Juli 2008 13:11:45 -0700 Art Age Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- snip -
Changing to this eliminates the errors, but bond1 ignores the different
options:
What exactly is ignored? The options do not look much different.
alias bond0 bon
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Akemi Yagi
> Once you find the way to get the installalation working without human
> intervention, you can put it in a place like /etc/
On Thursday 03 July 2008 22:12:10 Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 22:06 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > My daughter needs to send me a large file. It appears that it is getting
> > through my ISP, but being rejected on my CentOS mail server. The message
> > she's getting says
> >
> > A m
Daniel Bruno wrote:
Hi,
I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when
i run yum for udpate system show this error:
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of
drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos
file
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be
cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way the
upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).
In 5.1 X worked. I could startx from init 3 and get into GNOME. Also
VNC i
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Akemi Yagi
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 4:44 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: FW: [CentOS] Problem with nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to
CentOS5.2 (Akemi)
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, John <[EMAI
John wrote:
-Original Message-
Akemi,
Yes, someone did mention that. The only thing I am kind of worried about
when just copying it is, the difference between the Kernel Versions. Using
it over the same generation of kernels I'm assuming it is of the 2.6.x.x.x
family of kernels? If it
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://l
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 13:37 +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>
"Internet network currently down, TCP/IP packets delivered now by
UPS/Fedex ..."
Except in the U.S. where a combination of stupid policies, unreasonable
consumer expectations, spineless politicians, and $4+ a gallon (GASP!)
gasoline is
I'm in need of a minimal ks.cfg file for the smallest possible install
with yum. I've got the scripting for yum to install the apps I need, I
just want to insure all the cruft is not on the system as well. Using
the s-c-ks app, the smallest I have gotten is 600MB. This is for a
server appliance
I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing
suggesting it
needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false" yields nothing.
My CentOS 5.1 machines don't have this, and this is the same list of yum install
items I always use when setting up assp.
Any idea what to
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:09:36AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing
> suggesting it
^^^
> needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false" yields nothing.
false in /bin/f
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing
suggesting it
needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false" yields nothing.
My CentOS 5.1 machines don't have this, and this is the same list of yum install
items I always use when setting u
>Wierd, I just confirmed the issue. There is not a /usr/bin/false, but there
>IS a /bin/false on a stock 5.2 install. You might check in the >rpmforge
>forums/list archives for some mention of this problem.
>
>I thought I might be able to symlink /bin/false to /usr/bin/false (a kludge, I
>admi
MHR wrote:
Where I work, we have an application that has been merrily running
away (and being built) on FC1 (yes, you read that right).
One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first
effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build
process (FC1) uses mkd
>>Hi,
>>
>>could you describe in more detail?
>>What exactly is ignored? The options do not look much different.
As I said, I am trying to set a different primary interface for each
bond: eth0 for bond0, and eth2 for bond1.
>>Did you try without renaming? I do not use it, but it works nonetheless
On Saturday 05 July 2008 16:47:03 Jay Leafey wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> > I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing
> > suggesting it needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false"
> > yields nothing.
> >
> > My CentOS 5.1 machines don't have this, and
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > I also have KDE installed (rarely used, but it's there) and during some
>>
Take a look at Ghost 4 Linux when your at it ;-)
/Mats
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> drew einhorn wrote:
>
>> Hi, we have a new customer to support. They have RHEL5 not CentOS5.
>>
>
> You need to think more about things like compiling custom kernels or 3rd
> party repos, since you have upstream paid supp
In looking at the possibility of using yum-priorities on a RHEL5 system,
I noticed on thing that is different from my recollection,
I see that the default priority it 99,
but I seem to recall that it used to be 1.
Is my memory faulty, or did it change?
Actually 99 seems to make the most sense whe
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 17:38 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Now actually, I would have perfered renaming the LVM partition and its
internal ext3 partitions. I even had a naming convention laid out if I
had do this via Install instead.
If it's a boo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Understood. However, the investment in ks, now, may reap greater
dividends in the future. My opinion, only.
Given the reminder about LVM volume names, I am back to planning on
doing the 3rd drive with ks.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be
cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way
the upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).
In 5.1 X worked. I could startx from init 3 and get in
>I had no trouble copying it or linking it.
Yes, but how does that satisfy yum?
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I am trying to install:
perl-Compress-Zlib
perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
perl-Net-DNS
perl-Time-HiRes
perl-Email-Valid
perl-File-ReadBackwards
perl-File-Scan-ClamAV
perl-Mail-SPF-Query
perl-libwww-perl
perl-LDAP
perl-Unix-Syslog
perl-Mail-SRS
perl-Net-CIDR-Lite
perl-Mail-SPF
which are all either noarch or
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:13:46PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I am trying to install:
>
> perl-Compress-Zlib
> perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
> perl-Net-DNS
> perl-Time-HiRes
> perl-Email-Valid
> perl-File-ReadBackwards
> perl-File-Scan-ClamAV
> perl-Mail-SPF-Query
> perl-libwww-perl
> perl-LDAP
> per
>Can you identify which one of these packages individually is requiring
>the 32-bit perl? In other words, can you install perl-LDAP without it
>wanting to pull in the 32-bit perl? Same for all of them...
>
>You can also do an rpm -q -R -p on the .rpm file to see what it
>requires, but I'm not su
On Sunday 06 July 2008 05:07:38 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I had no trouble copying it or linking it.
>
> Yes, but how does that satisfy yum?
> jlc
If the dependancy is purely on /usr/bin./false then when you copy it I think
yum should find it.
The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see
>Why don't you try it and see what happens.
I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:)
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sunday 06 July 2008 07:20:33 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Why don't you try it and see what happens.
>
> I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:)
> jlc
Sorry,
Tony
Then you have a problem ;-)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
32 matches
Mail list logo
